Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-094
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2006 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/28/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * no known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Request detail of the typical enclosure. Enclosure requires 10' in both directions between the wall protections. * It is unclear if provisions are provided for recycling. Please discuss if such provisions will be provided. |
| 05/02/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: DESERT VIEW PLAZA S06-094 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the tentative plan submitted April 24, 2006. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Pole #42 will be in a 17' wide spillway; any adjustments or relocation will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power Company Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 05/02/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-094 DESERT VIEW PLAZA/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: MAY 2, 20006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Transcom Way to Transcon Way on Location Map. Correct 58/73 to 58/77 on all sheets. Delete Unit 1 and Unit 2 on Bldg. 14. jg |
| 05/09/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 8, 2006 TO: Marty Magelli, P.E. Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Desert View Plaza, Lots 1-7 Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-094 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-094, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. The use of public sewers within business developments will require approval from Pima County Wastewater Management Department’s Design Division. Please contact Eric Wieduwild or Frank Luiz at (520) 617-8200 to obtain approval, otherwise the proposed sewer shall be private. SHEET 1. If approval is obtained for public sewers, please revise General Note 27 to read as follows: ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. SHEETS 4 & 5. Should the proposed public sewers be approved by Pima County Wastewater Management Department, a PUBLIC SEWER ACCESS EASEMENT will be required through the Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) instead of the 20-foot public sewer easement shown. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/12/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/16/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number (S06-094) and any related case numbers such as for rezoning and Board of Adjustment cases, to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1 2) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Dimension the unpaved portions of the parking lot planter areas by providing a typical detail for each type of planter showing dimensions of the unpaved areas. 3) Provide a calculation of the number of parking lot canopy trees required and provided based on the number of vehicle parking spaces proposed. DS 2-06.2.2.A.2.c 4) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. The site is required to include screening along the east property line. Per LUC Table 3.7.2-I a 5-foot wall is required to screen the development from the adjacent R-1 zoned property and a 5-foot screen is required along non-MS&R street Atrim Loop. Revise as necessary. DS 2-07.A.3 5) Identify on the plans the native plant preservation methodology used to comply with the regulations. LUC 3.8.6.1 6) Revise the NPP plan so that the aerial photo location and the linework of the drawing are correctly superimposed. Further comments may be necessary once the drawing/photo is corrected. |
| 05/16/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Kristen Zimmerman, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S06-094 Desert View Plaza 5/11/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Valencia (Alvernon to Columbus) No 0 23,332 42,760 4 87,300 66,709 6 3,391 Rte 11, 30 min, 0 miles; 180 Express, 2 AM and 2 Pm trips, 0 miles None Alvernon (Valencia to Benson Highway) No 0 13,279 42,760 4 36,496 42,760 4 Rte 11, 30 min, 0 miles; 180 Express, 2 AM and 2 Pm None 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development |
| 05/18/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 18, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of Desert View Plaza - Tentative Plat and Development Plan TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: Desert View Plaza- 3943 E Valencia Road, T15S R14E Sec10, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green and Jose Ortiz, P.E. ACTIVITY: S06-094 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report, Landscape Plan and a copy of the Title Report. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The Tentative Plat is not approved at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide in plan view details and cross sections for the proposed collector channels, proposed weirs and any drainage structures with any associated protection requirements. 2) DS Sec.10-02.9.4.1: Provide energy dissipaters at all culvert outlets or provide a statement and calculations showing that protective measures are not required. Refer to DS Sec.10-02.9.3.3.1 for rock riprap sizing requirements and specifications. 3) DS Sec.10-02.11.4.2.2: A field visit showed that the existing 2-30" CMPs from the offsite detention basin are damaged. Provide structural considerations that will protect the culverts and the embankments from future damage. TENTATIVE PLAT: 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.E: Revise the small index drawing provided on Sheet 1 of 5 that shows the area represented on each sheet. Specifically revise the label for Sheet 2 to read 2 of 5. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.E: Provide a General Note stating that all Drainage Improvements will be constructed and completed in the 1st phase of the project. Per Rezoning Note C provide calculations and setback dimensions indicating how this will be achieved. Show phase lines on drawing. 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.H: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly label the future MS & R right-of-ways for Valencia Road and Alvernon Way. 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: Revise the 30' PAAL cross-section to reflect the recommended pavement section shown in the geotechnical report. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Revise the Tentative Plat, in conjunction with the submitted Drainage Report, to reflect the following information. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 1. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits at all proposed culvert locations with water surface elevations. 2. Indicate locations and types of drainage structures, drainage crossings, pipe culverts, etc. Specifically explain if culverts are proposed under the middle PAAL ingress/egress off of Alvernon Way. If culverts are not proposed demonstrate that all weather access can be achieved. 9) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.G: Submit a letter of certification from the Arizona Department of Water Resources on assured water supply, if the project is not served by the City of Tucson Water Department. 10) Provide a note stating that all landscape water harvesting areas will be depressed a minimum of 6 inches. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.2: Provide the seal and signature of the professional engineer that prepared the plans. The Tentative Plat must have the original seal stamped and signed prior to Tentative Plat approval. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Provide dimensions for the drainage easement for the 2-30" SRPs that are contained under the PAAL. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise details to show minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks, truncated domes, and handicap ramp details. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.3 for sidewalk specifications and requirements. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the Tentative Plat and the Landscape Plan to show existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVT) for the PAALs new access points. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.3 Line of Site Matrix for the dimensions needed. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Revise Tentative Plat to show maneuverability for all refuse containers. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.1.C for refuse requirements. Provide details for all refuse containers enclosures and bin construction. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for enclosure requirements. GEOTECHICAL REPORT: 16) Provide recommendations within the Geotechnical Report that addresses slope protection for the collector channels and the drainage swales. GRADING PLAN: 17) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit will be required for this project. Submit a copy of the Grading Plan with the grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Tentative Plat approval. Subsequent Grading Plan comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans 18) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 19) Provide a general grading note-specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 20) DS Sec.10-01.5.2.6: Be advised that the Grading Plan must accurately reflect the proposed collector channels, weir inlets, culvert designs and rock riprap blanket design and dimensions as called out in the Drainage Report. Provide these details on the Grading Plan and label the details according to the requirements and dimensions of the Drainage Report. 21) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.7: Provide a General Note referencing the Geotechnical Report, provide the name, address, job number, date, and phone numbers of the firms or individuals who prepared the report. State that the grading plan shall comply with recommendations within the report as well as any subsequent geotechnical addenda. 22) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised Tentative Plat, a revised Drainage Report, a revised Geotechnical Report and a revised Landscape Plan at re-submittal. The revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report and Landscape Plan must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report, and Landscape Plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 05/22/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-094 Desert View Plaza, L. 1-7 05/19/06 () Tentative Plat/Development Plan ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-90-18 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Valencia is a Gateway Route COMMENTS DUE BY: May 19, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat/Development Plan ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 5/19/06 S06-094, Desert View Plaza, L. 1-7 TP/DP This purpose of this review is to verify compliance with certain rezoning conditions. As per rezoning condition #1.c (General Note #4.A.3.), please clearly show the internal pedestrian and bikeway system, and how this system connects to Antrim Loop Road. The crosswalk shown in the PAAL on sheet L-4 south of Building 14 is to be shown on sheet 3/5, for consistency. |
| 05/22/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) Sahuarita, Az. 85629 FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: May 19, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-094 Desert View Plaza T151410 (140-32) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add bearings for the interior lot lines. Add bearing and dimension from the section corner to the point of tie. Add bearing and dimension for the west boundary line to sheet 2. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/26/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 26, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-094 Desert View Plaza: Tentative Plat Review(4-24-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 05/26/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-094 Desert View Plaza: Tentative Plat Review - Request clarification to the following easements* that were established by Plat Bk. 47 Pg.4: --Validate the number of vehicle access drives that cross the "No Vehicle Access Easement". It appears the existing plat permits 2 vehicle accesses along Alvernon Way and 1 along Valencia Rd. The Tentative Plat shows 3 access drives along Alvernon and 2 along Valencia. --In reference to Development Standards Sec. 7-01.4.0, the City's interest may be abandoned by new plat, however each utility ( i.e. Qwest, Pima Co., S.W. Gas...) needs to agree with the abandonment and an instrument recorded. Words stating the abandonment need to be annotated in the key notes and provide the Dkt. _____ & Pg. _____ of the recorded instrument. --Proposed Bldg. #10 appears placed within the P.U.E. along Wakefield Way (pvt.). |
| 05/26/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECT this TP: 1. The northern access on Alvernon Way does not appear to meet the minimum separation from Antrim Loop as dictated in section 5.4 of the Access Management Guidelines. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/03/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/05/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 06/23/2006 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/06/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S06-094 Desert View Plaza Tentative Plat / Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/06/06 DUE DATE: 05/19/06 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 05/18/07. 2. DS2-03.2.1.E and DS 2-05.2.1.E The page indicator on the index map on page one of five indicates page 2 of 4. Should read page 2 of 5. 3. DS 2-03.2.2.A.1 and DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the owners address and telephone number. 4. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 and DS 2-05.2.2.B.8 This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S06-094. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all tentative plat sheets including the NPPO and landscape sheets. 5. DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 and DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 The Commercial Storage use indicated does not appear to be correct. With public access to the storage buildings the use would then be Personal Storage, please revise. If building #5 is to be used as Commercial Storage further comments may be forth coming. The uses proposed for the I-1 zoned portion of the project do not appear to be as proposed on the Preliminary Development Plan for the rezoning case #C9-90-18. Provide a letter from the Rezoning section of DSD indicating that the change of use is an allowed change. 6. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 and DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 List the LUC Sec. 2.8.3 in note number nine (9) with the MS&R overlay zone design criteria. 7. DS 2-03.2.4.D On page 3 of 5, clearly indicate the location of the split zoning boundaries. 8. DS 2-05.2.3.C The indicated future curb location along Alvernon Way does not appear to be correct. The future curb location for a 150' right of way is 12' in front of the right of way. The monument signs indicated in the public right of way along Alvernon will not be allowed. Relocate or remove. The monument sign indicated in the future sight visibility triangle at the entrance from Valencia will not be allowed. Relocate or remove. 9. DS 2-05.2.3.D Clearly indicate the widths of all PAALs through out the entire project including the self- storage area. See DS 3-05.2.1.C.1. See LUC Sec.3.3.7.2.C.4 for widths of PAALs in a personal storage use. Clearly indicate the dimensions of the drive thru lanes and provide location of the required stacking spaces. Indicate the location of the pickup windows. (Buildings 11, 15, 16, 17) See DS 3-05.2.1.C.2, DS 3-05.2.2.B.4 10. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable building setback lines will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.K Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. Including, location, widths of sidewalks, handicap ramps, crosswalks, pedestrian refuge areas, connecting both streets to all structures, etc. Handicap ramps as provided in detail 4 on page 2 of 5 will not work in several areas through out this project. (Different style required when accessing an area wider than a sidewalk.) Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. See LUC Sec.3.3.7.2.C.4 for required pedestrian refuge areas in a personal storage use. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.M In the notes for the square footage and uses of the proposed structures, clearly indicate the square footage of the Personal Service use for each building. Personal Service requires a greater number of parking spaces. In order to be considered a shopping center for parking space purposes it must be clearly indicated that 50% or more of the square footage will be Retail use. In order to meet the requirements of a shopping center for parking purposes it appears the personal storage has not been considered in the calculations. If this is the case, provide documentation for a cross access only agreement for lot 1 and the rest of the shopping center. Provide documentation for cross access and cross parking agreements for the rest of the Lots in the shopping center. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawings, provide the dimensions for the foot print of all structures as well as the height of each structure. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.O Provide a break down of the required and provided loading zones for each building. See LUC Sec. 3.4.4.1.B.2 for location requirements. Loading zones must be located in close proximity to the service entrances of the structures. Clearly indicate the location of the proposed service entrances. Provide dimensions for each required loading zone. A loading zone or zones will be required for the Personal Storage use which does not have direct vehicular access. Clearly indicate vehicle maneuverability for all loading zones. It does not appear that vehicles will be able to use the loading zones near buildings #7 and #6. The loading zones cannot block each other, trash enclosures, or doors (near building #16). 15. DS 2-05.2.4.P Dimensions provided for parking spaces located south of buildings #12 and #13 do not meet the minimum required length of a parking space. Clearly indicate the parking spaces requiring wheel stops or barriers. See DS 3-05.2.3.C. Clearly indicate that when the sidewalk is used as a barrier for the parking spaces that the sidewalk will not be limited to less than four foot in width for pedestrian circulation. Provide dimensions. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.T Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.U Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Provide a written response clearly indicating how each of the rezoning conditions have been met. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 20. In the notes for the Floor Area Ratio it appears that the proposed FAR numbers have been switched. C-2 FAR should be .20 and the I-1 FAR should be .30. 21 . Based on responses to the comments and changes to the plans further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-094tp.doc |
| 07/12/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 12, 2006 Marty Magelli, P.E. Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc. 1636 North Swan Road, Suite 200 Tucson, AZ 85712 Subject: S06-094 Desert View Plaza Tentative Plat Dear Marty: Your submittal of April 24, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Environmental Services, Addressing, Assessor, Traffic, Real Estates, Landscape, Engineering, Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Community Planning, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 318-1930 |