Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S06-093
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S06-093
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/21/2006 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/28/2006 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this devilopment.
* Three single enclosure shown for this development. Possible conflict with the clea area required for service. Service area requires a clear area of 14' x 40'.
* Enclosure detail should show a clear area for service of 10' in both directions between the wall protections.
* No provions mentioned for recycling.
* Refuse provisions of three enclosures seems insufficience for the 14 shown commercial bussinesses.
05/02/2006 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S06-093 EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL CENTER/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 5/02/06



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Correct Bldg. letters to Bldg. numbers on all sheets.






es
05/02/2006 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S06-093
GREG CARLSON ENGINEERING, LLC
EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL CENTER

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
05/04/2006 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S06-093 Eastside Industrial Center 05/03/06

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-95

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/19/06

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(XXXX) Resubmittal Required:
(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 05/02/06
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN
S06-093 Eastside Industrial Center
May 2, 2006


Per annexation C9-85-95, condition A.2., which reads: “Construction of a wall along the south and west corner of the property to be painted in earth tones.” Please provide a detail of the wall on the tentative plat and identify the color that will be used.
05/09/2006 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL CENTER
S06-093


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted April 21, 2006. It appears that Unit #177 may be in
conflict with the West driveway; if a conflict does exist relocation
costs are billable to the customer and the customer will need to provide
the necessary civil work.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate
location of the existing facilities.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction
Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including
approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the
AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be
secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Ms. Mary Boice
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8732

Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should
you have any questions.


Sincerely,



Kathy Clark
Scheduling Coordinator
Design/Build
kc
Enclosures
cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson
N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power Company

Kathy Clark
Scheduling Coordinator
Design/Build
520-918-8271
kclark@tep.com
05/12/2006 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied Add the following note to plans:
1) Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer as required by the fire code in accordance with C.O.T. Standards
2) "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs shall be provided as needed to provide 20' clear unobstructed width along all fire apparatus access roadways in accordance with the fire code
05/15/2006 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the tentative plat/development plan and landscape plan to provide a 5' high screen along Research Loop. LUC 3.7.2-I

2) Revise the landscape plan notes regarding interior landscape borders, they are not correct. Borders are not required because the adjacent zoning is Industrial. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

3) Show the required sidewalk along Research Loop on the development plan and landscape plans. The sidewalk cannot be in the required street landscape border.

4) Revise the monitoring note on the native plant preservation plan to Identify the DSD Landscape Section as the recipient of copies of the reports, rather than the Planning and Parks departments.

5) Revise the NPP to include the required elements of the Salvage and Mitigation Report. DS 2-15.4.0.B

6) Add notes regarding the salvage and transplant methods.
DS 2-15.4.0
Clarify how large caliper trees will be located in parking areas.

7) Identify and locate on the landscape and native plant preservation plans all utility easements and facilities.
DS 2-07.2.2.E

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED.
05/16/2006 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Estimated daily traffic trips in 24 hr period - 401
05/18/2006 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: May 18, 2006
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Eastside Industrial Center, 1830 S. Research Lp.
Tentative Plat/Development Plan S06-093 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 21

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The TentativePlat/Development Plan (TP/DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Tentative Plat/Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. Provide a detail of the truncated domes or call them out on the plans.
3. Submit the soils report to review the recommended distance water is allowed to be adjacent to the building.
4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
5. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
6. Show Tentative Plat/Development plan number (S06-093) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
7. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The refuse container location cannot be in an area used for ponding.
8. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
9. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
10. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
11. Adhere to annexation condition number 2B.
12. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information.
13. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage.
3. Provide the ponding limits for the backwater at the weir outlet. The dumpster enclosure cannot located in the area of ponding.
4. Submit the soils report to review the recommended distance water is allowed to be adjacent to the building.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/1830 S. Research Loop CDRC
05/18/2006 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


TO: Development Services Center
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
S06-093
Eastside Industrial Center
Tentative Plat/Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: May 18, 2006
DUE DATE: May 19, 2006


1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before April 23, 2007.

2. Fill in the S06-093 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

3. Any time Class 2 parking is required, Class 1 parking may be substituted on a space-by-space basis, provided the Class 2 parking is not reduced more than fifty (50) percent. With 90 percent class 2 and 10 percent class 1 required, a minimum of one class 2 bicycle space is required. Revise the bicycle parking calculation and revise the drawing to show the location of class 2 bike parking, fully dimensioned per DS 2-09. Class 2 bicycle parking should be located to be visible from the project's main entrance and if not directly visible and obvious when entering the site from the public right-of-way, directional signs will be required to direct bicyclists to the class 2 bicycle parking area.
DS 2-09.4
DS 2-09.5
LUC 3.3.7.8.B

4. Revise the FAR calculation. It is not clear what is meant by a proposed FAR=1.0 for every building. Provide the correct proposed FAR (gross floor area divided by total site area). DS 2-05.2.4.M

5. Annexation condition 2 requires an earthtone wall along the south and west corner or the property extended to Palma Street. Demonstrate compliance, if applicable to the project site, by labeling the required wall on the plat. Label and state the height and materials of all other existing and proposed screen walls.
DS 2-05.2.4.U

6. Per IBC Sec. 1106.5, for every six or fraction of six handicapped parking spaces provided, at least one must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet. Revise drawing and calculation to show at least two van accessible spaces provided out of the eleven total h/c spaces shown. ANSI/IBC

7. On projects containing more than one building, loading zones must be provided for each building. Revise plan and loading calculation. There is not adequate maneuverability for trucks to easily access two of the proposed loading zones (the easternmost and the southernmost spaces). Please revise. LUC 3.4.4.1

8. Dimension the width of pedestrian circulation system clearly on the plat. Pedestrian connections must be continuous and provide accessible connections to all buildings from adjacent street right-of-way. Revise plat to show how the ped. system connects from the Research Loop right-of-way to buildings 2, 3 and 4.
DS 2-05.2.4.K
DS 2-08.3.1

9. The required street perimeter yard building setback measure from the street property line is the greater of 21 feet and 1- ½ times the height of exterior structure wall. With a proposed building height of 35 feet above design grade, the required setback is 52- ½ feet from the street property line. Revise plat to meet required building setbacks. LUC 3.2.6.5

10. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of DS 2-03.6.6.

11. Annexation condition 1 requires all buildings to be no higher than 35 feet above design grade. To demonstrate compliance with this condition, specify in general note 1 that the maximum proposed height of all buildings is no greater than 35 feet above finished grade elevation.
DS 2-05.2.4.U
DS 2-05.2.4.N

12. Add a matrix table showing the volume (in cubic feet or cubic meters) of airspace for each of the proposed units and state in the title block that this plat is for condominiums. Provide floor plans, elevation drawings, and three-dimensional calculations for each unit. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2

13. Detail any proposed free-standing signage on the plan. Label the location and dimensions of signs. DS 2-05.2.4.W

14. Is the required 10-foot street landscape border part of common element "A"? If so, list it as such in the title block. If not it must be designated as common area, and labeled individually with its own separate letter designations on the plat. Enclose each common element with a solid line and list them in the title block. DS 2-03.2.4.C

15. Between a PAAL and any enclosed structure a minimum 5-foot pedestrian refuge, including a 4-foot sidewalk, is required. The pedestrian refuge area must be physically separated from the PAAL., Revise plat to show the 5-foot pedestrian refuge between Bldg. D and the PAAL to the north. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1

16. A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation and delivery vehicles. If walls are proposed along perimeter lot lines revise the PAAL widths along the east and west property lines to be 28 feet.
DS 3-05.2.2.B.3

17. Dimension the PAAL widths at their narrowest points in the location of the dumpsters. Two-way minimum required width for PAALs is 24 feet DS 2-05.2.4.D.3

18. Wheelstop curbing must be used in all parking spaces where the adjacent sidewalk is less than 6-½ feet wide to allow for vehicle overhang without obstructing sidewalk clear widths to less than 4 feet. Provide a fully dimensioned parking lot detail showing wheel stops dimensioned at 2-½ feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1

19. All pedestrian sidewalks and ramps must meet new ADA requirements by utilizing truncated domes rather than the scored concrete tactile warning devices. Provide a handicap access ramp detail showing the truncated domes indicating all sidewalk grade changes and pedestrian crosswalks. Add a general note indicating that truncated domes shall be used at all crosswalks, access ramps and as otherwise required. ANSI

20. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan/Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan
05/22/2006 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approv-Cond Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: May 19, 2006


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S06-093 Eastside Industrial Center T141521 (135-07)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add the section tie, or show a tie to the old subdivision.
Add ties from the boundary line to the buildings.
Provide bearings for the building dimensions on sheet 2, or indicate if the bearings are perpendicular to the boundary line. Provide bearings and dimensions for the out door storage on each building.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.






Susan King
05/25/2006 FRODRIG2 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed
05/25/2006 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied May 24, 2006

TO: Greg Carlson, P.E.
Greg Carlson Engineering

THRU: Patricia Gehlen
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Eastside Industrial Center, Lots 1-12
Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal
S06-093

The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-093, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates.

SHEET 3. Please revise the location of the existing public sewers shown on this sheet, as the as-builts seem to show them further west than it is shown on this sheet.

SHEET 3. New manhole 1 shall be public.

SHEET 3. Common element A shall be granted as a public sewer access easement by final plat.

SHEET 3. Show the recording information for any existing public sewer easements. Please make sure that if such easements do exist, they are properly demarcated.

Contact Ilene Deckard (Pima County Wastewater Management Department) to request the abandonment and removal of the existing on-site public sewer.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
05/26/2006 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: May 26, 2006

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov

CC:


SUBJECT: S06-093 Eastside Industrial Center: Tentative Plat Review(4-24-06)

Staff has no comments.
05/26/2006 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved S06-093 Eastside Industrial Center: Tentative Plat Review - No comment.
05/26/2006 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP.

D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
06/03/2006 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

June 3, 2006

Greg Carlson
Greg Carlson Engineering, LLC
1521 East Broadway
Tucson, AZ 85719

Subject: S06-093 Eastside Industrial Center TentativePlat

Dear Thomas:

Your submittal of April 24, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Environmental Services, Addressing, Fire, Landscape, Engineering, Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Community Planning, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD),

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)






Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 624-4197