Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-087
Review Name: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2007 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER January 3, 2007 To: Steve Corrales, Steve Corrales Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Irvington West Estates Lots 1-120, Blocks A & B, & Common Areas "A"- "W" Final Plat - 1st Submittal S06-087 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The final plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. This is the 3rd request. 2. Be advised that the tentative plat has not been approved. The final plat will not be approved until after the tentative plat is approved. 3. All sheets: This project contains a re-subdivision of a portion of Clarke Park, Blocks 1 & 2, Book 23, M&P, Page 97. This information should be incorporated into the Legal Description and Title block for this project and the case number, Co12-71-128, should appear as a cross-reference. You may contact the City of Tucson Development Services staff with any questions on how to incorporate this information. 4. Sheet F1: In the DEDICATION block, 3rd paragraph. Although the City Of Tucson may accept that drainageways and common areas are granted as easements to the PUBLIC, Pima County prefers that these elements be GRANTED AS EASEMENTS TO THE CITY OF TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES… 5. Once the tentative plat is approved we will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of residential lots. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the final plat. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 02/02/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator FOR: Corrales Engineering SUBJECT: Irvington West Estates Subdivision Final Plat submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-087 SUMMARY: The Final Plat and CC&R's were received and reviewed for Final Plat conformance. Development Services Department Engineering Division has completed the review of the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. FINAL PLAT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.6.1.E: It is unclear on the index map as well as the rest of the plat where the limits are for Block "B". Clarify index map. 2) DS Sec.2-03.6.1.H.1: In Title Block, Blocks "A" and "B" are indicated yet the other portions of the plat show that these areas are common areas. Clarify whether these will be used as Blocks or Common Areas and revise notation in Title Report or plan views. 3) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Address the following easement comments: a) Submit a copy of the title report. All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included, assuring that all existing easements as listed in the Title Report Schedule B are clearly drawn, identified, and labeled on the Final Plat. Assure that all easements listed on the Schedule B of title report are clearly drawn, labeled with Book/page or Docket/page, and/or listed as a blanket easement, and/or labeled with accurate dimensions and bearings on the plat. Show or add note regarding (name/type) easement Dkt.(number) pg.(number) per Schedule B item (number). Provide dimensioning if these utility easements cross within the project boundaries, and label Bk/pg or Dkt/pg for each easement. In response letter, please state whether the items (numbers) of Schedule B are shown on the plat and state whether status of those easements that are to be abandoned or vacated. b) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.A: Label width of OHE easement as well as other utility or access easements to be abandoned, and label with abandonment dkt/pg on planview sheets. c) DS Sec.7-01.4 and DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: There are some easements indicated throughout the plat as to be abandoned. In some cases these easements are shown to cross proposed lot locations, which conflicts with the status of the easement. Remove text "abandoned as required"; the easements shall have a docket and page indicating that they are extinguished prior to approval of the Final Plat. d) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Indicate status, width, dkt/pg of abandonment, and other missing data for existing access easements and utility easements. e) Provide survey bearing and distance information for drainage easement Dkt 7174 pg1029 on sheet F2 and on sheet F3. 4) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Address the following street info comments: a) Labels for some street curve data C1-C8 on sheet F2 need clarification for legibility as the text color is too light. b) Curve data labels and street monuments on sheet F3 also need to be checked for legibility. 5) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.C: Address the common area comments: a) Separate common area will be needed for the basins. Any Retention/Detention basins need to be differentiated from the rest of the common area so that the detention retention basin is exclusive from channels or other common area regions. Exclusive Common Areas for the basins will need to be reflected in the title block. b) A separate common area will also be needed for the drainage area between lots 107/114 and lots 106/115 as this area will not be accepted for public right-of-way maintenance. c) Show survey data bearing and distance for delineation between common areas "B" and "F" on sheet F2. d) Clarify differentiation of common areas "E" and "F" on sheets F2 and F3. e) On various sheets there are leader lines from labels to common areas that need more legibility; revise. f) Clarify whether the square footage indicated for Common Area "O" is for both areas on sheet F2. g) Check common area name adjacent to lot 54 on sheet F2 - appears this should be labeled common area "R". h) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.B: Update Common Area "F" square footage. i) Label Common Area "G" on sheet F2. 6) DS Sec.2-03.6.2.J: Provide copy of annexation agreement C15-05-04 and state in response letter how any conditions have been addressed. 7) DS Sec.2-03.6.1.L: Address the following legend comments: a) Provide hatching or delineation for protected peak limits. b) Provide "100-year" floodplain limits. c) Provide a delineation for FEMA SFHA Zone A limits. d) DS Sec.2-03.6.1.D.4: City's jurisdictional limits at Pima County boundary needs clarification. Add Pima County hatching, shown on location map, to the legend. e) Assure all hatching or shaded areas are added to legend. 8) DS Sec.2-03.6.2.E: Provide a general note stating that a Floodplain Use Permit is required for any disturbance in the floodplain. 9) Land Use Code Section (LUC) 2.8: Add General Note stating that the plat is in compliance with Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ), Hillside Development Zone (HDZ), Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) overlays, or that it will be. 10) DS Sec.2-03.6.3.A, 7.1.B: Provide seal and signature for other surveyor who provided survey information for the plat. 11) DS Sec.2-03.6.3.B.2.a: Remove Common Areas from dedications section on sheet F1 unless a common area is dedicated as a park for public maintenance. 12) DS Sec.2-03.6.3.B.3: Revise word "weather" to "whether" in hold harmless clause on sheet F1. 13) DS Sec.2-03.6.3.D: It is recommended that under RECORDING DATA to provide more space for Seal (next to "ss"). 14) DS Sec.2-03.6.3: It is unclear why acknowledgement section is provided on sheet F1. 15) DS Sec.2-03.6.3.E: On sheet F1, revise "City of Tucson Engineer" to read: "City of Tucson Development Services Engineering Administrator". 16) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.E: Show / label setbacks for: a) Erosion Hazard Setback b) Building setback from basins (per geotechnical report) c) 30-ft Scenic Corridor 17) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.F: Address the following floodplain limits comments: a) Tie 100-year floodplain limits to property boundary and to a few lot corners or other plat corner pins such as a common area corner on either side of the floodplain. b) Tie common areas "D" and "F". c) Remove "varies" from sheet F3. 18) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.J: Show HDZ Protected Peak delineation within property boundaries. 19) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.G: Address the following access comments: a) Revise locations for star symbols for corner lots 65 and 66, such that entrance to driveways are clarified / situated off Mansfield and Lima Drives respectively. b) Tucson Code Sec.25-38: Minimum frontage for lot access needs to be checked for lots 32, 35, 65, and 120. Typically, 30-ft (outside of curve returns) provides sufficient space to allow for driveway width of 20-ft and minimum 12-ft distance between adjacent driveways for residential districts. c) On various sheets, clarify whether 1' no access keynote is a 1-ft No Access Easement or a 1-ft No Vehicular Access Easement. d) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.K: Plat design shall guarantee that access is not obstructed. Missouri Drive right-of-way appears to overlap Common Area "W"; Common Area "W" limits may need to be redrawn to reflect any dedicated future right-of-way for Missouri. This item needs to be addressed at Tentative Plat stage as well. e) Ohio Street is indicated as 46-ft wide. Show additional right-of-way to meet development standard width, and revise Common Area "F" square footage to reflect change. f) Explain why widths of all proposed streets south of the floodplain are not as wide as the north side. All streets shall meet minimum width per development standards section 3-01.10. g) Consider widening width of access to Common Area "B" between lots 56 and 57. h) Show locations of "no parking" in cul-de-sacs on the final plat. 20) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.A: Tie down southeast parcel to a section corner or main parcel. 21) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.C.1: The basis of bearings should be established from 2 found, physically monumented points described and shown on the final plat. Update basis of bearing general note 7 on sheet F1 and show on planview. 22) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.C.4.a: Fully describe and show all markings on found monuments. 23) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.C: Address the following comments: a) Show Lot 116 frontage corner pin. b) Show pin east of north corner of lot 120. c) Provide bearing for rear lot boundary for lot 84 on sheet F3. d) Label bearing and distance for lot line between lots 11& 12. e) Clarify keynote 4 on sheet F3 near lot 117. f) Connect floodplain line northeast of common area "L" on sheet F3. g) Provide north arrow for sheet F5. 24) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.C.5: Indicate whether the distances and bearings between all boundary monuments are recorded, measured or calculated. 25) DS Sec.2-03.6.6.A: Address the following CC&R comments: a) Update the CC&R's to reflect common area name changes if any. b) Provide signed original for final plat approval. c) Provide a table of contents for CC&R's. d) Clarify section 3.6(d) regarding provision for access to conduct studies on all lots for archeological purposes. 26) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.C.3: Provide project boundary closure calculation sheet with closing error. Include additional closure calculations for smaller southeast parcel. 27) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Provide delta symbol for curve data on sheet F3. 28) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.J: Provide a copy of ordinance 10213 as referenced in general note 5 of sheet F1. 29) Submit revised Final Plat, revised CC&R's, a copy of the title report, response letter, and any other supporting documentation. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 02/05/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 5, 2007 Charles Corrales Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation 1008 West Saint Mary's Road, Building #1 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S06-087 Irvington West Estates Final Plat Dear Charles: Your submittal of November 30, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Final Plat (TEP, Fire, Real Estate, Addressing, Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies CC&R's (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 622-2554 fpresubmittal |
| 12/14/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: IRVINGTON WEST ESTATES S06-087 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has received the final plat submitted for review November 30, 2006. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. An electrical design to determine our easement requirements will be provided on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. Unisource Energy Gas & Unisource Energy Electric PH: (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 12/21/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/21/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Detail for street for block B indicates street width of 34' with vertical curb. Refer to C.O.T. amendments to the 2003 International Fire Code, appendix D, Section D102 for requirements. |
| 12/22/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-087 Irvington West Estates: Final Plat Review - Request consideration for the following: -Multiple easements need to be abandoned or modified prior acceptance of Plat, to include: Dkt./Pg. 602/100, 1835/397, 5398/999, 5398/1003, 7174/1025 & 7136//943. -Request Tucson Water be contacted concerning the 6" main w/in easement Dkt./Pg. 602/95 and this easement be abandoned or modified prior approval of plat. -A 24' wide alley is not shown along the S. boundary of C.A. "I". -Sht. 4 has no "North" arrow. -Request confirmation if Cook Ave. should be 50' along the segment W. of C.A. "I". The existing Cook Ave. S. of Subject Plat is 50' wide. |
| 12/27/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: December 27, 2006 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S06-087 IRVINGTON WEST ESTATES T141334 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 12/28/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-087 IRVINGTON WEST ESTATES/FINAL PLAT DATE: 12/28/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Street names "Ohio and Lima" are unacceptable due to duplication. Choose new names and use the suffix of Place or Court. 2.) Correct the suffix of all street names to Place or Court. 3.) Completely spell Road for Mission Road on Sheets 2 and 3. 4.) Label street name adjacent to lots 88-94 on Sheet 2. 5.) Label street names adjacent to lots 71-73 and lots 58-59 on Sheet 3. 6.) Label "N" arrow on Sheet 4. es |
| 12/29/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/29/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S06-087 Irvington West Estates, Lots 1-120, and Common Areas "A through W" Final Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 28, 2006 DUE DATE: December 28, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before November 29, 2007. As of this final plat review date the tentative plat has not been approved therefore the one year date of the final plat approval is based on the date of submittal of the final plat documents. Once the tentative plat has been approved the approval date of the final plat will be on one year from the tentative plat approval date. This date will be provided on a future review of the final plat. 2. Please remove the shading from the location map. Add line-type to clearly distinguish the COT/Pima County Jurisdiction limits. DS 2-03.6.1.D.4 3. Line weights will reflect the nature of the line, e.g., right-of-way lines will be more prominent than lot lines or easements, and drainageways will be in heavy solid lines except at street crossings. DS 2-03.2.6.1.J 4. Add as reference to the plan, next to the title block the annexation case number C15-05-04. This is similar to a rezoning case number applicable to this site and should be listed on the plan. Add the C15-05-04 case number to general note five (5). DS 2-03.6.1. 5. Add the following note: "Prior to the issuance of any building permits, Hillside Development Zone approval is required for Lots ____." (Add the special application case number in the blank.) DS 2-03.6.2.F 6. Add the following note: "This subdivision is subject to Ordinance No. ____ which established zoning in the _____________________ Annexation Area." Fill in the blanks. Contact Peter McGlaughlin at 791-4541 ext. 1167 to assist with the required information. DS 2-03.6.2.J 7. Please revise the date of 2006 on all text blocks that have listed the year date as 2006 to 2007. This plat will not be approved or recorded this year (2006). Revise text blocks as required. DS 2-03.6.3.D 8. Add the lot line distances for lots 88 and 90. The missing distances are adjacent to Ohio Street. DS 2-03.6.4.B Please ensure that all common area labels are listed on the plan. Common area "C" could not be verified. Also the 30-foot natural buffer could not be verified on the plan. Please clarify if the buffer is part of a common area or should it have a separate common area designation. 9. If applicable to this within this development, show and label the boundaries of protected peaks and ridges. 10. Please ensure that all the line-types under the Legend block are used as intended per the adjacent note. It does not appear that all the line-types are used or used other than what the line was intended for. Please revise as required. DS 2-03.6.1.L 11. Please be aware that this development/site is subject to compliance and approval of the special application for SCZ and Hillside. Additional comments may be forthcoming. (It is acknowledged that the special application along with the tentative plat is for re-review.) List the special application case number and the date of approval in the lower right corner of the plan sheets next to the title block. 12. The title sheet of the CC&R's must include the subdivision name, number of lots and the Common Areas. Revise as required. Provide a revised copy of the CC&R's with the next final plat submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S06087fp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents |