Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-083
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/28/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Basin slopes are required to be no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 Revise the plans as necessary to comply. The requirement for 4: 1 slopes applies to basins 3' deep or greater. Several of the basins are 3 feet deep with slopes steeper than 4:1. RESUBMITTAL OF THE TENTATIVE PLAT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 08/31/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-083 Oasis-Harrison Tentative Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 22, 2006 DUE DATE: September 19, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please provide a copy of the approval from the City Engineer allowing maneuvering in and out of ninety (90) degree-parking spaces. This must be received prior to tentative plat approval. 2. Clearly indicate the future right of way and future curb location, with dimensions, for Harrison Rd. and Speedway Blvd. Both streets are proposed for R/W width of one hundred and twenty (120) feet requiring a taper to be provided for Harrison Road. Commencing at the centerline of Speedway for three hundred (300) feet Harrison is one hundred and fifty (150) feet wide, then tapering for another three hundred (300) feet to one hundred and twenty (120) feet wide. When the taper is applied to the plan the future R/W cuts through the Block A, CA "A-1", "D-1", and lot 1. Please revise plat. Speedway appears to have already been widened. MS&R Map R/W Widening at Intersections 3. Please provide the rear yard setback of three (3) feet as part of unit layout and show on lot typicals. LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2.d.3 4. Please remove general note 26 and 27. Urban Planning and Design does not review plot plans for compliance. Urban Planning will review for colors, architectural compatibility, and massing prior to model plan submittal. The applicant is required to comply with the following, providing these items to zoning review at DSD. Floor plans are also to be supplied to DUPD. a) Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings. b) Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. c) A list indicating which model homes fit which lots. 5. If a DSMR is applied for and approved for any of the above comments, list the case number next to the title block, in the notes provide the case number, date of approval and any conditions of the DSMR approval. DS 2-03.2.2.B.6 6. The pedestrian circulation path must be handicap accessible to all lots and the recreational area. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. Provide a detail on the tentative plat of the handicap ramp with dimensions and indicate the location of the truncated domes. 7. Based on changes to the plans and responses to the comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-083tpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and additional requested documents. |
| 09/07/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | REVISED DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-083 Oasis-Harrison 09/06/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-75-94 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 09/19/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 10/06/06 (1) Elevations to be submitted to Urban Planning and Design Department prior to model plan review. (2) Per Development Standard 2-10.3.2.D, lots less than four thousand (4,000) sq. ft., units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. Dimensioned building footprints should be provided. Also location of second story (where applicable) needs to be indicated in addition to front entrances. Also, a listing of which model home fits on which lot. Each lot is to be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. This list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., would still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. |
| 09/18/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-083 OASIS HARRISON/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 18, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Street names Citrus, Helen and Bellevue are unacceptable for this project. Please choose a new name and use the suffix of Circle. jg |
| 09/20/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 20, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-083 PROJECT NAME: Oasis-Harrison PROJECT ADDRESS: Speedway Blvd/Harrison Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Below is the comment generated by Dale Kelch 05/26/2006 "5. This plan does not seem to address the require improvements along Harrison Road as dictated by rezoning condition 1I. At a minimum the plan should indicate where the future edge of pavement will be and indicate that it shall be constructed under a separate PIA process." Rick Engineering's response was that continuing discussion in the timing of these improvements are being discussed with Andy Dinauer for COT DOT. In order to receive final approval of the tentative plat please place a note stating something similar to the following, that the required off-site improvements will be handled with a future PIA. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/25/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 23, 2006 To: Chuck Martin, Rick Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Oasis – Harrison Lots 1-32, Block A & Common Areas "A-1", "B-1" - "B-4", "C-1" & "D-1" - "D-2" Tentative Plat - 2nd Submittal S06-083 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy to our office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until this letter has been received by this office. This is the 2nd request. You are proposing the construction of a private sewer collection system in a residential subdivision. This type of sewer now necessitates prior written authorization, pursuant to PCWMD Director, Michael Gritzuk’s letter to PCDSD Director, Carmine DeBonis, dated March 13, 2006, regarding Private Sewers and Public Pump Stations. Provide approval, in writing from the PCWMD Directors office. Mr. Mike Bunch, PCWMD Deputy Director, is the contact for the above-mentioned approval. A copy of Mr. Gritzuk’s letter, to Mr. DeBonis, is being provided for your inspection with this email. Sheet 1: General Note #8, leads me to believe that the new streets are public, in which case the sewers would have to be made public. Please explain. Sheet 1: I know that you were asked by the previous reviewer to delete General Note # 14, the industrial waste note, from this plan. However, Block A appears to be a future commercial component to this development and I believe that you were correct in the original inclusion of this appropriate note. Therefore, add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 2: Sewer improvement plan G-78-27 clearly shows an existing HCS connection entering MH #8263-01, from the southwest, that provides sewer service to 9595 E. Speedway Boulevard, the Evans Insurance & Financial Services property. Verify this connection and show it’s location on sheet 2. Note that this HCS can not be routed into the private sewer pipe without a recorded Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement filed with PCWMD. Sheet 2: The sewer pipe slopes are incorrect between MH4 and MH6. Revise the plans so that the slope values for the 8” private sewer main are reasonably accurate. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 09/26/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/02/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-083 Oasis-Harrison: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - Request clarification to the following: -Sht. 1 of 3, Under General Notes, Item 10. B., where is the .28 mi. of new public streets (Harrison)? -Sht 2 of 3, is vehicle access permitted to the existing alley on the N. boundary and within Hidden Hills East No. 3 Sub.? |
| 10/11/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 11, 2006 Chuck Martin Rick Engineering 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S06-083 Oasis-Harrison Tentative Plat Dear Chuck: Your submittal of August 22, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Real Estate, Addressing, Wastewater, Landscape, Traffic, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies Color Palette, Floor Plans, and Elevations (Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |