Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-083
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/21/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-083 RICK ENGINEERING OASIS-HARRISON -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/26/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/28/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: OASIS-HARRISON Lots 1-32 S06-083 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review April 14, 2006. The preliminary point where TEP can possibly serve this project is from pole #2 at entrance to subdivision, transformer HHE-35 and HHE-34. The pole along Harrison Road is located in entrance to subdivision and is in conflict; all relocation costs are billable to the developer. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. Also enclosed is a copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision. This is not a preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: Building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to kclark@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact the Designer for this project, Frank Grijalva at (520) 918-8361. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson J. Campbell, Oasis Tucson, Inc. (Letter only) F. Grijalva, Tucson Electric Power Company Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 04/28/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * All lots have curb side frontage off the PAAL. APC curb side service is approved for this development. |
| 05/02/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-083 OASIS HARRISON/TENATIVE PLAT DATE: May 2, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label section corners on Location Map. Correct 28-31 to 28-51 on Location Map. Correct Speedway Blvd to Speedway Boulevard on sheet 2. Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. Add total number of lots and Block A to title Block. jg |
| 05/03/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 2, 2006 TO: Chuck Martin Rick Engineering Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Oasis - Harrison Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-083 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-083, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Delete General Notes 13 and 14. SHEET 2. Accurately show the existing public sewers by continuing the sewer line northward from the cul-de-sac at Avenida Marlene and labeling the existing public manholes with their corresponding six-digit Pima County manhole number, and labeling the sewer line with its size and Pima County plan number. SHEET 2. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole number for the existing public manhole to which this project is connecting. SHEET 2. The existing public manhole to which this project proposes connection appears to be on a proposed sloped area. Please confirm if this public sewer manhole is protected by a public sewer easement and if so, please show this easement along with its recording information. SHEET 2. Regardless of an existing public sewer easement, the existing public manhole to which this project proposes connection shall be kept at a flat and even surface in order to facilitate safe access by Pima County Wastewater Management Department’s maintenance vehicles. SHEET 2. Separate manholes 5 and 6 by no less than 150 feet at no less than a one percent slope, and manholes 4 and 5 by 198 feet at 0.50% slope. This will provide the minimum required three feet of cover as long as ductile iron pipe is prescribed in the design. SHEET 2. Revise the slope between manholes 8 and 9 to be no less than one percent. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/05/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-083 Oasis-Harrison 05/05/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-75-94 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/12/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations & Colors REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 05/03/06 Urban Planning and Design S06-083 Oasis-Harrison May 3, 2006 Oasis-Harrison tentative plat is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), and therefore must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria, in addition to the conditions set forth in rezoning case C9-75-04. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Pantano East Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. Condition #1.b. of rezoning case C9-75-04 states that lots 1, 6 through 14, 23 and 32 shall be limited to one-story with a maximum building height of eighteen (18) feet as measured from design grade to the highest peak of the roof. Two story units shall be limited to a maximum building height of twenty-eight feet (28) as measured from design grade to the highest peak of the roof. Please provide elevations to satisfy this request. The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Please submit elevations illustrating how this requirement will be satisfied for the units abutting Harrison Road and Avenida Marlene. Per Development Standard 2-10.3.2.D, lots less than four thousand (4,000) sq. ft., units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. Dimensioned building footprints should be provided. Also location of second story (where applicable) needs to be indicated in addition to front entrances. Also, a listing of which model home fits on which lot. Each lot is to be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. This list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., would still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. Condition #1.d., of rezoning case C9-75-04 states fifteen-gallon canopy trees shall be planted on every other lot not more then ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk. This should be shown on the landscape plan. Condition #1.g., of rezoning case C9-75-04 states design and construction of the east half of Harrison Road according to the MS&R and/or Transportation guidelines. Said improvements shall include additional paving, curbs, and six (6) foot-wide sidewalks along the site frontages of said roadways. Please illustrate this requirement on the tentative plat. The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another. |
| 05/08/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plans to show the trees required by rezoning condition 1d. C9-75-04 2) Basin slopes are required to be no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 Revise the plans as necessary to comply. The requirement for 4: 1 slopes applies only to basins 3' deep or greater. 3) Provide trees for the parking areas outside of individual lots per LUC 3.7.2.4.A. RESUBMITTAL OF THE TENTATIVE PLAT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 05/09/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 306 |
| 05/11/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: May 16, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Oasis-Harrison Tentative Plat S06-083 (First Review) T14S, R15, Section 02 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Subdivision Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel and this must also be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, ie.: Common Area "A" - Streets Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities Common Area "E" - Landscaping 4. Adhere to re-zoning notes numbers 1A, 1C, 1B, 1I and no. 7. 5. Separate rezoning notes no. 1F and 1G. 6. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 7. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. 8. Security barriers are required all basin slopes steeper than 4:1, where water depths exceed two feet per Stormwater Det./Ret. manual chap. 3.6.2. 9. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 10. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 11. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 12. All lots adjacent to Det./Ret. basing must be 1' higher than the 100-year WSEL. 13. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 14. The proposed street widths do not meet current development standards per D.S. 3-01.0. 15. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Show intersection widening for Harrison Rd. and Speedway Blvd. this may affect the design of the south portion of the project. Also per rezoning condition no. 1L. 16. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 17. Provide removable post barricades at each basin maintenance ramp and provide a depressed curb for a service vehicle to enter the basin. 18. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 19. Show the activity number for the Tentative plat (S06-083) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 20. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The min. inside turning radius is 36' and the min. outside turning radius is 50' for the service vehicle. Revise as necessary. 21. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Lot 14 appears to be over 2' in fill. Please address. 22. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 23. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 24. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. 3. The velocities at the discharge point of basins may warrant a rip-rap splash pad. Revise as required. 4. Include details of all drainage structures. 5. Demonstrate all-weather access. 6. Complete the address on the cover of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Speedway Blvd.-Harrison Rd. CDRC |
| 05/12/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 11, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Laith Alshami SUBJECT: S06-083 Oasis-Harrison: Tentative Plat Review(4-14-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 05/12/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: May 11, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-083 Oasis- Harrison T141502 (133-03) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add Lots 1-32, Block A and the common areas to the title block on each sheet. Add perimeter bearings and dimensions, interior lot bearings and bearings and dimensions for the street centerline. Add the complete curve data. Add the bearing and dimension from the section corner to the point of tie on the subdivision boundary. Remove shading. If there any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/18/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-083 Oasis-Harrison: Tentative Plat Review - The proposed dedication of R/W is not annotated for comment. This is in reference to Sheet 1 of 3, Rezoning Conditions (C9-75-04) Item I. |
| 05/26/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) While the ROW is shown, it is not labeled as to whether it is existing or future or both. If the existing and future ROWs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 2. This plan does not seem to take into account the future intersection widening on Harrison Road in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes plan. 3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 4. Provide the Traffic Impact Analysis as required by rezoning condition 1H. This plat will not be approved until such time as Traffic is in receipt of the required TIA. 5. This plan does not seem to address the require improvements along Harrison Road as dictated by rezoning condition 1I. At a minimum the plan should indicate where the future edge of pavement will be and indicate that it shall be constructed under a separate PIA process. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/03/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/16/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S06-083 Oasis-Harrison Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 06/16/06 DUE DATE: 05/12/06 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 05/11/07. 2. DS 2-03.2.1.D Provide on the location map the section corners. 3. DS 2-03.2.1.G A title block with the following information is to be provided approximately in the lower right corner of the first page of the plat. a. List the common areas with the use of each common area. b. The number of proposed lots is to be noted. c. Indicate that this is a residential cluster project 4. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S06-083. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all tentative plat sheets including the NPPO and landscape sheets. List the rezoning case number in the lower right corner next to the title block on all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO sheets. Provide a written response as to how each of the rezoning conditions has been met. Some of the rezoning conditions which do not appear to have been addressed are: 1B, maximum building height for certain lots, 1C, recreation area in southeast corner of the property, 1I, dedication of right of way for intersection widening of Harrison Rd. In the rezoning conditions separate lines 1F and 1G. In rezoning conditions 1C and 7 there are fractional designations that are not part of the rezoning conditions. 5. DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 Remove the proposed R-3 zoning portion of note #2. In the tabulation portion of page one change the zoning to C1 and change the perimeter yard setback information to reflect C1 zoning required setbacks adjacent to R1 and C1 zoned properties. 6. DS2-03.2.2.B.5 In note #5 the subject to section of the LUC is not correct. It should be subject to Sec. 3.6.1 of the LUC. 7. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 Add to note #25, a note stating that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 3.6.1, Residential Cluster Project (RCP) 8. DS 2-03.2.4.G The common area visitor parking spaces provided must be evenly distributed and useable by all residents. Per DS 3-05.2.4.A.1 the visitor parking spaces must be located with in one hundred fifty (150) feet of the front or street side yard property lines of each residential lot. Lots 17 through 19 and 25 through 29 appear to be more than 150' from the visitor parking areas. The visitor parking spaces which are 90 degrees to the street do not meet the requirements of LUC Sec. 3.3.7.5 (street may not be used for maneuvering in or out of a parking space). The exception to this provision is if a letter is provided from the City Engineer approving the location of the parking spaces. The visitor parking spaces perpendicular to the sidewalk will require wheel stops in order to prevent overhanging the sidewalk. See DS 3-05.2.3.C for location. An option is to install a sidewalk with a width of at least 6'-6". Detail C of 3 indicates the right of way as being located at the back of curb in front of the parking space. The plat indicates a sidewalk being located between the parking space and the lot line. Please revise. Provide details depicting both types of visitor parking spaces with dimensions, wheel stops, etc. In the tabulation portion of sheet 1 of 3 all parking spaces are referred to as being 8 by 23. Please revise. There is also a typo in the vehicle (in garages) portion, it should read 64 not 4. 9. DS 2-03.2.4.J All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Missing along the front of the lots? 10. DS 2-10.3.1.A The perimeter yard setback line from the property line of the subdivision is to be shown. The indicated setback along Harrison Rd. should be indicated as 21' or the height of the structure from the back of future curb (see engineering comments on Harrison Rd. improvements, right of way dedication, etc.). Indicate the perimeter yard setback for lots 23 through 32 as the height of the structure (RCP adjacent to C1 zoned property) Clearly indicate the future right of way and future curb location, with dimensions, for Harrison Rd. and Speedway Blvd. ( intersection widening will affect location ) Required for all streets on the MS&R map. 11. DS 2-10.3.1.B Show the footprint of a unit on each lot or provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner lot, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard setback. These typicals are to be fully dimensioned and are to be drawn at a larger scale than the tentative plat. 12. DS 2-10.3.2.D On lots of four thousand (4,000) square feet or more, it will be assumed that the lot is of sufficient size to accommodate a dwelling unit; therefore, on projects with lots of this size, floor plans will not be required. However, on lots of less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. Therefore, on projects that have lots less than four thousand (4,000) square feet in size, submit: 1. Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings. 2. Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. 3. A list indicating which model homes fit which lots. The square footage of the lots indicated on the plan for lots 1 through 6 and lot 23 do not appear to be correct. Please revise. The required setback for the south side of lot #1 is 21' or the height of the structure from the edge of the nearest travel lane. This requirement with the minimum of 21' setback would require the building to be a minimum of approximately 11' from the south property line. Provide a detail for the corner lot as indicated in previous comment. 13. DS 2-10.3.2.E Three (3) copies of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) are required if there is to be an association of home owners to assume responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. 14. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.10 Add a note stating: There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council. 15. LUC Sec. 3.1.6.4.B In the tabulation portion of sheet 1 of 3, provide the break down of the site coverage, square footage of buildings, square footage of driveways, Square footage of streets, etc. In the building height portion of the tabulations the maximum building height is 25' in a RCP-9. Clearly indicate that lots 1, 6 through 14, 23 and 32 are limited to 18' and all other lots are limited to maximum 28' as per rezoning condition 1B. 16. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.G The streets as indicated on the plan do not meet the minimum requirement for travel lane width as per DS 3-01.2.3.A.1. Minimum width of a two way roadway with and ADT of 0-1000 with 0 parking lanes is 24'. Clearly indicate on the plan where cross section B of 3 is located. 17. Luc Sec. 3.6.1.4.G.2 The pedestrian circulation path must connect to the required sidewalk on Harrison Rd., to all lots, and to the required recreational area required by rezoning condition 1C. The pedestrian circulation path must be handicap accessible to all lots and the recreational area. Handicap ramps are missing through out. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. Provide a detail of the handicap ramp with dimensions and indicate the location of the truncated domes. 18. If a DSMR is applied for and approved for any of the above comments, list the case number next to the title block, in the notes provide the case number, date of approval and any conditions of the DSMR approval. 19. Based on changes to the plans and responses to the comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-083tp.doc |
| 06/16/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 16, 2006 Chuck Martin Rick Engineering 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S06-083 Oasis-Harrison Tentative Plat Dear Chuck: Your submittal of April 14, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Real Estate, Addressing, Wastewater, Landscape, Engineering, Traffic, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Engineering, Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Color Palette and Elevations (Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |