Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-079
Review Name: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/11/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: 44 E. BROADWAY CONDOMINIUMS S06-079 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the plat submitted for review April 7, 2006. Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 04/21/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 18, 2006 To: Jack Buchanan, The WLB Group Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: 44 E. Broadway Condominiums Units 101, 201-210, 301-310 & 401-410 Final Plat - 1st Submittal S06-079 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Central Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The final plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Contact Mrs. Ilene Deckard or Ms Yvonne Suarez of the PCWMD Development Services Section, regarding any fixture unit credits that may be available for existing fixtures that will be replaced, prior to the construction of this project. This submittal does not provide me with sufficient information to complete a review of this project. Existing or proposed on site sewers are not shown on a final plat and the Final Construction Documents page provided, A2.01 has no plumbing information. I have several questions. How does this project propose to connect to the public sewerage collection system? What are the sizes, slopes and the pipe materials used to connect to the public sewer? Where is the point of connection? The existing connection may be 25 years old. What is the size of the current connection and is it adequate for the new proposed use? Will the existing BCS need to be replaced for this project? What is the fixture unit count and how many fixture unit equivalents are existing and how many fixture unit equivalents are proposed? Sheet 1: In the Dedication block there is no mention of private sewers being part of the common elements and there is no mention of private sewers elements being the responsibility of the association. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S06-079, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Once we have a resolution on these issues we will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of residential units and commercial fixture unit equivalents. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the final plat. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 05/02/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-079 44 EAST BROADWAY CONDOMINIUMS/FINAL PLAT DATE: May 1, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions on Location Map. Include units 1-31 on all Title Blocks. jg |
| 05/10/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: May 10, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the 44 East Broadway Condominiums Final Plat. The activity number is S06-079. SUMMARY: The Final Plat and CC&Rs were received by Engineering on April 7th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Final Plat or the CC&Rs. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: FINAL PLAT, CC&Rs, APPROVED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: ASSURANCES, BOUNDARY CLOSURE CALCS The next submittal must address the following items: GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the financial assurances are approved. The complete assurances package must include a copy of the original trust, the original amendment to trust with exhibit A, the original agreement to construct with exhibit B, a copy of the warranty deed, a current title report and a location map on an 8 ½ x 11 sheet. DS 2-03.7.1.G The Final Plat will not be approved until the Assurance Package is received and approved. CC&R COMMENTS 1. Provide Exhibit A-1, the legal description of the property, page 40. ASSURANCE COMMENTS 1. Due to the fact changes will be made to the designated common areas for this project, be advised that the appropriate changes must be made to the Assurance Package. FINAL PLAT COMMENTS 1. A final plat serves as a survey document. Any site or building plan information not required to be on the final plat should be removed. Remove any information that is not required to be on a final plat; wheel stops, hatching for walls, stairs, doors, plants, light posts, etc. DS 2-03.6.0. 2. Include the common areas (elements) in the title block. Each common area must have a separate letter designation and must clearly defined as to the use. For example the parking area is one separate use thus should be designated as one specific common area. The hallways and stairwells are another separate common area. Revise the plat to include each common area (letter designation and use) in the title block. Revise the CC&R appropriately. DS 2-03.6.1.H.1. 3. Unit 101 and the parking common area lot lines must be clearly defined. Clearly delineate unit 101's lot lines from the common area (parking /pedestrian use area). The common area and all the units must be distinguishable on each sheet. Provide bearings and dimensions as appropriate. 4. Provide the completed subdivision case number (S06-079) in the lower right hand corner of the plat next to the title block. DS 2-03.6.1.K. 5. Provide a legend, which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing placed on either the first sheet of the plat or the first sheet which contains all or part of the subdivision drawing. 6. Revise the Final Plat Standard paragraphs on the first sheet so that they are listed in the following order for better understanding and clarity DS Sec.2-03.6.3: 1. Dedication Paragraph 2. Beneficiary Block Paragraph (if applicable) 3. Acknowledgement Paragraph 4. Approval Paragraph 5. Recordation Data Block Paragraph 6. Assurance Block 7. Certification of Survey 7. If applicable the following BENEFICIARY block must be included on the title page of the plat. BENEFICIARY "The beneficiary of (Title Company Name and Trust Number) is (Name and Address)." 8. If a third party land trust is not going to be used, describe what mechanism will be used for the assurances (i.e. letter of credit, bond, etc.). 9. Under the APPROVAL section provide more space for seals next to "SS", in the "RECORDING DATA" section. DS Sec.2-03.6.3.D. 10. Spell out the word department in the ASSURANCES section. DS 2-03.6.3.E. 11. Provide a north arrow and the scale used on sheet 2. DS 2-03.6.1.A. 12. Most of the property/lot lines on sheet 2 are off by several feet. Please revise the lines to scale to the labeled/referenced dimensions on the plats. DS 2-03.6.4.D. 13. Provide distance and bearings for the shell building (exterior walls) and for the wall space between each unit for sheet 3, 4 and 5. Each unit must be tied down. If the information is exactly the same on each sheet it is acceptable to put the information on one sheet. DS 2-03.6.4.D. 14. Indicate if the TEP easement is public or private. DS 2-03.6.4.A. 15. If applicable show no-vehicular access easements where applicable. DS 2-03.6.4.H. 16. In addition to the above comment, the west parking lot along the north boundary (property line) is the intent to access the other parking lot? A cross access agreement (easement) is required if the intent is to allow access. If the intent is to not allow access a no-vehicular access easement is required. Clarify in detail in the response letter in regards to this comment and revise the plat appropriately. 17. If a project has common areas (elements), each common area should have separate letter designation for each use and must be clearly defined on the plat, including common limited elements. (See comment 4) Revise plat appropriately. DS 2-03.6.4.C. 18. Corner tie information is to be provided on the plat. At least one corner of the proposed project must be tied by course and distance to a section corner or a quarter section corner. Provide the corner tie recordation information on the plat. DS 2-03.6.5.A. 19. Spell the word "said" correctly in the basis of bearing general note (general note number 3). 20. Revise the plat to show all boundary monumentation as "found" or "set." a. Fully describe and show all markings on found monuments. b. A one-half (½) inch iron rod tagged by a registered land surveyor will be set at all corners upon completion of construction. 21. Indicate whether the distance and bearings are measured or calculated. DS 2-03.6.5.C.5. 22. Please tie down one corner of the 2nd floor to an established point on the first floor or to an established survey monument. DS 2-03.6.5.A. 23. There is a box shaped image located in 3 of the parking spaces shown on the plat that is not on the approved site plan. Is this a mistake? Does the image represent a concrete beam? Bicycle parking? Clarify in detail in the response letter and revise the plat appropriately. 24. Additional comments could be forthcoming depending on how each comment has been addressed. |
| 05/10/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: May 9, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S06-079 East Broadway Condominiums T141313 (117-13) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/11/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | S06-079 44 East Broadway Condominiums: Final Plat Review. No comment. |
| 05/16/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: 44 East Broadway Condominiums S06-079 Final Plat TRANSMITTAL: May 16, 2006 DUE DATE: May 7, 2006 1. Add the subdivision case number "S06-079" to the lower right hand corner /title block on each sheet. DS 2-03.6.1.K 2. The minimum text size required is 12 point (.012") for microfilming purposes. Revise the lettering in the location map to meet this minimum archiving standard. DS 2-03.6.1.C 3. General note 8 on sheet 1 of 5 indicates that there are a total of 30 parking spaces but the drawing and the approved site plan show 32 spaces provided. Revise. 4. The approved site plan indicates that 900 square feet (less than 1,000 square feet) of new retail construction was proposed for the site. This condominium conversion plat states that there is 1,400 square feet of retail building. This will require an additional five (5) vehicle parking spaces (one vehicle space per 300 square feet GFA) plus bicycle parking. Revise plat accordingly to provide for required vehicle and bicycle parking. Show calculations on the plat. LUC 3.3.6.1 5. For condominium conversion projects such as this, an affidavit is required showing that all requirements of LUC 4.1.9 have been met. Prior to final plat approval, submit a copy of this affidavit which demonstrates compliance with LUC 4.1.9.2. LUC 4.1.9 6. Show all easements specified in the CC&Rs on the final plat. DS 2-03.6.4.A 7. Add a north arrow and scale to sheet 2. 8. If there are common elements as indicated in the CC&R's and by the calculations on sheets 3 through 5, fill in the common element numbers or letters in the title block and label them on the plat. Based on the Dedication paragraph, the parking area, sidewalks, structural elements, landscaping, etc. fall within "common elements". Label the location and delineate all common elements in a surveyable manner on the plat. DS 2-03.6.1.H.1 DS 2-03.6.4.C If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call |
| 05/18/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water has been designated by the State of Arizona, Department of Water Resources, as having an assured water supply. This does not mean that water service is currently available to the proposed development. This development lies within the exterior boundary of Tucson Water's planned 50-year service area. Therefore, water supply is assured. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the availability of water service at the time an application is made. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying but not limited to: Water Use Fire Flow Requirements Offsite / Onsite Water Facilities Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System Easements / Common Areas Any specific area plan fees, protected main / facility fees and / or other needed facilities' cost are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be fiscally responsible for modifying/enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void one year from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Richard S. Williamson, P.E. Manager, New Development RW:bjh |
| 05/18/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 18, 2006 Jack Buchanan The WLB Group, Inc. 4444 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85711 Subject: S06-079 - 44 East Broadway Condominiums Final Plat Dear Jack: Your submittal of April 7, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Final Plat (Wastewater, Addressing, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised CC&R's (Engineering, DSD), 2 Copies Approved site plan (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Boundary Closure Calculations (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies LUC Affidavits (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 |