Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-076
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/07/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Only one single enclosure shown for the four buildings for the 31 units. This does not seen to be sufficient enclosures for refuse service. Please justify. * Shown enclosure does not provide a service clear area in front of the enclosure. * Shown detail does not provide a ten foot clear area between the wall protection. * Shown detail does not show protection for the side wall. |
| 04/10/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/11/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: GRANT ROAD PROFESSIONAL PLAZA S06-076 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 31, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer, Nancy DiMaria (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power Company Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 04/11/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-076 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC GRANT ROAD PROFESSIONAL PLAZA -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/13/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 13, 2006 TO: Wocky Redsar Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Grant Road Professional Plaza Development Plan/Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-076 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-076, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. General Note 14 contains two different notes. Divide them into two different General Notes. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 15 as follows and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). A sewer service agreement will be prepared and sent to you once this information is accurately displayed on General Note 15. SHEETS 1 & 2. Revise the symbols in the legend and the layout so that they match. SHEET 2. As this is the sheet where the sewer layout is shown, all sewer information shall be included on this sheet, not on keynotes on sheet 3. SHEET 2. Revise the sewer design so that the following information is clearly shown on this sheet by either labeling the layout or using keynotes: Show the length, size and slope of all newly proposed sewers. Assign a number to all newly proposed manholes and cleanouts. Show the rim and invert elevations for all newly proposed manholes and cleanouts. Show the size and Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer shown on this sheet. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole number for all the existing public manholes shown on this sheet. Show the rim and invert elevations for the existing public manhole to which this project is connecting. Explain in detail why this project proposes to use a 12-inch sewer line for such a small amount of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 04/14/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S06-076 Grant Road Professional Plaza Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: April 14, 2006 DUE DATE: April 28 , 2006 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before March 30, 2007. 2. Fill in the S06-076 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Bicycle parking must be evenly distributed and conveniently located to main building entrances. Revise to provide even bicycle parking with convenient pedestrian access to all buildings. Where not directly visible and obvious from the public right-of-way, , project entry and directional signs will be provided to direct bicyclists to the bicycle parking areas. DS 2-09.4 DS 2-09.5 4. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 19 by indicating on the plat the location of "No U-Turn" sign to be provided. DS 2-05.2.4.U 5. Keynote 17 indicates a 4-foot concrete sidewalk to remain along the Grant Road frontage. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 7, label the location of the required 6-foot sidewalk to be constructed along the site frontage on Grant Road. DS 2-05.2.4.U 6. Revise keynote 3 to reference rezoning condition #8 rather than #9. DS 2-05.2.4.U 7. Rosehill Wash, which borders the site on its northeast perimeter, is a designated Watercourse, Amenities, Safety and Habitat (WASH) ordinance wash. A WASH overlay zone application, requiring a preapplication conference with city staff, a neighborhood meeting, and public comment period, must be submitted for review. Development subject to the WASH regulations in City Code Sec 29-12 shall be subject to review and approval in accordance with the DSD full public notice procedure, Sec 23A-51, and to the standards for review set forth in Sec. 29-17. Information, application and request for mailing labels can be obtained at the DSD Zoning Counter, 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st floor, City of Tucson. Once approved, add the overlay zone case number, date of approval, what was approved, and any conditions imposed as a general note and reference the overlay zone case number in the lower right hand corner near the title block. City Code Sec. 23A-51.4 8. The square footage of gross floor area adds up to 34,340 but the FAR calculation is based a GFA of 34,400 square feet. Revise figures for consistency. DS 2-05.2.4.M 9. Add a statement to general note 4 that the proposed medical service-outpatient use is also subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.8.B. 10. Per IBC Sec. 1106.5, for every six or fraction of six handicapped parking spaces provided, at least one must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet. Revise drawing to show at least two van accessible spaces provided of the eight total h/c spaces shown. ANS/IBC 11. Dimension the depth of the four vehicle backup spurs located at the northwest, northeast, southeast and east corners of the site. Also, dimension the distance between the backup spurs and any obstruction over 6 inches in height the existing fence along the east property line. A minimum 3-foot deep backup spur is required and a minimum of 3 feet is required between the end of the spur and an obstruction to allow for vehicle overhang. A three-foot radius is required for the curb of the vehicle back up spur. Revise the backup spur near the southeast corner of the site to comply. DS 3-05.2.2.D 12. On projects containing more than one building, loading zones must be provided for each building. Revise plan and loading calculation. There is not adequate maneuverability for trucks to easily access two of the proposed loading zones (the easternmost and the southernmost spaces). Please revise. LUC 3.4.4.1 13. Keynote 22 reads "12 inch sewer line", but the arrow points to a sidewalk. Revise. 14. Rezoning condition 10 requires all buildings and portions of buildings within 100 feet of adjacent R-3 zoning to be no more than one story and twenty feet in height above design grade. Building 3 is proposed to be two stories and is closer than 100 feet from the west property line where there is adjacent R-3 zoning. Revise plan to demonstrate compliance and submit detailed, dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors and building materials as part of the development plan review as required by this rezoning condition. Label all heights and dimensions. DS 2-05.2.4.U DS 2-05.2.4.N 15. State the height of all existing (keynote 15) screen walls. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 12, which requires all existing and proposed masonry screen walls to be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. Walls visible from the public right-of-way must be constructed with at least one of the decorative materials listed. In addition, all walls greater than 75 feet in length and 3 feet in height shall be built with alignments that incorporate jogs, curves, notches, etc. and include trees or shrubs in voids created by the variations. Revise plan accordingly. DS 2-05.2.4.U DS 2-05.2.4.N 16. The 10-foot recreational trail easement (keynote 3) required by rezoning condition 8 is shown to be inside the proposed 6-foot screen wall located near the wash, and within the required 10-foot landscape border. The wall may not be built within or restrict access to the trail easement. Revise plat to allow trail access. DS 2-05.2.4.U 17. The property is made up of two parcels, which must be combined prior to approval of the tentative plat/development plan. Per general note 25, provide copies of assessors tax combo forms and notarized, recorded covenant with the next submittal. 18. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of DS 2-03.6.6. 19. It is not clear on the plat that this is to be an office condominium project. Revise to provide a matrix table showing the volume (in cubic feet or cubic meters) of airspace for each of the proposed units and state in the title block that this plat is for office condos. Provide floor plans, elevation drawings, and three-dimensional calculations for each unit. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 20. The common areas must be labeled individually with their separate letter designations on the plat. Enclose each common area with a solid line. Include dimensions and square footages of each common area on the plat. DS 2-03.2.4.C 21. A chainlink fence (keynote 40) is labeled along the west property line where a screen wall is required. Revise plat. DS 2-05.2.4.X LUC Table 3.7.2.I 22. Dimension the width of pedestrian circulation system clearly on the plat and in cross sections A and B on sheet 3 of 3. Pedestrian connections must be continuous and provide accessible connections to all buildings. Revise plat to show how the ped. system connects from the right-of-way to buildings 2, 3 and 4. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS 2-08.3.1 23. Add a dimensioned detail showing the materials and design of the proposed freestanding signage per rezoning condition 11, which requires that signs be integrated into the landscape plan and architecturally compatible with building design and materials. The sign is not depicted on the landscape plan. Revise. DS 2-05.2.4.U DS 2-05.2.4.N 24. The bearing along the north property line is incorrect. Revise. 25. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan/Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan, lot combination documents, detailed and dimensioned color building and sign elevation drawings. |
| 04/21/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-076 GRANT ROAD PROFESSIONAL PLAZA/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/21/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved with the following condition: Title Block should read : Condominium Units 1-31. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** es |
| 04/28/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | S06-076 Grant Road Professional Plaza: Tentative Plat Review. No comment. |
| 04/28/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-076 Grant Road Professional Plaza 04/26/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-28 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/28/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 04/20/06 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS S06-076 – GRANT ROAD PROFESSIONAL PLAZA April 20, 2006 Per Rezoning condition #7, please dimension the required six-foot-wude sidewalk along the site frontage on Grant Road. Per Rezoning condition #10, detailed dimensioned, colored elevations with proposed colors, building materials, and color photographs of surrounding properties are to accompany the development plan submittal. Please submit the required dimensioned colored elevations, colors, building materials and color photographs to comply with this condition. Rezoning condition # 11 reads; freestanding signs shall be integrated into the landscape plan and architecturally compatible with building design and materials. The submitted landscape plan does not include sign detail(s) needed to document proposed sign id integrated with the landscape plan and architecturally compatible with building design and materials. Please add case number to Development/Tentative and Landscape Plans. |
| 05/01/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders and planters on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. 2) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four(4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Revise the plans to provide planters that comply. 3) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 4) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 5) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes in most instances are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 6) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Revise the landscape plan as necessary to ensure compliance, while providing adequately sized planters. LUC 3.7.2.3.A 7) Revise the landscape plans to show/identify the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 8) If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15 9) Add the following required general note to the landscape plan: The height of screening material adjacent to property lines is measured on the project side of the screen, at finish grade. DS 2-06.3.7.A.1 Revise the plans as necessary to demonstrate that the required screen walls will provide the required screening. 10) Revise the development plan to show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. DS 2-05.2.4.X 11) All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, and walls shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan, tentative plat, or development plan). Revise development plan and the landscape plan to match regarding the location and type of existing and proposed walls. DS 2-07.2.1.A Show bike parking locations on the landscape plan. Show signs on the LP. Document compliance with rezoning condition #11. 12) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. 13) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 Indicate compliance with the above section. 14) Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1 15) Revise the landscape plan to include the location and purpose of utility and other easements. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1 Show the trail easement on the landscape plan. 16) The project is subject to the provisions of the Watercourse, Amenities, Safety, and Habitat Ordinance, TCC 29. A separate application and review is required. Contact Patricia Gehlen/Zoning Manager at 791-5640 Ext. 1179 for submittal requirements. 17) Maintenance access for the Rose Hill Wash may be required. TCC Sec. 29-16C(3) See Engineering Section comments for additional information. 18) The proposed screen wall located at the northeast property boundary is subject to review and approval as part of the WASH review. TCC Sec. 29-16 19) The canopy trees proposed along the northeast property boundary conflict with the required trail easement. Provide a letter of permission from Parks and Recreation allowing for landscaping within the easement. |
| 05/02/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 4/28/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. S06-076 Grant Road Professional Plaza 1,564 Pima Association of Governments Kristen Zimmerman, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 05/05/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 5, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Grant Road Professional Plaza Development Plan/Tentative Plat S06-076 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan and Drainage Report The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan and Drainage Report for Grant Road Professional Plaza and does not recommend approval at this time. Development Plan/Tentative Plat Comments: 1. Since the WASH submittal has not been submitted and approved and since there are outstanding drainage issues, additional comments may be made on resubmittals. 2. Include the Rose Hill Wash in the location map. (DS 2-05.2.2.C.3) 3. Revise the outfall from the drainage basin to provide for the discharge to be directed under the trail easement as specified in rezoning condition 9. 4. Add a note indicating that the project is subject to the requirements of the WASH Ordinance and has been designed to be in compliance with the ordinance. (DS 2-05.2.1.D.2) 5. Revise the sight visibility triangleso that it aligns with the curb. Show also the MS&R future SVT location. 6. Show maneuverability for the appropriate design vehicle for access to each loading zone and for the solid waste enclosures. 7. Correct key note 9. The indicated sight visibility triangle is the near side SVT. Since Grant Road is an arterial the length of the SVT must be 345 feet. 8. Provide sufficient landings and truncated domes for all curb access ramps. 9. Indicate that the sidewalk along the frontage will be a minimum width of 6 feet. (Rezoning condition 7) 10. Clearly indicate where curb access ramps will be provided throughout the project area. Drainage Report Comments: 11. The Rose Hill Wash along the northeast boundary of the project area is a WASH ordinance watercourse. Any development within the study area of the wash requires a WASH review process which follows the DSD Full Notice Procedure (Tucson Code Sec. 23A.51) 12. Revise the calculation for the volume required for retention. The runoff coefficients used for the calculation must be the ones corresponding to the 5-year rainfall. 13. Clearly indicate in the drainage report that the project is within a watershed that is neither balanced nor critical. 14. Provide a hydraulic analysis for the structure used to direct the discharge from the basin under the trail easement. 15. Provide a geotechnical evaluation for the location of the retention basin and the effect of repeated inundation on the soils adjacent to the proposed building. 16. Provide infiltration test results demonstrating that the basin will dispose of the retained volume within 12 hours. A complete grading permit submittal and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 05/10/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: May 9, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-076 Grant Road Professional Plaza: Tentative Plat Review(3-31-06) Denied. A 6 ft screen wall is shown located between the trail easement and Rosehill Wash. The wall will restrict use of the future trail. The wall must be west of the trail easement. In addition the wall must be a “view” wall. View walls allow greater visibility into the trail corridor for safety purposes. View walls shall be a minimum of 80 percent open and shall be constructed of wrought iron or other similar attractive open fencing material above thirty (30) inches above grade. Trees are shown planted within the trail easement. The 10 ft trail easement must be clear of trees and other obstacles. Show a pedestrian entry/exit point to the trail corridor from the proposed development. If safety railing is not existing along the top of bank of Rosehill Wash, show and indicate it will be constructed. |
| 05/11/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP/DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. There is only a near side SVT shown and it is not identified as to being existing or future or both. There is no far side pedestrian SVT shown. 2. Show location of new R3-4 as required by rezoning condition 19. Please ensure that the symbol used for new street signs is correct in accordance with Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/15/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/16/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: April 26, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-076 Grant Road Professional Plaza T131436 (110-16) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove stippling and hatching. Add ties from the perimeter to the buildings. Add bearings and dimensions for the buildings. Add the number of miles of new roads, public or private, to the general notes; even if the number is 0. Add the square footage for each of the units. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/18/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 18, 2006 Wocky Redsar Limley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1860 East River Road, Suite 100 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S06-076 Grant Road Professional Plaza Tentative Plat Dear Wocky: Your submittal of March 31, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Environmental Services, Wastewater, Landscape, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Traffic, Assessor, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Color Palette and Elevations (Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 615-9292 |