Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-072
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/11/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | For future reference.... Tucson Fire Code Section 10.302, 10.207, etc. has been replaced by the IFC 2003, and C.O.T. modifications. |
| 04/12/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: NCR OF TUCSON S06-072 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the tentative and final plat submitted March 28, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power Company Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 04/12/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 11, 2006 TO: Thomas Sayler-Brown Sayler-Brown Bolduc Lara Architects, LLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: NCR of Tucson, Lots 1-3 & Block A Development Plan – 1st Submittal S06-072 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Be aware that the final plat for this project will not be approved until the subject tentative plat/development plan is approved. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-072, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET DP1. Place the project number S04-038 in the box along with the rest of the reference project numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET DP1. Divide General Note 9 into three different general notes. SHEET DP1. Revise General Note 16 as follows and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET DP2. Revise the sewer layout so that it matches exactly the symbols within the legend. SHEET DP2. Revise the sewer design so that no more than 100 feet separate any proposed cleanout from a manhole or another proposed cleanout. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 04/19/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before March 27, 2007. 2. Fill in the S06-072 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. All pedestrian sidewalks and ramps must meet new ADA requirements by utilizing truncated domes rather than the scored concrete tactile warning devices shown in access ramp details #3 and #4 on sheet DP2. Revise details to show the truncated domes indicating all sidewalk grade changes and pedestrian crosswalks. Also, add a specific statement to general note 24 indicating that truncated domes shall be used at all crosswalks, access ramps and as otherwise required. ANS 4. Revise "12th Street" in the location map on sheet DP1 to read "12 Avenue". DS 2-05.2.1.D.2 5. The square footage of site area for Lot #3 as stated in the calculations (167,937 square feet) does not equal 3.90 acres and is not consistent with the square footage given in general note 5 (170,054 square feet) for Lot #3. It is also not consistent with the square footage given on the final plat (170,065 square feet). Revise to be accurate and consistent. Revise percent coverage calculation if necessary based on any changes in square footages calculated. DS 2-03.2.4.B 6. For measuring building heights the vertical distance of a building is measured from design grade elevation rather than finished floor elevation, at any point within the building footprint to the middle (between eave and ridge) of the highest gable of a pitched roof. Revise all elevation drawings on sheet DP4 to show compliance with maximum height restriction of 25 feet based on design grade elevation. Add dimensions to the elevation drawings showing midpoint height maximum, ridgeline height maximum and eave height maximum above design grade as required. LUC 3.2.7.2 7. Label class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking clearly on the plan or provide a legend symbol. Bicycle parking must be evenly distributed and conveniently located to main building entrances. Where not directly visible and obvious from the public right-of-way and entrances to the site, project entry and directional signs will be provided to direct bicyclists to the bicycle parking areas. DS 2-03.2.4.Q DS 2-09.4 DS 2-09.5 |
| 04/19/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Fill in the S06-072 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 |
| 04/21/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-072 NCR OF TUCSON/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/21/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** ES |
| 04/25/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: NCR Tentative Plat Submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-072 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat package was received by Engineering. Development Services Department Engineering Division has done a review of the received items and recommends approval. Call me at 791-5550, extension 2204 if you would like to set up a meeting or if you have any questions. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE, CPM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 05/01/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-072 NCR of Tucson 04/27/06 (X) Tentative Plat/Development Plan () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-15 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat/Development Plan () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: April 25, 2006 Department of Planning and Design Comments S06-072-NCR of Tucson Tentative Plat April 25, 2006 The development site is subject to rezoning case C9-03-15, and any reference to rezoning conditions make on this review are made in reference to C9-03-15. Staff offers the following comments: Please revise tentative plat/development plan to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 1, which requires the development plan to be in substantial compliance with development plan dated June 13, 2003. Development plan, dated June 13, 2003, states within lot 3, just south of the building foot print that “this project is self sufficient apartment living and is not an adult care facility.” Please add this information, per “verbatim” on tentative plat/development plan. Add this information in bold letters, locate information on sheet 2 of 4, and add it to the bold letter that identifies the existing zone as R-1 and proposed zone as R-2. Please revise tentative plat/development plan to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 2. Revise sheet 2 of 4, as a revised key note # 6 to ensure that a cross access easement has been recorded to provide cross-access to Irvington Road, between lots 1, 2, & 3, as recorded in Docket _____ and Page _____. Please provide the actual DKT. & PG. Numbers as part of Key Note # 6. In addition, please provide a hard copy of recorded document. Please revise tentative plat/development plan; sheet 2 of 4, to complete the note that makes reference to a covenant stating “housing only to the elderly.” Please include the actual Docket and Page(s) numbers of this recorded covenant. Please revise tentative plat/development plan to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 6, which requires that 5% of the residential units within the apartment complex shall be fully ADA compliant and that 2% of the residential units shall be designed for hearing/visually impaired tenants. Please revise DP3, sheet 3 of 4 to identify 4 residential units as fully ADA compliant units and to identify 2 residential units designed for hearing/visually impaired tenants. |
| 05/08/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Commercial property for elderly apartments. Refuse agreement is for the dumpster to be serviced off the adjacent property to the south. Was assured by the Architect that an agreement was made between the two property owners. |
| 05/08/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP/DP D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/11/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 11, 2006 Thomas Saylor-Brown Sayor-Brown Bolduc Lara Architects, LLC 1001 North Alvernon Way, Suite 105 Tucson, AZ 85711 Subject: S06-072 NCR of Tucson Tentative Plat Dear Thomas: Your submittal of March 28, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Community Planning, Zoning, DSD), Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 620-0535 |