Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-064
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/21/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Per previous discussions the desires for refuse service of the developer is for each seperately owned lot will have their own APC for refuse. The APC will be placed along the frontage of Whirlaway Lane for service. Note 15 on the Tentative Plat so states this for refuse service. |
| 03/24/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-064 DELPH ENGINEERING. INC. TRIPLE CROWN VILLAS TOWNHOMES ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 03/24/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/29/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: TRIPLE CROWN VILLAS TOWNHOMES S06-064 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 16, 2006. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. There are three power poles and one anchor in the middle of the proposed Whirlaway Lane. There is an anchor lactated on the North side of the project where the OH line goes from the South side of the alley to the North side where TEP has installed an anchor due to the angle of the pole that TEP will need to retain an easement for. It appears to fall into the existing 5' easement that is being requested to abandon. All TEP facilities that are in conflict will be relocated at the customer's expense. All civil work will be provided by the customer and all new legal descriptions for all new easements will be required prior to the removal of any existing TEP facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. Easements will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer, Nancy Dimaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power Company Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 04/04/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: Triple Crown Villas Townhomes RCP S06-064 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: April 4, 2006 DUE DATE: April 12, 2006 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before March 15, 2007. LUC 4.1.7.1 2. Fill in the S06-064 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. It is unclear if Whirlaway Lane is proposed as a private street (Common Area "A") as indcated by cross sections 2 and 3, or if it is to be a public street as indicated by the label on the drawing. Streets must be designed with parking on both sides unless parking is provided in common areas, uniformly distributed throughout the subdivision at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling. Revise drawing or cross section to be consistent. If Whirlaway Lane is to be public and the adjacent side streets are to be private, indicate the boundary between the common areas and the public right-of-way with a solid line. Dimension common area boundaries and provide the square footages of all common areas on the plat. Also, revise general notes 4 and 5 if necessary. Additional comments may apply once this is clarified. DS 3-01.6.2.C.2 DS 3-01.2.4.D LUC 3.6.1.4.F.2.b DS 2-03.2.4.I 4. A minimum of 25% of lots must be provided with barrier-free accessibility. With a total of 31 lots proposed, at least 8 must be barrier free. Revise general note 11 to indicate no less than eight barrier-free lots to be provided. DS 2-10.3.1.D LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 5. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of LUC 3.6.1.5 and DS 2-03.6.6. DS 2-10.3.2.E 6. For projects of less that four (4) acres in size, it is required that drawings and photographs be submitted to show how the architectural compatibility requirements of Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3 are met. Provide photos/ drawings as required. DS 2-10.3.2.C LUC 3.6.1.4.A.3 7. For microfilming and archiving purposes the minimum type size must be 12 point (0.12"). Revise the subdivision names and numbers in the location map along with any other text which does not meet this minimum requirement. DS 2-03.2.1.C 8. The site area stated in General note 6 is inconsistent with the site area stated in the calculations notes 1, 3, 6 and 7. Also, 2.067 acres does not equal 113,256 square feet. Revise. 9. Revise the density calculation to indicate the density proposed expressed as the number of units per acre for the calculation note 7B. For example, with 31 units proposed on a site area of 2.067 acres, the overall density proposed is 31 units divided by 2.067 acres = 15 units per acre. If the site area is 2.607 acres (see comment 8 above) then the density would be calculated as 31 divided by 2.607 = 11.89. LUC 3.2.10.2 10. Remove the part of general note 4 which indicates the project is subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F, as this section does not apply to RCP-9. LUC 2.5.3.2.E.2 11. Revise the adjacent zoning to indicate that a portion of the adjacent property to the south at the northeast corner of Sarnoff Drive and 22nd Street is C-2. DS 2-03.2.3.I 12. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/04/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the subdivision case number (S06-064) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and NPPO Plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2) Add a general note on the NPP plan specifying that the Plant Inventory Methodology was used as the selected method of NPPO compliance. LUC 3.8.4.1.A 3) All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") in size for microfilming purposes. Revise all text in the location map on sheet L-1 to meet this minimum archiving standard. DS2-03.2.1.C 4) Regarding existing streets; show dimensions, and any utility locations on the landscape plan. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 5) A 30-inch screen is required to screen the parking areas along the west property where they abut the Sarnoff Drive (MS&R) frontage. Revise the landscape plan to show how the 30" screening requirement will be met. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 6) All disturbed areas including adjacent right-of-ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Add this requirement to note 3 on sheet L-3. 7) Per DS 10-01, Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, for basins located adjacent to arterial thoroughfares, planted areas should account for at least 35% of the total basin area. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per acre must be provided, 33% of tress shall be 24" box or larger. A minimum of 2 shrubs for each tree is required per DS 10.01. Revise landscape plan to include basin(s) treatment including a calculation of percent coverage within the basin area. |
| 04/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 3, 2006 TO: Kent Delph, P.E. Delph Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Triple Crown Villas Townhomes, Units 1-31 and Common Areas A-C Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-064 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-064, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Clarify if this project is proposing public or private sewers by including the appropriate notes and excluding those that do not apply. SHEET 3. This project proposes public and private streets. Please be aware that private sewers are not allowed under public streets. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 04/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 182 |
| 04/11/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: April 11, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Triple Crown Villas, 1100 S. Sarnoff Rd. Tentative Plat S06-064 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 16 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report. The Subdivision Plat (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. The modification proposed will not be allowed. 3. There are numerous discrepancies throughout the plan that I cannot list them all. Re-check the TP for accuracy prior to re-submittal. 4. Submit the geotechnical report along with the corrected copies of the TP and DR. 5. A drainage easement is required for maintenance purposes whenever the drainage facilities are not located within a public street or common area that is not labeled for drainage. 6. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 7. If Whirlwind Lane is public than parking on both sides of the street is required per DS 2-03.2.4.I, DS 3-01.2.4.D and DS 3-01.6.2.C.2. 8. The geometric design of the private streets exceeds the exceptable length without an adequate turnaround if municipal services will used per D.S. 3-01.6.2.B. 9. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area, access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Alley access at the Northeast portion of the property for ingress/egress will not be permitted. 10. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 11. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 12. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 13. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 14. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Where are the call-outs for the keynotes 1, 2 and 3 on the plan view? 15. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 16. Show Tentative plat number (S06-064) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 17. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. New projects, including mobile home parks, consisting of three (3) or more dwelling units will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection, and pickup areas. 18. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 20. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 21. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 22. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage. 3. Include an exhibit for the stationing of the manholes and grates. 4. It appears that the EGL on the storm drain is higher than the ground elevations at 4 different locations. Please correct or adjust as required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1100 S Sarnoff Rd CDRC |
| 04/11/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-064 Triple Crown Villas Townhomes: Tentative Plat Review. Request clarification where "start & end" of private streets intersect with Whirlaway Ln. Also, are proposed parking spaces w/in Whirlaway Ln. R/W considered for on-site parking? No other comment for R.E. concerns. |
| 04/11/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: April 11, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-064 Triple Crown Villas Townhomes T141516 (134-08) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove shading, hatching and rip-rap symbols. Add the section tie. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 04/11/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-064 Triple Crown Villas Townhomes 04/07/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/12/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Other - Photos, dimensioned elevations, Floor Plans REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 4/6/06 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS S06-064 – Triple Crown Villas Townhomes April 6, 2006 The Triple Crown Villas Townhomes tentative plat is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), and therefore must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Pantano East Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another. Per Development Standard 2-10.3.2.B & C and LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3, the RCP is less than four (4) acres and must be compatible in architectural design with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of those existing single-family attached or detached structures along the same block frontage and the block frontage across the street, and/or development on the opposite lot corners. Please submit plans showing how the RCP will comply with these design requirements. Photos, dimensioned elevations, or a combination of both must be submitted. Per Development Standard 2-10.3.2.D, lots less than four thousand (4,000) sq. ft., units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. Dimensioned building footprints have been provided; however, location of second story (if applicable) needs to be indicated along with front entrances. Also, a listing of which model home fits on which lot can also be used. Each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. This list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., would still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. The tentative plat has not identified where open space and recreational uses will be located so that they may be functional to this development. The Plans call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that those pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped. [An active/passive adult recreational facility, which includes a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. The adult recreational amenities to include, but not limited to: ramada(s), table(s), outdoor grill, shaded sitting area(s). Please provide a usable open space area in that will provide passive or active recreational facilities. Detention basins can serve a dual purpose with the placement of required amenities within and surrounding the basin. The slopes surrounding the basin must be adjusted to provide handicap accessibility to the amenities by way of an all-weather ADA compliant path that connects to the proposed sidewalks within the subdivision. Please verify if the intention of the private drives are to provide rear loading vehicle access to individual lots. A Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR) may be necessary to allow this design, since there are no street cross-sections that currently meet this configuration. For staff to support a DSMR please add a note indicating that pedestrian access (sidewalks) and parallel parking along private drives will be restricted. Any proposed masonry walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These walls shall incorporate on of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of both. A street detail for Whirlaway Lane indicates allocation of six gang parking spaces measuring eight and one-half (8 ½ ) feet by eighteen (18) feet in length, including curb stops, being provided near the entrance to the subdivision on the north side of the street; however, no detail has been submitted for the 15 parking spaces, without wheel stops, on the south side of the street measuring eight and one-half (8 ½ ) feet by fifteen and one-half (15 ½) feet in length. As a rule, compact parking is not permitted for residential units; therefore, staff defers to the Traffic Engineering Department. |
| 04/12/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-064 TRIPLE CROWN VILLAS TOWNHOMES/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/11/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct 14/81 to 15/78 in Location Map. Correct Units 1-31 to Lots 1-31 in Title Block. Correct Affirmed Drive, Seattle Slew Drive and War Admiral Drive to Affirmed Place or Court, Seattle Slew Place or Court and War Admiral Place or Court. es |
| 04/18/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. The new proposed Seattle Slew and Affirmed streets appear to be greater than 150' in length. A turnaround will be required. (DS3-01.6.2.B) D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/02/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 28, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-064 Triple Crown Villas Townhomes: Tentative Plat(3-16-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 05/03/2006 | FRODRIG2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/06/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 6, 2006 Kent A. Delpj Delph Engineering, Inc., 221 North Court Ave., Suite 130 Tucson, AZ 85701 Subject: S06-064 Triple Crown Villas Townhomes Tentative Plat Dear Kent: Your submittal of March 16, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Real Estate, Traffic, Landscape, Community Planning, Addressing, Wastewater, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning Engineering, DSD), 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD), 2 Copies Revised Drainage and Geotechnical Reports (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Photographs (Zoning, Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-6570 |