Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-053
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/07/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-053 GREGOR ENGINEERING, INC. 1545 W. HEGEL LANE ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 03/14/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat plan is approved March 15, 2006. Required fire hydrants shall be installed and serviceable prior to and during construction per IFC Section 501.4 |
| 03/16/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 15, 2006 To: Francis Hemmah, Gregor Engineering, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: 1545 W. Hegel Lane Lots 1-4, A Minor Subdivision Final Plat - 1st Submittal S06-053 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Central Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S06-053, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1/1 (FINAL PLAT): In the DEDICATION block, 3rd paragraph. Although the City Of Tucson may accept that EASEMENTS are granted to the PUBLIC, Pima County prefers that these elements be: GRANTED TO CITY OF TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ABOVEGROUND, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SEWERS. (Or similar wording) Sheet 1/1 (SITE PLAN): Revise General Note #8 so that it states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION… Sheet 1/1 (SITE PLAN): Revise General Note #11 so that it states: MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWERS TO THE POINTS OF CONNECTION… Sheet 1/1 (SITE PLAN): Revise the site plan so that it shows: The existing HCS on lot 4, from the connection to the EXIST. STUCCO HOME, to the point of connection to the public sewer. And add an EXIST HCS linetype to the Legend or create an appropriate Keynote. Sheet 1/1 (SITE PLAN): Revise the site plan so that: The EXIST SMH is identified with the IMS number used by PCWMD and found on PCWMD Maps and Records Section (5th floor) basemaps and PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide websites. Sheet 1/1 (SITE PLAN): From the private sewer layout shown and KEYNOTES #11, it appears that a 6” connection is being made into the base of the public sewer manhole #9863-02, while KEYNOTES #12 tells me that the pipe size is only 4” diameter. Please clarify. Sheet 1/1 (SITE PLAN): At the point of connection. If the existing invert at existing public sewer manhole # 9863-02 is 2289.78 and the proposed invert at the point of connection is 2290.28, the WWM SD 301 connection will involve coring the base of the existing manhole. Due to flow management concerns PCWMD will not permit coring the base of an existing manhole without PCWMD Engineering and Field Operations approval. The added Flow Management engineering and bypass pumping expense will be high. I have discussed this project with Mrs. Ilene Deckard and Mr. Robert Decker, of the PCWMD Development Services Section and we all agree that a better option would be to scrap the shared private sewer with the manhole tap and connect each building with separate HCS directly to the 10” public sewer in Hegel Lane. Only two building would need to have HCS located within the INGRESS/EGREES, UTILITY EASEMENT. Robert also suggested that the cleanouts be located within the sidewalks, to the extent possible, for easy access. Direct connections in this manor will avoid the need for a Joint Use Maintenance Agreements and every owner would clearly know the extent of their private sewer responsibilities. Sheet 1/1 (SITE PLAN): The site plan shows 2 HCS connections being made to the private sewer in the right-of-way of Hegel Lane. Private HCS connecting to a private sewer need to be made on private property. Revise the site plan so that it shows. House Connection Sewers for lots 3 and 4 realigned and constructed on private property, connecting to the private sewer in such a way that they will avoid encroachment into the public right-of-way, now and during future operational maintenance. Or redesign as suggested in item #9. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 03/20/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: 1545 E. HEGEL LANE S06-053 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 3, 2006. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Ms. Mary Boice, Project Manager Design/Build - DB 101 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 (520) 917-8732 Please call me at (520) 918-8297, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Denise Tellez Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build dt Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (by e-mail) Denise Tellez 918-8297 DB102 |
| 03/20/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse enclosure does not have side wall protection. * 'T' turnaround does not have the width to meet the standards. Require 114 feet plus 4 feet on each end. * No provision shown or discussed for recycling. NOTE: Concept is feasible for the enclosure to be at an angle off the 'T' turnaround if the turnaround meet standards. Recycling needs to be provided. |
| 03/23/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-053 1545 W. HEGEL LANE/MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: 3/22/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add Lane to Higgens on Location Map. Delete W from W. Fort Lowell Road on Location Map. Delete tax codes and recording information on all adjacent parcels. Delete 1545 W. Hegel Lane. es |
| 03/27/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the subdivision case number (S06-052) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Plat and Landscape Plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2) Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 3) The parking lot area must be screened from adjacent properties and from the street frontage along Hegel Lane with a five-foot high screen. When using vegetative screens, the plants may be aligned, or unevenly spaced, but must provide a continuous screen at maturity within two (2) years. Revise landscape plan to meet screening requirements for parking lot areas per LUC table 3.7.2-I. 4) Clarify the note regarding grading limits, which states that the entire site will be graded with the exception of an area 1 and 1/2 times the dripline of the preserved protected trees. The NPP exception application indicates that the site does not contain native plants. If this is so, remove the portion of the note indicating that protected trees exist on the site. 5) Indicate the retention basins on the landscape plan. Also, label their depths, and percentage side slopes. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 |
| 03/31/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 31, 2006 TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, Civil Engineering SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Hegel Lane Minor Subdivision. The activity number is S06-053. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Minor Subdivision/Final Plat, and Drainage Report Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Minor Sub/Final Plat. 1. If the project has common areas (such as retention basins), label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. DS 2-03.6.4.C 2. Show retention areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner. DS 2-03.6.4.I 3. If applicable, provide Protective Covenants. Protective covenants or Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) establishing responsibility for construction, maintenance, and ownership of any proposed common area, open space, or similar joint use, when needed, such as the retention basis: DS 2-03.6.6 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), Final Plats, or Development Plans shall have a note stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and retention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention/retention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. SMDDFM 14.3.4.2 5. CC&R's may not be needed if the previous comment/note is provided on the Final Plat. 6. Due to the basin isolation onto private lots is a HomeOwners Associated needed to establish which party will be responsible for maintaining the retention basins, or is a drainage easement needed? 7. Provide for maintenance of and liability for any proposed commonly-owned areas; DS 2-03.6.6.A DRAINAGE REPORT 1. As part of the drainage report submitted in conjunction with Final Plat, or Site Plan verbiage should be included stating the responsibility for an annual and as-needed maintenance inspection of the basins. SMDDFM 1.5.2 2. Please clarify the discrepancy On Figure 3 and 4; why is the proposed CP-1 (Figure 4) lower then the existing CP-1 (Figure 3) 3. On Figure 4 there are two CP-1 call out notes and no CP-3 call out note. Please match the call outs in the plan view with the data table. If you have any questions or would like to meet to discuss the retention basin issues, I can be reached at 791-5640 ext. 1191 or jose.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz, PE Civil Engineer |
| 04/03/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-053 1545 W. Hegel Lane: Minor Subdivision Review. Multiple items are as follows: -E. Hegel Lane is 15' in width to the E. & W. of Subject Parcel. Parcel 106-12-065B is 15' wide S. of the apparent Hegel Ln. center line, taxes are delinquent and a possibility exists for an incompatible use. Parcel 106-12-0600 extends 15' into apparent Hegel Ln. Clarification should be provided concerning off sight access. -A Record of Survey was not provided concerning the N. boundary of Subject Plat. -Two easements (Bk. of misc. Rcrds./Pg. 49/360 & 75/584) are not found annotated on Plat. -In lower right hand corner of both sheets, change 1/1 to ½ and 2/2. |
| 04/03/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-053 W. Hegel Lane 03/31/06 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Site Plan and Final Plat CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/31/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 3/27/06 |
| 04/05/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily trips in 24 hr period - 20 |
| 04/13/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this minor subdivision. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/18/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 17, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-053 1545 E. Hegel Lane: Minor Subdivision Review(3-03-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 04/26/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S06-053 1545 W. Hegel Lane Final Plat, Minor Subdivision Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 26, 2006 DUE DATE: March 31, 2006 COMMENTS: THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF 4 SHEETS: LANDSCAPING, PRESUBMITTAL, COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN, AND A FINAL PLAT SHEET. THE ONLY SHEET REVIEWED FOR THIS SUBMITTAL IS THE FINAL PLAT SHEET. THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, VIA THE PROPER PERMIT COUNTER INTAKE PROCESS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW. ONLY THE FINAL PLAT PROJECT CAN BE TAKEN IN FOR REVIEW VIA THE CDRC SUBMITTAL PROCESS. THE FINAL PLAT DOCUMENT CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL THE COMMERCIAL LEVEL SITE PLAN SHOWING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS APPROVED. THE ACCOMPANYING COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WAS UTILIZED IN THIS REVIEW FOR PROJECT REFERENCE CALCULATIONS/SECTBACKS ONLY. 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of submittal to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before March 2, 2007. 2. This plan was reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS). Specifically, this project was reviewed for compliance with requirements of DS 2-03.6.0, which delineates information to be presented on the final plat. 3. Per DS 2-03.6.1.D.2, provide a listing of all subdivisions and associated recordation book and page in 12 point next to the location map. In addition, correct the spelling of Higgins Lane (shown as Higgens) on the location map. 4. Per DS 2-03.6.1.K, Development Services Department has assigned case number "S06-053" to this project. Please add this number adjacent to the title block. 5. Per advisement from City of Tucson Real Estate Division, blanket easements are not detailed enough to describe utility easement locations. Please provide a specific easement description/location for all utility lines, if they are outside of the AREA 2 easement depicted. For further assistance, contact Jim Stoyanhoff at (520) 791-5641. 6. Staff recognizes in note 11 of the final plat that an area of land is unclaimed between this property and the recorded city right of way. Please contact City Engineering Department, to ensure the city has not claimed this property. Note, further comments may be forthcoming. 7. On the accompanying reference site plan, for lot 4, please provide lot coverage percentages and square footages representing both vehicular and building area, (keep the total percentage provided as well please). This information is needed for the final plat project because lot 4 will have a building remain on site. The maximum allotment of 70% per lot does not appear to be an issue in this project. (NOTE: This information format will be requested for all lots once the commercial site plan is submitted for official review. In addition, on the accompanying reference plan, please show the exact setbacks of all buildings to the proposed lot lines. 8. Please provide legal descriptions for all 4 lots and easements (represent easements on plan as well). 9. Note, depending upon responses provided, further comments may be forthcoming. TO RECAP, THIS PLAT CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN IS APPROVED (SEE ADVISEMENT TOP OF PAGE). 10. Note, depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions on this review, contact me at heather.thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156. 11. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF THE FINAL PLAT, A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO DSD FOR THE OFFICIAL REVIEW PROCESS. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S06-053 1545 w hegel.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat and additional requested documents. |
| 04/28/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: March 24, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S06-053 1545 W. Hegel Lane T131327 (106-12) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/05/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 5, 2006 Francis Hemmah Gregor Engineering, Inc. 5232 East Pima Street, Suite A Tucson, AZ 85712 Subject: S06-053 Hegel Lane Final Plat Dear Francis: Your submittal of March 3, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Final Plat (Wastewater, Environmental Services, Addressing, Landscape, Real Estate, Zoning, Engineering, DSD), 4 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 319-1181 |