Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RECORD OF SURVEY REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-051
Review Name: RECORD OF SURVEY REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/17/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | No Comment S06-051 SUNLAND GARDENS SUBDIVISION ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 03/20/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: SUNLAND GARDENS SUBDIVISION S06-051 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the Record of Survey submitted for review March 6, 2006. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Mike Kaiser Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 03/20/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Lot split for two duplexes on each parcel. Each parcel has curbside frontage. * Approved for APC curbside service. APC's are to be placed and removed from the curbside collection area on the day of service. |
| 03/24/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-051 SUNLAND GARDENS SUBDIVISION/RECORD OF SURVEY DATE: March 22, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete street directions on Location Map. Include lots 1-3 on all Title Blocks. Recorded deeds with legal descriptions will need to be provided in order to address parcels. jg |
| 03/24/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/27/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 27, 2006 TO: Mike Kreus Reliable Permit Management THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Pinal Vista Residences Record of Survey - 1st Submittal S06-051 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. 1. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-051, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. 1. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. 1. All sheets for this project need to be sealed, signed and dated by a registered land surveyor or a professional engineer. 1. SHEET 1. Add the following two General Notes THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 1. SHEET 1. It appears that there is an existing public sewer and an existing public sewer easement along the north section of the proposed project. If so, and if any part of said easement falls within the project boundaries, please add the following General Note ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. If no part of the public sewer easement falls within the project boundaries, add this General Note instead. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 1. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 1. SHEET 1. Add the following paragraph to the Dedication WE HEREBY GRANT TO THE PUBLIC, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES ALL PUBLIC EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON FOR THE PURPOSES OF ACCESS, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC SEWERS AND UTILITIES AND OTHER USES AS DESIGNATED BY THIS PLAT. 1. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/28/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the Record of Survey/ subdivision case number (S06-051) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Plat. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2) The minimum required text size is 12 point (0.12") for microfilming/archiving purposes. Revise lettering on all sheets which does not meet this minimum standard. DS 2-03.2.1.C 3) The individual lots may not be developed in the manner shown on the submitted site plans. Ten-foot landscape borders and screening is required to screen the proposed parking areas from the street and adjacent properties. Variances would be required to allow development as shown. Submit sample site plans showing development proposals that meet code for each lot. Submittal of Landscape plans, Irrigation plans and Native Plant Preservation plans or NPPO Exception Applications will also be required for each lot at time of permitting. 4) The following requirement also applies to developments which provide more than four (4) motor vehicle parking spaces: Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each ten (10) motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1 5) Additional comments may apply upon resubmittal. |
| 04/03/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-051 Sunland Gardens Subdivision 03/31/06 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Record of Survey CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Western Hills/Pueblo-Sunland Gardens GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/3/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 3/30/06 |
| 04/05/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily trips in 24 hr period - 57 |
| 04/05/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-051 Sunland Gardens Subdivision: Record of Survey Review. No title report provided. |
| 04/12/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | April 12, 2006 The proposed Record of Survey cannot be approved as submitted. Provide a revised Record of Survey with the following issues addressed. Include a response letter detailing how each comment has been answered. 1. (DS 2-03.11.7.C, Draft) All lettering and dimensions must be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or when photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record keeping purposes. 2. (DS 2-03.11.7.D.2, Draft) Identify in the location map conditions within the square mile area, such as land surveys, major streets, major watercourses, and railroads. Reference recorded land survey plats by book and page numbers. 3. (DS 2-03.11.7.D.3, Draft) Show and label section, township, and range; and section corners in the location map. 4. (DS 2-03.11.7.F.2, Draft)Provide the proposed name of the Land Survey Exception. 5. (DS 2-03.11.7.F.3, Draft) The number of proposed lots is to be noted in the Title Block. 6. (DS 2-03.11.8.B.5, Draft)Add the following note, "There will be no further division of lots without the expressed approval of the City of Tucson." 7. Provide monuments for the endpoints of the line dividing lots 2 and 3. 8. (DS 2-03.11.11.a, Draft) The following information regarding the existing public right-of-way must be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. A bond must be posted for the installation of sidewalks before the Record of Survey is approved. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division |
| 04/13/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this ROS. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/26/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 25, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-051 Sunland Gardens Subdivision: Record of Survey Review(3-06-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 05/15/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/18/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT:S06-051 2541 & 2551 E Pinal Vista Resubdivision of Sunland Gardens: Record of Survey 1st review TRANSMITTAL: May 17, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This review is for a Record of Survey, which is a subdivision exception, in the R-2 Zone (DS 2-03.11 and LUC Section 2.3.5.2.A.2). The proposed use is multifamily residential with two units on each lot. The Development Designator is "K" and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is BB (LUC Sections 3.2.3.1.C and 3.2.6.4). 2. "All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size" (DS 2-03.11.7.C). [Please see comment #17.] 3. Identify all the relevant conditions within the square mile area of the location map. Identify all subdivisions and record of surveys by name along with the docket and page information. Also identify all major streets, major watercourses and railroads (DS 2-03.11.7.D.2). 4. Label the section corners of the location map (DS 2-03.11.7.D.3). 5. Please provide the proposed name of this Record of Survey and place the name in the title block (DS 2-03.11.7.F.2). 6. The number of proposed lots should be provided in the title block information (DS 2-03.11.F.3). 7. Place the Record of Survey number S06-051 in the lower right corner next to the title block of each sheet (DS 2-03.11.8.B.1). 8. In the General Notes: "The existing zoning is R-2" (DS 2-03.11.8.B.2). 9. In the General Notes: "There will be no further division of lots without the expressed approval of the City of Tucson" (DS 2-03.11.8.B.5). 10. "Include the following paragraph signed and sealed by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that the boundary survey as shown on this Record of Survey was performed under my direction and that all existing or proposed survey monuments and markers shown are correctly described. I further certify that this Record of Survey was prepared under my direction." (DS 2-03.11.9.A) 11. There are three paragraphs to be included in the DEDICATION. The second paragraph is as follows: "We hereby grant to the Public and all utility companies all easements as shown hereon for the purpose of access, installation, and maintenance of public sewers and utilities and other uses as designated by this plan" Please provide all three paragraphs (DS 2-03.11.9.B). 12. Include a 5" X 5" box for the County Recording stamp. The title over the box must read, "RECORDING DATA" (DS 2-03.11.9.C). 13. Please provide the recording data for the easements of record drawn on the plan (DS 2-03.11.11.A). 14. "The following information regarding existing utilities will be provided: The location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, and storm and sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and invert and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Show sewer line invert elevations." 15. There are errors and omission in some of the legal descriptions of the proposed lots. The length of the arc in Lot 1 differs from the dimension on the drawing. The dimension of 3.41' should not have been subtracted from 60.71 for the north property line of Lot 2. Also the "C1" portion of the arch in not included in the legal description for Lot 2. Please revise the legal descriptions. 16. The "SURVERYOR'S STATEMAENT" at the bottom center of the first sheet refers to only one sheet of a three sheet submittal. Please revise or remove that statement. 17. The third sheet provides no additional information. This would be the ideal place to provide the proposed plans for each lot. It would also be better if you used a scale that provides a larger image, such as 1" = 20'. 18. Please be aware that additional comments may be necessary relative to the information provided in subsequent submittals. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St.Paul, (520) 791-5608 x1184. |
| 05/23/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 24 2006 Mike Kreus Reliable Permit Management 7630 North Massingale Place Tucson, Arizona 85741 Subject: S06-051 Sunland Gardens Subdivision Record of Survey Dear Mike: Your submittal of March 6, 2006, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Record of Survey (Addressing, Landscape, Real Estate, Engineering, Zoning, Wastewater, DSD), 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 572-4292 |