Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-050
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2007 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/19/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PDEQ | PIMA COUNTY DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | Denied | Comments on file and will be faxed with letter from Patricia Gehlen when all comments have come in. |
| 01/23/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/26/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-050 Las Nubes 01/25/07 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – NPPO CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-22 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Tucson Mountains Subregional Plan Map Detail 1 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Goret COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/31/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 03/29/06 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 1/25/07 |
| 01/29/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-050 LAS NUBES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: January 29, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ON FINAL PLAT: 1.) CHANGE MILARGO TO MILAGRO ON PG. 2. 2.) LABEL APPROVED INTERIOR STREET NAME ON FINAL PLAT. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 01/29/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | S06-050 Las Nubes: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat - Request dedication language be provided to dedicate R/W on final plat. |
| 01/31/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the subdivision case number (S06-050) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the NPP Plan. Also, add the title of the subdivision to the NPP plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2) The project is subject to the provisions of the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. LUC 2.8.2. The Tentative Plat may not be approved until the SCZ application is approved. Additional restrictive notes and other modifications will be required to demonstrate compliance with the SCZ. A) Within the SCZ, excluding the Scenic Routes buffer area, all disturbed areas on the site that are visible from the Scenic Route and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. B) Along the scenic route, exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length. Submit a grading plan with the SCZ application. LUC 3.7.5.2.E 3) When using the Set Aside Methodology an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per Development Standard 1-07.0 and in conformance with Development Standard 2-15.3.5 shall be prepared for the entire site to determine the general viability, density, and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site. The Report shall include an assessment of areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of this Division. The natural resource value for an area shall be assessed by the consideration of factors such as: 1. Health, size, density, and variety of native plant species; and 2. The visual resource value of the area(s); and 3. The potential to maximize the preservation of contiguous areas of NUOS both on- and off-site. LUC 3.8.6.4 4) Revise the landscape plans to meet the tree requirements of rezoning condition 12. 5) Within the 30' scenic route buffer area, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible. Identify the scenic route buffer on the landscape plan and provide a revegetation plan. 6) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. Identify and preserve the scenic route buffer area. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5, DS 2-06.7.1.B 7) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. Identify and preserve the scenic route buffer area. DS 2-15.3.4.A 8) A street landscape border is required along Desert Shadows Drive. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2 9) The landscape borders along Goret Rd. and Desert Shadows Drive shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference the maintenance standards in Sec. 3.7.6. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1.c 10) Revise the tentative plat to label the area set aside for native plant preservation as Natural Undisturbed Open Space. LUC 3.8.6.4.B 11) Revise the landscape plan to clarify the irrigation proposal. Notes 4 and 11 are not consistent. A permanent irrigation system is required. 12) Identify specific water harvesting areas on the landscape and grading plans. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 13) Submit plans in compliance with DS 2-12.0. Identify any natural areas set aside to comply with LUC 2.8.1.7. 14) Revise the plans as necessary to comply with or document the requirements of the Hillside Site Improvement Standard. DS 9-04.0 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE REPORT IS REQUIRED PER DS 2-13.2.2.C. |
| 02/08/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S06-050 Las Nubes, Lots 1-14 and Common Areas Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 5, 2007 DUE DATE: January 31, 2007 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is February 28, 2007. Please be aware that the tentative plat has been denied and that the expiration date is at the end of this month. If an extension to continue the review of this plan is to be requested, please contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5608 ext. 1179. 2. Per your response to the previous comment, this project will not be developed as an RCP. The minimum lot size in the RX-1 zone is 36,000 sq. ft. Lot one (1) is labeled with a total gross lot area of 32, 473 sq. ft. A variance is required to allow an undersized lot. This is a self-imposed hardship where a variance may not be supported. It may be necessary to redesign the lot areas to provide the additional square footage for lot 1. See related comment 3. (Previous Comment:) Include in the title block the Common Area designations. If the proposed street is to be gated as depicted on the plan the street must be designated as private and must be labeled as such and with a Common Area designation. If the street is to be private list the street as a common area. Also include in the title block a statement that this project is a "Residential Cluster Project". DS 2-03.2.1.G 3. The SCZ buffer must be reserved in a separate common area and be maintained by the HOA. See related comment by Joseph Linville, Landscape Reviewer for the need to have the SCZ reserved as common area. In addition, if the SCZ buffer is reserved as a separate common area, the area labeled as SCZ buffer that crosses over lot one (1) will reduce the lot square footage even further. This will greatly impact the lot size and will require a major redesign of the lot areas. While there is nothing specific in the LUC requiring the SCZ to be placed in a common area it is preferred for maintenance by the HOA. An option (if the landscape requirements or criteria do not require SCZ buffers to be in common areas) is to provide a natural buffer easement over lot one and two. Along with a no build easement and provisions for the HOA to retain the responsibility for the maintenance of the natural area. Please discuss this option with Joseph Linville. (Previous Comment:) Per the legend on sheet one the property line is to be defined with a bold line. The property line that is not defined is the interior street frontage. Revise the drawing to delineate the street property line with the correct line type and consistent with property lines for each lot. Also, it is not clear if the SCZ buffer is to be included in the lot one and two square footage. The SCZ buffer should be reserved as a Common area. Define the property lines for the SCZ common area (30-foot natural buffer) and the property lines for lot one and two. DS 2-03.2.1.J 4. Per your response, this project is not to be developed under the RCP development criteria. Please revise the development designator from "O" to "D" in general note 5. (Previous Comment:) Include in general note 5 the LUC subject to section 3.6.1 and 3.5.7.1.F 5. It appears that the overlay special application has not been submitted for review. Please be aware that approval of the tentative plat is based on review and approval of the overlay special application. (Portion of the Previous Comment:) A separate application, review and approval process is required for all the overlays applicable to this site prior to approval of the tentative plat. Contact Patricia Gehlen for information on the application, process, fees and mailing labels. Patricia Gehlen's phone number is 791-5608 ext. 1179. Additional comments related to the SCZ and HDZ will be forthcoming when the overlay application submittal is reviewed. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 6. General note 12 must be revised to state that the proposed streets will be private. Previous Comment:) If this is to be a gated community the streets must be private. Please clarify if this is the case. Also contact the COT Transportation and Traffic Departments for more information on this issue. Revise general notes 24 to state private streets. DS 2-03.2.2.D 7. Please label the future curb and sidewalk. It is important to verify the location as well as the distance of the curb from the future property line in order to establish the required building setback from Goret Road. (Previous Comment:) The following information regarding the existing public right-of-way (Goret Road) will be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. The future curb and sidewalk must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. See additional comments by the Engineering reviewer. DS 2-03.2.3.D 8. If the 30-foot SCZ buffer is designated as a common area please ensure that the common area is labeled on the plan and in the title block and CC&R's. Previous Comment:) If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. DS 2-03.2.4.C 9. Staff acknowledges that a DSMR for the proposed street cross section will be applied for. It is further acknowledged that rezoning condition 13 states that every lot shall have an area 3 guest parking spaces. It is clear that the locations are preliminary at this time and that further review of the location of the parking areas will occur at time of individual permitting of each lot. Once the DSMR has been processed and approved please list the case number, date, and conditions of approval on the plat. Provide a copy of the DSMR approval letter with the future tentative plat package. (Previous Comment:) All streets are to be designed to accommodate parking lanes on both sides of the street. The proposed cross sections do not depict the required parking lanes. Please see D.S. 3-01, figure 1 and Figure 2 for more information on the required street cross-section. Revise the street width as required and details drawings for consistency with the development standards. See comments by the Engineering and Traffic reviewer for more information on street standards. DS 2-03.2.4.F and DS 2-03.2.4.G 10. After review of rezoning condition 12, it does not appear that the spacing as noted has been bet. Please contact Roger Howlett with the Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) 791-4505 for more information or clarification on this condition. Also you may contact Joseph Linville Landscape reviewer at 791-5608 ext. 1118. (Previous Comment:) Submit a separate response memo stating how all the rezoning conditions have been met. If necessary submit additional documents or drawings that clearly indicate how this drawing or proposed development has been designed to comply with the rezoning conditions. 11. It does not appear that an application for the overlay has been processed. I believe Mailing labels are good for 45 to 60 days. A new special application for the Scenic and Hillside overlay is required. Please contact Patricia Gehlen for specific information related to the application and the process. A separate review of the overlay requirements will occur at time of the special application submittal. A review for the overlay criteria has not been made but I am providing the following information (notes) that must be added to the tentative plat as part of the overlay application review process. This will save you a few comments on the actual overlay review. Add the following notes and fill in the blanks where required. 1. Include in 30 foot buffer label the notation "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 2. Add the 400-foot SCZ corridor boundary to plat. 3. Add the view corridor calculations to the plan. 4. If a color or construction materials palette is proposed , add both matrix tables, which includes the proposed exterior color name, number and manufacturer, proposed roof material type and color, required screening wall materials and color, etc. 5. Please add the appropriate following notes to the tentative plat. a) Individual SCZ case not required for each lot, but site plans, elevations, and colors must be submitted for each lot for review of compliance to Scenic Corridor Zone case number SCZ 99-05 for height, colors, and setbacks. This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. The Special application case number is _______.The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date __________, without conditions. b) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of Goret Road, not to exceed 18 feet per Rezoning condition 8 case C9-04-22 from design grade. c) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, drives, private yards, and structural improvements. All viable vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti will be preserved or relocated on the site per the Native Plant and Preservation Ordinance. d) Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. e) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Goret Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is re-vegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D f) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible Goret Road will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. Colors are as follows: (list approved colors from SCZ 99-05 case. g) Fencing and freestanding walls facing Goret Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. h) All areas between the MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. i) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Goret Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. j) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than 1-foot rise or fall over a 3-foot length. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06050tp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 02/16/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 16, 2007 SUBJECT: Las Nubes Tentative Plat- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: Parcel ID 103-19-002E & F, T13S R13E Sec33, Ward 1 REVIEWER: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S06-050 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Tentative Plat, revised Hydrology/Hydraulic Report, Pavement Section Design and Title Report and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) DS Sec.10-02.0-Section 5.3.2 of the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (COT SMDDFM): Revise the Drainage Report to provide a backwater flow depth analysis for the entire site for each wash crossing designs, including the 48" and 60" culverts as well as a study for each of the other smaller culverts. The wash crossings present a hydraulic control factor that necessitates a more detailed analysis than that provided by the Manning's equation and the HEC-5 culvert analysis. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.3: Revise the Drainage Report and Tentative Plat to satisfy Rezoning Condition Notes #17 thru #22 regarding the details of the required detention/retention basin. Refer to DS Sec.10-01 for Detention/Retention Basin design and requirements. 3) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.1.B: When address is available list the administrative / site address on the front cover of report. TENTATIVE PLAT: 1) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.C: Revise the Scour hole details on Sheet3 of 3 so that all lettering is equivalent of 0.12 point or greater in size. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Clarify on the Tentative Plat the NOS symbol in the legend. Use the solid faded line that is shown on Sheet 2 of 3 as the delineation within the symbol. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.3: Provide a copy of the preliminary development plan dated November 1, 2004. The proposed subdivision must be in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan. 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.3: Provide a letter from the developer per Rezoning Condition Note #5 stating when the $30,000 contribution towards the cost of a traffic signal at the intersection of Goret Road and Silverbell Road will be submitted. The contribution must be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. Please contact Thomas Weiderman at 837-6617 for further clarification. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.3: Provide the required documentation per Rezoning Condition Note #16 for the public meeting that is required. 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.3: Revise the Tentative Plat and Drainage Report to satisfy Rezoning Condition Notes #17 thru #22 regarding the details of the required detention/retention basin. Refer to DS Sec.10-01 for Detention/Retention Basin design and requirements. 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.6: Provide a note identifying by case number any Development Standard Modification Requests (DSMR), variances, or modifications together with the date and conditions of approval, or if the review has not been completed, a statement that it is in process. Specifically provide: a) DSMR for the required 6-foot sidewalks along Goret Road; b) A copy of the waiver from Pima County Department of Environmental Quality to allow the use of private on-site sewage disposal systems, per Rezoning Condition Note #26; c) A copy of the DSMR documentation regarding the approval of the agreement reached with Development Services Engineering Division and City of Tucson Fire, dated July 20, 2004 for the geometric design of the internal public cul-de-sac to be in accordance with Street Development Design Standards 3-01.0. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.a: Revise General Note #12 to call out private streets not public. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide all subdivision control monuments found or set. Specifically 1) the northeast corner of the subdivision, 2) the shown monument directly west of the entrance spandrel, 3) the 2 monuments adjacent to the right-of-way transition from 25-feet to 40-feet. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Provide all existing easements in plan view that are shown in the submitted Title Report. Specifically show the easements described in items 3, 5, and 6 on the Schedule B. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: Clarify if the 30-inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) located under Desert Shadow Drive is existing or proposed. If the CMP is proposed then it must be constructed entirely on the subject property or a construction and maintenance easement is required for the installation of the CMP. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J: Revise Tentative Plat to reflect the revised Drainage Report. A revised Drainage Report is required to show backwater flow depth analysis. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.3: Provide the symbol used for the water surface elevation in the legend located on Sheet 1 of 3. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Revise the Title Block to include all utilities that are within the common area. Specifically if the gas, water, electric and telephone easements are within the private street call the utilities out in the Title Block or provide the proposed easements with recordation information. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Provide a copy of the DSMR documentation regarding the approval of the agreement reached with Development Services Engineering Division and City of Tucson Fire, dated July 20, 2004 for the geometric design of the internal public cul-de-sac to be in accordance with Street Development Design Standards 3-01.0. Revise the Tentative Plat to reflect the revisions approved by the DSMR or provide revisions to the streets to be in compliance with the Street Development Standards 3-01.0. The Tentative Plat can not be approved until verification of conformance with the above DSMR agreement. 16) DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A: Provide an approved DSMR for the elimination of the required curb and 6-foot sidewalk along Goret Road. An approved DSMR is required prior to Tentative Plat approval. 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide spot elevations along the new private street at wash crossings to verify grades and positive drainage. 18) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Revise Tentative Plat to show the sight visibility triangles at the intersections of the entrance road and the private subdivision street. 19) DS Sec.3-01.3.0: Provide plan and profile of the general design of the entrance road and subdivision street to reflect the DSMR criteria and requirements. Provide call out for the locations of the 2 cross sections shown in plan view. The private paving and grading plan with plan and profiles could not be found in the submittal. 20) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.F.2: Provide a copy of the waiver from Pima County Department of Environmental Quality to allow the use of private on-site sewage disposal systems. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS: 21) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: A revised Geotechnical Report is required for this project due to the placement of fill at the wash crossings and the detention/retention requirements per Rezoning Condition Notes #17 thru #22. The soils report needs to discuss the suitability and feasibility of the project and is to include a discussion on the following: a) Description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, and other typical geotechnical data is needed for the placement of fill at all wash crossings; b) Provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas; c) Provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from building to drainage areas include minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales and proposed detention/retention basins; d) Provide infiltration test results for the required retention basin; e) Recommendations need to be incorporated into the conceptual grading plan, Tentative Plat, and Drainage Report. GENERAL COMMENTS: The following items are required at the Grading Plan Stage. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html A Floodplain Use Permit will be required for all work proposed in the floodplain or erosion hazard area. Please provide a revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report, and a revised Geotechnical Engineering Report at re-submittal. The revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 02/22/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 22, 2007 Jeff Stanley Stanley Engineering and Drainage PO Box 1888 Tucson, AZ 85702 Subject: S06-050 Las Nubes Tentative Plat Dear Jeff: Your submittal of January 3, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (PDEQ, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Landscape, Zoning Engineering, DSD), 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD), 2 Copies Revised drainage reports (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Environmental Resource Report (Landscape, DSD) PLEASE NOTE THAT A WRITTEN EXTENSION REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CDRC MANAGER PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF THIS TENTATIVE PLAT. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 297-3944 |