Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-033
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/16/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-033 LEE ST RCP/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 5/16/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved with the following condition: 1.) Correct Lee Estates Book 14 to Book 46 (sheet 2) on Final Plat. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** es |
| 05/18/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: Lee Street RCP S06-033 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL : May 18, 2006 DUE DATE: May 24, 2006 The Zoning Review Section at Development Services verifies that the tentative plat meets the requirements of the Land Use Code, subject to the following requirement. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. For setback purposes building heights are measured from design grade elevation rather than from finished floor elevation. Specify in keynotes 2 and 27 on sheet 2 of 2 and in the typical building setback detail information on sheet 1 of 2 that the building heights stated are measured from design grade. LUC 3.2.6.4 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/18/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/22/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-033 Lee Street RCP 05/19/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) – Elevations & Photos CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: May 24, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: March 13, 2006 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 005/16/06 Urban Planning and Design Comments S06-033 Lee Street RCP February 17, 2006 Because this project is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another. The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Please submit elevations illustrating how this requirement will be satisfied. The Plans call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that those pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped. [An active/passive adult recreational facility, which includes a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. The detention basin (Common Area “B”) can serve a dual purpose with the placement of required amenities within and surrounding the basin. For a project this size amenities can include, but are not limited to: a table, an outdoor grill, and/or shaded sitting area(s). The slopes surrounding the basin should be adjusted to provide handicap accessibility to the amenities by way of an all-weather ADA compliant path that connects to the proposed sidewalks within the subdivision. Please illustrate on the landscape plan how this requirement will met. Any proposed masonry walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These walls shall incorporate on of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of both. Please add this note to the “general notes” section. Per Development Standard 2-10.3.2.B & C and LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3, the RCP is less than four (4) acres and must be compatible in architectural design with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of those existing single-family attached or detached structures along the same block frontage and the block frontage across the street, and/or development on the opposite lot corners. Massing of proposed structures to existing structures will be a part of this review. The tentative plat should identify the height of existing structures that surround the project site. Proposed height must be indicated on the tentative plat. Please submit plans showing how the RCP will comply with these design requirements. Photos, dimensioned elevations, or a combination of both must be submitted. |
| 05/22/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: MAY 22, 2006 TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE SUBJECT: Lee Street RCP TENTATIVE PLAT (SECOND REVIEW) Job S06-033 T14S, R14E, Sec 2 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Engineering/Floodplain Review Section comments regarding the Development Standards were addressed. D.S. 2-03.0 Platting Procedures 1. The proposed Basis of Bearing (GEODETIC NORTH BY GPS OBSERVATION) is not recommended. Please follow the recognized techniques spelled out in the Development Standards 2-03.6.5. 2. All new sidewalk within city right of way local roads shall be 5 feet wide per City of Tucson Development Standards 3-01-3.3 Pedestrian Circulation Paths. Please revise any reference to a 4-foot along public right of way sidewalk in plan view and typical sections (i.e. sections 1/1 & 4/1). 3. On sheet 1 General Note 27 appears to have a typo (COMMON ARE = COMMON AREA) 4. On Sheet 2 General Note 25 what type of PC/COT standard is this ramp? Keynote 7 is more descriptive versus keynote 25. 5. Detention/Retention basins need to be stand alone common areas so that they are in a surveyable manner at the Final Plat stage. Please separate/callout out the basin as its own common area. 6. At this time there were no comments in regards to the Drainage Report. The Drainage report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only and any changes to the future Grading Plans may require modifications to the Drainage Report. If you have any questions or would like to meet with me before your next submittal, you may contact me at 791-5640 ext.1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/22/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | May 19, 2006 TO: Steve Gregor, P.E. Gregor Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Lee Street RCP, Lots 1-5 and Common Areas A & B Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S06-033 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project is hereby approved as submitted. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/26/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/09/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | S06-033 Lee Street RCP: Tentative Plat Review - No comment. |
| 06/23/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 23, 2006 Steve Gregor, PE Gregor Engineering, Inc. 5232 East Pima Street, Suite A Tucson, AZ 85712 Subject: S06-033 Lee Street RCP Tentative Plat Dear Steve: Your submittal of May 11, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 319-1181 |