Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-033
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/10/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/15/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Conditioned upon meeting Tucson Water requirements for water service. |
| 02/17/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/21/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-033 GREGOR ENGINEERING INC LEE STREET RCP ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 02/21/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Five individual lots approved for curb side service off the private street. APC's are to be placed and removed from the curb side collection area on the day of service. |
| 03/06/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: Lee Street RCP S06-033 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: March 8, 2006 DUE DATE: March 13, 2006 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before February 9, 2007. LUC 4.1.7.1 2. Fill in the S06-033 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street unless parking is provided in common areas, distributed throughout the subdivision at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling. The proposed private street is not designed to provide for any parking and vehicle parking is not allowed in the turnaround area as shown on the plat. Revise plat drawing and street cross section to accommodate required visitor parking on the street. Parking spaces required for visitors will be uniformly distributed throughout the project and may be located in parking areas or on streets designed with designated parking lanes. Additional parking spaces located on individual lots will not be considered to satisfy this requirement, as these spaces are located on private property and cannot be used by the guests of other residents. DS 3-01.6.2.C.2 DS 3-01.2.4.D LUC 3.6.1.4.F.2.b 4. A minimum of 25% of lots must be provided with barrier-free accessibility. Provide a general note stating which of the five proposed lots will be barrier-free. DS 2-10.3.1.D LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 5. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of LUC 3.6.1.5 and DS 2-03.6.6. DS 2-10.3.2.E 6. For projects of less that four (4) acres in size, it is required that drawings and photographs be submitted to show how the architectural compatibility requirements of Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3 are met. Provide photos/ drawings as required. DS 2-10.3.2.C LUC 3.6.1.4.A.3 7. Dimension the perimeter lot line building setbacks on all sides for both the first and second floor building heights. For setbacks purposes building heights are measured above design grade elevation rather than from finished floor elevation. Provide elevation drawings indicate the height of the exterior building wall above the ground for each proposed unit to verify that setbacks are met. LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-10.3.1.A 8. Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from vehicle travel lanes by means of curbing grade separation, barriers, railing or other means. Revise drawing and street cross section to show physical separation. DS 2-08.4.1 LUC 3.6.1.4.G.2 9. The pedestrian circulation system must be continuous and provide connections to all proposed units. Show the sidewalk to wrap around the fire turnaround area. DS 2-08.3.1 LUC 3.6.1.4.G.2 10. Revise the book and page number for Lee Estates (to the east of the project area) on sheet 2 of 2. This should read "Book 14, Page 67". DS 2-03.2.1.D.2 11. Show the footprint of a unit or provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner lot, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard setback. These typicals are to be fully dimensioned and are to be drawn at a larger scale than the tentative plat. It is recommended that, if possible, each lot be designed so that the largest proposed unit fits and still complies with Code requirements. This provides the greatest flexibility to the builder in terms of the size of the unit that can be sold for each lot. If this cannot be done, use the footprint of the largest unit that will fit on each lot. Include an example showing setbacks for garages/carports. DS 2-10.3.1.B LUC 3.2.6.5 LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2 12. Show the location and dimension widths of any existing or proposed easements. Add the recordation information by docket and page numbers for all easements, or state that they will be "by final plat". DS 2-03.2.3.C DS 2-03.2.4.J 13. The sight visibility triangles are drawn incorrectly on sheet 2 of 2. A 20-foot stem dimension is required. Revise. DS 3-01.5.2.A 14. When developed with a density increase, the RCP must provide for conveniently located commonly-owned recreation facilities, designed for, and usable by, both adults and children residing within the project. Twenty-five (25) percent of the site area that is not part of the site coverage is to be commonly owned or set aside as accessible to all residents of the development. Show on the plat the area and types of recreational amenities to be provided for the project. 15. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement by providing a general note and adding a detail showing how mechanical equipment screening will be accomplished. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.2 LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 16. Residential Cluster Projects developed with density increase must meet at least one (1) of the development categories listed in LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B. Indicate on the plat which of these criteria are being used to meet the requirement. 17. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | March 4, 2006 TO: Steve Gregor, P.E. Gregor Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Lee Street RCP, Lots 1-5 and Common Areas A & B Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-033 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-033, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 9 to read as follows ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 2. Show the size of the existing public sewers shown on this sheet. Subject to the above required revisions, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/07/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-033 Lee Street RCP 03/06/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: March 13, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other (elevations, photos) REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 02/17/06 Urban Planning and Design Comments S06-033 Lee Street RCP February 17, 2006 Because this project is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another. The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Please submit elevations illustrating how this requirement will be satisfied. The Plans call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that those pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped. [An active/passive adult recreational facility, which includes a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. The detention basin (Common Area “B”) can serve a dual purpose with the placement of required amenities within and surrounding the basin. For a project this size amenities can include, but are not limited to: a table, an outdoor grill, and/or shaded sitting area(s). The slopes surrounding the basin should be adjusted to provide handicap accessibility to the amenities by way of an all-weather ADA compliant path that connects to the proposed sidewalks within the subdivision. Please illustrate on the landscape plan how this requirement will met. Any proposed masonry walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These walls shall incorporate on of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of both. Please add this note to the “general notes” section. Per Development Standard 2-10.3.2.B & C and LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3, the RCP is less than four (4) acres and must be compatible in architectural design with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of those existing single-family attached or detached structures along the same block frontage and the block frontage across the street, and/or development on the opposite lot corners. Massing of proposed structures to existing structures will be a part of this review. The tentative plat should identify the height of existing structures that surround the project site. Proposed height must be indicated on the tentative plat. Please submit plans showing how the RCP will comply with these design requirements. Photos, dimensioned elevations, or a combination of both must be submitted. |
| 03/08/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 5-foot screen wall is required to screen any parking areas from adjacent residentially zoned property. Revise the landscape plan to include the required screen wall in accordance with LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Note the height and type of material/construction. 2. Landscape borders along parking areas where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. Provide concrete wheel stops or protection for landscaped areas in front of parking spaces. 3. Add the subdivision case number (S06-033) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Plat, Landscape Plan and NPPO Plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. Refer to DS 2-07.2.2 and DS 2-06.5.4 for the specific content required for Grading information on the landscape plan. Revise landscape plan to include required content and specifications. Grading information on the landscape plan shall include contour lines, spot elevations, percent slope across the site and direction of slope of paved areas, existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites. DS 2-07.0, LUC 3.7.4.3.B 5. With the next NPP plan submittal, provide photographs of the two saguaros that exist on the site. |
| 03/10/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-033; Lee Street RCP: Tentative Plat Review - A current title report is requested due to a recent change of ownership. |
| 03/13/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: MARCH 13, 2006 TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE SUBJECT: Lee Street RCP TENTATIVE PLAT (FIRST REVIEW) Job S06-033 T14S, R14E, Sec 2 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Engineering/Floodplain Review Section comments regarding the Development Standards were addressed. D.S. 2-03.0 Platting Procedures 1. Location map appears cluttered with excess parcel information, for example 10/96. Is this additional information needed? If not please remove. 2. Verify that all existing easements are drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes are included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. D.S. 2-03.2.3.C 3. Verify if there are existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site, if so they shall be shown. D.S. 2-03.2.3.G 4. Verify that all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they are to be public or private. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 5. Label curb returns radii. 6. Due to the frequency of curb opening for driveways it appears that the overall length of curb opening exceeds the length of vertical curbs; therefore a 2 feet separation is needed from the back of curb to sidewalk. 7. The drainage report states that there is minimal offsite runoff acceptance points, but verify that there will be no adverse drainage affects to existing adjacent lots by drawing locations and indicating types of off-site runoff acceptance points on these drawings. D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.7 8. A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The City Engineer or designee will determine the need for such a plan. D.S. 2-03.2.4.K 9. Grading Plan. Generally, the grading plans may be submitted for review upon approval of the tentative plat. Should the applicant wish, the grading plan could be submitted after the second resubmittal of the tentative plat; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is in conformance with an approved tentative plat. In the case of a tentative plat submitted in conjunction with a rezoning request, the grading plan and the tentative plat cannot be approved until thirty (30) days after adoption of the rezoning ordinance. D.S. 2-03.5.2 10. It is recommended that the maintenance responsibility for all drainage facilities (including detention basins) be in any future CC&R's and a maintenance checklist should be provided similar to the checklist provided in the Drainage Report. This will allow the HomeOwners Association access to the list and facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 11. At this time there were no comments in regards to the Drainage Report. The Drainage report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only and any changes to the Tentative Plat or future Grading Plans may require modifications to the Drainage Report. If you have any questions or would like to meet with me before your next submittal, you may contact me at 791-5640 ext.1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/14/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: March 14, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-033 Lee Street RCP T141402 (121-11) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove all shading and the footprints for the buildings. If that is no t possible, please dash the lines so they don’t look like another parcel. Add interior bearings for the lot lines, dimensions and bearings for the street centerlines and the complete curve data. The area west of the new private street, just off Lee Street needs to be labeled and dimensions, bearings and curve data added. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 03/17/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic trips in 24 hr period - 48 |
| 03/20/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 20, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S06-033 Lee Street RCP: Tentative Plat Review(2-10-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 04/04/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision. (DS 3-01.2.4.D) 2. Label the dimension of the radii returns at the new street. 18' minimum required. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/17/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 1. Change Section 12 to 10 (west of Section 11) on Location map. 2. Delete all parcel codes of adjacent lots on pg. 2. 3. Delete direction and spell out Avenue of N. Arcadia Ave on pg. 2. 4. Change Lee Estates Book 14, Page 16 to Book 46, Page 67 on pg. 2. |
| 04/21/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#156671 February 22, 2006 Gregor Engineering, Inc. Attn: Mr. Steve Gregor 5232 E Pima St., Suite A Tucson, AZ 85712 Dear Mr. Gregor: SUBJECT: LEE STREET RCP Lots 1-5 S06-033 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review on February 10, 2006. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the pole unit number 40. Please note the pole will need to be changed out for riser to feed this project. This will require an additional easement for the transformer and possible dedication by final plat for primary cable. Please note conflict with service may result in possible billable costs. Enclosed is a copy of TEP’s facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. Also enclosed is a copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision. This is not a preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within thirty (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to kclark@tep.com. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 918-8271. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson M. Gerson, New West Development |
| 04/26/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 26, 2006 Steve Gregor, PE Gregor Engineering, Inc. 5232 East Pima Street, Suite A Tucson, AZ 85712 Subject: S06-033 Lee Street RCP Tentative Plat Dear Steve: Your submittal of February 10, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Final Plat (Landscape, Community Planning, Addressing, Wastewater, Real Estate, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning Engineering, DSD), 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD), 2 Copies Color elevations or photos (Community Planning, DSD) 2 Copies Current title report (Real Estate, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 319-1181 |