Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-018
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/19/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The Landscape Border Table on sheet 1 of 6 indicates that no screening is required or provided. Revise table to list that a 5-foot wall is required/provided for screening of parking lot areas from adjacent residentially zoned properties, and a 30-inch screen is required/provided to screen parking area along Pima Street, which is a designated Major Street and Route. Revise table to indicate all required/provided screening and label the required screening and screen walls on the landscape plan. When a new development is using an existing screen wall on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of a recorded covenant for the wall is required. Once completed, provide a copy of recorded covenant and add the docket and page of recordation to the plat. DS 2-04.2.1.A.15 2. The landscape Table on sheet 1 of 6 states that the street landscape border is 113 linear feet and requires 3 trees. The LUC requirement is one tree for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress and egress points. For 113 linear feet of landscape border, a total of 4 canopy trees is required and compliance is shown on the landscape plan drawing. Revise table accordingly. LUC 3.7.2.4 DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f 3) Site existing and future sight visibility triangles are incorrectly dimensioned on the plat and landscape plan. A 20-foot stem dimension (the dimension parallel to the driveway/PAAL) is required. Revise to show SVT's correctly. Refer to DS 3-05.5.2.A for SVT dimensions. 4) Per rezoning conditions 9 and 10, basin design is to be in accordance with DS 10-01. Refer to p. 78 and 79 for design criteria regarding basin slopes and depths. Note that structures such as retaining walls are acceptable for up to only 35 percent of the above-ground basin perimeter. The portion of the common area that provides for storage and flow of water in underground pipes is not considered to be part of the basin. Revise plan. Note that rezoning condition 8 states that basin floors shall not be flat, and that rezoning condition 10 reads "rectangular basin shapes shall be avoided unless necessitated or accompanied by recreational or visual amenities within the basin". Revise plan accordingly to demonstrate compliance with all rezoning conditions and with DS 2-10. Specify the depth of earthen bottom basins in cross sections on the tentative plat sheet 3 of 3. DS 10-01 DS 2-05.2.4.U |
| 05/22/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | May 19, 2006 TO: James King Rick Engineering Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Alamo Lofts, Units 1-22 and Common Areas A & B Tentative/Development Condominium Plat – 2nd Submittal S06-018 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested on February 23, 2006, please provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 11 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. Subject to the above required revisions, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat/final plat/development plan. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/22/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-018 Alamo Lofts 05/19/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-019 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: May 25, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other - Photos REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 05/16/06 Per rezoning condition 5, the applicant is to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent residential development by submitting colored elevations and photos of the surrounding properties. Elevations have been provided; however, need photos of adjacent residential development for comparison to proposed project. |
| 05/24/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: May 24, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Alamo Lofts, 6105 E. Pima Street Tentative Plat S06-018 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 01 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Adhere to rezoning conditions 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12. The TP will not be approved until these conditions have been satisfied. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 5. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The clear area for the dumpster in the refuse enclosure shall be 10'x10' minimum. Revise as required. 6. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 3. Adhere to rezoning conditions 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12. The DR will not be accepted until these conditions have been satisfied. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office, 520) 879-8010 fax, C:/6105 E. Pima St CDRC2 |
| 05/25/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/25/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-018 ALAMO LOFTS/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 5/24/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: 1.) Add Road to Wilmot (Southern most) on Location Map. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** es |
| 06/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-018 Alamo Lofts: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat "Review On Sheet 1 of 3, request clarification to item 9.b. - Also, request confirmation that no changes have occurred to the 3/5/05 title report that was provided. |
| 07/20/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S06-018 Alamo Lofts Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 07/20/06 DUE DATE: 5/25/06 COMMENTS: The following comments will remain as a reminder to the reviewer. As per our meeting of 7/20/06 these comments were generated on the first review. 1. This project has been submitted as a Residential Cluster Project, which is not required. The rezoning of this property to R3 allows a density of 36 units per acre. The property being a total of 1.98 acres would allow up to 71 units. A RCP only benefits a project that requires higher density or reduced setbacks, both of which are not required for this project. Please remove RCP data and information from plans and tabulation section of page 1. The foot prints of the buildings will be required to be indicated along with any limited use areas for each structure. If two story structures are to be used along the east side of the property in order to meet the required setbacks, please clearly indicate these locations. 2. DS 2-052.2.B.3 The conditions of approval for the rezoning of this property has been provided on page 1. In addition to the required conditions provide a written response clearly indicating how each condition of rezoning has been meet. 3. DS 2-05.2.2B.5 List the proposed use of the property. The use indicated (single family residential RCP7) is incorrect. The use should be indicated as "Family Dwelling "P", subject to: Sec. 3.5.7.1.F." 4. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 A back up spur as per DS 3-05.2.2.D (Figure 2) is required at the end of all PAALs toward the east side of the property. Including the required 3' radius and 3' clear area behind the backup spur. This is to provide a turn around area for the vehicles in the garages. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.E Provide a dimension from the property line to the existing and future curb location. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable zoning building setback lines, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. Provide elevation drawings clearly indicating the heights of walls as measured from the adjacent grade to the top of wall in order to verify required setbacks. As per our meeting the is conflicting information on the elevation plans. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.K Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. A 5' wide striped crosswalk is required between the garages and the PAAL located within the required pedestrian refuge area. Provide a keynote clearly indicating the location of the pedestrian refuge areas between the garages and the PAALs. A sidewalk is required along the west side of the buildings between the PAAL and the building. Clearly indicate the pedestrian circulation path to the front door of each unit. Clearly indicate the required width of all sidewalks. Minimum of 4' in width. Clearly indicate the required accessible pedestrian path through out the entire site including crosswalks, handicap ramps, sidewalks, etc. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. If a DSMR is applied for any of the above, provide the case number, date of approval and any conditions of the DSMR on the plan. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.P The provided parking calculations are done as per single family dwellings but should be done as per multi family dwellings per LUC Sec. 3.3.4. Please revise parking calculations on page 1 in the Tabulation section. Provide floor plans for each type of dwelling unit. Floor plans are required in order to verify the provided number of bedrooms which the parking calculations are based on. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 11. Depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 @ ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-018tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 07/21/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 21, 2006 James King Rick Engineering Company 1745 East River Road, #101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S06-018 Alamo Lofts Tentative Plat Dear Rick: Your submittal of May 11, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Final Plat (Landscape, Community Planning, Real Estate, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning Engineering, DSD), 2 Copies Current Title Report (Real Estate, DSD), 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Elevations and Floor Plans (Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |