Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-018
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/13/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/17/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved January 17, 2006. |
| 01/20/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-018 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY ALAMO LOFTS ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 02/02/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 2, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S06-018 Alamo Lofts: Tentative Plat Staff has no comments. |
| 02/03/2006 | PMCLAUG1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the subdivision case number (S06-018) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and NPPO Plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 DS 2-07.2.1.B.2 2. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") in size for microfilming purposes. Revise all text within the key map to on sheet L-1 to meet this minimum archiving standard. DS2-03.2.1.C 3. Add the proposed zoning (R-3) to landscape plan general note 2 and provide reference numbers on the landscape plan for the rezoning case (C9-05-19) and any other reference numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add the legal description and address of the site to the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B 4. Revise the title of the project on the Landscape Plan, which reads "Pima Street Property" to be consistent with that on the Tetative Plat, which reads "Alamo Lofts". 5. The Landscape Border Table on sheet 1 of 6 indicates that no screening is required or provided. However, a 5-foot wall is required for screening of parking lot areas from adjacent residentially zoned properties, and a 30-inch screen is required along Pima Street, which is a designated Major Street and Route. Revise table to indicate all required/provided screening and indicate the required screening and walls on the landscape plan and tentative plat drawings. NOTE: When a new development is using an existing screen wall on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of a recorded covenant for the wall is required. Provide a copy of recorded covenant. DS 2-04.2.1.A.15 6. Landscape Table on sheet 1 of 6 states that the street landscape border is 113 linear feet and requires 3 trees. The requirement is one tree for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress and egress points. For 113 linear feet of landscape border a total of 4 canopy trees is required. Revise table and plan accordingly. Also, dimension the length and width of landscape borders on landscape plan sheet 3 of 6. LUC 3.7.2.4 DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f 7. Use keynote 5 indicator to show the required 10-foot landscape border location on tentative plat sheet 2 of 3. Also, keynote 6 does not appear on this drawing. Revise. 8. Site visibility triangles are incorrectly dimensioned on the plat and landscape plan. Revise to show SVT's correctly. Refer to DS 3-05.5.2.A 9. Per rezoning conditions 9 and 10, Basin design is to be in accordance with DS 10-01. Refer to p. 78 and 79 for design criteria regarding basin slopes and depths. Note that structures such as retaining walls, including grouted rip rap at 1:1 are acceptable for up to only 35 percent of basin perimeter. Revise plan. In addition, multi-use basins shall be required to conform to the following slope-to-depth ratios for basins less than 3 feet deep: Maximum 2:1 for protected side slopes and 3:1 for unprotected side slopes. Note that rezoning condition 8 states that basin floors shal not be flat, and that rezoning condition 11 reads "rectangular basin shapes shall be avoided unless necessitated or accompanied by recreational or visual amenities within the basin. Revise plan accordingly to demonstrate compliance with all rezoning conditions. Specify the depth of the vertical basin in cross section G on tentative plat sheet 3 of 3. Indicate the depth of the earthen bottom basin correctly in cross section E on sheet 3 of 3. DS 10-01 DS 2-05.2.4.U 10. To prevent vehicles from striking the railing shown in cross section E/3, wheelstop curbs will be required in the parking spaces adjacent to the the north propety line. Also, to avoid vehicle overhang in landscaped areas, wheelstops will be required in parking spaces such as those located near the south property line at the street landscape border along Pima Street. Revise tentative plat drawing and typical parking detail F on sheet 3 of 3 to show all wheelstop curbs where required, correctly dimensioned at 2-1/2 feet (rather than 2 feet as shown in detail) from front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C 11. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Revise landscape plan sheet 3 of 6 to show required canopy trees evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. 12. The street landscape border shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners assosication. It is not clear from the plat or landscape plan where the common area "A" boundaries are. Define the common area boundaries clearly with a solid line. A separate common area inset drawing may be used for delineating the common areas clearly. Label the street landscape border as part of common area "A" in the title block. Also, label on the plat and landscape plan drawings where the "recreation areas" identified in the plat title block are located. LUC 3.7.2.4.2.c 13. In the location map on the Native Plant Preservation Plan sheet 1 of 2, revise the label of "Ridgeway Road" to read "Sahuara Avenue" since Ridgeway Road is located further east than indicated. Also, add street labels to the location map on the tentative plat sheet 1 of 6. DS 2-03.2.1.D.2 |
| 02/03/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * No provisions shown or stated for recycling. * No detail of enclosures. (Condition of approval) * Access for service to enclosure is OK. |
| 02/07/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-018 Alamo Lofts 02/07/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-019 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: February 13, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 1/30/2006 The Alamo Lofts tentative plat appears to be proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), and therefore must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Pantano East Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. Please correct rezoning condition 12 by adding the word perimeter to the end of the sentence. Per rezoning condition 5, the applicant is to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent residential development by submitting colored elevations and photos of the surrounding properties. Please provide photos to staff for comparison to proposed project. Common Area “A” is denoted on the tentative plat for use as recreation. Besides the sidewalk please provide other passive or active amenities within this area that can be used by the residents. This could include benches, barbecues, play equipment, etc. The sidewalk alone does not make for an amenity. The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual encourages the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. Trees and shrubs have only been shown within the common area areas along the east property line and landscape border at the north and south. Additional trees or shrubs along the entrances to the units would add to the design. Staff would suggest adding landscaping within these areas. |
| 02/07/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-018 Alamo Lofts 02/14/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-019 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: February 13, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 1/30/2006 The Alamo Lofts tentative plat appears to be proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), and therefore must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Pantano East Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. Please correct rezoning condition 12 by adding the word perimeter to the end of the sentence. Per rezoning condition 5, the applicant is to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent residential development by submitting colored elevations and photos of the surrounding properties. Please provide photos to staff for comparison to proposed project. Common Area “A” is denoted on the tentative plat for use as recreation. Besides the sidewalk please provide other passive or active amenities within this area that can be used by the residents. This could include benches, barbecues, play equipment, etc. The sidewalk alone does not make for an amenity. The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual encourages the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. Trees and shrubs have only been shown within the common area areas along the east property line and landscape border at the north and south. Additional trees or shrubs along the entrances to the units would add to the design. Staff would suggest adding landscaping within these areas. |
| 02/10/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-018 ALAMO LOFTS/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: February 9, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add Section numbers to Location Map. Add Road to Wilmot and add Tanque Verde to Location Map. Change 10-58 to 10-68 and 11-87 to 11-83 on Location Map. Add BK 4, PG 19 to Catalina Heights and BK 4, PG 49 to Catalina Heights Annex on pg. 2. jg |
| 02/10/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Conditioned upon meeting Tucson Water requirements for water service. |
| 02/14/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: February 22, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Alamo Lofts, 6105 E. Pima Street Tentative Plat S06-018 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 01 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Adhere to rezoning conditions 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. 4. Re-zoning condition no. 10 is repeated, is there another condition that is supposed to take no. 10's place? Revise as required. 5. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) (service vehicle) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 10. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Show Tentative plat (S06-018) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 13. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The service vehicle cannot back-up in excess of 40 feet to exit the property. 14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 15. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 16. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 17. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 3. Adhere to rezoning conditions 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6105 E. Pima St CDRC |
| 02/14/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) Sahuarita, Az. 85629 FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: February 13, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-018 Alamo Lofts T141401 (121-01) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * x Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for the submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove the shading, hatching and rip-rap symbols. The limited use common area needs to be labeled as a separate common area, unless it is part of Common Area “A”. If so, the lines between the street and the areas around the buildings need to be dashed. Add the interior bearings. Add the section tie to the subdivision boundary, with bearing and dimension. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 02/15/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: ALAMO LOFTS S06-018 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 13, 2006. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Nancy DiMaria Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 02/15/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 211 |
| 02/16/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-018 Alamo Lofts Tentative, A current title report should be made available to staff for review, other than that, no comment. |
| 02/27/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 23, 2006 TO: James King Rick Engineering Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Alamo Lofts, Units 1-22 and Common Areas A & B Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-018 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-018, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 11 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 2. The existing public sewer line to which this project is connect does subsequently connect to the existing sewer line on N Rook Avenue. Show how the existing sewers are accurately connected and show the size and Pima County plan number for both existing public sewers. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 02/27/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/02/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S06-018 Alamo Lofts Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 03/02/06 DUE DATE: 02/13/06 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 02/12/07. 2. This project has been submitted as a Residential Cluster Project, which is not required. The rezoning of this property to R3 allows a density of 36 units per acre. The property being a total of 1.98 acres would allow up to 71 units. A RCP only benefits a project that requires higher density or reduced setbacks, both of which are not required for this project. Please remove RCP data and information from plans and tabulation section of page 1. The rezoning condition #1 requires that a Development Plan be submitted for this project. Indicate in the title block that this project is a "Tentative/Development" plan. This project has been reviewed per DS 2-03 and DS 2-05. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.D In the location map indicate the location of Ridgeway Road and Alamo Avenue. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S06-018. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all tentative plat sheets including the NPPO and landscape sheets. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 List as a general note: "Existing zoning is R1." 6. DS 2-052.2.B.3 This platting is in conjunction with a rezoning case, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is R3." The conditions of approval for the rezoning of this property has been provided on page 1. In addition to the required conditions provide a written response clearly indicating how each condition of rezoning has been meet. Condition #9 has been duplicated as #10. Condition #12 regarding "The pedestrian circulation path, in any form, must be free from inundation during runoff from a ten year storm." , is not on the plans, please provide. Renumber the remainder of notes. 7. DS 2-05.2.2B.5 List the proposed use of the property. The use indicated (single family residential RCP7) is incorrect. The use should be indicated as "Family Dwelling "P", subject to: Sec. 3.5.7.1.F." 8. DS 2-02.2.2.B.7 Reference the special overlay zone by adding a note stating that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 9. DS 2-05.2.3.B If applicable, show all easements on the plan as well as recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on the site. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 A two foot shy area is required between the PAAL and the property line along the west side of the property. See engineering comments. The shy area as well as the required landscape wall (see rezoning condition #13) must be maintained on the property. A back up spur as per DS 3-05.2.2.D (Figure 2) is required at the end of all PAALs toward the east side of the property. Including the required 3' radius and 3' clear area behind the backup spur. This is to provide a turn around area for the vehicles in the garages. Provide a dimension for the width of the PAAL at the access to the property. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.E Provide a dimension from the property line to the existing and future curb location. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable zoning building setback lines, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. Provide elevation drawings clearly indicating the heights of walls as measured from the adjacent grade to the top of wall in order to verify required setbacks. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.K Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. A 5' wide striped crosswalk is required between the garages and the PAAL located within the required pedestrian refuge area. Provide a keynote clearly indicating the location of the pedestrian refuge areas between the garages and the PAALs. A sidewalk is required along the west side of the buildings between the PAAL and the building. Clearly indicate the pedestrian circulation path to the front door of each unit. Clearly indicate the required width of all sidewalks. Minimum of 4' in width. Clearly indicate the required accessible pedestrian path through out the entire site including crosswalks, handicap ramps, sidewalks, etc. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.P The provided parking calculations are done as per single family dwellings but should be done as per multi family dwellings per LUC Sec. 3.3.4. Please revise parking calculations on page 1 in the Tabulation section. Provide floor plans for each type of dwelling unit. Florr plans are requied in order to verify the provided number of bedrooms which the parking calculations are based on. On the floor plans clearly indicate the size of the garage. The minimum required parking space size is 10 x 18 because of the adjacent wall in a garage. Each garage, if parking 2 vehicles in it, would then be required to be a minimum of 18 x 20. As per DS 3-05.2.3.C Wheel stops or barriers are required at any parking spaces that would allow overhanging into landscape areas or reducing the sidewalk width to less than the required 4'. If wheel stops are used, clearly indicate on the plans the location of each required wheel stop. In the typical parking space detail the wheel stop loction is indicated as 2' from curb. The correct dimension is a minimum of 2'6" from curb, please correct. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.T Clearly indicate vehicle maneuverability for the refuse container. See engineering comments. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal, and billboards) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. 19. Depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 @ ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-018tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 03/06/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 6, 2006 James King Rick Engineering Company 1745 East River Road, #101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S06-018 Alamo Lofts Tentative Plat Dear Rick: Your submittal of January 13, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Final Plat (Environmental Services, Landscape, Community Planning, Addressing, Wastewater, Real Estate, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning Engineering, DSD), 2 Copies Current Title Report (Real Estate, DSD), 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Elevations and Floor Plans (Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |