Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-255
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/17/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 21, 2006 TO: Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Southgate Business Park, Lots 1-5, Units 1-38 Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S05-255 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-255, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Two additional sheets were submitted with this plan, thus, an additional $100.00 should have been paid. Item 9 of this letter will include this amount for the next review. Please follow the sewer improvement plan review comments provided for G-2006-026 and incorporate those that apply to this project accordingly so that they are synchronized. SHEET 7. Show the proposed sewer all the way to its point of connection to the existing public sewer. SHEET 7. Show the size of the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. SHEET 7. Show the same elevations for the storm drain and the proposed sewer at their crossing, so it matches the elevations shown on G-2006-026. A revised Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents was sent to your office on March 20, 2006. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve of the tentative plat/development plan. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $139.00 ($39.00 for 3rd review + $100.00 for two additional sheets received with 2nd submittal) made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/24/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT has not received a copy of the traffic study on this project * access control has not been shown on the plans - this needs to be defined * the driveways on Ajo Way, SR-86, lie in ADOT jurisdiction and a permit will be required and built to ADOT standards * there is no justification for two driveways on Ajo Way without proper documentation - one may be allowed? If you have any questions or comments I can be reached at 620-5435. Thank you. TM. ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 03/27/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-255 Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: March 27, 2006 DUE DATE: March 29, 2006 The Zoning Review Section at Development Services verifies that the tentative plat meets the requirements of the Land Use Code, subject to the following requirement. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. All sidewalks must be ADA compliant with the required truncated domes rather than the grooves indicating grade changes and pedestrian crosswalks. Indicate the truncated domes on the tentative plat/development plan as required. IBC/ANS If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/29/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-255 SOUTHGATE BUSINESS PARK/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: March 28, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL BUILDING ADDRESSES AND UNIT NUMBERS WILL BE ASSIGNED TO THE CONDO UNITS UPON RECORDATION OF PLAT. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 03/30/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | S05-255 Southgate Business Park: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat. No Comment. |
| 04/03/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-255 Southgate Business Park 03/31/06 (X) Tentative Plat/Development Plan () (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-32 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan & Western Hills/Pueblo-Sunland Gardens GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: March 29, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 1/23/06 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 3/29/2006 |
| 04/10/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: April 10, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat S05-255 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat (See below) The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we recommend approval at this time. The Engineering Division Requests a copy of future submittals since comments by other reviewers may result in changes that may impact the Engineering Division approval. If any changes are made to the vehicle use areas, the resubmittal must demonstrate that loading zones and solid waste enclosures are accessible. Please note that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required as part of the grading permit submittal. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 04/13/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP submittal: 1. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 39 states that the maximum driveway width for business districts is 35'. A 3-lane section for the entrance can be accommodated with 2-12' lanes and 1-11' lane. 2. The northern most access point does not seem to satisfy rezoning condition 15. While the submitted TIA states that this access does not meet numerical warrants for a deceleration lane, there are horizontal and vertical alignment changes that also need to be taken into consideration. And, a deceleration lane is a condition of rezoning. The Developer has the option to seek a change of rezoning conditions, but Traffic will not support such a request. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/14/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 14, 2006 Tri H. Miller Rick Engineering, Co. 1748 E. River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S05-255 Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat Dear Tri: Your submittal of December 21, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (ADOT, Wastewater, Traffic, DSD) 3 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (ADOT, Traffic, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |