Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-255
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse enclosure detail OK. * Service access and enclosure detail OK. |
| 01/12/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Pete McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-255 Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: January 12, 2005 DUE DATE: January 23, 2005 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before December 20, 2006. 2. Fill in the S05-255 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. In general notes 30, 31 and 32 on sheet 1, and in rezoning conditions 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14 on sheet 2, question marks appear in various places where there should be hyphens. Revise. 4. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. 5. Revise the legal description in the title block to indicate that a portion of the subject property is located within the southeast corner of Section 30. DS 2-05.2.1.K 6. Several parking spaces located to the west of the northernmost access drive are within the future sight-visibility triangle. Revise. DS 3-01.5.1.A.1 7. Provide the Book and Page numbers for recorded subdivisions within the area shown on the location map on sheet 1. DS 2-03.2.1.D.2 8. Provide the height and both dimensions of the gas station canopy on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.N 9. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") for microfilming purposes. Revise all text in the sheet index map on sheet 1 of 6 which does not meet this minimum archiving standard. DS 2-03.2.1.C 10. Revise keynote 4 to indicate that the bicycle parking detail is C/2 rather than E/2. 11. Detail any proposed freestanding lighting on the plan to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #12. DS 2-05.2.4.W 12. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608 x1178. |
| 01/12/2006 | PMCLAUG1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The trash bins may not be located within the required street landscape border along the west side of the subject property. Revise. 2. A 30-inch screen is required along the west property line due to Kino Blvd. being a designated Major Street and Route. Revise the landscape plan and landscape border table (on sheet 1 of 8) Table 3.7.2-I 3. Revise the first statement under the "Analysis" heading on sheet 1 of the NPP plan, which states that the project is located at Gollub Road and Old Spanish Trail. Verify that all other aspects of the NPP plan apply correctly to the subject property. 4. A separate plant inventory is required for any work to be done in adjacent right-of-way. Add a note stating that a separate NPP0 plan is to be provided for the areas within the right-of-way along Kino Pkway and Ajo Way. Contact Gary Wittwer, Landscape Architect at TDOT Engineering Division regarding compliance with NPPO in public right-of-way. Contact info: gary.wittwer@tucsonaz.gov 5. Indicate the methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 6. Dimension all landscape borders on the landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #6. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2 7. Dimension how far any screen walls extent in the street landscape borders. Refer to LUC 3.7.3.2 for the criteria for locating walls in the border. 8. Per DS 10-01, Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, for basins located adjacent to arterial thoroughfares, planted areas should account for at least 35% of the total basin area. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per acre must be provided, 33% of tress shall be 24" box or larger. A minimum of 2 shrubs for each tree is required per DS 10.01. Revise landscape plan to include basin(s) treatment including a calculation of percent coverage within the basin area. 9. Add the existing and future sight-visibility triangles (SVT's) to the landscape plan. Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. However, trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exeed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street, and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 10. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") in size for microfilming purposes. Revise all text in the Key map on Landscape Plan sheet 1 of 8 to meet this minimum archiving standard. Note: This substandard text in the Key map may be removed since the information is legible at a larger scale elsewhere on the landscape plan. DS2-03.2.1.C 11. Add the subdivision case number (S05-255) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and NPPO Plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 |
| 01/13/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-255 SOUTHGATE BUSINESS PARK/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: January 12, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Enclose “Kino Pkwy/Ajo 1-10 Access Rd/Ramp” in parenthesis. Not to be confused with a street name. Correct 36th Road to 36th Street on Location Map. Are Units 1 thru 37 being platted as Condo Units? jg |
| 01/19/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: January 19, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-255 Southgate Business Park T141430 (132-08) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * x Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the number of miles of new road, public or private, to the general notes, even if the number is 0. Add interior bearings and dimensions Add the square footage for the lots. You have identified a section corner, now you need to show the bearing and dimension from the corner to a tie point on the subdivision perimeter. Add section 30 to the title block, since a small portion of the subdivision is in the section. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 01/23/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: SOUTHGATE BUSINESS PARK S05-255 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review December 21, 2005. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the existing facilities will be billable. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 01/23/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S05-255 Southgate Business Park 1/20/2006 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Ajo (Kino to W I-10 ramp) 0 17,993 64,140 6 64,140 40,175 6 1,406 Route 11, 30 min, 0 miles Bike route with striped shoulder Kino Pkwy (Ajo to W I-10 Ramp) 0 22,961 64,140 6 40,110 64,140 6 Route 2, 30 min, 700 feet Bike route with striped shoulder |
| 01/24/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 24, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat S05-255 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Tentative Plat /Development Plan 1. Show maneuverability for solid waste and delivery vehicles showing access to the solid waste enclosures or loading zones and back to the street. Use minimum outside radii of 50 feet and minimum inside radius of 36 feet for the solid waste vehicles. Use the same radii for the delivery vehicles unless a more appropriate design vehicle is specified. The maneuverability must remain outside of parking and loading spaces. 2. Clarify on the Tentative Plat/Development Plan the sizes and quantities of drainage grates. The drainage report indicates that two or three grates will be used at each location. 3. Show how maintenance access will be provided for each basin. Drainage report: 4. For clarity, revise the Existing Design Flow tables to be consistent with the discharges for Watershed B. The Hydrologic Data Sheets in Appendix B indicate that the Q100 is 10 cfs. The table indicates a discharge of 4 cfs with a cumulative discharge of 10 cfs. 5. Provide a detailed site map in the Drainage Report showing all of the required elements outlined in the Standards Manual For Drainage Design and Floodplain Management 2.3.1.6.A.4 a-f. 6. Provide the results of a soils report/geotechnical report addressing appropriate setbacks from each basin. 7. Provide details for the drainage structures including weirs and grates. Please note that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required as part of the grading permit submittal. Submit a revised Tentative Plat and a revised Drainage Report. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 01/27/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-255; Southgate Business Park - No objection except that no title report was included in the package to review. |
| 01/31/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP/DP: 1. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 39 states that the maximum driveway width for business districts is 35'. There are two access points on this project that exceed this distance. 2. The northern most access point does not seem to satisfy rezoning condition 15. 3. All stem lengths for SVTs are 20' not the 15' as is stated in key notes 17, 18. 4. Remove all crosswalks at project access points. 5. Submit the Traffic Study as required by rezoning condition 20. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 5, 2006 TO: Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Southgate Business Park, Lots 1-3, Units 1-37 Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S05-255 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-255, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEETS 1, 5 & 6. Please create three symbols in the legend to clearly differentiate the three different types of sewers: existing public sewers, proposed public sewers and proposed private sewers. SHEET 5. The public sewer shall commence at the exit of proposed manhole 2, that is, proposed manhole 2 shall be part of the proposed private sewer network within this project. SHEET 5. Create a PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT for the portion of public sewer that is not within the public right-of-way. Show the boundaries of this easement and its dimension. If no easement is necessary please indicate why in your response letter and disregard this comment. A Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve of the tentative plat/development plan. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 02/10/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 9, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-255 Southgate Business Park: Tentative Plat Staff has no comments. |
| 02/15/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Conditioned upon meeting Tucson Water requirements for water service. |
| 02/27/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-255 Southgate Business Park 02/03/06 (X) Tentative Plat/Development Plan () (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-32 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan & Western Hills/Pueblo-Sunland Gardens GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: January 23, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (*X) (*) Subject to comments outlined below = Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (*X) (*) If comments outlined below are not approved by the Department of Transportation, and/or DSD, a resubmittal is required: (X) Tentative Plat/Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 1/23/2006 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments S05-255 Southgate Business Park: Tentative Plat January 23, 2006 Staff offers the following comments: Mayor and Council approved on December 20, 2005; a revised preliminary development plan with modified conditions of rezoning on rezoning case C9-02-32. The revised conditions of rezoning include the following conditions, which the submittal dated December 21, 2005, does not provide sufficient information to determine compliance. These conditions are: Rezoning condition # 20 and #21 requires a traffic impact analysis. The submittal provided to the Department of Urban Planning and Design did not include a traffic impact analysis. Therefore, a resubmittal is not required to the Department of Urban Planning and Design if the traffic impact analysis was provide as part of this review to the Department of Transportation and/or the Department of Development Services. However, the traffic impact analysis needs to address the issue outlined below, shown as staff comments # 2. Rezoning condition # 2 reads: The City of Tucson Department of Transportation shall approve a site design for Parcel 2 that demonstrates the south/north bound traffic lanes on the Kino Parkway ramp are safe, accessible, and maneuverable for large commercial vehicles, such as but not limited to semi tractor trailers, which require servicing or delivering to this site, using the Kino Parkway ramp entrance. The submittal does not indicate if rezoning condition # 2 has yet been satisfactory to the State of Arizona Department of Transportation or to the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. Please provide some type of documentation to the Department of Development Services that the Arizona Department of Transportation and the City of Tucson Department of Transportation have given their tentative approval on tentative plan/development plan, S05-255 – Southgate Business Park. A resubmittal to the Department of Urban Planning and Design is not required if this issue is already under review by the Arizona Department of Transportation and the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. The proposed tentative plat/development plan does not indicate any phasing, the Department of Urban Planning and Design assumes the full development will occur as one project under one single phase. If this is not correct, please revise plan to indicate phasing lines and show that all the required landscaping as outlined in rezoning condition # 6, which reads that “If the property is developed in phases, these improvements (required perimeter landscaping) shall be completed with the first phase.” |
| 03/01/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT will need a full Traffic Impact analysis that satisfies current ADOT sdandards for this project, including an analysis of the affects on the development on the adjacent interstate ramps and maineliine > - any request for sound mitigation will be done by the developer or owner of the porperty > - all improvemets will be done to current ADOT standards and a permit from ADT wil be needed > - please adderss the comments from November 7, 2005 > > > I just received this request and there are some concerns from ADOT; > > * is there a TIA for this project, if so, may we have a copy for review and if there is not one on file ADOT recommends one be done > * how will this development affect the interchange, intersection of Ajo and the ramps and Ajo way itself > * will there be any modifications to the signals, if it is required the developer will make all changes to current ADOT standards and at no cost to ADOT > * has the developer taken into consideration any future modifications to the interchange....and the area it may require > * show current access control on the plans > * a corridor study is currently being done for I-10, it is proposed that Ajo way will connect directly to Kino blvd and access to Ajo be terminated ( from its current configuration ) > > If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at 620-5435. Thank You. TM. ********************************************************************* |
| 03/02/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 2, 2006 Tri H. Miller Rick Engineering, Co. 1748 E. River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S05-255 Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat Dear Tri: Your submittal of December 21, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, ADOT, Real Estate, Community Planning, Wastewater, Traffic, Addressing, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Community Planning, Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |
| 12/21/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/22/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved |