Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - MINOR SUBD REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-252
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - MINOR SUBD REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/27/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
07/03/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 2, 2007 To: Lloyd Rogers, Rogers Civil Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) Subject: 5000 Ft. Lowell Place, Lots 1-5 Final Plat - 3rd Submittal, S05-252 The drawings for the proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Modify the title Block of this 3rd sheet so that it resembles the title blocks on the 1st and 2nd sheets. This way we will have the information that we need shown on a Development Plan without having you to submit a formal development plan for this project. This is the 2nd request. 2. SHEET 1. The language in the DEDICATION block will need to be modified a little once we review and approve the sewer system serving this development that will be shown on the 3rd sheet. 3. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): Identify the street where MH #6196 -06 is located. Also show more of the existing sewer in the street and show the rim and invert elevations of the existing manhole. The construction plan # and pipe size should also be shown. 4. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. Also the symbols do not line up with the description in the legend.The symbol for existing sewer does not match the existing sewer line shown on plan. 5. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): All of the proposed sewer line segments need to be marked with length/size and slope. Also show the sewer directional flow arrows on both the existing and proposed sewer lines. 6. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): Show easement limits for the sewer line running out of the public street(if it is in fact public-mark it as public or private) west of the property and then across all of the lots (1 -4). The recordation information for the easement should also be shown. 7. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): The proposed manholes on property need to be sequentially identified with rim and invert elevations. Also they should be marked as public. 8. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): The HCS should be marked w/pipe size/length/slope and material 9. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement):Add a General Note that states: ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. 10. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement):Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. 11. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 12. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement):Add a Permitting Note that states: NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 13. Sheet 1(Sewer improvement): Add a General Note that states: THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the Final Plat. The next submittal of this Final Plat will be the third submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and a response letter addressing these comments. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tom Porter Phone: 520-740-6579 |
07/03/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: August 15, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 5020 E. Fort Lowell Road Final Plat S05-252 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Final Plat. The Final Plat (FP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Final Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FP. 2. Submit the Subdivision Improvement Assurances for review. The following items are required in the assurance package if a Third Party Trust Agreement will be used: · Title Report · Special Warranty Deed · Trust Agreement · Amendment to Trust · Agreement to Construct Submit the above documents containing original signatures, copies of the documents and signatures will not be forwarded to the City of Tucson attorney for review. The final plat cannot be recorded or approved prior to the acceptance of the assurances. Per previous comment. 3. At least one corner of the subdivision will be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter corner, or an established……….per D.S. 2-03.6.5.A. Per previous comment. The FP cannot be approved prior to this comment. 4. Label the I/E and utility easement as "Private", label all distances and bearings for the easement and show the on FP as bolder dashed line with ties to property corners. 5. Please submit a copy of the subdivision boundary closure calculations. Per previous comment. 6. The 100-year floodplain limits (50' setback line) and EHS shall be shown in a suveyable manner per D.S. 2-03.6.4.E and F. The FP cannot be approved prior to this comment. 7. Show the distance and bearing between all monuments used…per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C.5. Show the symbols used on the legend for the ½" IR to be set on the map of the final plat (sheet 2). Sheet 2 shows a curve on the property line at the Southeast corner of the project, yet the curve is not shown on the "Key Map" on sheet 1. Address as required. Drainage Report: 1. The DR has been accepted for FP purposes only. Re-submit the DR along with the grading plan. 2. FYI, show in the DR and on the grading plan, the WSEL's for the Alamo Wash along the entire length of the project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4632 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/5020 E. Fort Lowell Rd. FP 3 |
07/20/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-252 FORT LOWELL PLACE/REVISED MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: 7/19/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Add Road to Fort Lowell on Location Plan. 2.) Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Plan. 3.) On Location Plan: 2. Change FNCL Ave to Enclave and 20. change Glen to Glenn. 4.) Correct scale on pg. 2. 5.) Correct lot numbers of Rancho Alamo on pgs. 2 & 3. es |
07/26/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. It appears that the project may have a substantial impact on protected native plants. To demonstrate how Native Plant Preservation Ordinance requirements will be met for this subdivision an overall NPP Plan will be required. 2) Based on the location of contours above (to the west of) the top of bank, it appears that the 50-foot setback may be depicted incorrectly. Please clarify and revise location of top of wash bank as necessary. The WASH ordinance is applicable to this site. A plant/habitat inventory and is required for any development within the 50' resource area. |
07/27/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Andy Steuart S05-252 5000 fort Lowell Place: Resubmittal - Minor Subdivision Review - Request for multiple items: -The words "Deeded to Myrna Jones Per Docket 87 Pg. 1515" be deleted. -The in/egress corridor easement be annotated w/ diagonal hatch lines to make the area apparent. -Show the S. R/W boundary of Fort Lowell Blvd. with appropriate solid line. -Change "Drainage Easement Docket 8251 Pg. 808 Conveyed in Fee by Dkt./Pg. 8887/197 & 9179/1293" to "Drainage Easement Dkt./Pg. 8887/197 & 9179/1293." -The lead lines from the " in/egress & public utilities easement per final plat" need arrows to the W. of the easement corridor. |
07/30/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
08/02/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: August 01, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-252 5000 Fort Lowell Place: Minor Subdivision Review(6-27-07) Denied. The site is adjacent to Alamo Wash Linear Park. To preserve the natural character of the park corridor, preservation of native vegetation is of utmost importance. Approval is withheld, until verification is provided that Development Services Landscape Section approves the plans with respect to the requirements of the Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) ordinance and the Native Plant Preservation ordinance. LUC 4.2.2.I. |
08/06/2007 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: S05-252 5020 East Fort Lowell Road Minor Subdivision (Group B) TRANSMITTAL: August 6, 2007 Conditional Approval: The Zoning Review Section at Development Services verifies that the final plat for a minor subdivision meets the requirements of the Land Use Code, subject to the following condition: Clearly delineate street, curb and sidewalk with larger line weights and continuous lines. Should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, this approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. |
08/16/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
08/16/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 16, 2007 Lloyd W. Rogers P.E. Rogers Civil Engineering 1765 West Klamath Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 Subject: S05-252 5000 Fort Lowell Place Minor Subdivision Dear Lloyd: Your submittal of June 27, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Final Plat (Landscape, Zoning, Addressing, Parks and Recreation, Real Estate, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 2 Copies Native Plant Preservation Plans (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 888-8571 |