Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-252
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/17/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. A minimum 20 feet wide, paved, fire access roadway must be provided and extedned to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of all structures. 2. An approved turnaround, dimensioned in accordance with COT Dev. Standard 3-01 must be provided. No center islands permitted. 3. Fire hydrants required. Provide a note on the plan stating "Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code." |
| 01/30/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * 5 individual lots off of a col-de-sac off Ft. Lowell Road. Approved for APC service off the dead end cul-de-sac road. APC to be placed and removed from the curbside collection area on the day of service. |
| 02/07/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: FT. LOWELL PLACE S05-252 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the minor subdivision plan submitted January 11, 2006. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Warren McElyea Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 02/08/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: February 7, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 5020 E. Fort Lowell Road Final Plat S05-252 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Final Plat and Drainage Report. The Final Plat (FP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Final Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FP. 2. The proposed street width does not meet development standards per D.S. 3-01.0. A Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) will be necessary for the proposed street width. 3. Subdivisions over an acre equal to 3 units but not greater than 6 units are required to provide 2-year threshold retention. 4. Show detention/retention areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner per D.S. 2-03.6.4.I. 5. Show the subdivision case number (S05-252) in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block per D.S. 2-02.6.1.K. 6. Submit the Subdivision Improvement Assurances for review. The following items are required in the assurance package if a Third Party Trust Agreement will be used: · Title Report · Special Warranty Deed · Trust Agreement · Amendment to Trust · Agreement to Construct Submit the above documents containing original signatures, copies of the documents and signatures will not be forwarded to the City of Tucson attorney for review. 7. The title block of the plat must match the Subdivision Assurances verbatim. 8. Please re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel and this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, ie.: Common Area "A" - Streets Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities Common Area "E" - Landscaping 9. Show sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 10. Correct the mile of new public street on general note 3 per D.S. 2-03.6.2.C. 11. Show a 1' no access esmt. along the East property lot lines per D.S. 2-03.6.3.A. 12. At least one corner of the subdivision will be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter corner, or an established……….per D.S. 2-03.6.5.A. 13. Show the distance and bearing between all monuments used…per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C.5. 14. Complete "Basis of Elevation" per D.S. 2-03.6.5.C. 15. Please submit a copy of the subdivision boundary closure calculations. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The DR states that only 1 house will be constructed on the site. If not, a future condition hydrology data sheet must be included in the DR. 3. Subdivisions over an acre equal to 3 units but not greater than 6 units are required to provide 2-year threshold retention. 4. Show all details of and cross sections of the proposed basin. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 6. Correct the address listed on the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/5020 E. Fort Lowell Rd. FP |
| 02/08/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The site does have special development requirements, the Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) ordinance and the Native Plant Preservation ordinance. LUC 4.2.2.I 2) The native plant preservation application is denied. We find that the project may have a substantial impact on protected native plants. A native plant preservation plan will be required. 3) The WASH ordinance is applicable to this site. A plant/habitat inventory and is required for any development within 50' of the banks of the wash. Additional requirements apply for any resource area development. TCC 29-12. The review procedure is specified in TCC 23A-51. |
| 02/09/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 8, 2006 To: Lloyd Rogers, Rogers Civil Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: 5000 Ft. Lowell Place Lots 1-4 Final Plat - 1st Submittal S05-252 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito Central Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this project. How do you intend to provide sewer service to these lots? Provide this office with a separate utility improvement plan that shows all public and private sewers (and easements) necessary to provide sewer service to these lots. Note: The sewer improvement plan for 5068 E. Ft. Lowell Rd., G-2002-116, (that might have provided public sewer service to the boundary of this subdivision) has expired and the construction plans have been purged from our map racks. All Sheets: Add the final plat case number, S05-252, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Revise the plat map so that: The lot numbers that appear on sheet 1 are changed so that they match the lot numbers that appear on sheet 2. Sheet 2: The easement label is incomplete and does not allow for INGRESS. Revise the site plan so that: The off-site easement, west of the project boundary, is correctly labeled and the appropriate recording information, docket and page, is included. The on-site easement is correctly labeled with appropriate recording information, by final plat. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 02/09/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this Final Plat: 1. The proposed access road for this subdivision does not meet DS 3-01.0 figure 2. 2. Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision. (DS 3-01.2.4.D) 3. The proposed cul-de-sac does not meet DS 3-01.0 figure 21. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/09/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-252 5000 FORT LOWELL PLACE / MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: February 8, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Correct Sections on Location Plan. 2: Correct legal description on all Title Blocks. |
| 02/10/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: February 10, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S05-252 5000 Fort Lowell Place T131435 (110-10) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 02/17/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-252 5000 Fort Lowell Place 02/16/06 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Final Plat CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Old Fort Lowell GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 2/9/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP – Note: To enhance public safety and reduce the incidences of crime, “Safe by Design” concepts consider incorporating the following: Where perimeter walls are provided along lot lines that abut designated open areas, common areas, and trail system, the masonry portion of the wall is not to exceed three (3’) feet in height, except for pillars, with wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 2/2/06 |
| 03/01/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: March 1, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-252 5000 Fort Lowell Place:Minor Subdivision Review Denied. The site is adjacent to Alamo Wash Linear Park. Show the east and west boundaries of the drainage easement over Alamo Wash. Staff finds that native plants will be impacted. |
| 03/29/2006 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: S05-252 5020 East Fort Lowell Road Minor Subdivision (Group B) TRANSMITTAL: April 4, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) An applicant has one (1) year from the date of submittal of a minor subdivision to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before December 15, 2006. 2) This review is for a Group B Minor Subdivision (LUC Section 4.2.2.2) in the in the R-1 zone (LUC Section 2.3.4.2.A.1). The Development Designator is "G" for each individual lot and is subject to Section 3.5.7.1.E, .F, .G, and .H. The Perimeter Yard Indicator is AA for each lot (LUC Sections 3.2.3.1.B and 3.2.6.4). Please place a note stating that each individual lot must comply the requirements of the Land Use Code and Development Standards on the plat and any related Development Plan. 3) Please place the subdivision case (S05-252) number in the lower right corner of the plat and any other related sheets, such as the landscape plans, NPPO and grading plans (DS 2-03.6.1.K). 4) Please identify the conditions within the square mile area of the small projection map in the upper right corner. Identify the subdivisions plats by name with the book and page recording information. Also identify all major streets and major watercourses on the Final Plat (DS 2-03.6.1.D.2). 5) Please revise the APPROVAL note to read: " I, Kathleen S. Detrick, Clerk of the City of Tucson, Arizona, hereby certify that this plat was approved by the Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson, Arizona, on this _____ day of _______, 2006." (See DS 2-03.6.3.D.) 6) Clearly delineate the street. The minimum street width is twenty-four feet (24') without parking lanes and thirty-two feet (32') with parking lanes on each side of the street (DS 3-01.2.3.A.1). The minimum width for a parallel parking lane is seven feet (7') with a vertical curb (DS 3-01.2.4.A). Please revise the street to the proper width. 7) "Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision" (DS 3-01.2.4.D). "Visitor parking spaces should be provided within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the front or street side yard property lines of each residential unit" (DS 3-05.2.4.A.1). If one street parking is not provided there must be five (5) common area guest parking spaces provided within the one hundred fifty feet (150') of each front property line. Please revise the plans. 8) Clearly delineate the floodplain setback. Also provide an individual plot plan for Lot 5, with dimensioned elevations and a basic floor plan. |
| 03/29/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Needs Review | |
| 03/29/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Needs Review | |
| 03/29/2006 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 03/29/2006 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 03/29/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Needs Review |