Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-250
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Four residential lots. * Have Tee turnaround at the south end. OK for circulation. * Approved for APC curbside service off of the PAAL. APC's are to be placed and removed from the curbside collection area on the day of service. |
| 01/06/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S05-250 DELPH ENGINEERING INC COLONIAL SOLANA ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 01/10/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-250 Colonial Solana 01/10/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Grading Plan CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: El Encanto/Colonia Solana GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 1/19/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 1/06/06 |
| 01/10/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-250 COLONIAL SOLANA/MINOR SUBDIViSION REVIEW DATE: 1/10/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change 6th St to 5th St. on site Location Map. Include Title Blocks that have Lots 1-4, resubdivision information and Section, Township and Range. Spell out Boulevard of Broadway Blvd. on pg. 1& 3. |
| 01/18/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Add the CDRC Case Number to the landscape and N.P.P. plans. |
| 01/19/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 38 |
| 01/19/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: January 18, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Colonial Solana Minor Subdivision. The activity number is S05-250. SUMMARY: The Zoning, Grading and Improvement Plan and Drainage Statement was received by Engineering on December 20, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Zoning, Grading and Improvement Plan. SUBMITTAL: FINAL PLAT RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: ZONING, GRADING AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN, FINAL PLAT APPROVED: DRAINAGE STATEMENT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Statement was reviewed for the Minor Subdivision purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the financial assurances are approved. The complete assurances package must include a copy of the original trust, the original amendment to trust with exhibit A, the original agreement to construct with exhibit B, a copy of the warranty deed, a current title report and a location map on an 8 ½ x 11 sheet. DS Sec.2-03.7.1.G 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standard 11-01.4.1.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standard 11-01.8. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. All proposed easements must be shown in a surveyable manner on the Final Plat. The next submittal must address the following items: ZONING, GRADING AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN (MINOR SUBDIVISION) COMMENTS: 1. Place the subdivision case number in the lower right hand corner of the first sheet. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1. 2. Provide the following notes per DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b., "Total miles of new public streets are ________." "Total miles of new private streets are _______." 3. If applicable all existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.3.C. 4. If applicable, show existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.3.G. 5. The lot line dimensions (85' and 90.18') are off by approximately 5'. Revise the lot lines and the square footage appropriately. DS 2-03.2.4.A and B. 6. The typical cross section for interior roads (figure 1, DS 3-01) shows the travel lane with a minimum distance of 12'. Revise the plan to show 12' travel lanes or apply for a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). If the decision is made to apply for a DSMR and the DSMR is approved, provide the case number and the verbiage of the approved DSMR in a general note. 7. Keynote 5 indicates a sidewalk. It is not clear if this is proposed or existing. Per the Major Street and Route Plan 6' wide sidewalk are required along an arterial road. Broadway Blvd is an arterial street and is required to have 6' sidewalks along the street frontage. Revise the plan and detail 1/1 to show 6' sidewalks. DS 2-03.2.4.F. 8. Include the sight distance for the near and far side SVTs for Broadway Blvd. DS 3-01.5.0 9. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. It is acknowledged that the plan has provided dimensions for the street/access easement. However the legend simply shows an easement line and the plan view has the label street (private). Revise the plan to clearly show the street will be an easement (not common area) and that the easement will be a "private" easement. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.4.J. |
| 01/19/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: COLONIAL SOLANA S05-250 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the minor subdivision submitted December 20, 2005. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Mike Kaiser Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 01/27/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-250; Colonial Solana - MS&R right of way should be dedicated to the City as part of this action. If dedication is not going to be performed by recording a plat with appropriate dedication language, then Real Estate Division should be provided an updated title report, legal description and requested to draft the deed and other related documents to effectuate the dedication. |
| 01/31/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this minor subdivision. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/31/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: January 31, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-250 Colonial Solana: Minor Subdivision Review Staff has no comments. |
| 02/03/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-250 Colonial Solana, Lots 1-4 Minor Subdivision TRANSMITTAL: 02/03/06 DUE DATE: 01/19/06 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is December 19, 2006. 2. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with Development standards 2-03, tentative plat format and content and additional development standards, 2-08, 3-01 and any applicable LUC development criteria. 3. A small, project-location map will be provided, drawn at a scale of 3" = 1 mile. If possible, the map should be located in the upper right corner of the sheet. On multiple sheet drawings, the map will be located on the first sheet of the plat. The location map will provide the following information. a. Add the following street names to the location map, Camino Campestre and Randolph Way. Revise 6th Street to 5th Street also add the names for Randolph Golf Course and for El Con. b. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as subdivisions, major streets, major watercourses, and railroads. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. DS 2-03.2.1.D.1 and .2 4. A title block with the following information is to be provided approximately in the lower right corner of the first page of the plat. a. Provide the proposed name of the subdivision. The proposed name shall not duplicate or approximate the name of any other recorded subdivision in Pima County, Arizona, unless the plat is a continuation of an existing plat. If it is a continuation, the lots or blocks must be identified differently from that on the existing plat. For example, if the recorded plat includes lots numbered 1 through 12, the proposed plat should begin with lot number 13. b. The number of proposed lots is to be noted. If the subdivision is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the LUC, a statement to that effect should be included. c. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. DS 2-03.2.1.G.1-.3 5. Add the owners name or contact person to the owner's text block. DS 2-03.2.2.A.1 6. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S05-250. Please list the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets. DS2-03.2.2.B.1 7. Under general note 3, revise the word "Purposed" to "Proposed". Also revise the word "refuse" in keynote 12 to "Refuge". DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 8. If applicable, add a note identifying by case number any zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project, such as a Board of Adjustment variance, a Lot Development Option (LDO) modification, Project Design Option (PDO) modification, or Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) together with the date and conditions of approval or, if the review has not been completed, a statement that it is in process. DS 2-03.2.2.B.6 9. Revise general note 7 to state that the project has been designed to meet the criteria of the Major Street and Routes and Gateway Route. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 10. Add as a general note, the "Total miles of new private street are ___." DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b 11. Existing Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plat to indicate the existing conditions on site and within one hundred (100) feet of the site, except where the site is bounded by a street with a width of one hundred (100) feet or greater. In those situations, existing conditions across the street will be provided. DS 2-03.2.3 12. If applicable draw and label all existing easements. The location, width, and purpose including the recordation information must be labeled. DS 2-3.2.3.C 13. Please ensure that the location for the future curb is drawn, labeled, and dimensioned correctly based on the 150-foot street cross section. Add the street building setback from the future back of curb location on Broadway Boulevard. The setback depicted on the plan is not based on the future curb location. Please revise as required. Contact the Engineering reviewer for more information on the future curb location. DS 2-03.2.3.D 14. This project is not designed with common areas but has been designed with the pedestrian areas, private street, and the visitor parking over private property. An easement that covers the vehicular use area, pedestrian walkways and utilities must be drawn, labeled, and dimensioned on the plan. This common easement must be noted in the title block. Clarify how the maintenance of the of the common areas will be enforced, if by CC&R's provide copies with the next submittal. DS 2-03.2.4.C 15. Please revise the zoning classification for the adjacent property along the south boundary of the proposed subdivision. The zoning classification is RX-1. Also please draw and label the building setback for the south property boundaries for lots 2 and 3. The minimum setback requirement is 20 feet. DS 2-03.2.4.D 16. The proposed street has not been designed to provide for parking on both sides of the street. The street has been designed over private property which will require that an easement that covers not only the street but the pedestrian walkways and utilities will be necessary. Please ensure that the easement is drawn, labeled, and dimensioned on the plan. The easement will have to be written in a manner that explains how the visitor parking will be provided and that the spaces are not specific to any lot but are for the use for all visitors regardless of the location. DS 2-03.2.4.G 17. Please ensure that the under the individual lot table the driveway area is included for the lot coverage calculation. DS 2-03.2.4.I 18. Sidewalks are required as part of new development of all properties. All new subdivisions and applications for building permits shall provide five (5) foot wide sidewalks along the entire length of street frontage, whether public or private, of the property in question. The sidewalk requirements also apply to expansions in floor area, site area, or vehicular use area of twenty-five (25) percent or more. Sidewalks are not required in the following circumstances. DS 3-01.3.3.A.4 - On any residential street with an ADT of less than one hundred forty (140), provided the street has vertical curbs and concrete driveways providing pedestrian and disabled pedestrian access to the dwelling on each lot; Please ensure that the driveways are labeled with concrete drives and provide access as required per DS 3-01.3.3.A.4 19. I acknowledge that the final plat was not submitted with the development plans. We will do a second review with the final plat and re-review the development plans as required. 20. Review the section of the LUC related to building and garage setbacks. Revise the plan to correctly depict the interior street building setbacks based on an ADT of 140 or less. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05250tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, if applicable CC&R's and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL |
| 02/15/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 10, 2006 To: Kent Delph, Delph Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Colonial Solana Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S05-250 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The COLONIAL SOLANA ZONING GRADING AND IMPROVEMENT plans for this project have been submitted to our office for review as a Final Plat. These improvement plans have been reviewed as the 1st submittal of the Tentative Plat. Comments made on this review are only applicable to the Tentative Plat. Submit the Final Plat for 1st review in conjunction with the 2nd submittal of the Tentative Plat. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Aviation Corridor to Santa Cruz Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this project. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S05-250, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. The City of Tucson will require that the sewer crossing the major street (Broadway Boulevard) be constructed as public sewer. The expense of planning and constructing this segment of pubic sewer will be high. Have you considered possibly less costly options, like running a private sewer thru a private sewer easement to the west and connecting to a new public manhole, constructed over the existing cleanout, #5616*02? Or, building public sewer from that same cleanout, north to Broadway Boulevard and east to the entry of your project? Also, Building a qualifying off-site public sewer would qualify these residential lots for sewer connection fee discount rates. Pima County Wastewater Management is not interested in operating and maintaining the onsite sewer as it is currently designed. The proposed 8” public sewer to serve just 4 lots will not provide adequate self-cleaning velocities and the potential for sewer gas odors and related complaints is high. A better option would be a private 6”sewer flowing into a public sewer manhole, located at the property line south of the Broadway travel lanes or to the west, in N. Avenida De Palmas. Sheets 1 & 3: Revise the site plan so that: In all locations that they appear, the name of the street that is East and the name of the street that is West of this project, are spelled correctly. Sheet 1: Revise the site plan so that: The distance, shown in the Broadway Boulevard right-of-way, to Avenida De Palmas and Via Palos Verdes are within a reasonable distance of being accurate. Sheet 1: Revise the site plan so that it shows: A public manhole, NEW MH#2, relocated at the entry, as described in item #5 above, with an 8” public sewer flowing North and a 6” private sewer flowing South. Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different linetypes in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #15 so that it states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 02/24/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: January 17, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S05-250 Colonial Solana T141416 (126-21) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following addition/corrections before recording this plat. Add section, township and range to the title blocks. Add the name of the subdivision, the number of lots and common areas to the title blocks. Remove all shading and hatching. Correct the spelling of Plaos Verdes to Palos Verdes, Avenida Del Plamas to Avenida De Palmas and 75’ furture R/W to 75’ future R/W. These are all located north of the subdivision in the right-of-way area. If there area any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 02/28/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 02/28/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 28, 2006 Kent A. Delph, P.E. Delph Engineering, Inc. 221 North Court Avenue, Suite 103 Tucson, AZ 85701 Subject: S05-250 Colonial Solana Minor Subdivison Dear Kent Your submittal of December 20, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED Since the first submittal did not include all the required drawings, a full submittal is required for the second review cycle. The review will be scheduled for two weeks. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-6570 |
| 12/19/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/21/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The plan is approved December 21, 2005. |