Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: S05-207
Parcel: Unknown

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: REVISN TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB

Plan Number - S05-207
Review Name: REVISN TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/09/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/19/2008 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved May 19, 2008
S05-207
Revised DP/TP

The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed revisions to the DP/TP for Rillito Crossing Market Place and we recommend approval at this time.

Loren Makus
05/19/2008 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office (CDRC)

FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner

PROJECT: S05-207, Rillito Crossing Market Place
Tentative Plat/Development Plan, Review of Revision to DP/TP

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 19, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Per DS 2-05.2.1.6, for revised buildings "retail 4A, 4B and 3":
A) call out any roof overhangs/canopies with dashed line. If applicable, note vertical clearance from pedestrian walkways to overhang.
B) Per DS 2-05.2.1.6, Note that "retail 2" is not an actual retail use, it's been developed as an L.A. Fitness Health Club, which is under a Recreation Use Group. Change all notes throughout plan pertaining to "retail 2" to read "recreation".
C) on setback notes in sheet 2, where is retail 8 - typo referring to retail 7?

3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.8, regarding parking:
A) I acknowledge overall shopping center is parked at 1:200 gfa.
B) revise required parking calc for lot 2, to "5,000 gfa/200 = 25 spaces required"
C) update required parking calc for lot 1, "126,386 gfa/200 = 632 spaces required"
D) list total number of parking spaces required as 657
E) check total number of parking spaces provided, I could not verify 743. (734?)
F) the minimum width of a parking space is 8.5' per LUC 3.3.4 and DS 3-05 - revise detail 37 to reflect prior approved parking space width.

4. Per DS 2-05.2.1.9, regarding bicycle parking:
A) the position of the bicycle parking in the east lot has changed, please keynote next to the new location
B) per DS 2-09.4.1, the acceptable locations of class 2 bicycle parking has been revised since the last submittal. Please ensure class 2 bike parking is provided evenly throughout the center and is within 50' of each tenant entry.
C) acceptable types of bike racks have been revised since last submittal. Revise detail 8 for class 2 bike parking to those types allowed per DS 2-09 - see figure drawings on line.

5. Per DS 2-05.2.1.12 regarding pedestrian and accessible circulation: (Note that Accessible Circulation comments are made in consultation with Ron Brown, 837-4908)
A) dimension "landscape planter" in concrete walkway - keynoted but not shown
B) provide a clear 4' wide unobstructed pathway - setback 1' from PAAL- on concrete along west front of retail 1 - hard to see with lines. If just stamped concrete, note.
C) keynote ramps with slopes along front of retail 1
D) keynote all truncated dome locations along front of retail 1
E) reposition crosswalk at east side of site from bike parking to dumpster - a car cannot back out over it at this angle per DS 2-08.4.1.A & F
F) note location of truncated domes at both sides of raised marked crossing of crosswalks from bike parking to dumpster per ANSI
G) crosswalk from bike parking to building appears to lead nowhere and interrupted by loading zone screen wall - clarify?
H) apply truncated domes at each end of a raised crossed marking (crosswalk) throughout site - consult Ron Brown at 837-4905 for further details)
I) drop off zone in front of Retail 1 must be reconfigured to meet ANSI 503.2 & 503.3

6. Per DS 2-05.2.1.14, regarding loading zones:
A) check keynote 15 for loading zone screen wall at east side (behind retail 3, etc.)
B) show two loading zones can fit at loading area behind retail 1 - dimension opening for loading dock and show maneuverability. Appears old note of 40' on plan
C) keynote, show maneuverability, dimension, number of loading spaces behind retail 4A
D) clarify where screen wall is for full length of loading zone(s) behind retail 1

7. Per DS 2-05.2.1.20 -there is a new loading zone screen wall and loading area over a water easement behind Retail 1. Consult COT Water to ensure water easement location is acceptable. Any repairs to water line is at site owner's expense to remove obstructions.

8. Per DS 2-05.2.1.32, keynote any new trash compactors - behind retail 1?

9. Per DS 2-05.2.2.A.3, revise floor area ratio and decimal per reduced GFA on lot 1.

10. On elevation sheets, provide correct corresponding number of building on the elevation sheet with the revised development plan (i.e. what is D1? -Building 4A?)

11. On Elevations, provide height from finished floor to finished grade -zoning measures heights /setbacks from finished grade. If elevations for 4A & 3, height is acceptable.

12. Is there a new elevation for Retail 1? The shape and layout of the building is different from the last DP and a new elevation is needed please.

13. Please note, further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or 520 837-4951.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608.

HCT C:\planning\tent plat/S05-207 rillito crossing market place revision.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat/development plan
05/30/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved * * * * R E V I S E D * * * *

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place 05/29/08

( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
(XXXX) Other - Site Plan


CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-11 & C9-05-26

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: May 19, 2008

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY Department of Urban Planning and Design, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) Additional Comments Attached - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( ) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other - Elevations

REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: May 19, 2008
06/02/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

June 2, 2008

Gilbert Flores
Kurt D. Reed Associates, Inc.
7400 East McDonald Drive, Suite 101
Scottsdale, Arizona 85250

Subject: S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place Revised Tentative Plat

Dear Gilbert:

Your submittal of May 9, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

2 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, DSD)



Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: (480) 948-1055