Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-207
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/03/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat plan is approved, February 3, 2006. |
| 02/07/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-207 RILLITO CROSSING MARKET PLACE/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 2/06/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 02/07/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/08/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S05-207 RILLITO CROSSING MARKET PLACE ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 02/10/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Conditioned upon meeting Tucson Water requirements for water service. |
| 02/15/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place 2/9/2006 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 1st Ave (Limberlost to Wetmore) 0 30,921 42,760 4 64,140 43,814 6 5,941 Route 6, 15 min, 0 miles; Route 34, 30 min, 0 miles Bike route with striped shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 02/16/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) The curbs for the tree planters may not be located as to reduce the parking space below the minimum size required. Refer to DS 2-06, Figure 5 for alternative designs. Revise as necessary. 2) Note the recorded covenant on the development plan that allows the required screen(s) on adjacent property. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15 |
| 02/17/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other - NPPO CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-11 & C9-05-26 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 02/16/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) (Tentative approval, see attached comments)Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) Additional Comments Attached - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 1/10/06 REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 1/6/06Urban Planning and Design Comments S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place February 16, 2006 Staff provisionally approves tentative plat S05-207, subject to the following condition: Please add the following note to the “General Notes” section.* At some future date, should the adjacent apartment complex owner to the east express a desire to provide pedestrian connectivity to the site, via the installation of a gate at the northwest corner of the site, the developer agrees to provide such a gate at the developer’s expense. *NOTE: Development Services staff to check Mylar for note confirming future pedestrian connection to the commercial site via a gate, at the developer’s expense. |
| 02/17/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentat. Locations of easements listed in Schedule B of title report are not apparent on the preliminary plan & easements on the preliminary plan are not listed in title report |
| 02/21/2006 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: RILLITO CROSSING MARKET PLACE S05-207 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the tentative plan submitted February 2, 2006. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 02/21/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: February 21, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place T131419 (105-10) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. General note 3 states there are 2 lots when your title block states there are 6. All title blocks must be in the lower right hand corner of each sheet, these will include the name of the subdivision, the number of lots, any common areas and the section, township and range as well the Map and Plat of any re-subdivision. Please move terms Cover Sheet, Grading Plan, Site Plan, etc. to the area above the title block, or to the side. The lot lines are not delineated well enough and need bearings and dimensions added. Is the parking/drive area going to be a part of each lot, or is it going to be a common area? Square footage needs to be shown in the lots. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 02/22/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/03/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 2, 2006 TO: Paul McIheran National Survey & Engineering THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: David McCormick, Tetra Tech, Inc. (Contract Reviewer) Subhash Raval, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Rillito Crossing Market Place Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S05-207 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. A Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve of the development plan. ALL SHEETS. Provide a professional engineer’s seal, signature and date. SHEET 1. Delete General Note 23. SHEET 5. The Keynote No. 11 is to be revised to read the same as Keynote No. 20 on Sheet 3. 2. SHEET 5. Provide the Arizona minimum slope requirements of 0.33% for an 8" private sewer between Manhole S-10 and S-30 and a 1.00% minimum slope from Manhole S-44 to S-40. Remove “Preliminary Not for Construction” from all sheets. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $117.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/06/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 3, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place: Resubmittal(2/2/06) Staff has no comments. |
| 03/14/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S05-207 Rillito Crossing Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: March 13, 2006 DUE DATE: February 16, 2006 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 17, 2006. 2. This plan was reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the International Building Code 2003 (IBC). In addition, to the above code requirements, this development is the subject of two separate rezoning cases. The south 10 acres of the development was reviewed for compliance with rezoning conditions of case C9-04-11. The north 5 acres of the development was reviewed for compliance of conditions of rezoning case C9-05-26. 3. (Per this review) Per DS 2-05.2.1.D & DS 2-03.2.1.D, the city limits on the location map are incorrect. Most of the area North of River Road, east of 1st, is outside the city limits. See www.tucsonaz.gov/planning zoning maps, T 13, R14, Sec 19 for boundary line. 4. (Per last review) Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, cross-access easements and agreements should be provided to ensure access remains uninhibited to all parcels. (Per this review) RESPONSE: with regards to cross access agreement/easement: add note to Modification paragraph 26 that city approval is required for change to access easements. It is understood this document will be recorded to provide the access easement. Provide recordation information in docket and page next to access note 6 on site plan B. 5. (Per this review) The submittal indicates this project has been revised to show only 2 lots on the overall site plan page. The notes left of the title block indicate 6 lots still, as do the key maps provided on pages 2 and 3 of the submittal. Revise accordingly. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M, (Per last review/current review). Per the preliminary development plan, the uses at the southwest corner of the site (adjacent to the intersection of 1st/Limberlost) are to be food services (restaurants) rather than retail, as shown on the submitted plan. Please clarify if the submitted plan is correct, or revise if necessary. (A drive through service is shown for these locations, which indicates a restaurant use.) Please ensure all notes on the general notes page and building heights notes are revised. PLEASE NOTE, ANY CHANGE OF USE PROPOSED FROM THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE REZONING DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Contact Dan Castro for further information at 520-791-4541x1167. 7. Per this review: With regards to the handicapped sign detail drawing: the writing on the details drawing must be increased to 12 point typeface AND the height of the post for the handicapped sign - from ground to the bottom of the sign - needs to be revised to show 7 feet. 8. (Per this review:) RE: financial services drive-up windows, show overhead clearance, revise all lanes to be 9 feet in width minimum for 2 car lengths - ensure stacking for remaining 2 car lengths is 11 feet wide. Dimension 18 feet car length in all drive-through lanes. Refer to DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 for details. Dimension escape lane north of drive through. For restaurant drive -thru, please pardon the incorrect information provided in the last review noting the number of stacking spaces required for a single drive through lane is only 4 spaces. Please revise the drawing to show 6 cars (it appears 6 are possible from preliminary review) stacked in the restaurant drive through - at 18 feet in length. Please show the ordering location - and clarify if building 6 is also to utilize this drive-through. 9. (Per this review) Revise all buildings with the lettering system (A-G,etc.) used to refer to buildings in the rezoning cases, rather than by the numbers, shown this submittal. 10. (Per this review) Rezoning case C9-05-026, requires the building identified as "G" - the financial institution site on lot 2 - to be no greater than 5,000 square feet in floor area. The floor area square footage is missing from the plan for this building, and is needed. 11. (Per last review/This review) Please provide a separate response letter advising how all conditions of each rezoning case, C9-04-11 and C9-05-26, have been met. This comment was not addressed, and a response letter is required. 12. (Per last review/Addressing Response) Please provide elevation detail drawings (dimensions, heights) of all free-standing lighting, with lighting type information. -Response The photometric plan provided is helpful to understand where and what type lighting is being installed, however, an elevation drawing with dimensions of the free-standing lighting heights with bases, is requested. 13. Staff noted the cart storage location on this drawing, please provide any cart corral storage locations (in parking lot area) planned for this site on the drawing. 14. Further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or call (520) 791-5608x1156. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05-207.1st.rillito.crossing.2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan/tentative plat, modified cross access agreement. |
| 03/14/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 14, 2006 Paul McIheran National Survey and Engineering 16745 W. Bluemound Road Brookfield, WI 53005 Subject: S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place Tentative Plat Dear Paul: Your submittal of November 18, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Wastewater, Zoning, Real Estate, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 262-781-8466 |