Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-207
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 6, 2006 TO: Paul McIheran National Survey and Engineering THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Rillito Crossing Market Place Tentative Plat/Development Plan – 1st Submittal S05-207 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito West (North Line) Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. Based on the evaluation historical sewer improvement district maps, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-207, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 17 to read as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ___ PROPOSED AND ___ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 5. For reference purposes, assign a number to all newly proposed manholes and cleanouts. SHEET 5. Show the existing sewer M-141 and the easement that goes along with it. The easement shall include the recording information. For abandonment please apply with Pima County Real Property. SHEET 5. Label the manhole number for the existing manhole at First Avenue and Limberlost correctly. This project proposes connecting to an existing public sewer line 15 inches in diameter or larger. This existing public sewer line conveys high volumes of wastewater, therefore the owner, engineer and contractor shall be aware that a flow management plan may be required. The owner, engineer and contractor shall also be aware that Pima County Wastewater Management Department may require review of this project. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 01/06/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S05-207 Rillito Crossing Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: January 6, 2006 DUE DATE: December 19, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 17, 2006. 2. This plan was reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the International Building Code 2003 (IBC). In addition, to the above code requirements, this development is the subject of two separate rezoning cases. The south 10 acres of the development was reviewed for compliance with rezoning conditions of case C9-04-11. The north 5 acres of the development was reviewed for compliance of conditions of rezoning case C9-05-26. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.D & DS 2-03.2.1.D, show the city limits on the location map. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.2.A.1, list the telephone number of the site owner/developer on the plan. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.8, list the Development Services project number "S05-207" in the lower right hand corner on every page of the plat. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, cross-access easements and agreements should be provided to ensure access remains uninhibited to all parcels. Please provide such documentation on the resubmittal, noting any access easements on the site plan pages of the plat. Note, please provide any Covenants, Creeds and Restrictions (CCRs) and any advise how access easements will be recorded, by separate recordation instrument or via notes on the final plat. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D.3, please add the dimensions to all Parking Area Access Lanes (PAALs) and access points on the site drawing (sheet 3). 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.F, per the Major Streets and Routes Map (MS&R) map, the total future right of way width for 1st Avenue is 120 feet, and the total right of way for Limberlost Drive is 80 feet. Please amend the plan - including cross-sections. See Engineering for further comments. 9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.F, label the future curbs for 1st Avenue and Limberlost Drive. Both streets are designated MS&Rs. Note the required minimum building setback lines of: the greater of 21 feet or the height of the exterior building wall, from the back side of the future curbs for both streets. Key note 23 should have a specific measurement. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.G, clarify if the utility easements on sheet 5 are private or public. 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.I, staff acknowledges the buildings planned for the development appear to meet required setbacks. For setback verification and for record keeping purposes, please note the building setbacks for each building (as measured from property lines and back of future curbs along 1st and Limberlost) on the plan. 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, the minimum sidewalk width between a building and a parking space is 4 feet. Ensure all sidewalk areas abutting parking spaces meet this standard by widening them to 6.5 feet, or provide wheel-stops in the parking spaces. (Review the north side of lot 4 and the south side of lot 1.) See comment 24 for further details. For consistency, label all sidewalk widths. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M, per the preliminary development plan, the use of lot 6 is to be a financial institution (bank) rather than retail as shown on the submitted plan. In addition, the uses on lot 5 are to be food services (restaurants) rather than retail, as shown on the submitted plan. Please clarify if the submitted plan is correct, or revise if necessary. PLEASE NOTE, ANY CHANGE OF USE PROPOSED FROM THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE REZONING DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Contact Dan Castro for further information at 520-791-4541x1167. 14. On sheet 2 of the submittal, under the Building Area table, please list the development designator number for each lot, as there are two separate zoning classifications presented in this project, which have respective development designators. 15. Per condition 18 of rezoning case C9-04-11 (for the south 10 acres of this development) loading zones must be a minimum of 50 feet away from adjacent residential zones. The plan indicates a loading zone is proposed straddling the rezoning boundary and is within 20 feet of an adjacent residential zone to the east. Because the loading zone straddles the rezoning line boundary, the conditions of case C9-04-11 apply. Staff allows the total number of loading zones for a retail shopping center to be based upon the total gross floor area of the retail buildings. The total GFA of the retail buildings on lots 1-4 requires only 5 loading zones - at 12 x 35 size- to be provided in total for the main retail development on lots 1-4. As the plan proposes 10 loading areas, the loading zone straddling the rezoning line is not required. Please remove it from the plan or redesign it to meet all code and applicable rezoning conditions. 16. Per condition 19 of rezoning case C9-04-11, applicable to this property, a 10' tall masonry screen wall is required to screen all loading zones on the east side of the site, as they are adjacent to residential zoning classifications. Staff acknowledges the 10' screen wall to be erected adjacent to the recessed loading spaces, however, the required screen is not shown for the 5 loading spaces proposed behind Building C. Please revise the plan to show a 10' screen wall directly adjacent to the proposed loading zones. 17. Per condition 20 of rezoning case C9-04-11, applicable to this property, use of loading spaces within 200 feet of the east property line is restricted to 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. Signage with this information should be posted on the site, and such signs should be shown on the plan, with detail drawings. 18. The recessed loading dock proposed to the east of building A is labeled as providing two 12x55 loading zones, yet there appears to be a stairway within the stated loading zone area that conflicts with the proposed length. Please fully dimension all recessed loading zone areas, keeping in mind that the minimum size for the loading zones for this project are 12x35, and address the stair location. 19. Please provide a handicapped parking space sign detail, noting the fine for parking in a handicapped space illegally is now $518.00, per TCC (Tucson City Code) 20-222. 20. Please ensure all handicapped ramps and sidewalks are provided and maintained to the public pedestrian right of way areas adjacent to the site (1st/Limberlost intersection). 21. Truncated Domes (early warning detection devices) are required at all handicapped ramps, where transitioning from pedestrian to vehicular use areas. Please reference Chapter 7, Section 705.5 of ANSI for details on these warning systems and amend all applicable detail drawings accordingly. Add a keynote to the plan referencing the associated detail drawing on page 6. 22. With regards to bicycle parking, Per DS 2-09: provide a detail on the class 1 bicycle parking spaces that shows the distance provided between sets of bicycle lockers and clarify the width of the pedestrian access area around the bicycle parking spaces. 23. Please provide reference numbers to all detail drawings provided on page 6. 24. On the typical detail drawing of a standard parking space with sidewalk overhang, please clarify where on the site (using keynote) this parking with overhang occurs, and what the minimum width of the sidewalk is adjacent to this overhang. See comment 12 also. 25. Pertaining to both restaurant and financial services drive-up windows, provide number of lanes, dimensions, show the minimum required number of vehicles stacked in the lane(s), and overhead clearance information. Please refer to DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 for details. Note, the minimum length of a vehicle stacking space is 18 feet, and the minimum number of vehicle spaces required in a drive - through service is 4, not to interfere with the PAAL access area. Delineate and dimension the drive through lanes, including the escape lane to the north of the drive - through on lot 6. 26. Please clarify/highlight on the plan where the rezoning boundary line is located. 27. Post all conditions of rezoning case C9-05-26 on the plan. 28. Staff acknowledges Mayor and Council will hear a change of rezoning conditions involving this property in late January. Please ensure the plat is updated with all change of conditions information. 29. Please provide a separate response letter advising how all conditions of each rezoning case, C9-04-11 and C9-05-26, have been met. 30. Note, buildings are not allowed across lot lines. The retail center proposed indicates either the building is planned over lot lines, or buildings meet at the lot line. Please ensure this is clarified on the plan, and ensure Structural Reviewers with Building Codes are consulted for this project as it appears. THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO COMBINE THE LOTS, WITH COVENANTS. 31. Please provide elevation detail drawings (dimensions, heights) of all free-standing lighting, with lighting type information. 32. Please provide all monument sign details, including planned or existing billboards with dimensions, heights and materials used. 33. Please submit building elevations for all buildings to verify heights and that conditions of rezoning have been met. 34. Should the neighbor to the east of the project allow joint use and rights to their 6 foot tall block wall, a written joint use agreement, recorded through Pima County Recorder's Office, must be submitted to staff. See rezoning condition 13 for case C9-05-26 for further details. 35. Per Rezoning Case C9-04-11, a pedestrian access gate is encouraged at the east lot line. No gate is shown on the plan. Please respond with any information pertaining to the location of any proposed pedestrian access way. 36. Please remove case C9-OV-11, which is not an applicable reference to this project. 37. Please note, further review comments will be forthcoming, as rezoning conditions changes are proposed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05-207.1st.rillito.crossing.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan/tentative plat, easement/access agreements, building elevations, joint wall use agreement. |
| 01/13/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | ********UPDATED COMMENTS******** DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place 01/10/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other - NPPO CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-11 & C9-05-26 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/19/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat/Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations, Color Palette, Architectural Drawings & Letter of Agreement REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 1/6/06DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN – S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place Two different rezoning cases cover this site. Some of the conditions appear to conflict or will require interruption by staff. To assist in our review, staff developed a table for comparison purposes. Assuming Mayor and Council do not modified these conditions, our comments are as follows. # C9-04-11 Change Of Cond. # C9-05-26 Rezoning UP& D. Comments NOT CORRECTLY LISTED UNDER THE GENERAL NOTES SECTION NOT CORRECTLY LISTED UNDER THE GENERAL NOTES SECTION PLEASE UPDATE AND INCORPORATE CONDITONS UNDER THE GENERAL NOTES SECTION FO THE TENTATIVE PLAT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 1. A development plan in substantial compliance with the revised preliminary development plan dated August 11, 2005, and the Design Compatibility Report, is to be submitted and approved in accordance with Section 5.3.8.of the Land Use Code. 1. A development plan in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan dated September 26, 2005, and the Design Compatibility Report, is to be submitted and approved in accordance with Section 5.3.8. of the Tucson Land Use Code. There are conflicting dates regarding the preliminary plan. Correct date appears to be September 26, 2005. Please update to reflect correct preliminary plan date and add to the General Notes Section. 2. Dedication, or verification of existence, of right-of-way, per the Major Streets and Routes Plan (including applicable intersection widening), along the site frontage abutting First Avenue. The Major Streets and Routes Plan calls for 75 foot east of and parallel with the section line, which is also the centerline of First Avenue, for 300 feet north of the intersection of First Avenue and Limberlost Drive. From that point, the right of way should taper from 75 feet to 60 foot one-half right-of-way width at 600 feet north of intersection. 2. The owner/developer shall dedicate, or verify the existence of right-of-way, per the Major Streets and Routes Plan (including applicable intersection widening), along the First Avenue site frontage. Conditions may conflict. UP&D defers this to Department of Transportation. 3. The owner/developer shall participate in the upcoming First Avenue, River Road to Prince Road District Street Lighting and Sidewalk Improvements Project. UP&D defers this to Department of Transportation 4. The owner/developer will be responsible for the design and construction of the northbound right turn lane, five-foot wide bike lane, curb and six-foot wide sidewalk along the entire length of the First Avenue frontage. UP&D defers this to Department of Transportation 3. Dedication of a 30-foot radius spandrel at the northeast corner of First Avenue and Limberlost Drive. UP&D defers this to Department of Transportation 4. Dedication of right-of-way to a line 45 feet north of and parallel with the monument line on Limberlost Drive to the easterly project boundary. UP&D defers this to Department of Transportation 5. Design and construction of a center median with a left turn bay extending from the western most access point on Limberlost Drive to First Avenue, westbound lane, westbound right turn lane, 5 foot bike lane, curb, and 5 foot-wide sidewalk on north side of Limberlost Drive frontage with appropriate street taper for westbound traffic east of the southerly prolongation of the east property line of the project. In order to match ultimate planned cross-section for Limberlost Drive east of this project, design should transition so that the face of curb is located at 23 feet north of the monument line of Limberlost Drive at the southerly prolongation of the easterly property line of this project. UP&D defers this to Department of Transportation 6. Design and construction of a bus bay/pullout on First Avenue at the northeast corner of the intersection of First Avenue and Limberlost Drive, or as approved by the Transit Services Division of the Department of Transportation. UP&D defers to Department of Transportation 7. Development shall not exclude offsite to onsite floodwater flows from the ROW to the site. Site development shall not discharge flows to the right-of-way except at existing discharge locations and in a flow style that does not present a hazard to the right-of-way or any traffic (pedestrian or vehicular) that may be in the right-of-way. Any alternative must be approved by Department of Transportation prior to site construction. UP&D defers to Department of Transportation 7. Design and construction of northbound right turn lane, 5 foot bike lane, with the curbs and 6 foot wide sidewalk along entire length of First Avenue frontage coordinated with the upcoming First Avenue, River Road to Prince Road District Street Lighting and Sidewalk Improvements Project. UP&D defers to Department of Transportation 8. Architectural style and detail on the rear and sides shall be comparable with that on the front and designed with a southwest motif. Dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors (predominant in the natural desert landscape) and materials are to be submitted as part of the development plan process. Elevations to be similar to those submitted as part of the Design Compatibility Report. Please submit elevation drawings with proposed colors. 8. The owner/developer shall participate in the upcoming First Avenue, River Road to Prince Road District Street Lighting and Sidewalk Improvements Project and shall coordinate all design with the Project Manager for this project at the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. UP&D defers to Department of Transportation 9. Closure of any existing curb cuts that will not be used for vehicular access. UP&D defers to Department of Traffic Engineering 10. Traffic signal modifications as required by Traffic Engineering. UP&D defers to Department of Traffic Engineering 11. The Developer shall conduct a Category II TIA in accordance with the Access Management Guidelines. 5. The owner/developer shall conduct a Category II TIA in accordance with the Access Management Guidelines. An addendum to the existing Traffic Study encompassing both this property and the associated rezoning case (C9-04-11) shall satisfy this requirement. Conditions may conflict. UP&D defers to Department of Traffic Engineering 12. Primary access shall be from First Avenue. The westernmost ingress/egress point on Limberlost Drive shall be designed as a right-in/right-out ingress/egress point, as approved by Traffic Engineering. 6. The proposed access point as submitted on the Preliminary Development Plan shall either align with the access for the residential development across 1st Ave or shall be designed for right in/right out access only by means of a physical obstruction to preclude other movements at the access point. Design of a right-turn-in/right-turn-out restriction shall be approved by Traffic at the development plan stage. Conditions may conflict. UP&D defers to Department of Traffic Engineering 12. The required landscape buffer on the east property line shall be augmented with twenty-four (24) inch boxed canopy trees planted twenty-five (25) feet on-center where there are gaps/spaces in the existing trees. Palm trees and oleander shall not be used in the landscaping. Landscaping on site shall consist of native type landscape trees such as mesquite, acacia and palo verde. UP&D defers to Landscaping 13. Access to the site shall be limited to a maximum of two points from First Avenue and two points from Limberlost Drive. The eastern most access point on Limberlost Drive shall be an “Emergency Only” access with a locked gate that meets Fire Code standards to be a “break-away gate”. There shall be no ingress or egress from this eastern most Limberlost Drive access except for emergency purposes. All access shall be located in conformance with the spacing requirements of the Access Management Guidelines. UP&D defers to Department of Traffic Engineering 14. Access points shall align with existing access points or roadways or shall be separated by a minimum of 150 feet from any access points or roadways unless otherwise approved through the traffic study. UP&D defers to Department of Traffic Engineering 15. The required landscaping on the east property line shall be augmented with 24 inch boxed canopy trees planted 25 feet on-center. Prior to development on the site, a landscaping plan shall be presented to representatives of the affected neighborhood associations for their input and approval. The amount and maturity of the vegetation shall be in keeping with the landscape plan presented to the neighborhood representatives in their September and October 2004 meetings and dated May 14, 2004. Drought-tolerant landscaping shall be used that reflects the native environment. Palm trees and oleander shall not be used in the landscaping. Landscaping on site shall consist of native type landscape trees such as mesquite, acacia and palo verde. The mature trees located at the north end of the property shall be retained as part of the landscaping and shall act as the buffer to the adjacent residential properties to the north to the extent permissible under the Land Use Code and any subsequent variances approved by the Board of Adjustment. The trees located at the north end of the property may be deleted upon successful completion of the rezoning request for the adjacent five acre parcel C9-05-26 Continental 61 Fund – First Avenue, MH-1 to C-1/C-2. 20. The required landscaping on the property shall be augmented with a mix of 24 inch and 36 inch boxed trees as shown on the landscape development plan dated November 14, 2005, designed by the Acacia Group. The trees shall consist of native type landscape trees such as mesquite, acacia and palo verde. The amount and maturity of the new vegetation shall be in keeping with the landscape plans presented to the neighborhood representatives at their September to November 2005 meetings. Prior to approval of the development plan, a landscape plan shall be submitted to representatives of the affected neighborhood associations for their input and approval. Conditions may conflict. UP&D defers to Landscaping. Need verification that the neighborhoods have involved in the process. 16. A six-foot decorative masonry wall is required on the east property line. Existing walls on adjacent properties may be used to meet this requirement with the approval of the adjacent property owner(s). If the existing wall on the adjacent property is used to meet this condition, the owner/developer agrees to repair and/or replace the wall if it is damaged or removed. 13. The owner/developer shall obtain and record a use agreement from the adjacent property owner(s) in order to utilize the existing six-foot high masonry wall along the east property line as required screening. Please submit documentation of approval of adjacent property owners. 17. All loading zones and dumpsters shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from adjacent residential zoning. Condition met. 18. Where adjacent to residential zoning, the loading zones on the east side of the site shall be screened with 10 foot high masonry walls. 10. Loading zones adjacent to residential uses to the east shall be screened with a ten (10) foot-high masonry wall as submitted on the preliminary development plan. Please provide a detail of the 10-foot-high masonry wall. Conditions may conflict. 19. Loading and unloading of goods, and trash collection within 200 feet of the east property line shall be permitted only between the hours of 6 AM and 9 PM. 11. Loading and unloading of goods, and trash collection within 200 feet of the east property line shall be permitted only between the hours of 6 AM and 9 PM. Please add the General Notes Section. 19. Building heights for this development shall be a maximum of thirty (30) feet. Building “D” shall have a maximum floor area of 35,000 square feet and building “G” shall have a maximum floor area of 5,000 square feet. Please submit elevations. 20. Where adjacent to residential zoning, no second story windows or balconies facing north or east within 250 feet of the north or east property line, unless the sill height is a minimum of 70 inches, or the glass is obscure. Please add condition to the General Notes Section. 21. Signage is to be integrated into the overall design of the project, demonstrating aesthetic appeal and promoting ease of use of the development. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Tucson Sign Code, approved signs on the rezoning site may not change advertising copy by any type of electronic process. 9. Signage shall be integrated into the overall design of the project. Conditions may conflict. Please demonstrate how signage is integrated into overall design of project. 22. The owner/developer shall provide information and architectural elevations to justify (subject to LUC compliance) the increased height of the proposed entry feature of the 45,000 square feet building (Major 1) situated in the northeast corner of the parcel to 40 feet. As shown on the preliminary development plan, the 36,860 square feet building (Major 2) situated in the southeast corner of the parcel shall be a maximum of 26 feet in height at its northern most end, but will be stepped up from 21 feet 3 inches at its southern most end; the start of the 26 feet height shall be no less than 128 feet from the center line of Limberlost Drive. The 8,500 square feet building (Semi Major/Shops A) located in between these two buildings shall be a maximum of 30 feet including architectural features. The 5,000 square feet building (Pad 1) with 1,500 square feet patio situated in the northwest corner shall be a maximum of 29 feet 6 inches including architectural features. The 3000 square feet building (Pad 2) shall be a maximum height of 19 feet 10 inches and the two buildings (Shops B) on the western (3,840 square feet) and southwestern (3,338 square feet) edges of the site shall be a maximum of 21 feet 3 inches including architectural features. Please provide architectural elevations to satisfy this requirement. 23. All walls visible from a public right-of-way and/or adjacent to existing residential development, are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate two (2) or more visually appealing design treatments, such as the use of two (2) or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments, (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations. 14. All walls visible from a public right-of-way and/or adjacent to existing residential development, are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one (1) or more visually appealing design treatments, such as the use of two (2) or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments, (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations. Conditions may conflict with Conditions 16 and 13 above. Please submit a detail of the wall with the type of treatment and decorative materials that will be used. 24. Four (4) inch fence block or chain link fencing shall not be used for perimeter walls. 15. Four (4) inch fence block or chain link fencing shall not be used for perimeter walls. Please add condition to General Notes Section. 25. An archaeological assessment and survey shall be performed by a qualified archaeologist before any grading or other ground modification takes place. If cultural features or remains are found, testing and data recovery shall be completed as needed. Copies of testing plans, testing reports, data recovery plans and final reports shall be submitted to and approved by the City Historic Preservation Office prior to construction work commencing. If, during construction, human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified as required under A. R. S. 41-865. 16. An archaeological assessment and survey shall be performed by a qualified archaeologist before any grading or other ground modification takes place. If cultural features or remains are found, testing and data recovery shall be completed as needed. Copies of testing plans, testing reports, data recovery plans and final reports shall be submitted to and approved by the City Historic Preservation Office prior to construction work commencing. If, during construction, human remains and/or associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified as required under A. R. S. 41-865. Provide documentation this has been accomplished. 26. All outdoor pole and building lighting shall be full cut-off lighting - directed down and away from residential parcels and public roadways. All outdoor pole and building mounted lighting shall be mounted no higher than 17 feet within 75 feet of residential development or zoning. The applicant owner shall provide a photometric plan prepared by a professional lighting consultant that indicates outdoor lighting is uniform, renders color accurately, and does not create excessive overflow lighting. Please add condition to General Notes Section. The lighting code covers this condition and it may not be necessary. 27. “Safe by Design” concepts shall be incorporated in the development plan for review by the Tucson Police Department. 17. “Safe by Design” concepts shall be incorporated in the subdivision plat for review by the Tucson Police Department. UP&D defers to the Tucson Police Department. 28. Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development shall be at no expense to the public. 18. Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development shall be at no expense to the public. Please add conditions to General Notes Section. 29. The owner/developer shall time all development within the rezoning area to coincide with the availability of treatment and conveyance capacity in Pima County’s downstream public sewerage system. The owner / developer must obtain written documentation from the Pima County Wastewater Management Department that treatment and conveyance capacity for the proposed development is available, no more than 90 days before submitting any tentative plat, development plan, sewer improvement plan or request for building permit for review. If treatment and/or conveyance capacity will not be available via public funding mechanisms within a time frame compatible with the owner / developer's schedule for development, the owner/developer shall have the option of funding, designing and constructing the necessary improvements to Pima County's public sewerage system, within the context of a formal development or sewer service agreement between the owner/developer and Pima County. UP&D defers to Pima County Wastewater Management. 30. The owner/developer shall fund, design and construct all necessary sewers to serve the rezoning area and provide both capacity and service to all adjacent, up-gradient properties that do not have access to the public sewer system, in the manner specified at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan, sewer construction plan or request for building permit. UP&D defers to Pima County Wastewater Management. 31. The owner/developer shall connect all development within the rezoning area to Pima County's public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by the Pima County Wastewater Management and/or Development Services Departments at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan, sewer construction plan, or request for building permit. UP&D defers to Pima County Wastewater Management. 32. The owner/developer shall complete the construction of all necessary public and/or private sewers, obtain all necessary discharge authorizations (approvals of construction) from the Arizona or Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, and convey those sewers that will be publicly maintained to Pima County, before treatment and conveyance capacity in Pima Counties public sewerage system will be allocated for development within the rezoning area. UP&D defers to Pima County Wastewater Management. 33. Drive-through windows are prohibited except that a single drive-through window may be on PAD 2 as shown on the preliminary development plan dated October 14, 2004. Date of preliminary plan not consistent with Condition one of both cases. 34. Hours of operation shall be no earlier than 5AM and no later than 12:00 AM (midnight). Please add to General Notes Section. 35. Pedestrian access from the northeast corner of the site shall be provided by installing a gate in the perimeter wall subject to the adjacent apartment complex owner’s approval. Please provide detail of cross-access and adjacent apartment complex owner’s approval. 36. The owner/developer shall maximize the amount of water harvesting on the site. Stormwater (water harvesting) shall, wherever possible, be used for irrigation of landscaping on the site. The developer shall investigate the use of a pervious surface for the parking lot and shall present the findings (type of surface, cost analysis, and manufacturer) at a meeting of the neighborhoods held for that purpose. UP&D defers to Landscaping. Provide documentation of meeting with neighborhoods. 37. The owner/developer shall offer to meet with members of all homeowner’s associations within one (1) mile of the site to review the proposed development plan no less than ten (10) days prior to submitting for Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) review. Documentation of the meeting(s) with the homeowner associations, including invitations, sign-in sheets, and minutes, shall be provided with the CDRC submittal. 21. The owner/developer shall offer to meet with the members of the neighborhood associations within one (1) mile of the site to review the proposed development plan no later than ten (10) days prior to submitting for Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) review. Provide documentation of meeting with neighborhoods. 38. The improvements to First Avenue and Limberlost Drive required herein are not arterial road capacity improvements and therefore do not qualify as offsets to impact fees pursuant to Tucson Code Sec. 23A-87. UP&D defers to Transportation Department. 39. Five years are allowed from the date of initial authorization to implement and effectuate all Code requirements and conditions of rezoning. 22. Five years are allowed from the date of initial authorization to implement and effectuate all Code requirements and conditions of rezoning. UP&D defers to Development Services |
| 01/19/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: December 19, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place T131419 (105-10) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Jessica Shettleroe |
| 01/23/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ***REVISED*** January 25, 2006 Paul McIheran National Survey and Engineering 16745 W. Bluemound Road Brookfield, WI 53005 Subject: S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place Tentative Plat Dear Paul: Your submittal of November 18, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED Due to the rezoning conditions applicable to this site, a full submittal is required upon resubmittal with the exception of the Drainage report. Please include the elevations and color palettes requested by Community Planning. 2 Copies Elevations and Color Palette (Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 262-781-8466 |
| 11/18/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/21/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved November 21, 2005. |
| 11/28/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S05-207 NATIONAL SURVEY and ENGINEERING RILLITO CROSSING MARKET PLACE ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. Neither the State nor the Arizona Department of Transportation and/or its employees shall be liable for violations of law, or damages resulting from your dissemination or use of this email transmission if you are not the intended recipient. ********************************************************************* |
| 11/28/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Dumpster detail requires 10 feet clear between the bollardsf the side walls and between the rear wall ballards and the front gate. * Enclosure service area of 14 feet by 40 feet by 25 feet heigh is required in front of each enclosure. The 25 feet should exteed over the enclosure. By Retail space F the parking lot light maybe in conflict. * There are concerns with access to the following dumpster enclosures: * Enclosure Retail F, Lot 5. * Enclosure for the west dumpster will never be positioned properly within the enclosure. If the enclosures are positioned at an angle (45 degree) it could allow better service. * Enclosure by Retail E1, Lot 5. * For service flow if the enclosure is at a 30 degree angle to the N-S PAAL the service would be enhanced. * Enclosure by Retail G, Lot 6. * The enclosure might be better serviced if it would be located at the East end of the E-W PAAL. (The building schetmatic seems to be that of a bank. If the enclosure would be positioned off the N-S PAAL then the service trucks would not have to drive around the building and there is a possibility that the two or three parking spaces could be added.) * There is no mention of recycling for the different Lots. (The large retail store for lots 1,2 & 4 are of a size that usually require recycling oppertunties.) |
| 12/05/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-207 RILLITO CROSSING MARKET PLACE/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: December 5, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Number all buildings numerically on all sheets. jg |
| 12/08/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: RILLITO CROSSING MARKET PLACE S05-207 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted November 18, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 12/15/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | S05-207 Rillito Crossing - no comment |
| 12/19/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 12/19/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place 12/16/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 1st Ave (Limberlost to Wetmore) No 0 30,921 42,760 4 64,140 43,814 6 5,941 Route 6, 15 min, 0 miles; Route 34, 30 min, 0 miles Bike route with striped shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 12/19/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP/DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. The SVTs on 1st Ave are not identified as to whether they are existing or future or both. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) I can not locate any recordation data for Limberlost Road. 3. Why is there an extra "flare" on the south edge of the center access from 1st Ave? 4. The raised median diverter at the north access is inadequately designed to preclude left turns into the site from 1st Ave as required by the submitted TIA. 5. The raised median diverter at the access from Limberlost is redundant with the construction of the median in Limberlost Road. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/19/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 16, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-207 Rillito Crossing Market Place: Tentative Plat Review Staff has no comments. |
| 12/21/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | December 21, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-207 PROJECT NAME: RILLITO CROSSING MARKET PROJECT ADDRESS: 1ST AVE/LIMBERLOST DR PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz, Civil Engineer Resubmittal Required: Tentative Plat and Revised Drainage Report The following items must be revised or added to the plan. TENTATIVE PLAT 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Utilities Note. All development plans are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." DS 2-05.2.2.E 3. Provide bearings, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, along Limberlost Drive. 4. Show all future and existing Right of Way information along 1st Avenue and Limberlost Dr. 5. If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. DS 2-05.2.3.B 6. Provide Limits of sawcuts and new asphalt along 1st Avenue and Limberlost. 7. If applicable, the following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. DS 2-05.2.3.D 8. If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so that later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. DS 2-05.2.4.D.4 9. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. DS 2-05.2.4.G 10. Verify that locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts have been provided. DS 2-05.2.4.H.3 11. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development plan area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) DS 2-05.2.4.H.5 12. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM.14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. A. The responsibility of operating and maintaining a local detention basin rests with the owner of the facility. However, the City of Tucson reserves the right to periodically inspect of review any private-maintenance actions that would help to ensure that private maintenance, related to facility operation and safety, is being adequately provided. B. The Development Plans shall have a note stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention/retention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. C. The certified annual inspection report shall contain the following summaries: (a) either a statement that no maintenance work is needed at that time, or a list of repairs and work to be done to correct deficiencies or potential problems and/or to restore the aesthetics, followed by a letter of certification from an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer stating that the recommended work has been satisfactorily completed; and (b) a statement either indicating that watershed conditions have not changed since the previous inspection report, or stating that specific changes have occurred which alter or eliminate some of design features and affect the level of service of the drainage and detention/retention systems. The City Engineer is to be notified if watershed conditions have changed to the extent that drainage and detention/retention systems no longer satisfy the requirements of the Floodplain Regulations found in the Tucson Zoning Code. 13. Small, local detention basins constructed in compliance with Section 23-469 of the Tucson Zoning Code will not be accepted by the City of Tucson for maintenance or liability. All local detention/retention basins shall be constructed according to current design standards, and they must include appropriate access and maintenance easements, including an unobstructed access route into the basin. SMDDFM 1.5.2 14. As part of the drainage report submitted in conjunction with the Development Plan, or Tentative Plat, a detailed inspection list and basin-performance criteria shall be included for subsequent reference by the Engineer responsible for annual and as-needed maintenance inspections of the basins and drainageways. SMDDFM 1.5.2 15. Include Maintenance checklist in drainage report. SMDDFM 14.03 16. Provide earthwork quantities on the sheet labeled Grading Plan. 17. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 cubic yards is designated "Engineered Grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM 14.2.6 18. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert @ 791-5550 or myself for submittal requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal. 19. Address the maintenance responsibility for all drainage facilities (including detention basins) in the Drainage Report and provide a maintenance checklist. We also recommend including a copy of the check list in the CC & R's to allow the Home Owners Association access to the list and facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 21. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. DRAINAGE REPORT 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. An exhibit provided by National Survey & Engineering illustrated that at the northeast portion of the project the Q's at the hundred year event would be 272cfs. How does this compare to existing Q's at this location. In addition prevent adverse effects to adjacent lots at this location or any other location at the 2yr, 5yr, 10yr, and 100yr events due to this development. Adverse effects to adjacent lots include nuisance ponding, an increase in cfs, or changes to existing flow patterns such as sheet flow to a concentrated flow. 3. In the report it states that stormwater will remain in the depressed areas of the parking lot until most of the flood hydrograph for the entire offsite watershed has passed. What is the time of these hydrographs at the 2yr, 5yr, 10yr, and 100yr events? If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5640 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |