Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S05-180
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
2364 E DREXEL RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S05-180
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/03/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/04/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approv-Cond Please provide title report
10/04/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved October 04, 2005.
10/06/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) The landscape border calculations on sheet L1 are for Campbell Avenue and Bilby Road. Provide calculations for Drexel Road and Tucson Boulevard.

2) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size per DS 2-05.2.1.A. Revise the landscape plan to comply.

3) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans.
DS 2-07.2.1.B

4) Revise the landscape plan to include provisions for dust control in disturbed portions of adjacent right-of-way areas per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4

5) A 10' wide street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4.A is required along the entire Tucson Boulevard street frontage. The landscape border may not be located in the right-of-way. The landscape border shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference the maintenance standards in Sec. 3.7.6. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1.c

6) The project is subject to the provisions of the Watercourse, Amenities, Safety, and Habitat Ordinance, TCC 29. A separate application and review is required. Contact Patricia Gehlen/Zoning Manager at 791-5640 Ext. 1179 for submittal requirements. A pre-submittal meeting is required.

7) No person shall plant any tree, shrub, or other vegetation in the pedestrian area of the right-of-way without first obtaining a written permit from the city per
TCC Sec. 25-52.1(2). Add a note to the plans stating that a
permit is required prior to any right-of-way excavation or construction.

8) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5

9) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED.
10/07/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S05-180 TRES PUEBLOS IV / TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: October 6, 2005



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1: Label lot 15 on pg. 2.

2: Change Commerce Center Drive to Place on pg. 3.
10/07/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S05-180
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
TRES PUEBLOS IV
10/11/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development.
* APC's approved for curb side collection. APC's to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service.
10/19/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV 10/18/05

() Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
() Other (NPPO)

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Tucson Blvd. (gateway route)

COMMENTS DUE BY: October 31, 2005

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 10/13/05

The Tres Pueblos IV tentative plat is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), and therefore must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. In this instance, the RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, Kino Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all.

The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf. Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another.

The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Please submit elevations illustrating how this requirement will be satisfied for the units abutting Tucson Blvd., Drexel Rd. and the adjacent residential property to the west.

Please remove General Note 23. This site is not within the Airport Environs Zone for TIA.

Coordinate with City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department regarding trail width requirements, trail access, and placement along the southern portion of the property where it abuts the Rodeo Wash.

The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual encourages the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. In order to provide such a microclimate it is required to provide a minimum of one fifteen (15) gallon tree, no more than ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk, on every other lot frontage. This should be shown on the landscape plan along with a note indicating such.

Please call out on the landscaping plan the material to be used for the pathway within the amenity. The path should be ADA compliant as to material and slope. An ADA compliant path must also be provided that connects the sidewalk to any proposed trail adjacent to the Rodeo wash.
10/25/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: TRES PUEBLOS IV

Lots 1-60

S05-180



Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative
plat submitted for review October 3, 2005.



The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the
existing facilities to the north of the subdivision. Enclosed is a copy
of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers
of the existing facilities.



Also, enclosed is copy of subdivision layout showing where TEP will be
placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision. This is not a
preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the
proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. TEP's primary
and secondary conductors will be designed north and east. See the TEP
Service requirements book SR-601, pages 1 & 2 for the legend or go to
www.tep.com.



TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved
Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the
plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are:
building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and
paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or
email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have
any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com
10/31/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP:

1. A Traffic statement is required for this Development. Particular attention shall be paid to turn lane warrant analysis at the access points to this Development.

2. Add access ramps to between lots 23/24, 43/44.

3. Virtually all of the signage depicted on the plan set on the periphery of the Development is using the symbol for new signs when I suspect that these are existing signs. Please use correct symbols in accordance with Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition.

D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
11/01/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is October 2, 2006.

2. This project has been assigned subdivision case number S05-180. Please note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on the tentative and final plat, landscape and NPPO plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1)

3. Remove the case numbers referenced in the lower right corner of each sheet (C9-94-18 and S04-109) as they do not pertain to this site.

4. Under general note six (6) remove reference to AEZ. AEZ does not affect this subdivision.

5. General note 23 is not required. Please remove.

6. Since this is a Cluster Development with density increase, please demonstrate compliance with LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B. Documentation may be required to verify compliance.


7. Please show the location and type of recreation facilities to be provided for all recreation areas within the subdivision. The RCP must provide for conveniently located commonly owned recreation facilities, designed for, and usable by, both adults and children residing within the project. 25% of the site area that is not part of the site coverage is to be commonly owned or set aside as accessible to all residents of the development. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.2)

8. Revise the proposed density under the RCP calculations on sheet 1 of 3 to 5.45 du/ac. (60 units divided by 11 acres = 5.45)

9. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
11/07/2005 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond November 3, 2005

TO: James King
Rick Engineering Company

THRU: Patricia Gehlen
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Tres Pueblos IV, Lots 1-60 and Common Areas A1-A4 & B1
Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal
S05-180


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

Based on the evaluation of the construction of 525 feet of off-site sewer, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates for 21 lots and Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates for 39 lots.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-180, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
11/10/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: November 9, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov



SUBJECT: S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV: Tentative Plat(10-3-05)


Please show and indicate a public trail easement corresponding with Common Area “A”(adjacent to Rodeo Wash) is dedicated by plat.
11/15/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Transportation Information for Rezoning,
Subdivision and Development Review Requests
File Number Description Date Reviewed
E
Pima Association of Governments
Transportation Planning Division
177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405
Tucson, AZ 85701
Phone: (520) 792-1093
Fax: (520) 620-6981
www.pagnet.org
S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV 10/31/2005
1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street
2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Planned Action:
STREET IDENTIFICATION
3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic
4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E”
5. Existing Number of Lanes
9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development
(Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips)
8. Future Number of Lanes
TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS
10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance)
11. Existing or Planned Bikeway
Remarks:
Street Number 1 Street Number 2
Year Year
Planned Action:
VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS
6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed
7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E”
Drexel Rd. (Campbell to Tucson)
No 0
7,525
21,380
2
53,450
26,692
5
574
Route 26, 30 minutes, 0 miles
None
Tucson (Bilby to Drexel)
No 0
18,571
42,760
4
51,615
64,140
6
Route 26, 30 minutes, 0.2 mile
Planned bike route
11/29/2005 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: November 3, 2005


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV T151408 (140-26)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add the bearings for the lot lines and add the perimeter dimensions and bearings to each sheet.
Add complete curve data.
If there are any questions, please contact Jessica Shettleroe at 740-4398.


NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.






Jessica Shettleroe
11/30/2005 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator
SUBJECT: Tres Pueblos IV Subdivision Tentative Plat Submittal Engineering Review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-180

SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Landscape documents, and title report documents were received on October 3, 2005. Development Services Department Engineering Division has done a review of the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:
1) Tucson Code Sec. 29-15(b)(1): Per this section of the W.A.S.H. Ordinance, a Wash Report must be submitted for the Rodeo Wash along the south portion of the project. Provide a W.A.S.H. exhibit showing 50-ft Study Area and resource area delineated within that area. Provide complete discussions regarding any effects on hydrology and hydraulics to the study area due to each of the elements a - i listed in this section of the Tucson Code. The study area shall be delineated and if any portion of the 50-ft study area is proposed to be developed, a mitigation plan shall be included in the W.A.S. H. Report. The plat indicates a proposed drainage outlet and a trail/roadway to be constructed within the 50-ft study area; please note that any W.A.S.H. submittal with development in the study area may be referred to City of Tucson stormwater committee(s) for review.
2) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-03.2.3.J: Drainage Report shall provide details and calculations for a sediment trap or other sediment control device for CA-B1 basin, depending on sediment transport characteristics determined in W.A.S.H. Report.
3) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: Provide discussion in section 3.2 regarding basin infiltration design. Provide geotechnical results with elevation and location map of the percolation tests and discuss results in the Drainage Report.
4) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.4.L: Address the following comments for the Drainage Report:
a) Provide discussion of flow at existing drainage inlets at the wash crossing on Tucson Boulevard.
b) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4: Provide cross-sections with dimensions from basins to existing Rodeo W.A.S.H. area on a drainage exhibit. Show outlet structures and existing and proposed grades.
c) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: The Title Block indicates that the basins are recreation areas. Provide explanation in drainage report how the basins will comply with human activity zone exit requirements. Label on the drainage exhibit the basin perimeter slopes at 8:1(H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements.
d) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.e & f: Add information regarding locations and types of all basin security barriers to be installed. Handrail is typically required at scuppers adjacent to a basin.
e) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6 A.4.d: In revised drainage report, discuss building setbacks, with dimensions between structures and any proposed basins or drainageways per geotechnical assessment of 30-foot boring.

TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
5) DS Sec.3-01.10.Fig.22: On sheet 2, show 50-foot ROW tangents, label 60-foot radial dimensions, and revise proposed survey monument locations for standard curb knuckle.
6) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A.1: Provide other title report document or other documentation regarding ownership of property.
7) DS Sec.2.3.2.2.B.7: Clarify General Note 6 to add an additional overlay zone criteria for LUC Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone.
8) DS Sec. 2-03.2.4.H: Street design shall be in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan. Dimension the Tucson Boulevard and Drexel Road intersection widening / dedications / taper on sheet 2.
9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: To prevent standing water, provide spot elevations showing positive drainage throughout the common area and basin to outlet area.
10) DS Sec.10-02.7.6: Provide delineation for the EHS line for sheet 2.
11) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.6: Address the following comments for flows of 100 cfs or more on plan views:
a) The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations will be drawn on the plat, including separate delineation for FEMA Zone A floodplain.
b) Label also the Q100 for the Rodeo Wash at Tucson Boulevard.
c) Label all existing and proposed Q100 entering/exiting the site.
12) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: A proposed trail is indicated by notation to lie within the Pima County drainage easement area and specifically on the existing maintenance access road as noted on sheets 2 and 5. If the existing maintenance road lies within this existing drainage easement, provide a letter from the county regarding their authorization of proposed design for the proposed trail and its maintenance within the drainage easement. Otherwise, provide a trail location that does not overlap the maintenance access road. Provide a cross section.
13) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Submit a bound copy of the soils report that discusses suitability and feasibility of the project. Besides description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, pavement design section, and other typical geotechnical data, the soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from basins to buildings, include minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales, and provide infiltration test results. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Infiltration rates shall meet Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria per DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a.
14) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1 & -14.3.4: On planview, show 15-ft.wide basin maintenance access ramp with maximum ramp slope of 15% max for the basin.
15) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a: Dimension spillway for flow into basin on sheet 2.
16) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4: Provide cross-sections with dimensions from basins to existing Rodeo W.A.S.H. area. Show outlet structures and existing and proposed grades.
17) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: The Title Block indicates that the basins are recreation areas. Label on planview the basin perimeter slopes at 8:1(H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements.
18) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.e & f: Show locations and types of all basin security barriers to be installed. Handrail is typically required at scuppers adjacent to a basin.
19) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6 A.4.d: Label and dimension building setbacks, with dimensions between structures and any proposed basins or drainageways per geotechnical assessment of 30-foot boring.
20) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.H:Show existing features:
a) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Add sections with the following information regarding the existing public right-of-way will be provided: besides the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, show existing curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks within 100 feet of the site, including the following:
i) Show locations of existing curb and sidewalk along Tucson Boulevard.
ii) Show existing curb along Drexel.
iii) Show locations of any existing guy wires on planview.
iv) Provide details and cross sections for existing bank protection structures at Rodeo W.A.S.H. and Tucson Blvd.
v) Show location of grade control structure(s) in Rodeo Wash.
b) Add notation regarding stockpile and fill at site and provide in soils report the geotechnical recommendations for earthwork or removal.
c) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C&D: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Complete descriptions for existing conditions by providing all easements. Also, for the Pima County right-of-way for the drainage area of Rodeo W.A.S.H., assure that all curve and line data per Bk7088 pg87094 is shown on planview.
d) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site shall be shown, including:
i) Show existing drainage inlets at the wash crossing on Tucson Boulevard.
ii) Label material for embankment for Rodeo W.A.S.H. at east end near roadway crossings.
21) Per D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Regarding the conceptual grading design for the project, address the following comments:
a) Fill in missing information; provide basin data, volume, depth, etc per report on sheet 2.
b) Provide cross sections for the following areas for clarification of conceptual grading:
i) Cross section of the maintenance road where the channels are proposed to cross. The crossings shall be traversable by motorized vehicle. See above comment 7.
ii) Clarify interlot grading to clarify positive drainage at the rear of lots 18 - 26.
c) For clarification of proposed flow conditions on these RCP lots, provide typical lot grading detail, that shows direction of drainage around proposed lots and explains the following:
i) Clarify and provide flow arrows, swale dimensions, slope run-outs, minimum slope grades, and general access.
ii) Show/clarify area for utility pads / mechanical equipment or A/C unit locations, if it is located along the side yards.
iii) Show general / typical high point relative elevation to other side of lot or to the street, grade break locations, as well as minimum flow grades around building pads.
iv) Show any building setbacks to swales, slope setbacks for screen walls, minimum side and rear building setbacks, per geotechnical report and drainage report.
v) Dimensioned distance of 3-ft does not appear to be sufficient at sideyard. Provide typical lot grading details to show that there is sufficient area for drainage swales, mechanical equipment, A/C units, slope setbacks for screen walls, slope run-outs, and general access. The Typical Lot Setbacks detail on sheet 4 may need to be revised to accommodate proposed structures, drainage, grading, and geotechnical constraints.
d) The proposed development is subject to NPDES requirements and the SWPPP will be needed at Grading Plan review stage that clearly protects Rodeo Wash from adverse impacts stormwater runoff.
22) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Label and show the local basis of elevation for site on the planview.
23) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Clarify access ramps with a detail or further notation to state that truncated domes are required per ADAAG. This is an update to COT standard detail 207. There is a recent directive to use the new "truncated domes" - little raised nodules in lieu of grooves. Remove lines in HC ramp area details on legend, all plan views, and details on all sheets; or, add notation to clarify that truncated domes are required on these areas.

LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
1) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Delineate basin access with width of ramp and show that no proposed vegetation will block access.
2) DS Sec.3-01.5.3: Show sight visibility triangles for Tucson Boulevard and Drexel Road at new street access points. Also, update correct right-of-way dimensions for Tucson Boulevard and Drexel Road.

Submit W.A.S.H. submittal, revised Drainage Report, revised Tentative Plat, revised Landscape documents, a bound copy of the geotechnical report, response letter, and any other supporting documentation such as the Pima County letter. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services
12/08/2005 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

December 8, 2005

James King
Rick Engineering Company
1745 East River Road #101
Tucson, AZ 85718

Subject: S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV Tentative Plat

Dear James:

Your submittal of October 3, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Real Estate, Addressing, Community Planning, Parks and Recreation, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, DSD)

6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Community Planning, Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscaping, DSD)


Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 322-6956