Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-180
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/26/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size per DS 2-05.2.1.A. Revise the landscape plan (L1 and any others) to comply. 2) Revise the landscape plan to include provisions for dust control in disturbed portions of ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY areas per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. The minimum depth is to be 2" per DS 2-06.5.2.C. 3) The project is subject to the provisions of the Watercourse, Amenities, Safety, and Habitat Ordinance, TCC 29. Approval of the plat is conditioned upon approval of the WASH application. Note the case number and date of approval on the tentative plat. 4) Revise the landscape plans to clearly show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 Correct the line weight to match the legend and/or call out the line. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 07/16/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: Tres Pueblos Norte RCP S05-180 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: July 16, 2006 DUE DATE: July 24, 2005 1. The labeling of the common areas in the key map on sheet 1 of 3 is inconsistent with the plat and landscape plan. Revise all drawings to have the same designations for each common area. If one proposed common area "A" is designated for private streets, include this information in the list contained in the title blocks on sheets 1 - 3. DS 2-03.2.4.C 2. In addition to showing recreational amenities on the landscape plan, label them on the tentative plat. LUC 3.6.1.3.B 3. As acknowledged in the response comments, the Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 4. The setback table on sheet 1 of 3 references Campbell Avenue and Bilby Road. This project site does not front on these two streets. Revise to provide MS&R setbacks required and proposed for Tucson Blvd. And Drexel Road. LUC 3.6.2.5 5. Add a general note stating that this project is also subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.E & .F. 6. Add the adjacent zoning to the south of the site on sheet 3 of 3. DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 7. For microfilming and archiving purposes the minimum type size must be 12 point (0.12"). Revise the lettering in the location map that does not meet this minimum requirement. DS 2-03.2.1.C If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 07/19/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 19, 2006, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-180 PROJECT NAME: Tres Pueblos Norte PROJECT ADDRESS: Drexel Rd/Tucson Blvd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat and a copy of the Traffic Statement is required for resubmittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. This review will be concluded at the time that the Traffic Statement has been submitted. This plat will not be approved until the Traffic Statement is in receipt and all required modifications recommended in the Traffic Statement have been indicated on the plat. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/21/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-180 TRES PUEBLOS NORTE/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 7/21/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: Correct scale on pg. 1. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** es |
| 08/01/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-180 Tres Pueblo Norte: Resumittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - Request "1' No Vehicle Access Easement" be considered along W. boundary, C.A. A-1 and C.A. B-1. |
| 08/10/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 10, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV: Tentative Plat(6-23-06) Approved. |
| 09/12/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Tres Pueblos IV Subdivision Tentative Plat Resubmittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-180 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report, revised Landscape documents, and response letter were reviewed. Development Services Department Engineering Division has done a review of the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. A substantial amount of the comments were not addressed. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.4.L: Address the following comments for the Drainage Report: a) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: Basins are required to act as multi-use areas. Provide explanation in drainage report how the basins will comply with human activity zone exit requirements. Label on the drainage exhibit the basin perimeter slopes at 8:1(H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements. b) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.e & f: Add information regarding locations and types of all basin security barriers to be installed. Handrail is typically required at scuppers adjacent to a basin. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 2) DS Sec. 2-03.2.4.H: Street design shall be in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan. Dimension the Tucson Boulevard (120-ft future per MS&R) and Drexel Road (100-ft future per MS&R) intersection widening on planview sheet. The taper will be from the Drexel right-of-way to the Tucson Boulevard intersection. Revise taper and future right-of-way delineations. 3) DS Sec.10-02.7.6: Provide delineation for the Erosion Hazard Setback line on planview. 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.6: The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations will be drawn on the plat, including separate delineation for FEMA Zone A floodplain. 5) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Only a couple of pages of the geotechnical report were found in this submittal. Submit a bound copy of the soils report with addenda. 6) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: The Title Block indicates that the basins are recreation areas. Label on planview the basin perimeter slope(s) at 8:1(H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements. Access ramp of 15% is steeper than 8:1(H:V) and can not be approved. 7) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.e & f: Show locations and types of all basin security barriers to be installed. Handrail is typically required at scuppers adjacent to a basin. 8) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6 A.4.d: Label and dimension building setbacks, with dimensions between structures and any proposed basins or drainageways per geotechnical assessment of 30-foot boring. Clarify dimensions for lots 33 and 34. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Provide sidewalk along frontage of project along Drexel that connects to existing sidewalk and provide H/C ramps. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.H: Show existing features: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Show locations of any existing guy wires on planview especially any utility poles that are in conflict with proposed development and may need to be relocated; label relocated or to be removed entities. b) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: Provide information and depict existing bank protection structures at Rodeo W.A.S.H. and Tucson Blvd. c) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.H & DS Sec.2-03.4.K: Add notation regarding stockpile and fill at site and provide in soils report the geotechnical recommendations for earthwork or removal. Provide copy of soils report showing discussion of recommendations for the fill soils. d) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C&D: Per the Title Report pulled from the Final Plat package, all existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Complete descriptions for existing conditions by providing all easements. Specifically address: i) Identify the following Schedule B items on the plat: (1) Item 4 drainage easement (2) Item 5 slope easement (3) Item 6 flowage easement (4) Item 7 water easement ii) Regarding the drainage easement, remove the words "granted to Pima Co" for clarification. e) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: The following information shall be provided on the plat to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 100 feet of the site. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site shall be shown, including: i) Show existing drainage inlets at the wash crossing on Tucson Boulevard. ii) Label material for embankment for Rodeo W.A.S.H. at east end near roadway crossings. 11) Delineate and label temporary construction easement / drainage maintenance (or similar) easement with docket / page for the proposed drainage improvements along west property boundary. 12) Per D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Where lots do not indicate 6 inches of fall within 10 feet from the foundations, swales should be clarified to ensure drainage away from the foundation. For clarification of proposed flow conditions on these RCP lots, provide typical lot grading detail, that shows direction of drainage around proposed lots and explains the following: i) Clarify and provide flow arrows, swale dimensions, slope run-outs, minimum slope grades, and general access. ii) Show/clarify area for utility pads / mechanical equipment or A/C unit locations, if it is located along the side yards. iii) Show general / typical high point relative elevation to other side of lot or to the street, grade break locations, as well as minimum flow grades around building pads. iv) Show any building setbacks to swales, slope setbacks for screen walls, minimum side and rear building setbacks, per geotechnical report and drainage report. v) Dimensioned distance of 3-ft does not appear to be sufficient at sideyard. Provide typical lot grading details to show that there is sufficient area for drainage swales, mechanical equipment, A/C units, slope setbacks for screen walls, slope run-outs, and general access. The Typical Lot Setbacks detail on sheet 4 may need to be revised to accommodate proposed structures, drainage, grading, and geotechnical constraints. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Label and show the local basis of elevation and local basis of elevation for site on the planview. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Provide section for trail or access way along south side of development labeling material of path. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Add note to plat or label with keynote or on each lot as to clarification of lot drainage pattern / direction. 16) DS Sec.3-01.Fig18: End of SVT triangle needs to be properly drawn to end at edge of pavement to the south of lot 40. Lot 40 needs to be revised or clarified how the future building structure and any future screen wall will not conflict with the SVT along the local street for near side SVT. 17) Remove floating text "Future SVT" near southeast corner of site on sheet 3. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENT: 1) DS Sec.3-01.Fig18: Show sight visibility triangles south of lot 40 and assure that no trees will obstruct the sight visibility area. Submit separate copy of the title report, revised Drainage Report, revised Tentative Plat, revised Landscape documents, a bound copy of the geotechnical report, response letter, and any other supporting documentation such as the Pima County letter. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 10/04/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV 10/03/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Tucson Blvd. (gateway route) COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/02/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 10/31/05 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 10/2/06 |
| 10/06/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 6, 2006 Luno Rick Engineering Company 1745 East River Road #101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S05-180 Tres Pueblos IV Tentative Plat Dear Luno: Your submittal of June 23, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Real Estate, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Statement (Traffic, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Bound Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF THIS TENTATIVE PLAT, A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A REVIEW EXTENSION MUST SUBMITTED AND GRANTED BY THE CDRC OFFICE. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |