Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-164
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/19/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-164 INTERSTATE BUSINESS PARK / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 16, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Label approved interior street name for cul-de-sac adjacent to lots 11-16 on Final Plat. |
| 09/19/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentatijve Plat is approved September 19, 2005. |
| 09/21/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Subdivision for commercial lots. Refuse service will have to be addressed during the development plan review for each lot. |
| 09/27/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a landscape/irrigation plan. DS 2-07.0, DS 2-03.3.1.C 2) Submit a native plant preservation plan or application. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0, DS 2-03.3.1.D 3) Revise the general notes on sheet 1. Notes 1,3,8, & 24 include references that are not applicable. 4) Additional comments may apply. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 10/11/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: INTERSTATE BUSINESS PARK S05-164 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review September 13, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 10/13/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-164 Interstate Business Park, Lots 1-16 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 10/14/05 DUE DATE: 10/11/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is September 9, 2006. 2. Please revise and add the following items within the location map. Review the street name location for Park Avenue and place the name on the correct corresponding street. Add the following street names to location map, Kino Parkway, and Benson Highway. The following street names Ajo Way, 36th Street, and Campbell Avenue are not legible please revise. All recorded subdivisions within the one square mile location map area must be labeled with the book and page number. (DS 2-03.2.1.D.2) 3. The title block must be revised as follows. The subdivision name cannot be duplicated and must be revised as required by Pima County. Also the brief legal description in the title block must revised to state that the this development is "Resubdivision of Lots 1, 2, and 4 of Interstate Business Park as platted in Maps and Plat book 42 at page 20". (DS 2-03.2.1.G) 4. Please list the owner/developer's phone number and contact person. (DS 2-03.2.2.A.1) 5. List as reference in the lower right corner next to the title block, the annexation case number C9-56-29. (DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 and DS 2-03.2.2.B.9) 6. List the proposed use of the subdivision along with any applicable subject to sections. Uses for each lot along with the applicable subject to sections must be listed if the uses are not the same for individual lots. Additional comments may forthcoming on this item. (DS 2-03.2.2.B.5) A note should be added to the plat that states that individual site, landscape, and NPPO plans will be submitted for review and approval for each lot. The note should also include that the approved tentative plat and landscape plan must be included as reference for each site review. 7. List as general note, "Existing Zoning is I-1( DS 2-03.2.2.B.2) 8. If applicable, add a note identifying by case number any zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project, such as a Board of Adjustment variance, a Lot Development Option (LDO) modification, Project Design Option (PDO) modification, or Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) together with the date and conditions of approval or, if the review has not been completed, a statement that it is in process. (DS 2-03.2.2.B.6) 9. General note number one should be revised to state the specific overlay zones that are applicable and affect his specific site. The only overlay zone that affects this development is the Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone, LUC section 2.8.3. Please revise the note accordingly. Also please remove general note number three. This parcel does not front along a Scenic Corridor street therefore the note is not required. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 10. Please review the perimeter boundary distances and bearings. Add and revise as necessary any missing or omitted distances and bearings. Also, in reviewing the individual lots for corresponding distance and bearings it was noted that some of the lot lines were not labeled with the distance and bearings or were incorrect (typo). (DS 2-03.2.3.B and DS 2-03.2.4.A) 11. Draw and label the existing and future curb along the north side of the property. (I acknowledge that this roadway is part of the I-10 freeway system.) DS 2-03.2.3.D 12. Label the adjacent zoning classifications. (DS 2-03.2.4.D) 13. Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), handicap ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and handicap ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plat if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Indicate if streets are to remain private or are to be dedicated to the public. Indicate the proposed street names, if available. See engineering comments. (DS 2-03.2.4.F) Add a note stating that truncated domes will be provided at all access ramps and at vehicle handicapped parking access ramps that transition to handicapped access aisles. 14. If streets are proposed, indicate if they are designed for on-street parking to accommodate visitor parking or if parking is provided in common parking areas. Visitor parking is to be evenly distributed and usable by all residents of the project. Extra parking on individual lots, such as tandem parking in driveways, does not count toward visitor parking, as it is not available to other property owners within the project. (DS 2-03.2.4.G) If you have any questions about this transmittal please call David Rivera (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05164tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised, tentative plat, and additional requested documents. |
| 10/14/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT has a few comments on this proposed project. > > - show access control for I-10 on the plan > - is the property draining toward I-10, please provide a drainage report for the project > - is there a development plan for this project > - identify the property to the east of the project > - has this property been previously recorded > - will there be any type of noise mitigation along the property and I-10 > - the Kino interchange will be rebuilt and reconfigured in the future, it will be the developer's/designer responsibility to check how and if the development will be affected > > If you have any questions or comments, I can be contacted at 620-5435. Thank you. TM. > |
| 10/14/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: October 13, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-164 Interstate Business Park: Tentative Plat Review(9-13-05) Staff has no comments. |
| 10/14/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: October 11, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-164 Interstate Business Park T141430 (132-13) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove shading and hatching. Add names of adjacent subdivisions and the map and plats, or labels as UNSUBDIVIDED. Add the tie to section corner. If there are any questions, please contact Jessica Shettleroe at 740-6658. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Jessica Shettleroe |
| 10/17/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-164; The A.C.E. along the north east PL is a No Access Easement previously established. Show where/how the N.A.E. was created. Wall Street and Metric Place are not existing public...they are private. Not all of the schedule B items in the title report are illustrated on the plan. |
| 10/18/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-164 Interstate Business Park 10/18/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/11/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 10/11/05 |
| 10/19/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) There is no recordation data for any streets on this plan. There is no ROW information for Wall Street or Metric Place. 2. Label ROW on Ajo as either existing or future. If the future and existing ROW are coincident, label the ROW as both existing and future. 3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. This is particularly applicable to the new cul-de-sac off of Ajo Way. 4. Supply the rest of the curve table. The table appears to stop at C10. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/24/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S05-164 Interstate Business Park 10/3/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Ajo Way (I-10 to Benson Hwy) No 0 53,680 64,140 6 64,140 85,302 6 688 Route 11, 15 minutes,o miles Bike route w/ striped shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 11/02/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 2, 2005 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Interstate Business Park Tentative Plat S05-164 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Tentative Plat 1. The plat for Interstate Business Park (Book 42 Page 20) indicates that Wall Street and Metric Place are private streets (common area A). Clarify the status of the existing streets. If the streets have been dedicated and accepted by TDOT provide recordation information for the dedication. If the developer intends to dedicate the street to the public, provide a letter from the City of Tucson Department of Transportation providing the conditions under which the dedication will be made. The TDOT usually does not accept streets that were constructed as private streets. Provide documentation the the existing property owners' association will consent to the addition of new street length. Discuss how the streets and drainageways will be maintained. 2. Revise general note 26 indicating the total miles of new streets and whether the streets will be public or private. (DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b) 3. Show and label the offsite discharges that impact the site. (DS 2-03.2.4.L.7) 4. The discharge from this site is expected to be about 138 cfs. Show adjacent drainage facilities to show how the discharge is accommodated off site. (DS 2-03.2.3.G and I) 5. List the contour interval near the scale and north arrow. (DS 2-03.2.1.H) 6. The drainage report indicates that retention/detention requirements will be addressed in the individual development plants for each proposed lot. Remove general note 19 or revise the note to be consistent with the drainage report. 7. Revise the cul-de-sacs to provide for 52-foot raddii as required by figures 20 and 21 of Development Standard 3-01. Drainage Report 8. Provide hydaulic analyses for each drainage structure. Provide calculations of the depth of flow in the 10 foot drainage easements. Provide for adequate freeboard for each open channel. (Standards Manual for Drainageway Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson Arizona Section 8.5.1) 9. Provide hydraulic calculations for the pipe culverts at lot 6. Provide a backwater analysis for the new culverts to demonstrate that there will be sufficient capacity within the existing channel or to determine that channel improvements will be required Please note that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Floodplain Use Permit will be required as part of the grading permit submittal. Submit a revised Tentative Plat and a revised Drainage Report. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 11/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 22, 2005 TO: Jeff Stanley Stanley Engineering & Drainage THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Interstate Business Park, Lots 1-16 Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S05-164 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. Based on the evaluation of project C12-86-51, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-164, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 11 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. SHEET 2. Show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. SHEET 2. As reference, show manhole numbers for all proposed public manholes. SHEET 2. Show the rim and invert elevations for all proposed public manholes. SHEET 2. Show the length, size and slope for all proposed public sewers. SHEET 2. A PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT BY FINAL PLAT will be required across lot 15, please label it accordingly. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |