Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S05-162
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S05-162
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/06/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/08/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved Sept. 08, 2005.
09/13/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S05-162
A.C. TSANG ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
HUACHUCA CONDOMINIUMS
09/15/2005 DBELL1 LANDFILL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved
09/15/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved estimated daily trips in 24 hr period - 59
09/21/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. (Dragoon Landfill is over 1000 feet away.)
* CC&R for the subdivision needs to state how the refuse will be handled and should state that the home owners association will be responsible for the refuse enclosure and billing for such service will be to the association.
09/21/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Add the CDRC case number to the landscape and native plant preservation plans.
DS 2-07.2.1.B
2) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes in most instances are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet.
DS 10-01.4
3) If a new development is using a screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15
4) Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose each with a solid line. DS 2-03.2.4.C

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED
09/23/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S05-162 HUACHUCA CONDOMINIUMS/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 9/23/05



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Add Street to Dragoon and Huachuca on Location Plan.

Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Plan.

Please refer to the attachment to label the unit numbers for condominiums.








es










5)Condominiums:
a)Condominium developments shall be assigned a situs address for each building.
b)Individual living facilities in each building shall be assigned occupant identifiers (unit numbers): First floor units shall have 100 series numbers, second floor units shall have 200 series numbers, and additional floors shall be numbered accordingly.
09/28/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: HUACHUCA CONDOMINIUMS

Units 1-10

S05-162



Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative
plat submitted for review September 6, 2005.



The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the
existing overhead facilities proceeding through the interior of the
subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the
approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities.



TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved
Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the
plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are:
building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and
paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or
email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have
any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com
10/04/2005 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: October 4, 2005


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S05-162 Huachuca Condominiums T141303 (115-17)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add exterior dimensions on units.
Label common areas, add square footage and use solid lines for common areas.
If there are any questions, please contact Jessica Shettleroe at 740-6658.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.






Jessica Shettleroe
10/07/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP:

1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) The book and page is not listed for Huachuca St.

2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) SVTs at the access points to the Project (DS 2-03.2.4.M).

D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
10/10/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S05-162 Huachuca Condominiums 10/10/05

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: N/A

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/04/05

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

(XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( ) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 10/04/05
10/13/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: October 13, 2005
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Hauchuca Condominiums, 1709 N Huachuca Ave.
Development Plan D05-162 (First Review)
T14S, R13E, Section 03

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Tentative Plat:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Because of the proximity of the Silvercroft Wash, perhaps waiving the Detention/Retention requirements and draining directly into the Silvercroft Wash would best for recharge and minimal disturbance to the environment.
3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
6. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP.
7. Show Tentative plat number (S05-162) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
8. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address.
9. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
10. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
11. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
12. List the consulting engineer on the plans with the pertinent information.
13. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
14. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. Because of the proximity of the Silvercroft Wash, perhaps waiving the Detention/Retention requirements and draining directly into the Silvercroft Wash would best for recharge and minimal disturbance to the environment.
3. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage.
4. Provide a detail of the Ret/Det basin.
5. Percolation tests are required prior to the issuance of the approval of the grading plan.
6. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/1709 N Huachuca Ave CDRC
10/14/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: October 13, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov



SUBJECT: S05-162 Huachuca Condominiums: Tentative Plat Review(9-6-05)


Please show on the development plan a public trail easement that overlays the 40 ft and 16 ft drainageway easements along Silvercroft Wash. Indicate the public trail easement will be dedicated by plat.
10/17/2005 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: S05-162
Huachuca Condominiums
Tentative/Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: 10/17/05

DUE DATE: October 04, 2005

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative/development plan. If, at the end of that time, the tentative/development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 03, 2006..

2. Per DS 2-03.2..1.G The title block should indicate that this is a Tentative Plat / Development Plan. This project will be reviewed per DS 2-03 and DS 2-05.

3. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 This project has been assigned the case number S05-162, list in the lower right corner next to the title block of all pages of the plat including the landscape and NPPO pages

4. Per DS 2-03.2.4.C This project has common areas therefore, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc.

This would include any elements for the exclusive use by an individual owner or group of owners such as balconies, barbecue area, yards, etc.

5. Provide floor plans and elevations for each type of condominium proposed in order to establish setbacks and parking compliance. In the site development data there are 2 units indicated as 1 story units. All units on the site plan are indicated as 2 story units. Please clarify.

6. Per DS 2-03.2.4.G The streets proposed are considered PAALs and must meet the criteria of DS 3-05 and LUC Sec. 3.3.0 for vehicular area use. Clearly indicate the location of barriers for vehicular use areas per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Indicate on the plan location of required curbs or barriers. Provide a dimensioned cross section of the proposed street and adjacent sidewalk clearly indicating curbs and separation from pedestrian pathways.

7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.B The indicated surrounding zoning indicated on the south side and the west side of the proposed project is not correct. A portion of the south side and all of the west side are zoned R-1 not R-2 as indicated. Please correct. Contact Harold Schwartz at 791-5550 ext. 1162 for exact location of the Zoning boundaries.

8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.I The indicated street perimeter yard setback does not meet the requirement for developed area setbacks within established areas as per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.A. The required setback is 20' or 11/2 times the height of the structure which ever is greater. Based on a building height of 23' the required setback will be 34'-6". Provide a dimension from the building to the property line which meets this requirement.

9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K Pedestrian circulation including handicap accessibility must be provided. The handicap ramps at the corners of the front sidewalk do not provide access to the pedestrian path for the project. See DS 2-08.3.1 A redesign will be required. Provide a handicap ramp from the required handicap parking space. See later comment about handicap parking space.

10. Per ANSI A-117.1 Sec. 1106.1 A van accessible parking space is required as one of the required visitor parking spaces. Provide a dimensioned detail of the van accessible parking space as well as a standard parking space.

11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.G If applicable, indicate all proposed easements with dimensions and labeled as to their purposes and whether or not the will be public or private.

12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.R Indicate sight visibility triangles along Huachuca St. See engineering comments.

13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for
the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0.

14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, indicate the type and location of all freestanding signage including billboards.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.

TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05-162tp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents.
10/17/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved S05-162; Title report schedule B items should be addressed on the final plat.
10/20/2005 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied October 19, 2005

TO: Tony Tsang
A. C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc.

THRU: Patricia Gehlen
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Huachuca Condominiums
Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal
S05-162


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Northwest Outfall. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

Based on the evaluation of historical sewer improvement district maps, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-162, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

SHEET 1. Add the following General Note

THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS.

Place a public manhole just outside the property line (i.e. in the right-of-way). From this location, the sewer to existing public manhole 9344-07 shall be public.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
10/25/2005 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

October 25, 2005

Antony C. Tsang
A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc.
4626 East Fort Lowell, Suite S
Tucson, AZ 85712

Subject: S05-162 Huachuca Condominiums Tentative Plat

Dear Tony:

Your submittal of September 6, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

8 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Parks and Recreation, Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Floor Plans and Elevations (Zoning, DSD)


Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 325-0979