Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-134
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/29/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/02/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved August 02, 2005. |
| 08/09/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * All lots have curbside frontage. * Approved for APC curbside service. * APC's are to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service. |
| 08/10/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S05-134 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY TRES PUEBLOS II |
| 08/12/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | August 12, 2005 TO: Luno Martinez Rick Engineering Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Tres Pueblos II, Lots 1-183 and Common Areas A1-A4 and B1-B3 Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S05-134 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. Based on the evaluation of the project site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-134, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEETS 3-5. Show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewers. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/18/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-134 TRES PUEBLOS II/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 8/16/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change NW ¼ to NE ¼ on all Title Blocks. 2.) Complete entire street name or delete on pg. 3. |
| 08/24/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The project is subject to the provisions of the Watercourse, Amenities, Safety, and Habitat Ordinance, TCC 29. A separate application and review is required. Contact Patricia Gehlen/Zoning Manager at 791-5640 Ext. 1179 for submittal requirements. 2) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 4) Show the proposed drainage structures and improvements on the landscape plan. 6) Show the proposed trail along the Rodeo Wash on the landscape plans. 7) Show the proposed drainageway along Tucson Boulevard on the landscape plan. The channel is to be designed and landscaped to appear natural. Per TCC sec 26-8.a.3 "a mitigation plan shall be established with emphasis being placed on earthen or naturally appearing channels with landscaping and texture/color added to bank protection materials. The design of earthen channels will be encouraged in order to allow for a more permeable surface which permits reintroduction of the water into the groundwater system, allowing for the reintroduction of native plant species which promotes a natural, partially soil-stabilized system". Revise as necessary to incorporate natural colors and textures. The color of the slope stabilization is important when attempting to create a natural appearance. 8) Revise the tentative plat and the native plant preservation plan for consistency. The preservation plan shows a number of plants as PIP where the plat shows grading and drainage modifications. 9) Clarify that the space adjoining the sidewalk area along Tucson Boulevard will be treated for dust control if necessary per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. 10) Coordinate the treatment of the drainage channel along Tucson Boulevard. The landscape plan calls for d.g., while the plat allows for 2:1 slopes that would require greater protection. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 08/24/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-134 Tres Pueblos II 08/23/05 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (Irrigation Plan) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-94-18 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Tucson Blvd. (gateway) COMMENTS DUE BY: August 26, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: August 13, 2005 The Tres Pueblos tentative plat has a portion being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), and therefore must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. That portion of the subdivision not utilizing the RCP should consider design concepts requirements to unify the development’s architectural theme and scale. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Kino Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another. The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Please submit elevations illustrating how this requirement will be satisfied for the units abutting Tucson Blvd., and Bilby Road. Lots 14-36 and 159-170, that incorporate walls and abut amenities such as designated open space areas, common areas, and trail systems, should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot six (6) inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of the community” on these areas. Please submit a detail on the tentative plat to indicate compliance with this requirement. Please indicate on the tentative plat the width and material used for the trail along the Rodeo Wash. It should constructed of an ADA compliant, all-weather material. The proposed portions of trail to the north in Tres Pueblos, S04-003 are to match to the proposed trail in width and material for consistency. Please verify with Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation Department at 791-4560. Please indicate if common areas A-1 and A-3 are to serve as open space with recreational uses. The Plans call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that those pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped. [An active/passive adult recreational facility, which includes a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. The adult recreational amenities should include, but not limited to: ramada(s), table(s), outdoor grill, shaded sitting area(s). Detention basins can serve a dual purpose with the placement of required amenities within and surrounding the basin. The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual encourages the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. In order to provide such a microclimate it is required to provide a minimum of one fifteen (15) gallon tree, no more than ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk, on every other lot frontage. This should be shown on the landscape plan along with a note indicating such. Please show on the landscape plan the trails and connections along the Rodeo Wash. This will assure that the paths are free from obstructions. Both the Tentative plat and landscape plan should match. |
| 08/26/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: TRES PUEBLOS II Lots 1-183 S05-134 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat submitted for review July 29, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plat at this time. The existing facilities along Bilby Road must be shown on the plat prior to approval. A copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. The existing pole #132 appears to be in conflict with the entrance. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within twenty-two (22) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 08/29/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: August 29, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-134 TRES PUEBLOS II T151408 (140-26) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. ___X___Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove all hatching and shading. Add the bearings for lot lines. Add complete curve data. If there are any questions, please contact Jessica Shettleroe at 740-4398. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Jessica Shettleroe |
| 08/30/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT:Tres Pueblos II Lots 1-183 Tentative Plat (1st Review) S05-134 TRANSMITTAL: August 30, 2005 COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 27, 2005. 2. This project has been assigned subdivision case number S05-134. Please note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on the tentative and final plat, landscape and NPPO plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 3. Add applicable "subject to" Land Use Code sections for proposed land use classifications listed under general note three (3). Refer to the LUC 2.3.4.2.A for "subject to" sections. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5) 4. General note six (6) indicates the property is affected by the W.A.S.H. ordinance. A separate application review is required for the WASH ordinance. You may obtain a copy of the Overlay Zone application online at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf For additional information please contact Engineering Section reviewer for this project. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7) 5. Where applicable, CUZ shall be labeled as CUZ-2. 6. Delineate the CUZ-2 boundary on all applicable sheets. 7. Add a street section call-out for the street running north and south in front of lots 1-14 and 103-123. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.G) 8. Since this is a RCP Development with density increase, please demonstrate compliance with LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B. Documentation may be required to verify compliance. 9. When developed with a density increase, the RCP must provide for conveniently located commonly owned recreation facilities, designed for, and usable by, both adults and children residing within the project. Twenty-five (25) percent of the site area that is not part of the site coverage is to be commonly owned or set aside as accessible to all residents of the development. (Ord. No. 9374, §1, 4/10/00) (LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.2) 10. Under the R-1 RCP-4 site coverage calculation, revise the site area from 200.04 acres to 20.04 acres. 11. Re-check the site coverage calculation for the R-1 RCP portion. The calculation is provided for 123 homes and drives but the RCP portion is intended for 60 homes. 12. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. (D.S. 2-10.3.2.E) (L.U.C. 3.6.1.5) 13. Barrier-free accessibility shall be provided to a total of 46 lots. General note 15 provides a total of 45 lots, one (1) lot short of the minimum required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 or e-mail Daniel.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/30/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. This development will require a Category I TIA as described in section 6.3.2 of the AMG. This TP will not be approved until Traffic receives and approves the submitted report. 2. Show existing and future SVTs on the NE corner of Tucson and Bilby. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S05-134 Tres Pueblos II 8/26/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Tucson Blvd (Irvington to Valencia) No 0 16,000 42,760 4 43,000 33,795 4 1,751 None Bike route w/stripe shoulder Bilby (Tucson to Country Club) No 0 1,700 22,680 2 16,234 23,500 2 None None |
| 09/04/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Tres Pueblos II Subdivision Tentative Plat Submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-134 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Landscape documents, and title report documents were received on July 29, 2005. Development Services Department Engineering Division has done a review of the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.4.L: Address the following comments for the Drainage Report: a) Regarding street capacity, discuss contribution to existing catch basins along Tucson and Bilby. b) Clarify the following watershed comments: i) Add analysis with cross sections for flows within the Bilby Road right-of-way. Revise / add discussion in sections 2.1 or 2.2 of the Drainage Report. ii) Provide offsite watershed map exhibit. iii) Add discussion of derivation and assumptions for flows used for the cross sections in the HEC analysis. c) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: In the revised drainage report, state provision for basin maintenance access. d) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a: Revise drainage report details in Channels portion of the appendix to provide minimum 2xD50 thickness for riprap. e) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4: Provide cross-sections with dimensions from basins to existing Rodeo W.A.S.H. area on a drainage exhibit; see below comment11aii. Show outlet structures and existing and proposed grades. f) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: The Title Block indicates that the basins are recreation areas. Provide explanation in drainage report how the basins will comply with human activity zone exit requirements. Label on the drainage exhibit the basin perimeter slopes at 8:1(H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements. g) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.e & f: Add information regarding locations and types of all basin security barriers to be installed. Handrail is typically required at scuppers adjacent to a basin. h) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6 A.4.d: In revised drainage report, discuss building setbacks, with dimensions between structures and any proposed basins or drainageways. 2) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Address the following Basin Maintenance Checklist comments: a) Revise the maintenance checklist in the addenda to clarify "conditions that should exist" with specific solutions or repairs that would need to be done to resolve drainage feature problem. b) Include drainageways and channels as a system feature. As part of the checklist, state that the annual inspection report shall contain the summary listed in section DS Sec.10-02.14.3.3. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.10-02.7.6: Provide delineation for the EHS line with varying dimensions per the Drainage Report, as this line appears to be missing for sheets 2, 3, and 5. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F.2: Label existing contour lines on planview sheets. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Address the following legend comments: a) Explain notation "EPCTSMP #319" b) Show the complete 100-yr Floodplain lines and Erosion Hazard Setback limits clearly on the planviews. Clarify these delineations on planview sheets of the Tentative Plat. Some of the linetypes are confusing for the erosion hazard, floodplain lines, and other lines. Consider variation of linetype widths or types to clarify all the lines. Update the legend to clarify delineations for Erosion Hazard Setbacks, FEMA floodplain limits, existing 100-yr floodplain limits, and other dashed delineations. c) Explain whether the rectangular box symbols in Bilby Road on sheet 4 and other locations are jurisdictional limits. Add delineation to legend. 4) LUC Sec.2.8.1.5.A: Some overlay zones require a separate review process which has been recently implemented. An application must be filled out for the following overlay zone that affects your project: W.A.S.H. Ordinance. If this has not already been completed, contact Zoning Manager Patricia Gehlen 791-5608 ext. 1179 to process the overlay zone application. 5) DS Sec.2.3.2.2.B.7: Where the overlay zone requires a separate review process, note the case file number, status/date of approval in General Note 6 on the Tentative Plat. State in response letter whether the W.A.S.H. application/review is submitted with next Tentative Plat submittal or has been currently submitted under separate cover for review. 6) Tucson Code Sec. 29-15(b)(1): Per this section of the W.A.S.H. Ordinance, a W.A.S.H. Report must be submitted for the Rodeo W.A.S.H. along the northeastern boundary of the project. Within the W.A.S.H. Report, provide the following elements: a) Provide discussions in the W.A.S.H. Report stating how the project is in compliance with the ordinance and whether mitigation is proposed. b) Provide complete discussions regarding any effects on hydrology and hydraulics to the study area due to each of the elements a - i listed in this section of the Tucson Code. c) Provide a W.A.S.H. Exhibit showing the 50-ft Study Area and the Resource Area delineated within that area. d) If any portion of the 50-ft study area is proposed to be developed, a mitigation plan shall be included in the W.A.S. H. Report, and the report shall explain how it complies with regulations within the ordinance. 7) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: A proposed trail is indicated by notation to lie within the Pima County drainage easement area and specifically on the existing maintenance access road as noted on sheets 2 and 5. If the existing maintenance road lies within this existing drainage easement, provide a letter from the county regarding their authorization of proposed design for the proposed trail and its maintenance within the drainage easement. Otherwise, provide a trail location that does not overlap the maintenance access road. Provide a cross section. 8) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Submit a bound copy of the soils report that discusses suitability and feasibility of the project. Besides description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, pavement design section, and other typical geotechnical data, the soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from basins to buildings, include minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales, and provide infiltration test results. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Infiltration rates shall meet Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria per DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Address the following drainage comments for the Tentative Plat sheets: a) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1 & -14.3.4: On planview, show 15-ft.wide basin maintenance access ramps with maximum ramp slope of 15% max for all basins. b) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: Label on planview the basin perimeter slopes at 8:1(H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements. c) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: Show 100-year ponding limits in detention/retention basin area. d) DS Sec.11-01.14.2&3 & DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: On planview, label dimension of minimum setback from demarcation of ponding limits to edge of building footprint from the basins. This dimension should be at an acceptable distance per geotechnical recommendations. e) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Show that each basin has at minimum a 15-foot wide maintenance access per the revised Drainage Report. Planview sheets show 10-feet wide ramps. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.H:Show existing features: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: The following information regarding the existing public right-of-way will be provided: besides the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, show existing curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks within 100 feet of the site, including the following: i) Show existing curb along Tucson Boulevard. ii) Show existing 6 ft of sidewalk, 1 (or more?) ft of shy space and existing curb along Bilby. iii) Show existing guy wires along Bilby Road. iv) Provide details and cross sections for existing bank protection structures at Rodeo W.A.S.H. and Tucson Blvd as well as at Rodeo W.A.S.H and Bilby Road. v) Depict location of the monument site near proposed lot 170. State in response letter and add notation to the Tentative Plat whether this monument will be fenced off during construction. b) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C&D: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Complete descriptions for existing conditions by providing all easements. Also, for the Pima County right-of-way for the drainage area of Rodeo W.A.S.H., assure that all curve and line data per Bk7088 pg87094 is shown on planview. c) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site shall be shown, including: i) Catch basins along Tucson Boulevard. ii) Label material for embankment for Rodeo W.A.S.H. at northwest and east ends near roadway crossings. d) Show and label existing sewer structures in Bilby Road. e) Show and label existing overhead power poles. 11) Per D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Regarding the conceptual grading design for the project, address the following comments: a) Provide cross sections for the following areas for clarification of conceptual grading: i) Cross section of the maintenance road where the channels are proposed to cross. The crossings shall be traversable by motorized vehicle. See above comment 7. ii) Provide sections for the north side of the project to include a lot pad elevation near lots 16 and 159 through the basins and outlet channels, with existing and proposed grades, slopes, property line, setbacks, and to the adjacent wash. iii) Provide a typical cross section for the channels. iv) Clarify interlot grading between RCP lots for lots with pad differential elevation changes of 1 or more. Specifically, clarify with cross sections how grades will change between lots: 144-145, 138-150, 169-170, and at rear of lots 152-153-157. Provide cross sections or revise pad elevations. v) Revise pad elevations for the following lots to minimize potential ponding for pads with the same pad elevations: 88-89, 104-105, 108-109, 120-121. vi) Also check proposed pad elevations labeled for lots: 7, and 54/55. vii) Provide section at end of southeast cul-de-sac to Bilby showing how grading will accommodate change in grades at this location. b) For clarification of proposed flow conditions on these RCP lots, provide typical lot grading detail, that shows direction of drainage around proposed lots and explains the following: i) Clarify and provide flow arrows, swale dimensions, slope run-outs, minimum slope grades, and general access. ii) Show/clarify area for utility pads / mechanical equipment or A/C unit locations, if it is located along the side yards. iii) Show general / typical high point relative elevation to other side of lot or to the street, grade break locations, as well as minimum flow grades around building pads. iv) Show any building setbacks to swales, slope setbacks for screen walls, minimum side and rear building setbacks, per geotechnical report and drainage report. v) Dimensioned distance of 3-ft does not appear to be sufficient at sideyard. Provide typical lot grading details to show that there is sufficient area for drainage swales, mechanical equipment, A/C units, slope setbacks for screen walls, slope run-outs, and general access. The Typical Lot Setbacks detail on sheet 4 may need to be revised to accommodate proposed structures, drainage, grading, and geotechnical constraints. c) The proposed development is subject to NPDES requirements and the SWPPP will be needed at Grading Plan review stage. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.a& b: On planview sheets, label public streets. 13) DS Sec. 2-03.2.4.H: Street design shall be in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan. Dimension the Tucson Boulevard and Bilby Road intersection widening / dedications / taper on sheet 4. 14) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Clarify access ramps with a detail or further notation to state that truncated domes are required per ADAAG. This is an update to COT standard detail 207. There is a recent directive to use the new "truncated domes" - little raised nodules in lieu of grooves. Remove lines in HC ramp area details on legend, all plan views, and details on all sheets; or, add notation to clarify that truncated domes are required on these areas. 15) Label proposed curving lines extending from end of north cul-de-sac on sheet 2 and at the north side of east knuckle on sheet 3. 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Provide benchmark locations, and the proposed location of and method of tie to permanent survey monuments or to the nearest section or quarter section corner. Specifically, address the following: a) Provide east quarter corner for section 8 on planview. b) Show a tie to a section or quarter corner to a project boundary corner on planview. c) Label on plan view the location of a local benchmark. d) Label and show the local basis of elevation for site on the planview. 17) DS Sec.10-01.4.3: Where human activity zones are proposed in the two basin areas, 8:1(H:V) side slopes are needed at location of pedestrian access, and shall not conflict with inlets to the basins. Label/clarify grades for side slopes of all basins. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Delineate basin access and show that no proposed vegetation will block access. 2) DS Sec.3-01.5.3: Show sight visibility triangles for Tucson Boulevard and Bilby Road at new street access points on sheet L1. Submit W.A.S.H. submittal, revised Drainage Report, revised Tentative Plat, revised Landscape documents, a bound copy of the geotechnical report, response letter, and any other supporting documentation such as the Pima County letter. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/19/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Width of R/W varies on Tucson Blvd. & Bilby Rd. and is not annotated or provided range/bearing. |
| 09/20/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: September 20, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-134 Tres Pueblos II: Tentative Plat Review(7-29-05) The Rodeo Wash path and trail should be consistent with Tres Pueblos project on the west side of Tucson Bd.(S04-003). Please show and indicate the following on the plat and landscaping plan: A landscaped trail corridor at last 50’ in width along the south side of Rodeo Wash that crosses the subject site. Dedication of a public recreational trail easement over the entirety of the corridor(as shown on submittal). A 12 ft wide, paved, handicapped-accessible, slightly meandering, shared-use pathway and an 8 ft wide, meandering, decomposed granite trail along the south side of the Rodeo Wash within the landscaped trail corridor. The paved path shall be 2” of asphalt over 4” of compacted AB. The 12 ft paved path shall be located closest to Rodeo Wash and north of the trail. The 8’ meandering trail shall be 2” of stabilized DG compacted to 95% over native subgrade compacted to 95%. Path and trail to be constructed according to the City/County Divided Urban Pathway standard. Please show a cross-section of the pathway and trail on plans(contact Parks and Recreation for cross-section). Show transitions where path and trail meet sidewalks. Show that paved path and trail merge at Country Club Rd and at Tucson Bd. Show trail connections from the development to the trail corridor along the Rodeo Wash. Indicate drainage structures crossing the trail corridor should be located at least 18” below ground to allow for landscape irrigation. Walls along trail corridor should incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, wrought iron, or a combination of the above materials to create a see-thru “view wall”. If you have any questions, please contact Glenn Hicks. |
| 09/21/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 21, 2005 Luno Martinez Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S05-134 Tres Peublos II Tentative Plat Dear Luno: Your submittal of July 29, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Wastewater, TEP, Assessor, Real Estate, Community Planning, Parks and Recreation, Addressing, Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Community Planning, Parks and Recreation, Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD), 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD), 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) SEPARATE SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF WASH OVERLAY ZONE REQUIRED PRIOR TO TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |