Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-129
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/20/2006 | RBABBIT1 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | |
| 07/24/2006 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 07/24/2006 TO: Patrecia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Westmoreland S05-129, T14S, R13E, SECTION 11 RECEIVED: Revised Tentative Plat on June 23, 2006 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Revised Tentative Plat is recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain review. |
| 08/23/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S05-129 Westmoreland Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 08/23/06 DUE DATE: 8/25/05 COMMENTS: 1. Your response to the following comment is acknowledged. The comment will remain as reference for the reviewer. (Changes have been made to this comment.) The vehicular use areas indicated as common areas CA "A" are considered a street and must meet the requirements of DS 3-01. As per a determination by the Zoning Administrator the required sidewalk area at the rear access way can be eliminated as long as the lots within the subdivision have frontage on a public or private street front which provides pedestrian facilities as per LUC 3.2.8.4 . The minimum width of the paving is required to be twenty (20) feet. If the paving is to be less than twenty (20) feet a DSMR is required. FYI: Upon discussion with staff, a wedge curb may be required along the building side of the one way streets as a condition of approval for the DSMR. If the DSMR indicated is approved, provide the case number , date of approval and any conditions of the DSMR on the plan. Provide the DSMR case number near the lower right corner of all pages. 2.. Your response to the following comment is acknowledged. The comment will remain as reference for the reviewer. Per DS 2-10.3.2.E Three (3) copies of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) are required if there is to be an association of homeowners to assume responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly owned property. 3. The following comment has been partially addressed. Show the footprint of a unit on each lot or provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner lot, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard setback. These typical are to be fully dimensioned and are to be drawn at a larger scale than the tentative plat. DS 2-10.3.1.B Please provide dimensions for the required setbacks on the typical plot plans for each model. Dimension the street perimeter yard setbacks as per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B Table 3.2.6-I for an ADT of 140 or less. On the typical lot layout plan on sheet 3 of 3, the setback provided is ½ the height of the structure from back of curb. As per LUC 3.2.6.5.B Table 3.2.6.-I the height of the building is the height of the proposed exterior wall which includes the parapet. Revise note and dimension. 4. On the typical lot layout on page 3 of 3 is a note indicating "midpoint of garage". Please add to the note "per zoning administrator letter". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5608. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05-129-3tp.doc |
| 08/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 24, 2006 Craig A. Hunt, P.E. EEC 4625 East Fort Lowell, Ste. 200 Tucson, AZ 85712 Subject: S05-129 Westmoreland Tentative Plat Dear Craig: Your submittal of June 23, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 |