Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-121
Review Name: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/25/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-121 OLD SPANISH TRAIL MARKETPLACE / FINAL PLAT DATE: JULY 25, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** sgg |
| 07/29/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 08/08/2005 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | August 6, 2005 TO: Eduardo Gonzalez Rick Engineering Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Old Spanish Trail Marketplace, Lots 1-5 and Common Areas A & B Final Plat - 1st Submittal S05-121 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. 2. SHEETS 2 & 3. There appears to be an existing public sewer along the south border of this project. This sewer is likely to be contained within an existing public sewer easement which needs to be shown along with its recording information. If the easement does not yet exist, a 20-foot wide public sewer easement must be created and access to all public sewer manholes must be provided following PC/COT Standard Details WWM 109-WWM 111. 3. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/08/2005 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | After a telephone discussion with Mr. Eduardo Gonzalez (Rick Engineering Company) in which he assured that the public sewer easement, mentioned in item 2 of the wastewater review letter, is located completely on the adjacent property, I have indicated to him that I will conditionally approve this project, subject to the submittal of the capacity response letter required per item 1 of the same wastewater review letter. No fee will be required. Dickie Fernandez, E.I.T. |
| 08/11/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/11/2005 SUBJECT: Old Spanish Trail Marketplace S05-121, T14S, R15E, SECTION 23 RECEIVED: Final Plat, CC & R's and Assurances on July 19, 2005 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: 1. Provide the correct S05-XXX Case Number in the Title Block (D.S. 2-03.6.1.k). 2. General Note 6 states that Lots 1, 2, and 3 require a floodplain use permit, but the floodplain is contained within the wash and the detention basins. General Note 6 is not needed. 3. Revise the "Certification of Survey" text to match the text in D.S. 2-03.6.3.A. 4. Revise the "Assurances" text to match the text in D.S. 2-03.6.3.E. 5. The submittal of the Performance Bond Assurance could not be verified. The City's assurance file for 22nd Road and Harrison Project does not have the original Performance Bond nor does it have a copy of the release letter for the Third Party Land Trust Assurance for 22nd Rd and Harrison. Submit the Original Copy of the Performance Bond. 6. It is preferable to install a monument where the parcel ties into the Harrison Road Bearing. 7. When the Final Plat was compared with the submitted Development Plan/Tentative Plat, the proposed lot lines for lot 2 appear to straddle some parking spaces through the middle. Additionally, Building 2 on lot 4 appears to encroach on the existing Pedestrian and Utility Easement (DKT, PG 1991). Revise the lot line to correspond to the submitted information on the Development Plan/Tentative Plat. 8. It is not clear if the existing easements are still needed. Investigate the need for the existing easements to remain (i.e. Key Notes 1, 3 and 6). 9. Explain how the existing TEP easement is located within the public right of way. 10. 10' X 135' Drainage easement (Key Note 5) does not appear to be shown correctly. Additionally, clarify why this easement is needed. 11. It appears that cross access and parking easements are needed for this project over and across lot lines, not over and across common areas as stated in the Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions. 12. It does not appear that the submitted Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions reflect the proposed subdivision information shown on the Final Plat. Revise as necessary. 13. The Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions should specifically address the maintenance of the proposed drainage facilities as shown on the subject project Tentative Plat/Development Plan. This Office recommends including the maintenance checklist in the Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions to allow the owners' association access to it and to facilitate their maintenance responsibility (D.S. 2-03.6.6.). 14. It does not appear that the submitted Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions includes all the easements and documents listed in the Title Report. Clarify and revise as necessary. 15. Add a symbol in the Legend for all SET MONUMENTS. 16. Show required erosion hazard, slope and detention/retention basin setback lines as required by D.S. 2-03.6.4.E. 17. The 100-year floodprone area should be tied to intersecting lot lines as required by D.S. 2-03.6.4.F. 18. It is not clear if the "to be abandoned" existing common areas, as shown on the Tentative Plat/Development Plan, have already been abandoned. 19. Show detention/retention areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner (DS 2-03.6.4.I). Please be advised that showing the Common Areas, within which the detention basins are located, in a surveyable manner is not sufficient to satisfy this requirement. 20. Indicate whether the distance and bearing between all monuments are measured or calculated as required by (D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.5). 21. In order to expedite the plat review and approval, provide the boundary survey and closure calculations report in accordance with D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.3. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location on the Final Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Final, DEC & R's and Assurances |
| 08/15/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: OLD SPANISH TRAIL MARKETPLACE S05-121 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the final plat for this project. All costs associated with the relocation of facilities that are in conflict will be billable to the developer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Juan Valenzuela Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 08/16/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-121 Old Spanish Trail Market Place, Lots 1- 5 and Common Areas "A" and "B" Final Plat TRANSMITTAL: 08/16/05 DUE DATE: 08/16/2005 COMMENTS: 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before July 18, 2006. 2. Reference all recorded subdivision plats by book and page number on the location map. DS 2-03.6.1.D.2 3. If the plat contains more than one (1) sheet, a small index drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet is to be placed on the first sheet. Exception: The project-location map required in Sec. 2-03.6.1.D may be used as the index map on plats having only two (2) or three (3) sheets. Please add the index drawing as required by this development standard. DS 2-03.6.1.E 4. This project has been assigned the Subdivision case number case number S05-061. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-03.6.1.K 5. In reviewing the final plat and comparing the proposed lot lines against the development plan/tentative plat it was noticed that the development plan/tentative plat was not drawn to the scale as listed on the sheets. I'm sure this is just a plotting error but it does make for some interesting comparison of the plans. Please ensure that the development plan/tentative plat drawing is plotted at the correct scale factor. Please clarify why lot 2 is proposed to be split as shown. It appears that the split is taking in vehicle and bicycle parking spaces adjacent to the east building. Please review the proposed split and verify that the proposed split will not affect vehicle or bicycle parking for the other uses in the east building. Cross access, vehicle and bicycle parking, pedestrian access easements will be required. These items can be addressed in the CC&R's. See comment seven as well. DS 2-05.6.4.B 6. Please indicate if any of the existing easements are to be abandoned and if so indicate by what instrument. The two existing easements over lot 4 appear to be for vehicular access and pedestrian access. Please clarify if both these easements will be abandoned or left in place. (The pedestrian easement appears to be over the proposed building footprint.) DS 2-03.6.4.A 7. The submitted CC&R's document is not consistent with the final plat or the proposed development. Please submit a set of CC&R's that is specific to the new development. Remove any sections or revise sections that mention Yavapai County to Pima County. Additional Comments may be forthcoming based on the new CC&R's document. Please ensure that the title sheet is annotated specifically for the new subdivision name, lot numbers and common areas. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S05121fp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 08/18/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: August 15, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S05-121 OLD SPANISH TRAIL MARKETPLACE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Jessica Shettleroe |
| 08/22/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |