Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-117
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/14/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. No on-street parking permitted. Provide General Note on plan stating: " On street parking shall be prohibited to provide a minimum of 20 feet wide fire access roadway. Approved fire lane signs shall be provided." 2. Indicate fire lane signs posted on west side of drive and in turnaround on Sheet 2 of 3. 3. Indicate fire lane sign on Street Section A-A Sheet 3 of 3. 4. Fire hydrant required. Provide a General Note on the plan stating: "Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the Developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code." |
| 07/18/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S05-117 AMEC YAVAPAI DUPLEXES |
| 07/22/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Single family town houses with dumpster service. Access to and from enclosure OK. * Dumpster enclosure shown insufficient rear wall protection and no side wall protection per Development Standards Section 6.01.4.2C2. ( Maximum spacing of the Post Barricade Standard Detail 106 is 5 feet.) * Dumpster enclosure requires gates per Section 6.01.4.2B of the Development Standards. |
| 07/25/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-117 YAVAPAI DUPLEXES/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 7/22/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete street directions on Vicinity Map. Spell out all street suffixes except on Vicinity Map. Add “ A resubdivision of the east half. . . .” on all Title Blocks. Delete 431 E. Yavapai Road on pg. 1. |
| 07/29/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Show sight visibility triangles on the tentative plat/development plan. DS 3-10.5.0 Ensure that no plantings or structures interfere with the required visibility plane. 2) Provide the required 2' seperation between the p.a.a.l. and the wall proposed along the west property line. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 3) Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions. The landscape, drainage, and private street portions should be labeled independently. DS 2-03.2.4.C RESUBMITTAL OF THE TENTATIVE PLAT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 07/29/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 08/04/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: YAVAPAI DUPLEXES S05-117 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review July 12, 2005. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 08/04/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 3, 2005 TO: Jeff Stine AMEC THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Yavapai Duplexes, Lots 1-8 and Common Area A Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S05-117 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito West (South Line) Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. Based on the evaluation of historical sewer improvement district maps, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-117, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 10 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. The restrictive common area does not provide the necessary turn around space for Pima County Wastewater Management Department’s maintenance vehicle, thus the sewer for this project shall be private. SHEET 2. Show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. SHEET 2. Show the manhole information for manhole 139. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/04/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: S05-117 Yavapai Duplexes: Tentative Plat Review(7-12-05) CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/04/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-117 Yavapai Duplexes 08/04/05 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: n/a NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Cragin-Keeling GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: n/a COMMENTS DUE BY: August 9, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: vf 791-4505 DATE: August 3, 2005 Urban Planning and Design Comments S05-117 Yavapai Duplexes Staff Comments The General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual state that noise-generating activities should be located away from adjacent residential uses. Subdivisions using a community dumpster should place it no less than 50 feet away from adjacent residentially zoned areas or uses. The dumpster location abuts residentially zoned property to the east (R-3), and it is barely 10 feet from the duplexes to its north and south. Dumpsters should also be screened with a six (6) foot high masonry wall in order to provide appropriate buffering (proposed plan shows a five (5) foot high masonry wall). Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation (retention basin and water harvesting areas adjacent to Yavapai Rd) |
| 08/10/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: AUGUST 12, 2005 TO: Jeff Stine, AMEC FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE SUBJECT: Yavapai Duplexes TENTATIVE PLAT (FIRST REVIEW) Job S05-117; T13S, R13E, Sec 25 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Engineering Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. D.S. 2-03.0 Platting Procedures 1. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve- (0.12) point or greater n size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or when photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record keeping purposes. D.S. 2-03.2.1.C. The text size of all survey info along the property line appears too be small. 2. "A property owners' association will be formed to accept responsibility and liability for construction, maintenance, operation, and control of all private sewers." D.S. 2-03.2.2.F.2.c If no homeowners' association is being formed, use the following note. "Maintenance and operation of the private sanitary sewer to its point of connection to the public sanitary sewer is the responsibility of each and every property owner within this subdivision." 3. Existing Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plat to indicate the existing conditions on site and within one hundred (100) feet of the site, except where the site is bounded by a street with a width of one hundred (100) feet or greater. In those situations, existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-03.2.3 4. If applicable, all existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. D.S. 2-03.2.3.C 5. If, applicable, the following information regarding existing utilities will be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, and storm and sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and clean-outs; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Show sewer line invert elevations. D.S. 2-03.2.3.E 6. If applicable, existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site shall be shown. D.S. 2-03.2.3.G 7. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the subdivision will be shown. This includes items such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. D.S. 2-03.2.3.I 8. A symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface elevation shown on the plat should be included in the legend. D.S. 2-03.2.3.J.3 9. If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 10. To help alleviate possible drainage issues are weep holes needed in block wall on the West Side of all lots that have the 8" x 6" wall opening on the East Side? 11. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.7 12. Grading Plan. Generally, the grading plans may be submitted for review upon approval of the tentative plat. Should the applicant wish, the grading plan can be submitted after the second resubmittal of the tentative plat; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is in conformance with an approved tentative plat. In the case of a tentative plat submitted in conjunction with a rezoning request, the grading plan and the tentative plat cannot be approved until thirty (30) days after adoption of the rezoning ordinance. D.S. 2-03.5.2 13. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated into the development by conveying rooftop drainage to designated water harvesting areas. Please address how water-harvesting techniques will be incorporated into the development. Incorporate this information onto the grading plan, and illustrate how water harvesting will operate, especially in the back yards of each parcel. 14. The owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered professional civil engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once a year. These regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by city staff, upon written request. 15. Separate drainage common areas from all other common areas. Therefore the retention basin should be a separate common area. 16. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. If you have any questions or would like to meet with me before your next submittal, you may contact me at 791-5640 ext.1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/11/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 11, 2006. 2. The minimum lot size for a single-family residence in the R-3 zone is 5,000 square feet. In addition, building setbacks for interior and perimeter yards (street setbacks see LUC 3.2.6.5) are based on the greater of, 10 feet or ¾ height of the exterior building wall. In order to meet Land Use Code requirements, the subdivision must comply with the Residential Cluster Project (RCP) criteria listed in LUC Sec. 3.6.1 and Development Standards 2-10. The following comments are based on RCP criteria listed in the aforementioned sections. 3. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers in the location map. (D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2) 4. Since this is a proposed Residential Cluster Project (RCP), a statement to that effect should be included in the title block. (D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2) 5. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S05-117. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 6. Revise the last sentence of general note three (3) to the following: "The development designator is RCP-7". (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5) 7. Add the following general note: "This plat is designed to meet the Residential Cluster Project (RCP) overlay zone criteria." (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7) 8. Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision. Common area parking provided shall require a total of 24 vehicle parking spaces. The plan currently provides for 20 spaces. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.G) (LUC 3.2.8.3) (D.S. 3-01.2.4.D) 9. All existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plat, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. If an easement is to be recorded or abandoned by final plat, please so state. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.J) 10. Submit drawings, photographs, or a combination of both, showing how the architectural compatibility requirements of Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3 of the LUC will be met. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.3) (D.S. 2-10.3.2.C) 11. Barrier-free accessibility must be provided to twenty-five percent of the ground floor units and all common areas within the project. Indicate how this accessibility is to be provided, and add a detail to the plat showing the accessibility. In addition, label those units, which are proposed for barrier free accessibility on the plan or provide a general note listing the lot numbers. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5) (D.S. 2-10.3.1.D) 12. Revise general note 19 to the following: "All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP." (LUC 3.6.1.4.9) 13. Revise general note 21 to a site coverage calculation (maximum allowed/proposed). For the purposes of the RCP, site coverage shall be applied in accordance with Lot Coverage requirements in LUC Sec. 3.2.9. For an exception to site coverage refer to LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.B. (LUC 3.6.1.4.B) (D.S. 2-10.3.1.C) 14. Since a new street is not being proposed and the block is more than 50% developed, this project does not qualify for developing area setbacks. The building setback required from Yavapai Road shall meet an established area setback of 20 feet or one and one-half (1½) times the building height, whichever is greater, measured from the Yavapai Road property line. Based on the proposed 18 foot building height, a 27 foot setback will be required. Revise keynote 32 as required. (D.S. 2-10.3.1.A) (LUC 3.2.6.5) 15. On lots of four thousand (4,000) square feet or more, it will be assumed that the lot is of sufficient size to accommodate a dwelling unit; therefore, on projects with lots of this size, floor plans will not be required. However, on lots of less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. Therefore, on projects that have lots less than four thousand (4,000) square feet in size, submit: 1) Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings. Plans can be reviewed in a more timely manner if copies of the building footprints drawn at the same scale as the plat are provided. This allows staff the ability to check which models fit which lots using a light table, instead of performing the tedious lot-by-lot math work. 2) Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits. 3) A list indicating which model homes fit which lots. Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. The list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., will still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. 16. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. (D.S. 2-10.3.2.E) (L.U.C. 3.6.1.5) 17. Dimension the width of a standard vehicle parking space. Minimum width required shall be eight and one-half (8 ½) feet. 18. Wheel stop curbing is required for all parking spaces abutting a sidewalk with a width of less than 6.5'. Wheel stop curbing shall be located two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space. Show all wheelstops and dimension on drawing. (D.S. 3-05.2.3.C) 19. Under general note 23, revise the maximum allowed building height to 40 feet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro at (520) 791-5608 or e-mail Daniel.Castro@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/12/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | 47 ESTIMATED DAILY TRIPS IN 24 HR PERIOD. |
| 08/12/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D). Provide this for Yavapai Road. 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 3. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 38) 4. The access points shall have 18'(min) radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6). Please label this dimension. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/15/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: August 11, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-117 Yavapai Duplexes T131325 (106-04) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Please add total miles of new public/private streets, even if it’s zero. Add the tie to a section corner. Add distance and bearings to interior and exterior lines. Add names to adjacent subdivisions and the map and plat. If there are any questions, please contact Jessica Shettleroe at 740-4398 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Jessica Shettleroe |
| 08/19/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 19, 2005 Jeff Stine AMEC 3295 West Ina Road, Suite 200 Tucson, AZ 85741 Subject: S05-117 Yavapai Duplexes Tentative Plat Dear Jeff: Your submittal of July 12, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Fire, Environmental Services, Addressing, Wastewater, Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 219-0499 |