Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Plan Number - S05-114
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/19/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-114 10200 E Ft. Lowell Rd. Revision - Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 20, 2014 DUE DATE: July 9, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. ********************************************************************* 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Clarify if the title block needs to be revised because of the change of name for the subdivision. If so revise the title block on all sheets to reflect the new subdivision name. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; 2. COMMENT: Same as comment 1 ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 3. COMMENT: This site is subject to compliance with the Scenic Corridor regulations. After some internal discussion related to the scenic corridor requirements as it relates to the exposed slopes, the proposed rip-rap at one to one ratios cannot be supported. The proposal will require approval through a Board of Adjustment variance process. Under the LUC, the sections related to the SCZ are as follows; LUC Section 2.8.2, The LUC section 3.7.5.2.E is clear on the Cut and Fill requirements; "Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length." (A possible re-notification may also be required.) ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 4. COMMENT: List the lot numbers that are affected by this exposed slope regulation as noted in the comment 3 above. All lots within the 400 foot Scenic Buffer are affected by the exposed slope regulation. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 5. COMMENT: The grading plan may have to be revised if the Board of Adjustment Variance is not approved. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 2-06.4.9.M.3 - Tentative Plats - Non Concurrent Review. A separate grading plan may be submitted after the second resubmittal of the tentative plat; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is conformance with an approved tentative plat. Note: In the case of a tentative plat submitted in conjunction with a rezoning request, the tentative plat and grading plan cannot be approved until 30 days after adoption of the rezoning ordinance. See Section 3.5.3.K.6, Ordinance Effective Date, of the UDC. 6. COMMENT: The grading plan was reviewed concurrently with the TP and scape plan review. Any changes made to the TP must be made to the corresponding grading and landscape plan sheets. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 7. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 07/03/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 07/07/2014, SUBJECT: La Cima Esplendora (Formerly Escalante-Houghton) S05-114, T14S, R15E, SECTION 35 RECEIVED: Revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on June 10, 2014 The subject project has been reviewed. The submittal can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the plan where the revisions were made: 1. The subdivision name does not match the name shown on the approved plans. Tentative plat, Final plat and grading plan may need to be revised accordingly. 2. Specify which lots are affected by this revision. 3. Provide a geotechnical report to verify the stability of the proposed 1:1 slopes. The report shall address how to stabilize the slopes if necessary. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative and Final Plats and Grading Plan |
| 07/09/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION On-Site Monitoring On-site monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre. The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. Provide monitoring report verifying that all natural areas have been preserved and all landscape has been installed and maintained per plan. |
| 07/09/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 07/10/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requrested by reveiw staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/29/2014 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |