Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-109
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/04/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Note the CDRC Case number on the native plant preservation plan also, as requested by the Zoning reviewer. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2) Revise the landscape plans to provide screening along Fairview Industrial Park Place. LUC Table 3.7.2-I The screening may only be located within the street landscape border in accordance with LUC 3.7.3.2.C. 3) Screen plants are not included in the 50% coverage requirement per DS 2-06.3.7. Ensure that 50% coverage is provided exclusive of screen plantings. 4) Provide screen walls for any loading areas within 100 feet of any street per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. It was noted that several lots include loading areas that require additional screening. 5) Revise the plans to show any applicable sight visibility triangles and revise the landscape plans to comply with the sight visibility standards. DS 3-01.5.0 6) The mitigation requirement for Prosopis velutina should be listed in the legend as 30 on sheet 2 of the landscape plan. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 10/04/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved October 04, 2005. |
| 10/05/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Per DS 6.01.4.2C1, the verbage callsa out for 10' clear inside. * Per DS 6.01.4.2C2, the verbage calls out for rear and side wall protection. Note: Appreciate the visual representation on sheet 6 showing the operational clear area in front of each enclosure. |
| 10/07/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-109 FAIRVIEW INDUSTRIAL PARK/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 10/06/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Per letter dated 7/13/05: Correct “A portion of the Southeast Quarter” to “A portion of the Southwest Quarter” (in Title Block and north of composite map). es |
| 10/17/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2005 TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE SUBJECT:Fairview Industrial Park TENTATIVE PLAT Job S05-109 T13S, R13E, Sec 35 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and a copy of the modified drainage report. Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Engineering comments regarding the Development Standards were addressed. D.S. 2-03.0 Platting Procedures 1. Comment 10 on the previous set of review comments read "Are manholes required for the Underground Storm Detention System to provide access for maintenance of the drainage facilities?" Urban's Response "Per DS 10-02.0, Sec 10.9.1, manholes have been provided where pipe lengths exceed 300 feet." It does not appear that the Underground Detention System can be properly maintained with the current configuration. Please address how the system will be maintained. In the drainage report please provide an applicable retention basin checklist that addresses how this system will be maintained and demonstrate how access will be provided to ensure that any blockage to the bleed pipes can be removed to maintain proper operation of this system. If you have any questions or would like to meet with me before your next submittal, you may contact me at 791-5640 ext.1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/21/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) There is STILL NO RECORDATION DATA listed for Fairview Ave. 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. SVTs must be shown for ALL ACCESS POINTS to the Development. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/26/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Heather Thrall Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-109 Fairview Industrial Park Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 10/25/05 DUE DATE: October 17, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 4, 2006. 2. It is acknowledged that the allowed 25-foot encroachment into the O-3 zoned portion of the property will be used for the required parking. Draw and label the zoning line and include a note for the 25-foot encroachment on all sheets for reference. Previous Comment: Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.2, this project area is zoned both O-3 and I-1. Please revise the notes and the drawings accordingly. For reference, the City of Tucson zoning maps can be found at www.tucsonaz.gov/planning under zoning overlay maps. A small strip of O-3 zoning, measuring 75 feet wide, extends from the centerline of Fairview Avenue west into this site. Note the Zoning Administrator has determined that the O-3 portion of this project cannot be used for any parking for industrial uses. Please review the zoning maps and revise the drawings accordingly. 3. A portion of the previous comment was addressed with the exception of the following. The floor area ratio is based on the individual lots not on the entire parcel. Revise the floor area ratio based on the individual lots. (Obviously the allowed building square footage will be different for each lot.) A matrix table should be provided listing all the lots with specific building areas allowed and proposed and the floor area ratio allowed and proposed. The allowed and proposed building heights must also be included in the matrix table. Previous comment: Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.5, the use of the property is listed as an industrial plaza. Please explain further as to what types of uses are planned, i.e. general manufacturing, offices, etc. This information should be provided for each lot on the plat. 4. Revise general note number 7 to list the correct LUC section number for the Major Streets and Routes Overlay. The correct section number is 2.8.3. Revise as required. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.7, as Fairview Avenue is an identified on City of Tucson Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) maps, a note should be added to the plat indicating this project is subject to and will comply with the Major Streets and Routes overlay zone requirements. 5. The future curb and property line must be clearly labeled and dimensioned from the centerline. In order to verify compliance for the proposed development the future right-of-way acquisition must be taken into account. Please add the requested information in order to verify future compliance of the landscape buffer and parking areas as well as building setbacks. If this site is within the intersection widening distance, draw, dimension, and label the future right-of-way and curbs. Previous Comment: Per DS 2-03.2.3.D, please clearly label the future curb and future right of way widths. Note: Per the City of Tucson MSR map, the future right of way for Fairview is listed at 76 feet, with a half right of way of 38 feet. It appears right of way expansions will affect this proposed development. Please revise the plat and the cross section provided for Fairview accordingly. Note: Further review comments on this issue may be forthcoming. 6. The I-I zoning classifications are not visible on plan sheets 3 to 6. Please adjust the text as required. Previous Comment: Per DS 2-03.2.4.D and comment 7 please provide the correct zoning classifications of this site on the plat, adding the zoning classifications (I-1) to all adjacent sites. 7. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.At least one sidewalk will be provided from each street on which the site has frontage. Lot 1 and 10 has frontage on Fairview Avenue and Fairview Business Park Place. A sidewalk must be provided to both of these lots from the Fairview Business Park Place. Add the required sidewalk to both lots. Previous Comment: Per Development Plan requirements, per section 2-05.2.4.K, show all pedestrian access routes on site and adjacent to right of way in accordance with specifications delineated in DS 2-08. In addition, handicapped accessible ramps should be provided and dimensioned. Please refer to ANSI chapters 4 and 5 for further information relating to Handicapped accessibility. 8. Provide a matrix table that lists all the development designator criteria for the specific uses proposed in this development. The matrix table shall include the required and proposed site area, allowed and proposed FAR, allowed and proposed building height, and the perimeter yard indicator. This information shall be provided for each lot in the matrix. Also a matrix that lists the required and actual provided vehicle, bicycle, and handicapped parking spaces for each lot must be included. A loading zone calculation that lists the number of loading zones required and proposed for each lot must be added. These development criteria tables and calculations should listed on the same sheet. See comment 3 for related information. Previous Comment: Per DS 2-05.2.4.M and N, per development plan requirements, add the height of each building, the specific use in that building and dimension all building footprints. Be sure to add the respective development designators and Floor Area ratio calculations. Note: staff reviewed this project under requirements of development designator "34", predominant for development in the I-1 zone. 9. Maneuverability into and out of the loading zones must be demonstrated on the plans. It does not appear based on the locations of the loading zones on most of the lots that maneuverability can be accomplished in a safe manner. Please call Jose Ortiz (791-5550 at ext. 1191) for more information on the requirements for maneuverability into and out of loading zones. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O, per development plan requirements, label and dimension all loading zones, indicating the number of loading zones required based upon the square footage and the use(s). Refer to section 3.4.5. of the LUC for further information on loading zone criteria. 10. All parking spaces that abut sidewalks must be provided with wheel stops unless the sidewalk is constructed to a width of no less than six and one-half feet. The extra width of the sidewalk allows for a typical vehicle overhang of two and one-half feet onto the sidewalk while a minimum of four feet is left for pedestrian access. If the wheel stops are to be provided the stops must be placed two and one-half feet from the front of the parking spaces. Revise the vehicle parking space details as required. Previous Comment: Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, per development plan requirements, provide typical details for parking spaces, with dimensions. Be sure to provide, label and dimension handicapped spaces and their respective access aisles. Provide a typical detail drawing for handicapped parking spaces, specifying handicapped van accessibility information and signage. Refer to ANSI Chapters 4 and 5 for further assistance with handicapped parking. 12. Bicycle parking as with all development criteria is to be provided based on the use and the number of parking spaces provided on the individual lot. All bicycle parking must be listed for each use and the number of class one and class two spaces must be drawn and labeled on the plan. The matrix tables should reflect the bicycle parking calculations accordingly. Also please revise the detail references to class one and class two as follows. The class one spaces are the long term parking which include the lockable box facility and the class two spaces are for short term parking which include the ribbon and pole type facilities. Both class one and two facilities must be provided on each lot. Draw and label the facilities as required and revise the titles for bicycle parking detail drawings. Previous Comment: Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, per development plan requirements, provide specifications for all bicycle parking facilities for each use on each lot, with their respective locations clarified and dimensioned. 13. A five-foot wide pedestrian refuge area with a four-foot wide sidewalk is required between a PAAL and a building. All the lots appear to have vehicular use areas adjacent to the buildings in the rear of the properties. If these areas are not for public use but rather for employees only, the pedestrian refuge areas may be provided as five-foot wide painted walkways around the buildings. DS 2-08.4.1 The title block in the title block should state Tentative Plat / Development Plan. This tentative plat / development plan will be become the overall site plan for this development and will be stamped as an approved site plan once the final plat has been approved. If individual site plans for each lot will be submitted please add a note to the plat stating that individual site plans are to be submitted for code review and compliance for each lot. 14. Should you have any questions on this review, please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156 Please note, depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S051092.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative/development plan. |
| 11/01/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 1, 2005 Morris I. Riback Urban Engineering 877 South Alvernon Way, Suite 200 Tucson, AZ 85711 Subject: S05-109 Fairview Industrial Park Tentative Plat Dear Morris: Your submittal of October 3, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Environmental Services, Addressing, Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO plans (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Modified Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 318-3808 |