Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-098
Review Name: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | March 30, 2006 To: Michelle Dodroe, Castro Engineering Corp. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: La Estancia de Tucson Lots 1-340 and Common Areas “A” & “B” Final Plat - 1st Submittal S05-098 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of residential lots. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the final plat. Sheet 1: In the DEDICATION block, 4th paragraph. Although the City Of Tucson may accept that common areas are granted as easements to the PUBLIC, Pima County prefers that these elements be GRANTED AS EASEMENTS TO CITY OF TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES… All Sheets, with the exception of sheet 6: Correct the Title block. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the final plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 04/03/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/03/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | |
| 04/03/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | April 13, 2006 To: Michelle Dodroe, Castro Engineering Corp. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: La Estancia de Tucson Lots 1-340 and Common Areas “A” & “B” Final Plat - 1st Submittal (AMENDED) S05-098 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of residential lots. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the final plat. Sheet 1: In the DEDICATION block, 4th paragraph. Although the City Of Tucson may accept that common areas are granted as easements to the PUBLIC, Pima County prefers that these elements be GRANTED AS EASEMENTS TO CITY OF TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES… All Sheets, with the exception of sheet 6: Correct the Title block. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN 10’ OF ANY PUBLIC SEWER, IN THE COMMON AREAS OR PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: NO PERMITS FOR ANY PERMANENT STRUCTURE WITHIN 10’ OF ANY PUBLIC SEWER, IN THE COMMON AREAS OR PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREIN, WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the final plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 04/05/2006 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain review, 04/05/2006 SUBJECT: La Estancia De Tucson Phase I, Lots 1-340 S05-098, T15S, R15E, SECTION 18 RECEIVED: Final Plat and CC & R's on March 13, 2006 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Final Plat: 1. It is not clear why the area (419.60 acres) of this phase, which includes 340 lots, is bigger than the area for the entire Phase I development (395.60 acres), which includes 674 lots. Explain the discrepancy. 2. The Block numbers as described in the Title Block are different from the block numbers described on the Tentative Plat. Explain the discrepancy. 3. Include a reduced-scale map of the entire PAD District on the first sheet, including the location of the portion being developed (D.S. 2-03.6.1.F.). 4. Provide the total miles of new public streets as required by D.S. 2-03.6.2.C. 5. Add the following general note: "There are three underground gas lines within and in the vicinity of this subdivision. An El Paso natural gas pipeline is located within the north-south El Paso natural gas property, BK.687, PG.564. Additionally, two Kinder Morgan Petroleum gas lines are contained within a 60 ft. gas line easement located within the south portion of the union pacific railroad right-of-way". 6. In order to expedite the plat review and approval, provide the boundary survey and closure calculations report in accordance with D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.3. 7. It is not clear how the subject development ties into the basis of bearing. Verify compliance with the requirements of D.S. 2-03.6.5.A. 8. The existing 10' Slope and Utility Easement and 35'Slope Easement (BK. 54, PG. 22), for the Julian Wash, are not shown. Revise. 9. The existing 10' Electric Easement (BK531, PG. 232) is not called out on Sheets 4 and 6 of 21. Additionally, the easement is shown "to be abandoned" on the Tentative Plat and on the Final Plat on Sheet 7/21. Since the easement conflicts with proposed improvements and structures, it must be abandoned prior to the approval of the Final Plat. 10. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain area in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more (D.S. 2-03.6.4.F.). Please be advised that this includes the existing FEMA floodplain. 11. There are several existing easements that were shown on the Tentative Plat as "to be abandoned", but they are shown "to remain" on the Final Plat (e.g. Keynote 4 on Sheet 5/21 and Keynote 10 on Sheet 6/21). Explain the change or revise as needed. 12. Show detention/retention areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner (D.S. 2-03.6.4.I.). 13. The right of way that is shown to crosses several lots in the approved Tentative Plat (Keynote 17) is not shown on the Final Plat. The Tentative Plat shows this right of way "to be abandoned". Either abandon the right of way by a separate instrument prior to the approval of the final Plat or show it on the Final Plat "to be abandoned by this Plat". 14. The Easement described in Keynote 6 of the approved Tentative Plat is not shown on the Final Plat. The Tentative Plat shows this Easement "to be abandoned". Either abandon the Easement by a separate instrument prior to the approval of the final Plat or show it on the Final Plat "to be abandoned by this Plat". 15. All onsite existing easements and right of way, which are shown on the approved Tentative Plat, that are proposed to be abandoned by a separate instrument or vacated, must be processed before the Final Plat (FP) can be approved. Proper abandonment documentation, including recording information, must be submitted with the FP resubmittal for the FP approval. Abandonment can also be accomplished by the Final Plat. Address this issue. 16. It is not clear why there is a Keynote 4 call out within lot 234 on Sheet 9/21. Check and revise as needed. 17. Drainage Easement described in Keynote 7 (on the approved Tentative Plat, Sheet 18/30) is not shown on Sheet 9/21 of the Final Plat. Revise. 18. Calle Hora Cero and the adjacent existing Slope/PUE Easement shown on Sheet 18/30 of the approved Tentative Plat are not shown on Sheet 9/21 of the Final Plat. Revise. 19. The 20' water easement "to be abandoned" shown on Sheet 10/21 is not shown in its entirety as shown on the approved TP. Revise. 20. Call out the Public Drainage Easement (BK. 54, PG. 22) on Sheet 15/21. 21. Call out, on the 100 scale plans, all existing easements that are proposed to remain, and are shown on the approved Tentative Plat. 22. The same required final plat information that is shown on the 40-scale plans shall be shown on the 100-scale plans (i.e. easements, right of way, common areas, floodplain delineation, etc.). 23. Submit a copy of an up-to-date Title Report. 24. Submit a copy of the Assurances package. CC & R's The CC & R's are acceptable for Engineering and Floodplain purposes. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Final Plat, Title Report and Assurances |
| 04/06/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON - PHASE I Lots 1-340 S05-098 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has received the final plat submitted for review March 13, 2006. TEP is unable to approve the plat at this time. TEP is in the process of completing the electrical design for Lots 1-693. The design must be completed in order to determine our easement requirements. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 04/11/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-098 LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON-PHASE I/FINAL PLAT DATE: 4/10/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct resubdivision information and Section, Township and Range information on all Title Blocks. Label all lots on pg. 2. Ghost lot 296 on pg. 7. Label Paseo Monte Verde on pg. 10. es |
| 04/12/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/14/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-098; Final Plat Page 6 - the west boundary of Detention Basin (CA "B") needs to be defined along the Julian. Page 10, 16 & 17 - The 20' water easement to be abandoned...If there is no facilities in the easement area, abandon by plat. I do not recall this being included in the request to Real Estate. Also show as affecting Blocks "C" & "D". Page 18 - A sewer easement should show through existing (soon to be former) Via Pampas Morenas for the existing sewer line. There should be a Park dedication and a Well dedication by plat to replace the Park and Well that are proposed to be conveyed back to the developer. Also, the realigned well at the NE corner of the original subdivision needs to be resolved and the additional Park property (Block 31?) needs to be dedicated. NOTE: These comments were discussed at a meeting this morning with John Lupo, Matt & Laith. |
| 04/14/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-098 La Estancia De Tucson 04/13/06 (x) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: La Estancia PAD NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon / Southeast Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: December 28, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments. Complies With Planning, Subject to Attached Comments REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 12/20/05 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments La Estancia De Tucson – S05-098: (4th submittal) Please forward the following information to the applicant as part of staff’s approval. Staff’s approval of tentative plat S05-098 is subject to the following understanding with the applicant: Note 37 is accepted and will be interpreted as follows. Prior to final plat approvals in Phases I, II & III, design guidelines shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Urban Planning and Design to ensure compliance with La Estancia Plan PAD requirements as it relates to residential densities and diversity of housing types. The applicant has designed Phase I as a low density single-family detached development. In order to comply with the La Estancia PAD housing requirements, Phase II & III shall provide a range of densities and a diversity of housing types to balance the uniformity of Phase I design consisting of single family detached housing at approximately five RAC. Housing diversity in Phase II & III shall not constitute multiple building elevation options of single-family detached residential units (model homes). Residential Phase II & III shall require a range of densities, varied lot sizes, and a variety of housing types. The design guidelines to include language to address the wall(s) along the southern boundary of Camino Boleadoras as a non-linear wall with offset or variations in wall setbacks from the right-of-way boundary of Camino Boleadoras. Per revised tentative plat S05-098, sheet 2 of 30, Phasing Note #1 (submitted electronically by applicant to Urban Planning and Design staff on December 19, 2005) now includes Parks and Recreation requirements for the Julian Wash improvements as part of Phase I requirements. Please provide to Development Service staff an updated version of tentative plat S05-098 with revised sheet 2 of 30 shown as attached. |
| 05/08/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: April 10, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S05-098 La Estancia De Tucson T151518 (141-09) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections before recording this plat. On sheet 4 and 9, label Common Area “B”; one between lots 17 and 18 and the other next to lots 240-242. Also label Common Area “A” on sheet 9. Add the number of miles of new public roads to the general notes. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/11/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/11/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 11, 2006 Wocky Redsar Castro Engineering Corp. 3580 West Ina Road, Suite 200 Tucson, AZ 85741 Subject: S05-098 La Estancia de Tucson - Phase I Final Plat Dear Wocky: Your submittal of March 13, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Final Plat (Wastewater, TEP, Addressing, Real Estate, Community Planning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 293-2115 |