Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-082
Review Name: OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/24/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | S05-082 is approved May 24, 2005. |
| 05/31/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-082 NASSAR/FREIJ 4 LOT SPLITS / OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: MAY 31, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Correct section locations on Location Map. 2: Correct scale on Location Map. 3: Delete street directions on Location Map. 4: Include lots 1-4 on all Title Blocks. 5: Label lots 1-4. 6: Delete address. 4: Spell out Rd. of Delta Rd. on pg. 1. |
| 05/31/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Lot split and parking configuration does not allow any curb frontage for Automated Plastic Container service area. * Denied for additional clarification on how the refuse (garbage and recyables) will be serviced. |
| 06/01/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S05-082 STEVE CORRALES ENGINEERING CORPORATION NASSAR/FREIJ 4 LOT SPLITS |
| 06/09/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-082 Nassar/Freij 4 Lot Splits 6/9/05 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other – Record of Survey CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Avenue-Valencia Road Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: June 20, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: vf 791-4505 DATE: 06/08/05 |
| 06/13/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | June 13, 2005 TO: Charles Corrales Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Nasser/Freij 4 Lot Splits Record of Survey – 1st Submittal S05-082 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project S04-097, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-082, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEETS 1 & 2. Show the size and Pima County plan number for the two existing sewerlines shown on the layout. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/14/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) REVISE THE PLANS AS REQUESTED BY OTHER AGENCIES AND SUBMIT REVISED LANDSCAPE AND NPP PLANS. |
| 06/14/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 14, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S05-082 Nassar/Freij 4 Lot Splits: Other Subdivision Review CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/15/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: NASSAR / FREIJ 4 LOT SPLITS S05-082 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review May 20, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the existing facilities must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 06/17/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | 47 estimated daily traffic (in average 24 hour vehicle trips) |
| 06/18/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S05-082 5901 S. 6th Av. Nasser/Freij 4 Lot Split TRANSMITTAL: 07/06/05 DUE DATE: 6/20/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a Record of Survey. If, at the end of that time, the Record of Survey has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 6/19/06. 2. DS 2-03.11.7.E Place the words "Book_____Page______" in both the upper and lower right corners out side the margin line. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder"s Office at the time of recordation. 3. DS 2-03.11.7. I. A legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing will be placed on either the first sheet or the first sheet which contains all or part of the drawing. 4. DS 2-03.11.7J. Line weights will reflect the nature of the line, e.g., right-of-way lines will be more prominent than lot lines or easements, and drainageways will be in heavy solid lines except at street crossings. 5. DS 2-03.11.8.B.6 On single family projects bounded or intersected by a Major Street or Route, list the following note: "Lots with frontage on a street designated a Major Street or Route shall have ingress-egress designed in a manner so that motor vehicles do not back out onto the Major Street or Route, through the use of circular drives, turnarounds, or other similar solutions." 6. DS 2-03.11.11.E. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way width will be required to dedicate right-of-way to the MS&R width. Right-of-way dedication is required prior to Land Survey Exception approval. Include right-of-way dedication recordation information on the plan. The west lot will be affected by this requirement. 7. DS 2-03.11.12.D Identify each proposed lot by number, and include the square footage of each. Item #8 will affect the west lot square footage. 8. DS 2-03.11.12.E Show locations of all proposed driveways. A driveway can only access two units. 9. Remove all proposed development form the Record of Survey plan. Provide a second sheet with proposed development showing the viability of the lot split. This includes, but is not limited to, lot coverage, setbacks, future r/w curbs and sidewalks, sight visibility triangles, etc……. Please note that the parking as shown on submitted plan will not be approved unless a wall or barrier is placed along lot lines between the parking areas. Upon a second sheet being provided and reviewed, additional comments may be forthcoming. 10. Add a note indicating that this property is within the boundary of the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) for the Noise Control District 65 (NCD 65) and the Airport Hazard District (AHD). 11. For compliance with the AHD indicate on the plan the mean sea level (MSL) elevation of the NW end of the runway for Tucson International Airport (TIA), the MSL elevation of the proposed property, the height of any proposed structures, the difference between height of the proposed structure and the allowed height with in the AHD. 12. Provide a note on the plan that all structures with in the NCD 65 must be provided with sound attenuation to reduce the interior noise level to an Ldn of 45 or less, as specified by Development Standard 9-05. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5608 @ ext 2000. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 06/20/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | S05-082 Nasser/Freij Land Split Engineering Review Comments Doug Williams - Reviewer 20 June 2005 Resubmittals required: Revised Record of Survey, Drainage Report and Grading Plan reflecting all revisions. Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed Record of Survey/Land split proposal, and approval is not recommended at this time. Please address the following comments prior to resubmittal: 1. Provide each address or revise the Record of Survey or the CDRC application address provided for consistency. 2. Correct the parcel number provided in the legal description to match that which appears on Pima County records - # 138-10-053D. Additionally, the legal description provided does not appear to match that which appears on County records - specifically, "EXC E104.68' THEREOF" has been omitted (DS 2-03.11.7 F). 3. Provide all signatures and certifications on the Record of Survey, as specified in DS 2-03.11.9 A & B. 4. Provide the following note: "All public roads and drainage improvements within and adjacent to this subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer’s Office for review and approval" DS 2-03.2.2 D 1a. 5. Benchmark locations, the proposed location of and method of tie to permanent survey monuments or to the nearest section or quarter section corner, and the proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments will be shown. All monuments found or set will be described. Fully describe and show all markings on found monuments (DS 2-03.2.3 a). 6. All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status DS 2-03.2.3 C. 7. Street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan must be shown. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Record of Survey approval may not occur prior to dedication. Provide recording information on the plan (DS 2-03.2.4 H). 8. Indicate primary control points, or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which all dimensions, angles, bearings, and similar data on the plat will be referred. Where a coordinate system has been established by the City Engineer or County Engineer, primary control points may be referenced thereto. At least one (1) corner of the subdivision will be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner, or an established City or County survey monument. Include a description of that corner marker and an indication of how the bearings were determined. Corner tie recordation information must be provided on the Record of Survey. 9. Please provide reference to a record of survey, a plat name (Book 5 Page 3 of ___(?), and additional, survey information for the basis of bearing. The Subdivision Plat for Emery Park (Bk 5 Pg 3) does not appear to provide a bearing for Delta Rd, as implied on the document. 10. The basis of bearings should be established from two (2) found, physically monumented points described and shown. If the monuments at each end of the reference line are fully described on the plat, they need not be described in the "Basis of Bearings" statement. 11. Provide abutting right of way recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks 12. The drainage report must address Balanced Basin Flow attenuation requirements. Refer to Section 2.1 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual (DS 10-01.0). Please provide a revised report adressing how this proposed development will meet these requirements, or how alternative design(s) may preclude providing such. 13. Refer to Section 2.2 for 5-year threshold retention requirements (DS 10-01.0). If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 791-5550 x 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov Doug Williams Sr. Engineering Assoc. Engineering Division Development Services Dept. |
| 06/21/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this OSR: 1. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38 states that the maximum driveway width for adjoining properties is 30'. This drawing is depicting 35.5' 2. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38 requires a minimum driveway separation of 12'. This drawing shows approximately 9' of separation. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 07/09/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 9, 2005 Charles Corrales Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation 1008 West Saint Mary's Road, Bdg #1 Tucson, AZ 85745 Subject: S05-082 Nasser/Freij Record of Survey Dear Charles: Your submittal of May 20, 2005, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Record of Survey (environmental services, landscaping, traffic, engineering, zoning, TEP, addressing, wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (engineering, landscaping, zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report and Grading Plans (engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 622-2554 |
| 07/09/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Denied | May not be recorded until approved |