Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-081
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/22/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/26/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved July 26, 2005. |
| 07/27/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit irrigation plans that convey the intent to comply with the irrigation standards of DS 2-06.5.4 and LUC 3.7.4.5. Required elements of the plan are listed in DS 2-07.2.2.C. 2) Revise the plans to label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. DS 2-03.2.4.C Common Area C, as currently shown on the plat and landscape plans, includes the landscaped area along 6th Avenue. The requirements and restrictions differ for NUOS and other landscape areas. 3) Revise the landscape plans to locate the 72" decorative masonry wall proposed along 6th Avenue behind the street landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.b 4) Revise the landscape plans to show and identify the future sight visibility triangles. Locate any shrubs or accents that exceed thirty inches in height behind the SVT. LUC 3.7.3.4 Show the near side SVT for the intersection of 6th Avenue and Manor View Road. 5) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area per LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Identify water harvesting areas on the landscape plans. 6) List the area of the NUOS area shown on Exhibit II.B.1 of the Environmental Resource Report. LUC 3.8.6.4.B. A minimum of 116,305 sq. ft. of NUOS is required. Revise all plans to provide the minimum NUOS area required. 7) Delinate the NUOS area on the tentative plat. The boundaries of the NUOS area are not consistent with Common Area C. 8) Revise the landscape plan and others, if applicable, to remove the proposed wall from the NUOS. The wall may not be located in this area. 9) The street landscape border is also required along Lot 30. Revise as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.C RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, Submit: Exhibit II.B.1 of the Environmental Resource Report. |
| 08/08/2005 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | August 8, 2005 TO: Paul Nzomo, P.E. Coronado Engineering & Development, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: 6th & Medina, Lots 1-30 and Common Areas A-C Tentative Plat - 2nd Submittal S05-081 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. As previously requested on June 8, 2005, please provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. 2. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. 3. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/10/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/10/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 10, 2005 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC Coordinator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: 6th & Medina Tentative Plat S05-081 (Second Review) T15S, R13E, Section 13 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Tentative Plat 1. Provide sufficient details for the basins and drainage structures to demonstrate compliance with the drainage report. 2. Provide truncated domes on the access ramps. 3. Label intermediate contour intevals to provide a clear description of existing conditions The fonts used for all labels must be at least 12 point in size. 4. Provide recordation information and full existing and future dimensions for the adjacent rights-of-way. 5. Indicate the dimensions of the proposed sidewalks. Sidewalks along the internal streets and along Medina Road must be 5 feet wide. The sidewalks along 6th Avenue must be 6 feet wide. The typical street details do not meet this requirement. 6. Provide proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage. 7. Show the proposed scuppers and other drainage structures on the Tentative Plat. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. Include discharge quantities. Provide specifice enough details to demonstrate compliance with the drainage report. Show how the scuppers that are proposed to be 1.5 feet deep will be constructed and show the effect on the street and on the sidewalk grades. 8. Revise the Legend or the plan view so that the symbol for the Floodplain Limit is consistent throughout the plan. The symbol for the water surface contour in the legend must be consistent with the symbol used in plan view. 9. Fully describe the survey monuments referenced on the Tentative Plat. Include any markings on the monuments or indicate that they are unmarked. 10. The basins must be given a separate common area designation and must be shown with surveyable limits on the Final Plat. Clearly define the limits of the NUOS area (Common Area C) on the plan view. 11. Show the maintenance access for the basin. Provide details showing the ramp. Account for the volume displaced by the ramp in the volume calculations. Drainage Report 12. Provide all of the required elements from Development Standard 10-02.2.2 and Development Standard 10-01.5. The July 2005 drainage report is a confusing presentation. The information in the summary tables and the conclusions are not clearly supported by the calculations. Please set up a meeting with me to discuss the report. The report will need to be revised so future readers will be able to clearly understand its content. 13. Provide clear and complete retention and detention basin calculation. Justify the percent of impervious area used to determine both the existing and developed runoff coefficients. Provide drawings of the drainage structures and basins including the weir design to demonstrate that the basin volumes consistent with the analyses. 14. Revise the Drainage Report to provide the correct description of the parcel location. The project is shown on the maps and exhibits to be located on the Northwest Corner of South 6th Avenue and East Medina Street instead of the Southeast corner as stated in the Drainage Report. 15. Revise the basin routing calculations so that the infiltration rates are not included as required by the Stormwater Detention Manual Page 7. Include a diagram of the proposed weir and provide weir calculations supporting the routing tables. 16. Clearly address the offsite drainage areas that impact the entire eastern boundary of the project. Show how the off-site drainage will be accepted in historical patterns. Show how the lots will be graded to handle the flows. 17. Provide a maintenance and inspection checklist for the long term maintenance of basin and drainage structures. 18. Provide engineering justification for general notes 14 and 15 of the Tentative Plat. Include references to the equation from the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management for each of the weir and scupper design calculations and channel/swale calculations. Use the appropriate clogging factors for the scupper design. Demonstrate that the discharges will be discharged to the Valencia Wash or its tributary without causing undue erosion. If the flow is to be returned to sheet flow conditions, show how this will be accomplished with the natural grades of the NUOS areas. 19. Provide details of the basins and other hydraulic structures in the Drainage Report. Include details for all basin inlet and outlet structures. Show how the discharge from the basins will not contribute to undue erosion. 20. Provide results of percolation tests that demonstrate that the retention volume will be disposed of within 12 hours. The percolation tests must also address the proposed use of cobbles for the floor of the basin. Please note that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Floodplain Use Permit will be required as part of the grading permit submittal. Include a completed checklist as provided on the ADEQ website with the SWPPP. Submit a revised Tentative Plat and a revised Drainage Report. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 08/16/2005 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Lead Planner PROJECT: S05-081 6th/Medina Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 08/16/05 DUE DATE: August 5, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 17, 2006. 2. This project was reviewed for Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standard (DS) compliance. 3. As this property is subject to requirements of the Airport Hazard District within the Airport Environs Overlay Zone, it is essential to list the following on the plans: A) the mean sea level of runway 11R B) the (maximum) mean sea level of the subdivision C) the maximum building heights Note - the project should comply with the maximum height allowed for the underlying R-2 zone and Airport Hazard District restrictions. 4. Per LUC 2.8.5.5.B.1.B, residential development is not permitted on property zoned C-1 within the CUZ-2 overlay zone. Lot 10 of this project is subject to these circumstances. It is staff's determination the most efficient way to address this concern is to split off the CUZ-2 portion of Lot 10 and create another common area, while ensuring Lot 10 remains a minimum lot size of 5000 square feet. A note should then be added to the plat that this common area cannot be built on. Note: a driveway area is permitted across the CUZ-2 zone to allow access for the proposed SFR on the developable portion of the lot. 5. Please remove comment 23 from the plat, which refers to screening requirements for mechanical equipment in a Residential Cluster Project (RCP). As this is not an RCP, this note does not apply. 6. Please move the "NCD-65" notation on the plat to the right side of the dashed line shown as the NCD-65 boundary. This will clarify the NCD-65 area begins to the right of the provided line, as is correct. 7. The submitted drawings indicate Common Area B is the basin area and Common Area C is the NUOS area, yet their boundaries are not clear. For clarification purposes, please show boundary lines for all common areas, with their respective labels (Common Area A, B, C, etc.) on the plat. 8. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.5, the associated development designators for the proposed residential development should be provided. The plat gives development designator information for only the R-2 portion of the subdivision, when such information should also be provided for the C-1 portion of the subdivision. Due to the varying setbacks on lots throughout the subdivision, staff advises a chart/table format be utilized on the plat. This chart/table should include: A) both minimum allowed and proposed lot sizes for each the C-1 and R-2 zones B) both maximum allowed and proposed lot coverage for lots within each zone C) both maximum allowed and proposed building heights for each zone -AEZ prevailing D) minimum building setbacks required for each street (see note below) E) minimum building setbacks required for lots along east and north subdivision borders (R-2 to R-2 subdivision boundary = greater of 6 ft. or 2/3 ht. of ext. bldg wall) (R-2 to I-1 subdivision boundary = height of ext. bldg wall) F) minimum building setbacks required for interior lots from R-2 to R-2 zone (greater of 6 ft. or 2/3 ht. of ext. bldg wall G) minimum building setbacks required for interior lots from C-1 to C-1 zone (height of ext. bldg wall) H) minimum building setbacks required for interior lots for R-2 abutting C-1 zone (height of ext. bldg wall) I) minimum building setbacks required for interior lots for C-1 abutting R-2 zone (greater of 10' or ¾ ht. of ext. bldg wall) Note, as this project abuts 6th Avenue, a Major Streets and Route, developing area street setbacks may be utilized throughout the subdivision. This setback information is found in the LUC, Section 3.2.6.5.B. Please revise all setback notes accordingly. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Heather Thrall at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 791-4541x1156. HCT C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05-081.2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat. |
| 08/19/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 19, 2005 Paul Nzomo Coronado Engineering 1010 North Finance Center, Suite 200 Tucson, AZ 85710 Subject: S05-081 6th and Medina Tentative Plat Dear Paul: Your submittal of July 25, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 571-1961 |