Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S05-081
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
120 E MEDINA RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S05-081
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/18/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/19/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied Provide a General Note on the plan stating: "Additional fire hydrant shall be provided by the Developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code."
05/23/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development.
* Approved for Automated Plastic Container (APC) service at curb side. APC's are to be placed and removed from the collection area to the storage area on the day of service.
05/26/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S05-081
CORONADO ENGINEERING
6TH & MEDINA
05/31/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S05-081 6TH& MEDINA/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: May 31, 2005



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

ON FINAL PLAT:
1.) CHANGE 6TH ST TO 6TH AVENUE ON LOCATION MAP.
2.) LABEL APPROVED INTERIOR STREET NAMES.


***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when
submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima
County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing
and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's
Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***









jg
06/09/2005 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied June 8, 2005

TO: Paul Nzomo, P.E.
Coronado Engineering & Development, Inc.

THRU: Patricia Gehlen
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: 6th & Medina, Lots 1-30 & Open Space/Drainage
Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal
S05-081


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter.

Based on the evaluation of project G-2001-124, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-081, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

SHEET 2. Show all the sewer information, including slopes.

SHEET 2. Show all the manhole information.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
06/13/2005 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Lead Planner

PROJECT: S05-081
6th/Medina
Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL: 06/22/05

DUE DATE: June 16, 2005

COMMENTS:

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 17, 2006.

2. This project was reviewed for Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standard (DS) compliance.

3. Per DS 2-03.2.1.D.2, the railroad by Nogales Hwy should be on the location map.

4. Per DS 2-03.2.1.D.3., the township, range and section should be added to the township boundary to the east of the project, as depicted on the location map.

5. Per DS 2-03.2.2.A., the recorded owner should be listed on the plat, per Pima County as a trust. The trust members and their contact numbers should be placed on the plat.

6. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.1, the subdivision number S05-081 should be added to the plat.

7. Per DS 2-03.2.1.6.2, the plat notes indicate the project is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP). PLEASE NOTE, per LUC 2.8.5.5.B.1.A, AN RCP IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE CUZ-2. Please remove the RCP note from the plans.

8. Per DS 2-03.2.2.7., notes should be added stating this project will comply with the Major Streets & Routes (MS&R) plan and Airport Environs overlay Zone (AEZ), as the project abuts south 6th Avenue and is within the AEZ.

9. Per DS 2-03.2.3.D, future curbs for 6th Avenue and Medina Road, if applicable, should be drawn, labeled and dimensioned on the plat.

10. Per DS 2-03.2.3.I, clarification is needed for the site to the east- developed or vacant.

11. Per DS 2-03.2.4.C, if the Open Space on the plat is common area it should be stated.

12. Per DS 2-03.2.4.F, street names for the streets proposed should be provided.

13. Per DS 2-03.2.4.M, current and future sight visibility triangles should be provided.

14. Per DS 3-012.4.D, parking must be provided on both sides of local streets throughout the subdivision. A cross section of Medina Road showing how the above requirement will be met should be provided on the plat.

15. This project is also within the Noise Control District 65 (NCD) of the AEZ. Per LUC 2.8.5.6.A.1.A, sound attenuation is required for single family residences in the NCD-65, and such requirements should be noted on the plat.

16. This project is in a section of the AEZ identified as Airport Hazard District (AHD), and a note should be listed indicating the project will be in compliance with the AHD. Please ensure the mean sea level of the runway 11R is provided on the plans, and the (maximum) mean sea level of the subdivision is also listed, along with maximum building heights. Note - the project should comply with the maximum height allowed for the underlying R-2 zone and AHD restrictions.

17. Per LUC 2.8.5.5.B.1.B, residential development is not permitted on property zoned C-1 within the CUZ-2 overlay zone. Lot 10 of this project is subject to these circumstances. This note should be added to the plat.

18. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.5, notes should be added to the plat indicating the use of the properties involved with this project and their associated development designators. A chart including both allowed and proposed: lot sizes, lot coverage, building heights and densities - for both the C-1 and R-2 zones - should be shown on the plat. Building setback lines should be delineated on the plat for each street and the north and east subdivision borders.

19. Per DS 3-05.2.4.A.1 and DS 6-01.3.1.A, visitor parking must be within 150 feet of property lines, but cannot inhibit sanitation vehicle access. The cul de sacs shown appear to provide on street parking that would not meet these standards, and should be addressed on a revised tentative plat. No parking signs should be erected in these cul de sacs.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Heather Thrall at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 791-5608x1156.

HCT C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05-081.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat.
06/13/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the tentative plat to include the cross section for the retention/detention basin shown. The basin is required to conform to the technical requirements and guidelines of DS 10-01.4.3.

2) An Environmental Resource Report is a required element of the Native Plant Preservation proposal and is acceptable for use for the ERZ study, when prepared with sufficient detail. See DS 1-07.Exhibit III for the report content specifications.

3) Revise note 8 on sheet 1 of the landscape plan. An irrigation plan is required prior to submittal of the final plat. Construction drawings are not required but the plans must clearly convey the intent to comply with the irrigation standards of DS 2-06.5.4 and LUC 3.7.4.5. Required elements of the plan are listed in DS 2-07.2.2.C.

4) Revise note 9 on sheet 1 of the landscape plan to indicate that irrigation will be provided after establishment. Irrigation and landscaping is to be maintained permanently as shown on the approved plans. LUC 3.7.6.

5) Revise note 10 on sheet 1 of the landscape plan to include adjacent right-of-way areas per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. Revise the landscape plan to designate decomposed granite for the abutting right-of-way areas and all landscape borders. Consult the City Engineer for standards related to dust control material in the right-of-way.

6) Revise the specification for the path indicated in the open space adjacent to Sixth Avenue. 1/4" minus should be specified for pedestrian areas and paths.

7) Revise all plans as necessary to locate the required landscape border adjacent to Sixth Avenue behind the MS&R right-of-way line. LUC 3.7.2.4

8) Non-required landscaping may be place in the right-of-way in accordance with LUC 3.7.2.9. Provide verification, in writing, from the City Engineer of any approvals received for placing required or non-required landscaping in right-of-way areas.

9) Based on the presence of riparian habitat in the watercourse in the northern part of the site, the listing of the watercourse as an ERZ Wash is under review. This habitat may not be unnecessarilly altered by development. TCC Sec. 26-5

10) Revise the plans to label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners'
association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. DS 2-03.2.4.C

11) Where natural floodprone areas, such as washes, channels, drainageways, etc., exist within the plat boundaries of the drawing, water surface contours
for the 100-year flood with water surface elevations indicated must be shown and clearly labeled. Revise the legend on sheet 1 of the plat and the floodplain delineation on the remaining sheets to correspond.

12) Revise the landscape plans to locate the 72" decorative masonry wall proposed in the MS&R right-of-way behind the street landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.b

13) Revise the landscape plans to show and identify the future sight visibility triangles. Locate any shubs or accents that exceed thirty inches in height behind the SVT.
LUC 3.7.3.4

14) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area per LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Identify water harvesting areas on the landscape plans.

15) A 10' public utility and pedestrian easement is shown along portions of Sixth Avenue in the location where the street landscape border is required. Revise as necessary to eliminate conflicts with landscaping and utility easements. LUC 3.7.2.6.B

16) Label the 30% set-aside area as Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS). LUC 3.8.6.4.B.

17) Revise Landscape Note 2 on sheet 1 of the landscape plan to include the site area in addition to the 30% set-aside.
30% of 8.96 acres should result in a set-aside of 2.68 acres.

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, AN INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE ERR REPORT IS REQUIRED.
06/13/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: 6th Ave. & Medina
Lots 1-30
S05-081

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat
submitted for review May 18, 2005.

The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing
facilities along Medina Road proceeding through the interior of the
subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the
approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative
Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional
plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including
water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the
AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com
<mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact
me at (520) 917-8745.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com>
06/14/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: June 14, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S05-081 6th and Medina: Tentative Plat

CC: Craig Gross
Patricia Gehlen, Development Services


Staff has no comments.







Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
06/15/2005 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: June 15, 2005


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S05-081 6th & Medina T151313 (138-15)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.

I’m having some trouble with the open space/drainage area. The line work indicates that the floodplain delineation is different from the erosion hazard setback, which is different from the basin. If this is to all open space/drainage, all the lines between these areas need to be dashed; otherwise, each will be viewed as separate parcels. Also, if the open space/drainage is to be held by the home owners association, it should really be labeled as Common Area “A”
Add the complete curve data.
If there area any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.





Susan King
06/16/2005 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 16, 2005

To: Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Coordinator
FROM: Loren Makus, EIT
Engineering Division

SUBJECT: 6th & Medina
Tentative Plat S05-081 (First Review)
T15S, R13E, Section 13

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report

The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed.

Tentative Plat

1. The Drainage Report indicates that two basins will be provided for retention and detention purposes. Revise the Tentative Plat to show the two basins as required by the Drainage Report.
2. Provide dimensions for the Sight Visibility Triangles along 6th Avenue which is a collector. Label 6th Avenue as a MS&R route.
3. Indicate the no parking areas in each cul-de-sac in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0 Figure 20.
4. Indicate the Contour Interval near the North Arrow on each sheet. Label intermediate contour intevals to provide a clear description of existing conditions The fonts used for all labels must be at least 12 point in size.
5. Provide recordation information and full dimensions for the adjacent rights-of-way.
6. Indicate the dimensions of the proposed sidewalks. Sidewalks along the internal streets and along Medina Road must be 5 feet wide. The sidewalks along 6th Avenue must be 6 feet wide.
7. Provide proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage.
8. Show the proposed scuppers and other drainage structures on the Tentative Plat. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. Include discharge quantities.
9. Provide cross section details for the basin. The callout on the plan view refers to a non-existant detail.
10. Add the General Note: "All public roads and drainage improvements within and adjacent to this subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval."
11. Revise the Legend or the plan view so that the symbol for the Floodplain Limit is consistent throughout the plan. Include the symbol for the water surface contour in the legend.
12. Fully describe the survey monuments referenced on the Tentative Plat.
13. General Note 7 states that the area designated as Common Area "A" will be drainage area. Label the area as indicated. The basins must be given a separate common area designation and must be shown with surveyable limits on the Final Plat.
14. Show the maintenance access for each basin.
15. Show the City's jurisdictional limits on the Location Map.

Drainage Report

16. Revise the Drainage Report to provide the correct description of the parcel location. Note that Valencia Road is also an arterial and is closer to the project site than South Nogales Highway. Since Nogales Highway is not adjacent to the project, show how other streets will provide all-weather access.
17. The proposed project is in a balanced basin as indicated in the Drainage Report. Revise the retention requirements to provide 5-year threshold retention as required by section 1.4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. (Page 6) Provide the calculations for the retention volume. Use the 5-year existing and proposed run-off coefficients for the calculation.
18. Clearly address the offsite drainage areas that impact the entire eastern boundary of the project. Show how the off-site drainage will be accepted in historical patterns. Show how the lots will be graded to handle the flows.
19. Provide a maintenance and inspection checklist for the long term maintenance of basin and drainage structures.
20. Provide engineering justification for general notes 14 and 15 of the Tentative Plat.
21. Address the impacts of the drainage from Hacienda Del Sol on the project.
22. Provide details of the basins and other hydraulic structures in the Drainage Report. Include details for all basin inlet and outlet structures. Show how the discharge from the basins will not contribute to undue erosion.
23. Provide results of percolation tests that demonstrate that the retention volume will be disposed of within 12 hours. The percolation tests must also address the proposed use of cobbles for the floor of the basin.

Please note that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Floodplain Use Permit will be required as part of the grading permit submittal. Include a completed checklist as provided on the ADEQ website with the SWPPP.
Submit a revised Tentative Plat and a revised Drainage Report. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov.

Loren Makus, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
06/17/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S05-081 6TH & Medina May 18, 2005

(X) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: Tucson International Airport (AEZ) Overlay Zone

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Ave.-Valencia Rd. Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No

COMMENTS DUE BY: June 16, 2005


SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

(X) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(X) See Additional, Advisory Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: June 16, 2005
Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments
6th & Medina: Tentative Plat/Landscape Plan
S05-081
June 16, 2005


The applicant proposes to use the existing zones of C-1 and R-2 on this site. The site is located at the northeast corner of Medina Road and 6th Avenue. The site is located within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ), an overlay zone for the Tucson International Airport. The site is affected by the NCD-65 (Noise Control District), the CUZ-2 (Compatible Use Zone), and the AHD (Airport Hazard District). Except for C-1 zone portion of the site, residential development is permitted subject to AEZ Land Use Code requirements. Although the following advisory comments do not require a resubmittal, staff offers the following:

The tentative plat should include within its general notes that this site is located within the Tucson International Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) and subject to AEZ regulations, and the potential impacts of aircraft approach and departure fly patterns.

As proposed lot 10 is designed for a single-family residential unit. Lot 10 is intersected by and has both R-2 and C-1 zone. Staff’s concern is whether that portion of lot 10 which is zoned C-1 can be developed as part of a residential lot which would potentially include residential improvements on that portion of the lot? Or does that portion of lot 10, zoned C-1 be required to be or dedicated as common area, open space or other common area use?

.Staff recommends the landscaping which surrounds the open space with ramada(s), BBQ, and playground area to be of plant material that is safe for children play areas, thornless canopy trees, and some turf surface within the playground area.
06/17/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved 287 estimated daily traffic (in average 24 hour vehicle trips.
06/17/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection
06/17/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP:

1. Show the near side SVT at the intersection of Street "A" and Street "B".

2. 6th Avenue is a COLLECTOR roadway. The near side SVT at this location is to be 260'. It appears that the SVT meets this criterion however, it is neither labeled as 260' nor is it detailed in the SVT detail on sheet 2.

3. Add curb access ramps (keynote 5) to the following locations: lot line between lots 10/11, 26/27.

4. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to the point opposite the PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing no parking signs on the plans. (DS 3-01.0 fig 21)

D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
06/20/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

June 22, 2005

Paul Nzomo
Coronado Engineering
1010 North Finance Center, Suite 200
Tucson, AZ 85710

Subject: S05-081 6th and Medina Tentative Plat

Dear Paul:

Your submittal of May 18, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

7 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (fire, waste water, landscape, zoning, engineering, traffic, DSD)

4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (engineering, landscape, Zoning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD)



Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 571-1961