Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-077
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/29/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-077 FONTANA ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 8/30/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 09/14/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Fontana Estates-Tentative Plat Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus DATE:13 September, 2005 CDRC #: S05-077 Resubmittal Required: Revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, Drainage Report, and a detailed response letter describing how and where each comment has been addressed. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Approvals are not recommended at this time. A revised Drainage Report with scupper calculations and a revised Tentative Plat addressing the comments below must be resubmitted. A complete assurances package must be submitted and approved before the Final Plat can be forwarded to Mayor and Council for approval. The following comments must be addressed: TENTATIVE PLAT: 1) Label applicable basin perimeter slopes to be 8:1 (H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements - see drainage report comment relating to multi-use, active/passive recreation, and project amenity guidelines (DS 10-01.4.3.1). 2) Revise the basin inlet detail (D/TP4) to include depiction of a sidewalk scupper, clearly labeled, with number of cells and opening height, and provide a cross-section perpendicular to the one provided (see drainage report comment). This is a Development Standard requirement. John Wallace indicates in his response letter that the sidewalk scupper will interfere with the basin access ramp and that residents are not likely to be using the sidewalk during a 10-year rain event. If basin access cannot be provided across the area where the sidewalk scupper is located, provide an alternate maintenance location. Further the scupper is to provide a floodfree sidewalk for all events up to a 10-year event. This include lesser events during which residents may well be outside enjoying the weather. Provide scuppers on the tentative plat. Provide scupper sizing calculations in the drainage report. If safety considerations are an issue provide appropriate safety railings at the scupper location. 3) Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance, and on-site runoff discharge points (DS 2-03.2.4 L 7). Indicate the discharge quantity at the basin outlet. 4) Assure the minimum setback from the 100-year detained ponding limits is depicted, once determined/provided in the soils/geotechnical report recommendations (DS 2-03.2.4 M). DRAINAGE REPORT: 5) Observation of existing topography indicates present site drainage exits in relative sheet flow fashion along the majority of the western property boundary, yet proposed developed conditions proposed discharging all site drainage at the northwest corner of the site. Please describe this apparent discrepancy and present hydraulic calculation sheets for each of the hydraulic systems used to return flow to either its natural or existing location and magnitude along the downstream property line. The proposed discharge location directs the newly concentrated discharge onto a single small privately owned parcel. If the discharge cannot be returned to the existing sheet flow, provide a notarized letter of permission from the owner of the receiving parcel accepting the discharge. (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.5 F). 6) Provide a basin inlet detail providing a sidewalk scupper at the inlet for continuous pedestrian circulation within the proposed subdivision. Appropriate calculations for conveyance of 100% of the 10-year flow at a minimum should be included Provide the appropriate sizing calculations for the scupper. (DS 2-08.5.1 E). 7) Describe and demonstrate how site grading will comply with Chapters 1 and 4 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, with particular attention/discussion given to how the basins will serve as: project amenities; multi-use facilities; will be visually appealing; whether they will serve as human activity zones (8:1 slope maximums in such areas - see Tentative Plat comment # 5); and whether intended as passive and/or active recreation areas (DS 10-01.0). 8) Please refer to Section 4.3 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for additional retention/detention technical design guidelines and requirements, and provide discussion and designs for conformance with these guidelines (DS 10-01.0). LANDSCAPE PLAN: 9) Revise the retention basin slopes to conform to DS 10-01.4.3.1 (p. 78). GENERAL COMMENTS: 10) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. Resubmittal will require a revised Tentative Plat and a revised Drainage Report. Include a detailed response letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov Loren Makus Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 09/17/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-077 Lots 1-16 and Common Area "A" Tentative plat TRANSMITTAL: 09/17/05 DUE DATE: 09/13/05 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Review Section verifies that the tentative plat meets the requirements of the Land Use Code. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05077tpa.doc |
| 10/18/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | September 21, 2005 To: Daniel White, Physical Resource Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Fontana Estates Lots 1-16 & Common Area A Tentative - 2nd Submittal S05-077 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Item # 1, from Dickie Fernandez comment letter dated June 12, 2005, was not addressed in your response letter dated August 12, 2005. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the last 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. 2. Sheet 2: General Note #6; Last line; Change the word CONSTRUCTION to CONNECTION. 3. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the Tentative - 2nd Submittal. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits, must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 10/20/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 20, 2005 Daniel White Physical Resources Engineering, Inc., P.O. Box 36985 Tucson, AZ 85740 Subject: S05-077 Fontana Estates Tentative Plat Dear Daniel: Your submittal of August 29, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 690-1769 |