Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S05-077
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S05-077
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/12/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/13/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved May 13, 2005.
05/26/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S05-077
PHYSICAL RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC.
FONTANA ESTATES
05/27/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S05-077 FONTANA ESTATES/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 5/27/05



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Delete all street directions on Location Map.
Change N. Emery Park Unit No. 2 8/25 to 5/14 on Location Map.
Add Section, Township and Range to all Title Blocks.
Change Pg 18 to 14 on all Title Blocks.
Change Aircraft Street to Road on pgs. 1 & 2.
Label approved interior street name on Final Plat.
06/01/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S05-077 Fontana Estates 05/31/05

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12TH Avenue/Valencia Neighborhood Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: June 10, 2005

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

(xxxxx) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(xxxxx) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: vf 791-4505 DATE: May 26, 2005

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN
S05-077 Fontana Estates

STAFF COMMENTS


The Fontana Estates proposed development complies with the Land Use Code and General Plan, but it is important to note that it also falls within the Airport Environs Zone (in particular the CUZ-2 zone). The property lies within Subarea 5 of the 12TH Avenue/Valencia Neighborhood Plan, and one of the goals for this subarea (Policy 1) is to “discourage new residential development in this Subarea and consider an orderly transition to office, commercial, and park industrial uses.”
Subarea 5 lies entirely within Noise Control District 65 (NCD-65) of the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ), and a large swath of this area is covered by Noise Control District 70 (NCD-70). Noise Control Districts require that new residential structures within their boundaries be insulated for noise.
06/04/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved 153 ESTIMATED DAILY TRIPS IN 24 HR PERIOD.
06/04/2005 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond June 2, 2005

TO: Daniel White
Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.

THRU: Patricia Gehlen
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Fontana Estates, Lots 1-16 and Common Area A
Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal
S05-077


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter.

Based on the evaluation of historical sewer improvement records, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-077, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

SHEET 2. Show the length of the sewer reaches.

Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
06/09/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the retention basin slopes to conform to
DS 10-01.4. (p. 78). Where water depths exceed three feet the basin slopes shall be a maximum of 4:1. The requirements and guidelines in the manual were designed to preclude the need for any fencing around retention/detention basins.

Slopes not steeper tha 4:1 will not require security barriers and provide a more natural configuration. LUC 3.7.4.3.A
06/09/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP.

1. The consultant should note the near side SVT is only required to be 180'. 260' is acceptable as it is conservative.

D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
06/10/2005 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC
SUBJECT: Fontana Estates-Tentative Plat Review
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 10-13 June 2005
CDRC #: S05-077

Resubmittals Required: Revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, Drainage Report, a Soils Report, infiltration test results and a detailed response letter describing how and where each comment has been addressed.

SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Approvals are not recommended at this time. A revised Drainage Report with soils report and infiltration test results, Tentative Plat, and Landscape Plan addressing the comments below must be resubmitted. A Subdivision assurance package should be include with the resubmittal. The following comments are offered:

TENTATIVE PLAT:

1. All four sheets of the submittal must be considered a part of the plat and as such, must be titled accordingly. Alternatively, consolidation onto 1 or 2 sheets of all the necessary information may be appropriate. Refer to Development Standard (DS) 2-03.2.0 for Tentative Plat content requirements.
2. Differential grading criteria shall apply to Lots 7-9 as currently proposed. Please refer to Development Standard 11-01.8.1 for detailed requirements. This matter should be addressed early in the planning stages of this proposed development.
3. Cross-section B/TP2 on sheet TP4 is identified as representing existing conditions, yet labels new sidewalk to be constructed in the Fontana Ave. right of way, beyond the project limits. Please revise as appropriate to represent existing conditions in the right of way (DS 3-01.2.7, 2.8, 3.3).
4. Specify that the common area is a "Retention/Detention Basin" in plan view, and in each title block of all plat sheets (DS 2-03.2.3 D - DS 2-03.2.4 C).
5. Label applicable basin perimeter slopes to be 8:1 (H:V) or flatter for human activity zone exit requirements - see drainage report comment # 7 relating to multi-use, active/passive recreation, and project amenity guidelines (DS 10-01.4.3.1).
6. Provide a retention/detention basin maintenance access ramp detail or depict in plan view (15' wide with 15% slope, max.), labeled and dimensioned (DS 10-02.0, Sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 a & b and 14.3.4).
7. Revise the basin inlet detail (D/TP4) to include depiction of a sidewalk scupper, clearly labeled, with number of cells and opening height, and provide a cross-section perpendicular to the one provided (see drainage report comment # 5).
8. Depict and label the basin 100-year ponding limits - these must be recorded in surveyable, retraceable fashion on the Final Plat.
9. Basin slopes should not exceed 4:1 when designed to be 3' deep or greater, per DS 10-01.4 (p. 78).
10. Indicate the method of tie to permanent survey monument or nearest section or quarter corner, and describe all monuments found or set on the plat (DS 2-03.2.3 A).
11. Assure/verify that all easement and utilities are depicted, dimensioned and described as their purpose(s) with recording information provided on the plat (DS 2-03.2.3 C & E).
12. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance, and on-site runoff discharge points (DS 2-03.2.4 L 7).
13. Assure the minimum setback from the 100-year detained ponding limits is depicted, once determined/provided in the soils/geotechnical report recommendations (DS 2-03.2.4 M).
14. Provide cross sections for each perimeter, depicting any drainage swales, side yard walls, and lot lines, proposed pad slopes, location of foundation edge, and slopes.

DRAINAGE REPORT:

1. Provide retention/detention basin maintenance access ramp information on an exhibit within the report (DS 10-02.0, Section 2.3.1.6 A 4).
2. The Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0) requires that a soils report be submitted in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The report shall address at a minimum soil classification, erodibility, permeability, slope stability and ground water elevations. Infiltration test results shall be included with the report, demonstrating the drain time for retained stormwater for any proposed basin does not exceed the maximum disposal time allowed. Testing should be performed in accordance with the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District's recommended procedures. Discuss results in the drainage report (Section 3.5.1, DS 10-01.0).
3. Please discuss emergency spillway requirements, should the basin design employ embankment for storage volume requirements (DS 10-01.0, section 3.3.4).
4. Observation of existing topography indicates present site drainage exits in relative sheet flow fashion along the majority of the western property boundary, yet proposed developed conditions proposed discharging all site drainage at the northwest corner of the site. Please describe this apparent discrepancy and present hydraulic calculation sheets for each of the hydraulic systems used to return flow to either its natural or existing location and magnitude along the downstream property line (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.5 F).
5. Provide a basin inlet detail. Assure a sidewalk scupper is provided at the inlet for continuous pedestrian circulation within the proposed subdivision. Appropriate calculations for conveyance of 100% of the 10-year flow at a minimum should be included (DS 2-08.5.1 E).
6. The report must contain a detailed site plan (or copy of the tentative plat), clearly showing the dimensions and locations of the following:
a. All proposed detention/retention systems, including the location, size, and type of inflow/outflow structures to be employed, fully labeled and dimensioned. Include dimensions and elevations of critical portions of those structures (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 a);
b. The locations, dimensions and slopes of the basin maintenance access ramp (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 b and 14.3.4);
c. Clearly marked dimensions of all building and/or erosion hazard setbacks, with dimensions between structures and any proposed basins or drainageways (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 d);
d. maximum water-surface elevations, limits of ponding and locations and types of all security barriers to be installed (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 e & f).
7. Describe and demonstrate how site grading will comply with Chapters 1 and 4 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, with particular attention/discussion given to how the basins will serve as: project amenities; multi-use facilities; will be visually appealing; whether they will serve as human activity zones (8:1 slope maximums in such areas - see Tentative Plat comment # 5); and whether intended as passive and/or active recreation areas (DS 10-01.0).
8. Please refer to Section 4.3 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for additional retention/detention technical design guidelines and requirements, and provide discussion and designs for conformance with these guidelines (DS 10-01.0).
9. Basin slopes should not exceed 4:1 when designed to be 3' deep or greater, per DS 10-01.4 (p. 78).

LANDSCAPE PLAN:

1. Provide a landscape note and/or typical details demonstrating water-harvesting maximization in all landscaped areas (LUC, Section 3.7.4).
2. Please assure proposed tree planting locations do not conflict with a basin maintenance access ramp.
3. Revise the retention basin slopes to conform to DS 10-01.4.3.1 (p. 78).
4. The consultant may wish to correct the spelling of the subdivision in the title block.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

1. A subdivision assurance package must be included with a resubmittal.
2. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html.

Resubmittal will require a revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Landscape Plan, a soils report with infiltration test results, and a subdivision assurance package. Please assure all comments provide have been fully addressed.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
06/11/2005 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: June 10, 2005


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S05-077 Fontana Estates T151312 (138-110)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add the section, township and range to the title block.
If Tract “A” and Common Area “A” are the same, please re-label Tract “A” as Common Area “A” on the plat; if they are not the same, please add Tract “A” to the title block and label whatever is Common Area “A” on the plat.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.






Susan King
06/13/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: FONTANA ESTATES
Lots 1-16
S05-077

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat
submitted for review May 12, 2005.

The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing
facilities along Fontana Avenue proceeding through the interior of the
subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the
approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative
Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional
plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including
water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the
AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com
<mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact
me at (520) 917-8745.



Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com>
06/15/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: S05-077
Lots 1-16 and Common Area "A"
Tentative plat

TRANSMITTAL: 06/15/05

DUE DATE: 06/10/05

COMMENTS:

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 11, 2006.

2. Add the following street names to the location map. 12th Avenue, Elvira Road, Delta Road, Fontana Avenue, Aircraft Street and adjust the text height to 12 point (.12). DS 2-03.2.1.C and .D.2

3. Add to the title block that is a resubdivision of a portion of lots 80 and 83. DS 2-03.2.1.G.3

4. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S05-077. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

5. Revise the words TRACT A to Common Area "A". DS 2-03.2.4.C

6. Visitor parking must be within 150 feet of any of the properties within the Cul-de-sac. It appears that a couple of the parcels may not be within the 150-foot area. Parking spaces are not allowed in the cul-de-sac. Please demonstrate on the plan that visitor-parking spaces are within 150 feet of lots 8 and 9. DS 2-03.2.4.G

7. Please address the following comments:

The following items related to the AEZ must be listed on the plan.

a. Revise the label CUZ to CUZ 2

b. List the MSL elevation of the SW Runway, 2575' at the end of the runway. List the MSL elevation of the property. The highest point of the property must be listed. Include the calculation that demonstrates that any structure constructed in this subdivision will comply with the height limitations allowed. See the AEZ overlay map on the web for the specific height limitations within this parcel, station 70+00.

c. Revise general note 20 to state the following. Maximum allowable height is 25'; proposed height is 14'.

d. Clarify if the proposed dwellings for this development are manufactured homes or site built.

e. Clarify how the structures will be certified that the structures are built to meet the NCD 65 and NCD 70 noise standards.

f. Add the following notes:
1. That the building setbacks other than the street building setbacks are based on the perimeter yard indicator AA.
2. Add a note that the building setback for a front loading carport or garage is 18 feet from the property line and 19 feet from the back of sidewalk.
3. Add a note that the maximum lot coverage is 70 percent.

g. Clarify who will be responsible for the maintenance of the common area. Will a homeowner's association be created? Provide a copy of the CC&R's if applicable.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05077tp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents.
06/17/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection
06/23/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: June 14, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S05-077 Fontana Estates: Tentative Plat

CC: Craig Gross
Patricia Gehlen, Development Services


Staff has no comments.







Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
07/07/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development.
* Sixteen lot subdivision with each lot having street frontage.
* Aproved for APC's curbside service. APC's are to be placed and removed from the curbside collection area on the day of service.
07/08/2005 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

July 8, 2005

Daniel White
Physical Resources Engineering, Inc.,
P.O. Box 36985
Tucson, AZ 85740

Subject: S05-077 Fontana Estates Tentative Plat

Dear Daniel:

Your submittal of May 12, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (landscaping, zoning, engineering, addressing, wastewater, DSD)

4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (engineering, landscape, Zoning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD)




Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 690-1769