Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-061
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/25/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise the following notes on sheet L-2: 1) NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY SUMMARY This note should not state that there are no protected plants requiring transplanting. 2) General NPP Note 15 is not applicable. 3) The ANA specifications for caliper measurement differ from the City of Tucson Standards. See LUC 6.2.3. |
| 10/31/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: STONE LANE TOWNHOMES S05-061 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the tentative plat submitted for review October 21, 2005 . In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Warren McElyea Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 11/01/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-061 STONE LANE TOWNHOMES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 10/31/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** ES |
| 11/04/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes, Lots 1-14 Tentative Plat - Residential Cluster Project TRANSMITTAL: 11/04/05 DUE DATE: 08/12/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is April 17, 2006. 2. Thank you for providing the requested information. Please adjust all text height within the location map to 12 point. Previous comment: Add the following items to the location map. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page that are within the one square mile area. Also label the City of Tucson and Pima County limits. DS 2-03.6.1.D.2 and .4 3. Remove the note stating that project is subject to LUC section 3.6.1. This is not a RCP development. Previous Comment: Due to the change in the type of development add the following note; Single Family Dwelling DD "K", subject to LUC section 3.5.7.1.F. 4. The future curb and sidewalk have been depicted on the plan as requested. Please label the future curb dimension to the property line. This dimension is necessary in order to verify that the buildings along the Stone Avenue frontage will meet the required building setbacks of 21 feet or the height of the structure whichever is greater. Previous comment: Draw, label, and dimension existing and future curb and sidewalks. Stone Avenue is a major street per the MS&R map and is subject future widening. Ensure that the existing and future right-of-way information is provided on the plan. See engineering comments related to Stone Avenue. DS 2-03.2.3.D 5. Portions of the previous comments were addressed. Please address the remaining items. The limited common elements should be delineated and dimensioned. The building area should also be dimensioned as requested. (I acknowledge that all this information is required on the final plat and that the final plat will be drawn with the requested information.) Per your response to the bicycle parking comment, one bicycle fixture will be placed in each carport. The response did not address class two parking facilities. A requirement for the detail drawings still apply for both the class one and class two facilities. Please add the details and locations of the facilities as requested. If the substitution allowance for bicycle parking is to be used please reference the section and add a note under the parking calculation. Per a discussion with Craig Gross about the delineation of the development the following revisions must be made. Condominium projects do not have individual lots. The drawing should be revised to delineate the building footprint and not include the any lot lines as shown on the plan. This development functions essentially as an apartment complex. There are no interior building setback requirements other than the setbacks required for carports or garages adjacent to the interior street/PAAL based on the proposed design. Building setbacks adjacent to the perimeter boundary must be drawn, dimensioned, and labeled based on the proposed building height and the adjacent zone. See the perimeter yard matrix in the Land use code section 3.2.6.4 perimeter yard indicator for the appropriate setbacks. The limited common elements should be delineated and dimensioned separate from the building footprint. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of 8% of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided of, which 50% of the bicycle parking spaces must be class one and 50% must be class two. Please review LUC 3.3.7.8 for substitutions of class one for class two facilities. Add on the plan, fully dimensioned detail drawings for both the class one and class two bicycle facilities. Label the type of facility and number of bicycles the facility supports. 6. The future SVTs based on the future curb location have not been depicted on the plan. Previous comment: Add sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Stone Avenue and the entrance into the proposed subdivision. DS 2-03.2.4.M 7. Thank you for adding the proposed perimeter building setback to the plan. The required building setback annotation should be added to the plan as follows. The note should state "the greater of 10 feet or ¾ hgt". The street perimeter building setback along Silverbell Road must also be drawn and labeled. The street perimeter setback is dimensioned from the back of the future curb location. The annotation for the setback should state "the greater of 21 feet or the height of the structure from back of curb". Based on the proposed design and the height of the building the street setback along Silverbell Road frontage will not be met. The drawing must be revised to meet code. Previous comment: Perimeter boundary building setback line must be drawn and labeled based on the adjacent zoning to north, south, and west boundaries. Add a keynote or label the dimension as building setback. Keep in mind that the building setback is based on the overall height of the structure measured from design grade to the tallest point of a parapet wall, top plate, gable, etc. The building setbacks from the interior street must also be drawn and labeled or dimensioned. The max ADT for the interior street is 140. See LUC section 3.2.6.5 for more information related to street building setbacks. DS 2-10.3.1.A 8. I acknowledge that the floor plans were not available after the first review. If they are available at time of the next submittal please provide copies with the next tentative plat package. 9. The number of required vehicle parking is 32 spaces. Per the parking calculation 31 spaces have been provided. One additional parking space is required and must be provided. Parking. In addition too applicable regulations in Sec. 3.3.0, Motor Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements, of the Land Use Code (LUC), the following standards shall be observed. 10. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the resubmittal of the revised tentative plat drawing and response comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05061tp3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and additional requested documents. |
| 11/07/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. The symbol used for new street signs is not correct in accordance with Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition. While the symbol used in the legend is correct for an existing sign, the proposed right turn only sign will be a new sign and therefore the symbol for a new sign shall be used at the egress to the project. 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. There is only one set of SVTs on the plans. Is this the existing SVT or the future or both? It appears that the SVT that is presented is the existing and no account is made for the future SVT. 3. The existing median in Stone Avenue shall be extended to the southern boundary of the subject property. As this is submitted, there is a safety consideration with left turns through the striped gore area. The flexible delineators as submitted on this plan are not acceptable. The City is not going to accept an ongoing maintenance obligation for the proposed flexible markers as proposed. This project will require an improved median to preclude left turn safety conflicts. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 30, 2005 TO: René A. G. Piña, P.E. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Stone Lane Townhomes, Lots 1-14 Tentative Plat – 3rd Submittal S05-061 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Show all the existing public sewers within one hundred feet of the property. Show the complete manhole number for any existing public manhole within 100 feet of the property. Show the correct Pima County plan number for the sewer along Stone Avenue. Add the following General Note: THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. Cleanouts may not be proposed within the right-of-way, instead propose a new public manhole to be located at least 10 feet away from the property line. From the location of the new manhole at the entrance of the project, run a newly proposed public sewer at least 10 feet away from the property line to the existing public sewer (S-567). Propose a new public manhole over S-567. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 4th submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 11/08/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 8, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-061 PROJECT NAME: Stone Lane Townhomes Lots 1 through 14 T13S, R13E, Section 24 REVIEWER: Jose Ortiz, P.E. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat has been reviewed and revisions need to be made to the Tentative Plat. The revisions needed are stated in the following comments, which will need to be addressed prior to the next submittal. In addition to the next submittal please include a response letter that states how the following comments have been addressed. GENERAL COMMENTS This Tentative Plat does not appear to be the latest draft due to the fact that many of the previous Engineering comments were not addressed. Please provide the most updated sealed Tentative Plat for review at the next submittal. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS 1. The private drive cross section needs modifications. Sidewalks cannot be attached to a wedge curb; therefore a minimum 2-foot separation is required. A sidewalk can be attached to the sidewalk if vertical curbing is provided, but looking at the plans this may not be an option due to the volume of driveways. 2. Grading Plan. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required since the earthwork exceeds 50 CY. Generally, the grading plans may be submitted for review upon approval of the tentative plat. Should the applicant wish, the grading plan can be submitted with the ; D.S. 2-03.5.2 3. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. 4. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text; upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. 5. Remove one of the Keynote 11. It is pointing in the wrong location. 6. Maximize water harvesting. Please refer to the newly adopted City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual. Provide a note on the Tentative plat to maximize water harvesting. The details on how to maximize water harvesting can be done on the grading plan. 7. I cannot locate keynote 1. 8. Cross section B does not match up with the callout on the plat, please revise. If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free to contact me at 791-5550 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov. Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1191 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/0000 O. Street Address_Site |