Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-061
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/29/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the native plant preservation to include a Salvage and Mitigation Report per DS 2-15.3.4.B. including: A) A schedule for salvage work including the timing and phasing of all tree boxing, tree and cacti salvage, and grading operations to take place on-site. DS 2-15.4.0. B) A method and schedule for providing irrigation to salvaged plants in a temporary holding area. DS 2-15.5.0 C) The Salvage and Mitigation Report should address the following items as applicable: 1. Season of the year. 2. Feasibility of successful salvage/transplant. 3. Pruning requirements before and after transplant. 4. Appropriate box size for salvaged material based on trunk diameter. 5. Side boxing techniques and timing. 6. Plant removal techniques and transportation techniques. 7. Maintenance in temporary holding nursery. 8. Permanent location planting techniques. 9. Long-term maintenance. D) Identification Requirements. All Protected Native Plants shall be properly tagged and/or permitted in accordance with the Federal Endangered Species Act, the Arizona Native Plant Law, and this Division, as applicable. DS 2-15.5.0 2) Provide a summary listing the number of protected plants required for mitigation and the number of transplants on the landscape plan. DS 2-15.3.4.B The landscape plan is also required to show the location of the two transplanted Fraxinus Velutina. 3) The street landscape border located along Stone Avenue is required to be a minimum of ten feet wide (measured from the MS&R ROW line) along the entire street frontage. Locate the MS&R ROW on the plans. RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 08/03/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Approved for APC service. |
| 08/04/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: STONE LANE TOWNHOMES S05-061 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review July 29, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the existing facilities and any easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. There are existing facilities along the northern boundary and also along Stone Avenue. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 08/10/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes 08/04/05 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: n/a NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: n/a COMMENTS DUE BY: August 12, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: VF 791-4505 DATE: August 4, 2005 |
| 08/10/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | August 5, 2005 TO: René A. G. Piña, P.E. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Stone Lane Townhomes, Lots 1-14 Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S05-061 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested on May 5, 2005, please provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Show all the existing public sewers within one hundred feet of the property. Showing part of the existing public sewer and then letting disappear in the middle of the alley is not acceptable. Show any existing public sewer easements that may contain the existing public sewer. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/10/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-061 STONE LANE TOWNHOMES / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: AUGUST 4, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Change NE Quarter to SW Quarter under Location Map and Title Block per letter dated 4/28/05. 2: Delete all street directions on Location Map per letter dated 4/28/05. 3: Stone Lane Court is a duplicate street name with 2 suffixes. Please choose another street name with the suffix of Place or Court. |
| 08/10/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-061 STONE LANE TOWNHOMES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 10/04/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project on the condition that: Change NE Quarter to SW Quarter under Location Map and Title Block per letter dated 4/28/05. Delete all street directions on Location Map per letter dated 4/28/05. Stone Lane Court will be deleted and a new street name will be chosen on Final Plat. . ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 08/12/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 15, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-061 PROJECT NAME: Stone Lane Townhomes Lots 1 through 14 T13S, R13E, Section 24 REVIEWER: Jose Ortiz, P.E. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed and revisions need to be made to both the Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The revisions needed are stated in the following comments, which will need to be addressed prior to the next submittal. In addition to the next submittal please include a response letter that states how the following comments have been addressed. GENERAL COMMENTS This Tentative Plat does not appear to be the latest draft due to the fact that many of the previous Engineering comments were not addressed. Please provide the most updated sealed Tentative Plat for review at the next submittal. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS 1. A portion of the previous review comment was not addressed - Provide additional notes per Development Standards No: 2-03.2.2.C.1. 2. Some survey symbols (i.e. SM, PINS, ½ IRON PIN) not clearly called out. Appears that leader lines are missing. 3. Previous review comment not addressed - Provide transportation information per Development Standards No: 2-03.0-2.4 (F). Information shall include all right of way dimensions (proposed and future), types of handicap ramps, proper width of new sidewalks, and proposed pavement widths per City of Tucson standard details. 4. Previous review comment not addressed - In the plan view callout the PRIVATE DRIVE X-SECTION DETAIL. 5. Previous review comment not addressed - Clarify all sidewalks as existing or proposed. It is difficult to tell where existing sidewalk ties into either the proposed sidewalk and/or new handicap ramps. 6. Previous review comment not addressed - Need to provide sidewalks on Street A (Private Road). All new sidewalk shall be 5 feet wide per City of Tucson Development Standards 3-01-3.3 (Supplement 8) Pedestrian Circulation Paths. 7. Previous review comment not addressed - A new city policy requires that all MS&R's/arterial roads be serviced with a 6' wide sidewalks. Stone Avenue is an arterial road, which will require a 6' sidewalk; therefore the existing sidewalk will have to be widened to six feet. 8. Previous review comment not addressed - Include cross sections of retention basins. 9. Previous review comment not addressed - Provide Sight Visibility Triangle (SVT), and insure that items on the landscaping plans do not interfere with the SVT. 10. Previous review comment not addressed - Per Development Standards 2-03.2.4.L.4 Provide proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage. Provide spot elevations along property line. 11. Correct overlapping text on NEC of property line. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS Comments addressed. If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free to contact me at 791-5550 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov. Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1191 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/0000 O. Street Address_Site |
| 08/15/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 2nd request. 2. The existing median in Stone Avenue shall be extended to the southern boundary of the subject property. As this is submitted, there is a safety consideration with left turns through the striped gore area. The flexible delineators as submitted on this plan are not acceptable. 3. Tucson City Code Chapter 25, section 38 requires a minimum of 12' separation between curb cuts. Regardless of garage configuration, the vertical curb proposed will still require a curb cut to access the garage. Minimum curb cut distance is 10' maximum distance is 20'. 4. The hammerhead is to be 24' wide at all locations. (DS3-01.0 figure 23) 5. The hammerhead is the have vertical curbing at all locations. (DS3-01.0 figure 23) 6. The symbol used for new street signs is not correct in accordance with Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition. Keynote 2 and in the legend. 7. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D). Ensure that existing and future ROW is listed for Stone Ave. 8. There are 2 north arrows on both the plan view and the location map. 9. The proposed guest parking on the north side of the hammerhead is not acceptable. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/18/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes, Lots 1-14 Tentative Plat - Residential Cluster Project TRANSMITTAL: 08/18/05 DUE DATE: 08/12/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is April 17, 2006. 2. Previous comment: Add the following items to the location map. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page that are within the one square mile area. Also label the City of Tucson and Pima County limits. DS 2-03.6.1.D.2 and .4 3. Please add to the title block the legal description as follows, E250' N200' S630' NE4 SW4 EXC E30'. Portion of previous comment: Also add a brief legal description of the property. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 and .3 4. The previous comment was not addressed. Previous comment: Add the owner's name (or Contact Person) and telephone number to the "Owners" text block on sheet one. DS 2-03.2.2.A.1 5. Please ensure that the subdivision case number is added to the landscape and NPPO sheets. Previous comment: This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S05-061. List the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, including landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 6. This comment was not addressed. Plats are never zoned; the property is designated with a zoning classification. Revise the note appropriately. Previous comment: Revise general notes number 2 to state the following. "The existing zoning of this property is R-2 and will remain." DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 7. Due to the change in the type of development add the following note; Single Family Dwelling DD "K", subject to LUC section 3.5.7.1.F. Previous comment: List the use of the property as a general note. The use should be listed as follows. "Single Family Dwelling DD RCP-6, subject to LUC section 3.6.1 and 3.5.7.1.F. DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 8. This comment was not addressed. Previous comment: Draw, label, and dimension existing and future curb and sidewalks. Stone Avenue is a major street per the MS&R map and is subject future widening. Ensure that the existing and future right-of-way information is provided on the plan. See engineering comments related to Stone Avenue. DS 2-03.2.3.D 9. This comment was not completely addressed. Previous comment: Street "A" should be labeled as a common area. Please label the street and include the common area designation in the title block. DS 2-03.2.4.C 10. Per a discussion with Craig Gross about the delineation of the development the following revisions must be made. Condominium projects do not have individual lots. The drawing should be revised to delineate the building footprint and not include the any lot lines as shown on the plan. This development functions essentially as an apartment complex. There are no interior building setback requirements other than the setbacks required for carports or garages adjacent to the interior street/PAAL based on the proposed design. Building setbacks adjacent to the perimeter boundary must be drawn, dimensioned, and labeled based on the proposed building height and the adjacent zone. See the perimeter yard matrix in the Land use code section 3.2.6.4 perimeter yard indicator for the appropriate setbacks. The limited common elements should be delineated and dimensioned separate from the building footprint. The street must be provided with curbs and sidewalks. The curbs should be vertical to discourage parking on the sidewalk areas. Sidewalks must be provided throughout the subdivision connecting all common elements of the subdivision including the visitor parking areas. All sidewalks must be clearly defined, dimensioned, and labeled. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of 8% of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided of, which 50% of the bicycle parking spaces must be class one and 50% must be class two. Please review LUC 3.3.7.8 for substitutions of class one for class two facilities. Add on the plan, fully dimensioned detail drawings for both the class one and class two bicycle facilities. Label the type of facility and number of bicycles the facility supports. Previous comment: All new residential subdivisions must be designed with a street that provides for parking on both sides of the street. If the street design is to deviate from the development standard the street design must comply with the minimum width, curbs, and sidewalks. The visitor parking spaces must be provided in common areas and the spaces must be within 150 feet of all property lines. The number of visitor parking spaces to be provided is based on one space per unit for a total of 14 visitor parking spaces if utilizing a common area for the parking spaces (parking lot). Also when common area parking is the parking lot are subject to landscape and screening requirements. DS 2-03.2.4.F and .G 11. This comment was not addressed. Previous comment: Add sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Stone Avenue and the entrance into the proposed subdivision. DS 2-03.2.4.M 12. This comment was not addressed. Previous comment: Perimeter boundary building setback line must be drawn and labeled based on the adjacent zoning to north, south, and west boundaries. Add a keynote or label the dimension as building setback. Keep in mind that the building setback is based on the overall height of the structure measured from design grade to the tallest point of a parapet wall, top plate, gable, etc. The building setbacks from the interior street must also be drawn and labeled or dimensioned. The max ADT for the interior street is 140. See LUC section 3.2.6.5 for more information related to street building setbacks. DS 2-10.3.1.A 13. This comment was not addressed. The location of the curb as shown on the plan does not indicate that the future curb and sidewalk location has been taken into account. Please confer with the Engineering section reviewer and the DOT Engineering division for more information on the roadway widening of Stone Avenue. Previous comment: It is clear per the plan that the buildings are to be constructed at zero building setbacks. Therefore add a keynote stating that all interior lot line building setbacks will be zero. Also dimension the proposed building setback to the interior street and property line. The building setback along Stone Avenue is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from existing or future back curb but at no time can the setback be less than three feet from the Stone Avenue property line. If the full right-of-way for Stone Avenue has not been dedicated or acquired, draw and label the future property line and curbs. The building setback may change due future right-of-way acquisition and curb location. DS 2-10.3.1.B 14. Add the proposed building heights for all structures in order to verify applicable building setbacks. 15. I acknowledge that the floor plans were not available after the first review. If they are available at time of the next submittal please provide copies with the next tentative plat package. Previous comment: It appears that the same floor plan is to be used on all the lots. Please add a dimensioned copy of the building floor plans and building elevations drawings with next submittal. 16. I acknowledge that the CC&R's are not available at this time. Please ensure that the CC&R's are submitted with the final plat package. Previous comment: If preliminary copies of the CC&R's are available at this time please submit a copy for review or the CC&R's may be submitted with the final plat. DS 2-10.3.2.E an LUC 3.6.1.5.A 17. Parking. In addition too applicable regulations in Sec. 3.3.0, Motor Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements, of the Land Use Code (LUC), the following standards shall be observed. 18. The plan does not demonstrate that the required sidewalks have been provided. Depict on the plan clearly, label, and dimension all driveways, garage locations, and all sidewalks and refuse pick-up locations. Previous comment: A pedestrian circulation system must be provided, connecting all elements of the development and to all units. The system shall be physically separated from the vehicular circulation system, except where the system intersects a PAAL or street. LUC 3.6.1.4.G.2 Sidewalks must be provided along the entire street frontage in front of the properties and must connect to the Stone Avenue sidewalk system. 19. Please clarify what the use or depiction of the crosshatched areas along the back of the visitor parking spaces is for. 20. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the resubmittal of the revised tentative plat drawing and response comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05061tp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and additional requested documents. |
| 08/19/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 19, 2005 Rene A. G. Pena, P.E. 2030 East Broadway Blvd., Suite 28 Tucson, AZ 85719 Subject: S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes Tentative Plat Dear Rene: Your submittal of July 29, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Landscape, TEP, Wastewater, Addressing, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 514-6893 |