Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-061
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/20/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentatijve Plat is approved April 20, 2005. |
| 04/25/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Problem with the turnaround. Standard calls for a clear space to be at the ends of the turnaround. Parking and dumpster are in the clearspace. * No detail shown for the dumpster enclosure. * Concrete aproach slab required in front of the dumpster enclosure.* No provisions stated for recycling. Note: If the townhomes are going to have individual water meter then the complex could have individual Automated Plastic Containers (APC's) for refuse service. If APC's are utilized for the project then the service area and the storage area for the containers has to be shown. |
| 04/28/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-061 STONE LANE TOWNHOMES / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: APRIL 28, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Delete all street directions on Location Map. 2: Correct the description under the Location Map and all Title Blocks. 3: Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. |
| 05/03/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: May 3, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes T131324 (105-12) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add dimensions and bearings for the lot lines and the street centerlines. Add the complete curve data. Since the street is private, it is a common area or element for this subdivision, as is the detention basin. These must be labeled as two separate common areas or elements, and then add the labels to the title block. Also add square footage for each area. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/05/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 5, 2005 TO: René A. G. Piña, P.E. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Stone Lane Townhomes, Lots 1-14 Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S05-061 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito West North Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of the project site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, S05-061, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. The sewer layout does not follow the symbols used in the legend. Please clarify which sewers are proposed private sewers, and which sewers are existing public sewers. Additionally, show the size and Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. There is a “New Manhole 1” label which points to nowhere. Please revise all your sewer labels to make sure they are accurate and in the right location. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/12/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: STONE LANE TOWNHOMES S05-061 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review April 18, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the existing facilities and any easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 05/16/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 16, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-061 PROJECT NAME: Stone Lane Townhomes Lots 1 - 14 T13S, R13E, Section 24 REVIEWER: Jose Ortiz, P.E. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed and revisions need to be made to both the Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The revisions needed are stated in the following comments, which will need to be addressed prior to the next submittal. In addition to the next submittal please include a response letter that states how the following comments have been addressed. GENERAL COMMENTS Due to the earthwork numbers provided in the Tentative Plat, a Grading Plan and Grading Permit will be required for this project. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS 1. Provide additional notes per Development Standards No: 2-03.2.2.C.1 and No: 2-03.2.2.D.1. 2. Survey symbols (i.e. SM, PINS, ½ IRON PIN) do not show in drawings. 3. Need to clarify and callout all existing information per Development Standards No: 2-03.0-2.3 (C), and (D). Provided with the Tentative Plat was a copy of the Precision Land Surveying topo drawing that illustrates existing utility easements. It does not appear that the utility easements and their utilities are being shown on the Tentative Plat. In addition, all existing property and right of way information needs to be shown, called out, and dimensioned. 4. Provide transportation information per Development Standards No: 2-03.0-2.4 (F). Information shall include all right of way dimensions (proposed and future), types of handicap ramps, proper width of new sidewalks, and proposed pavement widths per City of Tucson standard details. 5. In the plan view callout the PRIVATE DRIVE X-SECTION DETAIL. 6. Callout 2 foot minimum sawcut of existing pavement at the tie in point of Street A and Stone Avenue. 7. Clarify all sidewalks as existing or proposed. It is difficult to tell where existing sidewalk ties into either the proposed sidewalk and/or new handicap ramps. 8. Need to provide sidewalks on Street A (Private Road). All new sidewalk shall be 5 feet wide per City of Tucson Development Standards 3-01-3.3 (Supplement 8) Pedestrian Circulation Paths. 9. A new city policy requires that all MS&R's/arterial roads be serviced with a 6' wide sidewalks. Stone Avenue is an arterial road, which will require a 6' sidewalk; therefore the existing sidewalk will have to be widened to six feet. 10. Include cross sections of retention basins. 11. New Manhole # 1 points to no where. 12. Explain the purpose of note 5 of the Precision Land Surveying topo sheet, which states that "There is one dwelling and several accessory building on site they were not located at the request of the client". Per Development Standards 2-03.2.3.H these existing elements should be indicated and labeled to be removed or retained. 13. Provide Sight Visibility Triangle (SVT), and insure that items on the landscaping plans do not interfere with the SVT. 14. Per Development Standards 2-03.2.4.L.4 Provide proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage. 15. Will need to verify with Traffic Engineering and Solid Waste whether parking at the end of the hammer head will be permitted. In addition the location of the two parking spots as you enter the private street off of Stone Avenue may be in conflict with turning movements from Stone Avenue. Please verify with Traffic Engineering that this configuration will meet City of Tucson standards. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. In the OBJECTIVE of the Drainage Report it states that a detention basin is required. Per the Pima County DOT & Flood Control District COT Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual sections 1.4 and 2.2 any residential development larger than one acre in size which has a density greater than six units per developed acre requires a 5-year threshold retention basin. Please modify the report to reflect the need and calculations of a 5-year threshold retention basin. If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free to contact me at 791-5550 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov. Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1191 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/0000 O. Street Address_Site |
| 05/17/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision. (DS 3-01.2.4.D) This plan as submitted only provides 5 parking spaces and no parking lanes. 2. Parking is not allowed in hammerheads (DS 3-01.0 Fig 23) 3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 4. Extremely difficult to discern from the plans as submitted how this project meets the driveway spacing as required by Tucson City Code Chapter 25, Section 38. 5. The existing median in Stone Avenue shall be extended to the southern boundary of the subject property. As this is submitted, there is a safety consideration with left turns through the striped gore area. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/17/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the Native Plant Inventory list to clarify what is meant by size under the Characteristics column. 2) Revise the Native Plant Inventory list to identify protected plants by genus and species. 3) Revise the numbering of the 'L' sheets, both are L-1. 4) Revise the native plant preservation to include a Salvage and Mitigation Report per DS 2-15.3.4.B. 5) Provide a summary listing the number of protected plants required for mitigation and the number of transplants. Use a different symbol for transplants. DS 2-15.3.4.B 6) Revise the native plant preservation plan to correspond with tentative plat format. Each sheet should measure 24" x 36" and include a one-half (½) inch margin on each side. DS 2-03.2.1.B 7) Define any abbreviations used on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2 8) The street landscape border located along Stone Avenue is required to be a minimum of ten feet wide along the entire street frontage. Parking or structures may not be located in the street landscape border. 9) Dimension and label the street landscape border on the tentative plat and the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2 10) The street landscape border shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). The subdivision CC&Rs and shall reference the maintenance standards in Sec. 3.7.6. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.c 11) Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. DS 2-03.2.4 12) Revise the plans to provide a screen wall per LUC Table 3.7.2-I along the west side of the site. The refuse storage areas require 6' high walls. 13) Any excavation, construction, plant removal or landscaping is prohibited, unless approved by the City Engineer. Native plant preservation plans may be required for the right-of-way construcrion. 14) Revise the landscape plans to clarify that the Stone Avenue right-of-way areas will be improved to comply with LUC 3.7.2.7. 1/4" minus decomposed granite should be installed between the curb and the property line. RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 05/17/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes 05/17/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: May 16, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (xxxxx) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (xxxxx) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: VF 791-4505 DATE: 05/13/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with Section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, as well as the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the North Stone Neighborhood Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual. The purpose of the RCP is to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. North Stone Neighborhood Plan The North Stone Neighborhood Plan is intended to guide future development in the area, and its goals are to protect and enhance existing neighborhoods, and to protect mountain views. The Plan’s policies address many of the issues in this proposed RCP development. Staff’s recommendations: Based on the policies and guidelines provided, and given the applicant’s request to utilize the existing hard zone of R-2 with the RCP-6 option (14 RAC), the following revisions are required to meet Plan compliance: When an RCP site area is less than four acres in size, single-family structures need to be architecturally compatible with single-family structures on adjacent parcels (LUC, RCP Development Criteria, Sec. 3.6.1.4. A.3). The General Plan, Design Guidelines and the North Stone Neighborhood Plan Architectural Elements policies also address the need for compatibility with existing neighborhoods. Existing development surrounding the site is mostly comprised of one-story, single family residences (only one home is two-story). Proposed development is two-story attached units. Please provide proposed mitigation to address compatibility and privacy concerns with existing units to the south and north (e.g. no balconies, clerestory second-story windows, etc.). Please provide elevations for the proposed development, and demonstrate how they are compatible with the surrounding single-family structures. Also, please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another. One of the main goals of the North Stone Neighborhood Plan is to preserve mountain views, and its Architectural Elements policies provide guidance regarding residential development such as providing transition of heights or providing view corridors from at least one point from adjacent development. Please demonstrate how you address this policy. The Land Use Code, General Plan and Design Guidelines state that noise-generating activities should be located away from adjacent residential uses. Proposed dumpster location abuts residentially zoned property, it is approximately 12 feet away from the nearest residence The general standard for Dumpster locations is a location 50 feet way from the adjacent residential property with a six (6) foot high masonry wall to provide appropriate buffering. Please demonstrate why it is not appropriate to revise tentative plat to show appropriate distance from adjacent residences and provide buffer wall. Please note masonry walls surrounding the development should follow the policies in the plans. Walls visible from Stone Avenue should be constructed or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. In addition, please incorporate one of the following decorative materials: a) tile, b) stone, c) brick, d) textured brick/block, e) a course material such as stucco or plaster, or f) a combination of the above materials. Please provide a wall detail details regarding the north wall on tentative plat, and for the wall (building or free-standing) facing Stone Avenue. Other walls should be finished to be compatible with design details of structures of the proposed development. The Plans state common areas should be used as active or passive recreational amenities. Please revise tentative plat and/or landscape plan to show the detention basin area to be designed as usable passive and/or active recreation area. Where amenities provided they should be handicapped accessible. Other areas designated as common area should provide passive amenities. Please, do not locate any vegetation that has thorns at maturation in the active recreation areas. Barrier-free accessibility for the elderly and physically disabled shall be provided to twenty-five (25) percent of the ground floor units and all common use areas, including parking areas, within the project (3.6.1.4.A.5). The Design Guidelines Manual also addresses the need for providing safe and convenient access when detention/retention basins are used for open space use and as additional recreational amenities for the development. On tentative plat, please show handicap accessibility to parking spaces, common/recreation areas. Plans and the LUC state that every RCP shall have a pedestrian circulation system connecting all elements of the RCP to all units. Please revise tentative plat and/or landscape plan to provide a pedestrian link (5 feet width sidewalk) connecting all elements of RCP and to the entrance of the development. Unless a DSMR has been processed, one guest space per unit should be provided on site. Any parking spaces located parallel to Stone Avenue require appropriate buffer from street view. Please provide appropriate buffering on tentative plat. Location of guest parking should respond to the need for pedestrian connectivity to Stone Avenue without a safety risk to residents or pedestrians. Staff Comments: Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, which features a palette of diverse Sonoran Desert Colors. The handout was created to showcase and promote the incorporation of all Sonoran Desert colors into the base and/or accent colors of building design. |
| 05/26/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 5/16/2005 Case Number Project Name Estimated Daily Traffic (in average 24-hour vehicle trips) S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes: Tentative Plat Review 82 Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 792-9151 |
| 05/26/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 05/27/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-061 Stone Lane Townhomes, Lots 1-14 Tentative Plat - Residential Cluster Project TRANSMITTAL: 05/27/05 DUE DATE: 05/16/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is April 17, 2006. 2. Add the following items to the location map. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page that are within the one square mile area. Also label the City of Tucson and Pima County limits. DS 2-03.6.1.D.2 and .4 3. This project has been presented as a town-home development with 0-foot lot lines as allowed under the development designator of RCP-6 for a property zoned R-2. This plan has been reviewed as such and must comply with LUC Section 3.6.1. Please add to the title block that this is a Residential Cluster Project. Also add a brief legal description of the property. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 and .3 4. Add the owners telephone number to the "Owners" text block on sheet one. DS 2-03.2.2.A.1 5. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S05-061. List the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, including landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 6. Revise general note 2 to state the following. "The existing zoning of this property is R-2 and will remain." DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 7. List as a general note the use of the property. The use should be listed as follows. "Single Family Dwelling DD RCP-6, subject to LUC section 3.6.1 and 3.5.7.1.F. DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 8. Add as a general note that this site has been designed to meet the criteria of the Residential Cluster Project LUC section 3.6.1. Also revise general note 20 to state that the site has been designed to comply with the criteria of the MS&R overlay zone. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 9. Add the following note. "Lots with frontage on a street designated a Major Street or Route shall have ingress-egress designed in a manner so that motor vehicles do not back out onto the Major Street or Route, through the use of circular drives, turnarounds, or other similar solutions." DS 2-03.2.2.D.2 10. Please draw, label, and dimension all existing or proposed easements. Include recordation data of any existing easements and if existing easements are to be abandoned or vacated by separate instrument, insure that the recordation data for the vacation is listed. DS 2-03.2.3.C and DS 2-03.2.4.J 11. Draw, label, and dimension existing and future curb and sidewalks. Stone Avenue is a major street per the MS&R map and is subject future widening. Insure that the existing and future right-of-way information is provided on the plan. See engineering comments related to Stone Avenue. DS 2-03.2.3.D 12. Label the lot line distance and bearings for each lot, which includes any curve data applicable to any lot line. DS 2-03.2.4.A 13. Street "A" should be labeled as a common area. Please label the street and include the common area designation in the title block. DS 2-03.2.4.C 14. All new residential subdivisions must be designed with a street that provides for parking on both sides of the street. If the street design is to deviate from the development standard the street design must comply with the minimum width, curbs, and sidewalks. The visitor parking spaces must be provided in common areas and the spaces must be within 150 feet of all property lines. The number of visitor parking spaces to be provided is based on one space per unit for a total of 14 visitor parking spaces if utilizing a common area for the parking spaces (parking lot). Also when common area parking is the parking lot are subject to landscape and screening requirements. DS 2-03.2.4.F and .G 15. Add sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Stone Avenue and the entrance into the proposed subdivision. DS 2-03.2.4.M 16. As mentioned in a previous comment, this plan has been reviewed as an RCP due to the nature of the submittal and the fact that the plan reflects lot sizes and proposed building locations that can only be developed as an RCP development. The following comments must be addressed specifically for the Residential Cluster Project criteria. 17. Perimeter boundary building setback line must be drawn and labeled based on the adjacent zoning to north, south, and west boundaries. Add a keynote or label the dimension as building setback. Keep in mind that the building setback is based on the overall height of the structure measured from design grade to the tallest point of a parapet wall, top plate, gable, etc. The building setbacks from the interior street must also be drawn and labeled or dimensioned. The max ADT for the interior street is 140. See LUC section 3.2.6.5. for more information related to street building setbacks. DS 2-10.3.1.A 18. It is clear per the plan that the buildings are to be constructed at zero building setbacks. Therefore add a keynote stating that all interior lot line building setbacks will be zero. Also dimension the proposed building setback to the interior street and property line. The building setback along Stone Avenue is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from existing or future back curb but at no time can the setback be less than three feet from the Stone Avenue property line. If the full right-of-way for Stone Avenue has not been dedicated or acquired, draw and label the future property line and curbs. The building setback may change due future right-of-way acquisition and curb location. DS 2-10.3.1.B 19. Provide, by note on the plan, the developable area, density, and site coverage calculations. If the use of a density increase is proposed, as permitted under Sec. 3.6.1.3.B of the LUC, indicate which of the provisions is being utilized and how the increased density criteria are being met. DS 2-10.3.1.C 20. Indicate by note how many and which units will be provided with barrier-free accessibility in conformance with Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.5 of the LUC. The drawing should reflect how accessibility would be accomplished. Barrier-free access, as applied under this criterion, is access from a street and/or a parking space to the front door of a unit. DS 2-10.3.1.D and LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 21. If the project is within an adopted neighborhood or area plan, submit plans showing how the RCP will comply with design requirements of such adopted plans as required in Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.1 of the LUC. DS 2-10.3.2.B 22. If the project is less than four (4) acres in size, by gross area, submit drawings, photographs, or a combination of both, showing how the architectural compatibility requirements of Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3 of the LUC will be met. DS 2-10.3.2.C 23. On lots of four thousand (4,000) square feet or more, it will be assumed that the lot is of sufficient size to accommodate a dwelling unit; therefore, on projects with lots of this size, floor plans will not be required. However, on lots of less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. Therefore, on projects that have lots less than four thousand (4,000) square feet in size, submit: DS 2-10.2.3.D.1 It appears that the same floor plan is to be used on all the lots. Please add a dimensioned copy of the building floor plans and building elevations drawings with next submittal. 24. If preliminary copies of the CC&R's are available at this time please submit a copy for review or the CC&R's may be submitted with the final plat. DS 2-10.3.2.E an LUC 3.6.1.5.A 25. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. Add a note on the plan that states that the mechanical equipment will be screened and architecturally integrated with the RCP. If the mechanical equipment will be ground mounted indicate as such and also indicate on the note how the equipment will be screened. If the equipment is to be mounted on the roof, indicate how the equipment is to be screened. Add detail drawings that demonstrate how the screening for both ground and/or roof mounted mechanical equipment will be accomplished. LUC section 3.6.1.4.A.9 26. Add the following as a general note. "In every RCP, there shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council." LUC 3.6.1.4.10 27. Along interior lot lines for attached dwellings, setbacks are not required provided traffic sight visibility, as required in Development Standard 3-01.0, is not obstructed and at least three hundred (300) square feet of outdoor space is located on that lot, and: A. Of the three-hundred (300) square feet, a minimum of one hundred (100) square feet is provided as one (1) consolidated outdoor space; and B. The one hundred (100) square foot space is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width in any direction. LUC 3.6.1.D.2.c 28. Parking. In addition to applicable regulations in Sec. 3.3.0, Motor Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements, of the Land Use Code (LUC), the following standards shall be observed. 1. For an RCP, which does not utilize a density increase, required parking spaces must meet the following criteria. a. Parking spaces may be located within the individual lots, in common parking areas, on-street within the RCP site, or on-street outside the RCP site provided the on-street parking complies with the requirements of Sec. 3.3.7.1.E. Streets within or outside the RCP site, if proposed for on-street parking, must be designed with parking lanes to accommodate the proposed parking. For on street, off-site parking, only those parking spaces located on the portion and side of the street abutting the RCP site may be used to count toward the RCP requirements. b. Parking spaces required for visitors will be uniformly distributed throughout the project and may be located in parking areas or on streets designed with designated parking lanes. Additional parking spaces located on individual lots will not be considered to satisfy this requirement, as these spaces are located on private property and cannot be used by the guests of other residents. LUC 3.6.1.4.F.1.a and .b 29. Every RCP shall have a pedestrian circulation system connecting all elements of the RCP to all units. The system shall be physically separated from the vehicular circulation system, except where the system intersects a PAAL or street. LUC 3.6.1.4.G.2 Sidewalks must be provided along the entire street frontage in front of the properties. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05061tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, if available, copies of the CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 06/08/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 06/09/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | no objections/comments. |
| 06/09/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |