Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-052
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to note the depths and include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basins are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 2) Ensure that basins provide access slopes of 8:1 or flatter and that there is no more than 100 feet to either the base of an access slope or to a 4:1 side slope from within the basin. DS 10-01.3.6.1 3) Clarify how the site will meet the requirement to screen mechanical equipment from adjacent streets as indicated in general note 8 on sheet 1 of the Tentative Plat. 4) Revise the landscape plans as requested by other agencies. |
| 09/06/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-052 BARRIO PANTANO / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 6, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 09/07/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * The back up requirement on the west end is longer than the standard but is acceptable to Environomental Services for this subdivision. |
| 09/16/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Comments to be posted on 09-19-05 - PM |
| 09/17/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is March 30, 2006. 2. Under zoning and land use note number three (3), remove reference to development designator "28". 3. Two (2) of the three (3) on-street vehicle parking spaces (south spaces) located west of lot 57 shall be 23 feet in length. 4. Typical lot detail 2/4 lists the wrong perimeter yard setback required. The perimeter yard indicator for RCP-9 is "CC", which requires a perimeter yard setback based on the height of the exterior building wall. (D.S. 2-10.3.1.B) 5. Revise the perimeter yard setback keynote five (5) on sheet 3 of 3 to be based on "height of exterior building wall" only. (LUC 3.2.6.4."CC") If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/19/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/28/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-052 Barrio Pantano 09/27/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – NPPO Plan CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/16/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations REVIEWER: DCe 791-4505 DATE: 9/14/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments S05-052 Barrio Pantano COT UPD Comment 3: The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. The General Plan also states that subdivision designs should avoid “monotonous designs and repetitive building footprints. Please submit elevations illustrating how this requirement will be satisfied for the units with rear and side facades adjacent to Golf Links Road. Applicant Response: Enclosed plans showing three varied elevations The submitted front elevations provide an acceptable variety of facades. However, the rear elevations appear to be identical between models. This will result in singular rooflines and monotonous building planes along the edges of the property. Please modify rear elevations to include a similar degree of architectural treatment and variety as is shown for the front elevations. COT UPD Comment: Massing of Structures. Adjacent residential structures should be taken into consideration when designing a subdivision. Lots adjacent to single story units at the perimeter of the RCP should have similar height to protect the adjacent homes privacy and to be compatible with existing structures within the adjacent neighborhood to the north. Since the development to the north of the site is mostly comprised of one-story, single family residences, and proposed development is two story attached unites, appropriate mitigation would be new one-story development. Please detail proposed mitigation to address compatibility and privacy concerns with existing units to the north (e.g. no balconies, clerestory second-story windows, etc.) Applicant Response: Per our May 5th, 2004 (sic) meeting with Community Planning, we have provided additional landscaping at the rear of all structures along the north side to assist with mitigation of the proposed 2-story units. It was indicated that Community Planning would discuss with Development Services to forward any input. No information was forwarded. If this item is still an issue, please call so we meet to discuss other architectural options. Appropriate mitigation would be new one-story development along the northern edge of the property. Mitigation along this property line could include removing balconies, providing only clerestory second-story windows, and providing continuous canopy trees. Additional landscaping should be indicated on the landscape plan. Additional landscaping alone does not constitute sufficient mitigation. Please address compatibility and privacy concerns with existing units to the north through the suggested mitigation measures. |
| 09/30/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | September 30, 2005 TO: Kent Delph, P.E. Delph Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Barrio Pantano, Lots 1-58 and Common Areas A-C Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S05-052 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET 1. Delete General Note 3, it is a duplicate of General Note 1. SHEET 1. Unless there are existing public sewer easements within the project boundaries, revise General Note 4 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. However, public sewer improvement plans were recently reviewed for this project, thus it is assumed that your intent is for the sewers to be public instead of private. If that is the case, revise General Note 4 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. This second submittal contained four sheets, one more than the first submittal. Therefore, please pay $50.00 for the additional sheet as outlined in the fee schedule and in the review letter dated April 20, 2005. Make check payable to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 10/07/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 7, 2005 Kent Delph Delph Engineering 221 North Court #103 Tucson, AZ 85701 Subject: S05-052 Barrio Pantano Tentative Plat Dear Kent: Your submittal of September 1, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Community Planning, Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Community Planning, Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-6570 |