Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-052
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/24/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-052 Barrio Pantano Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: January 25, 2006 DUE DATE: February 2, 2006 1. Typical lot detail 2/4 on sheet 4 of 4 lists the wrong perimeter yard setback required. The perimeter yard indicator for RCP-9 is "CC", which, with adjacent C-1 zoning, requires a perimeter yard setback based on the height of the exterior building wall rather than 3/4 of the height. Revise. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B, LUC 3.2.6.4 2. Add a statement to general note 3 that the plat is designed to also meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.4, the Gateway Corridor Zone DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 3. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") for archiving purposes. The text for the book and page numbers of recorded subdivisions in the location map is too small to be legible on microfilm. Revise text that does not meet this minimum standard. DS 2-03.2.1.C If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 02/01/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to note the depths and include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basins are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2:1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 The response letter of January 18th, 2006 indicates that the basin (2) is designed solely to provide a detention/retention function and is not intended to serve as a multi-use facility. Page 61 of the SDRM establishes that "The goal of all detention/retention basins is to be multi-use" . Indeed, page one of the SDRM introduces the multi-use concept on page 1 "It is intended that detention/retention facilities designed in accordance with the guidelines presented herein will meet the following goals: "2) result in detention/retention facilities which are multi-use and visually appealing. " "One of the major objectives of this manual is to provide guidelines towards ensuring that future retention/detention facilities will be planned and designed in such a way that they will be considered as amenities by the affected community. In an attempt to achieve this goal, Chapter 4 provides detailed policies and criteria regarding grading and landscaping of proposed detention/retention basins for multiple uses." The Land Use Code requires that basins be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin and establishes DS 10-01. as the design criteria to be followed. LUC 3.7.4.3. The Land Use Code requirement is to designed to create basins that serve as visual amenities or focal points, thus meeting the multi-purpose standard. The applicant should pursue redesign of the basin slopes or consider a DSMR per DS 1-01.4.7. Per DS 1-01.4.7.A "Whenever there are practical difficulties which prevent the strict application of the Development Standards, the Development Services Department Director may approve modifications or waivers from the requirements of the Development Standard provided that: 1. The modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of the Development Standard and such modification addresses health, life, and safety considerations; and 2. The strict application of the Development Standard fails to accomplish the intent of the Development Standard due to such reasons as existing conditions, the character of the area, or existing site or location constraints, etc. |
| 02/15/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | February 14, 2006 TO: Kent Delph, P.E. Delph Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: R S Engineering (Contract Reviewer) Subhash Raval, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Barrio Pantano, Lots 1-58 and Common Area A-C Tentative Plat – 3rd Submittal S05-052 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project is hereby approved as submitted. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Subhash Raval, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6586 Copy: Project |
| 03/14/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 14, 2006 Kent Delph Delph Engineering 221 North Court #103 Tucson, AZ 85701 Subject: S05-052 Barrio Pantano Tentative Plat Dear Kent: Your submittal of January 19, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape & NPPO Plans (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-6570 |
| 03/14/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-052 Barrio Pantano 03/13/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – NPPO Plan CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 2/02/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP-No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) NOTE: Applicant has removed the balconies and has significantly increased the landscaping along the northern border of the site; therefore, complies with Planning Comments Submitted On: 9/14/05 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 1/31/06 |