Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-030
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/13/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-030 DOS RIOS / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: JUNE 13, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Map. 2: Change Braddock Street to Drive, Lane, Road, Trail or Way. 3: Change Kirtley Place to Drive, Lane, Road, Trail or Way. 4: Label Lakota Drive on pg. 4. |
| 06/13/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-030 DOS RIOS/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: JULY 7, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED ON THE CONDITION THAT: SPELL OUT ALL STREET SUFFIXES EXCEPT ON LOCATION MAP. CHANGE BRADDOCK STREET TO DRIVE, LANE, ROAD, TRAIL OR WAY. CHANGE KIRTLEY PLACE TO DRIVE, LANE, ROAD, TRAIL OR WAY. LABEL LAKOTA DRIVE ON PG. 4 ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 06/14/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Where natural washes cannot be maintained, a mitigation plan shall be established with emphasis being placed on earthen or naturally appearing channels with landscaping and texture/color added to bank protection materials. The design of earthen channels will be encouraged in order to allow for a more permeable surface which permits reintroduction of the water into the groundwater system, allowing for the reintroduction of native plant species which promotes a natural, partially soil-stabilized system". Revise as necessary to incorporate natural materials and landscaping within Common Area 'B'. THE TENTATIVE PLAT INCLUDES NO REFERENCES TO DESIGNS AND METHODS USED TO RECREATE NATURALLY APPEARING CHANNELS DECRIBED IN THE LANDSCAPE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER. 2) Note the slope ratios for rentention basins on the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2.B 3) Provide verification, in writing of any City Engineer approval to locate required landscaping the public right-of-way. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 4) Revise the irrigation note 1 on sheet L-1. 5) Revise the note on sheet L-7 regarding drainage. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 06/15/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | June 15, 2005 TO: Wocky Redsar Castro Engineering Corp. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Cantera, Lots 1-143, Blocks A & B and Common Areas A-C Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S05-030 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project is hereby approved as submitted. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/22/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 22, 2005 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Dos Rios Tentative Plat 2nd Submittal Engineering Review LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 10 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-030 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, revised Landscape sheets, Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation, infiltration testing geotechnical letter, Collapsible Soils Geotechnical submittal, Pima County Regional Flood Control document, Sierra Pacific Letter, Cultural Resource Letter, TIA, response letters, and revised Drainage Report were received by Engineering on June 9, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.10-02.12.5: Storm waters must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under existing conditions. The drainage scheme must be modified to show storm waters released at the same locations and with the same magnitudes as existing conditions. Provide cross section near lot 90, where existing floodplain indicates receipt of potential flow; an interceptor drainage design is needed at this location. Revise detail J/3 to show full cross section of channel. Also show on plan view the drainage easement that will be necessary to accommodate this assurable item. 2) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1 & -14.3.4: Show 15-ft.wide basin maintenance access ramp with maximum ramp slope is 15%; clarify drainage maintenance access for Basin 1. Explain whether there will be a barrier or gated entrance for Basin 2 maintenance access and show location of access to Basin 2. 3) DS Sec.10-02.10.6.9: Response letter indicates that this was complied yet the calculation sheet in appendix did not reflect update. Use the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management for appropriate scupper clogging factors. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 4) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6, & 10-01.3.5.1: Percolation tests show infiltration rates for Basin 1 to be inadequate and therefore the bleed pipes are crucial for the drainage to function. Show that the invert elevations (for both basins) are low enough to bleed off and that the outlet invert elevations must be high enough to not cause backwater or other adverse conditions. Also use 24" diameter minimum pipe with 6" plate. 5) DS Sec.11-01.8.1.A: Proposed fill on lot 44 is in excess of two feet above existing grade in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property and will require the procedure outlined in this section. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 6) DS Sec.11-01.9: Where proposed right-of-way abuts property line, provide cross sections depicting existing and proposed topography and grades showing that slope runout is provided and in conformance with 2-foot slope setbacks. For the wall depicted in details A/6 and B/6, the wall and footer as well as construction trench area should be within the property limits, otherwise, notarized permission from adjacent property owner is necessary, with sheet 6 revised to show a docket page for surveyable construction / maintenance easement for this wall. Submit revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report, any permission letters, and detailed response letter. Call me at 791-5550, extension 2204, to discuss comments or to schedule a meeting to go over comments before resubmittal. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/23/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | >>> Dale Kelch 06/23/2005 4:38:19 PM >>> Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/23/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-030 Dos Rios 06/23/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – NPPO Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-15 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 6/23/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations and Color Palette REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 06/22/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments S05-030 Dos Rios Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with Section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code as well as the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Design Guidelines Manual. Rezoning condition #8 states “all residential building elevations visible from Alvernon Way and Benson Highway shall incorporate five-sided architectural detail to provide a visually interesting streetscape.” Elevations submitted do not illustrate what type of individual enhancement (window pop outs, edge treatment, color variation, etc.) will be added to the sides and back of units visible from Alvernon Way and Benson Highway. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view “The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, which features a palette of diverse Sonoran Desert Colors. The handout was created to showcase and promote the incorporation of all Sonoran Desert colors into the base and/or accent colors of building design. Please provide elevations illustrating how these requirements will be satisfied. |
| 06/23/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-030 Dos Rios 7/26/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – NPPO Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-15 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: N/A SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments*- Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 6/23/05 *Applicant hand-delivered revised elevations. () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 07/25/05 |
| 07/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Real Estate is in the process of vacating Atrim Loop under RES 2005-030. Contact Real Estate at least 1month in advance of the date the Final Plat is agendized for Mayor and Council. The vacation of Atrim Loop must be done simultaneously with the approval of the final plat. |
| 07/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Conditional approval: Contact real estate at least one month before final plat is scheduled on M&C agenda. The vacation of Antrim Loop must be on the same agenda. |
| 07/09/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 9, 2005 Wocky Redsar Castro Engineering Corp. 3580 West Ina Road, Suite 200 Tucson, AZ 85741 Subject: S05-030 Dos Rios Tentative Plat Dear Wocky: Your submittal of June 9, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (landscape, zoning, engineering, community planning, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (engineering, community planning, landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Elevations (community planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 293-2115 |
| 07/09/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-030 Dos Rios, Lots 1- 143 and Common Areas "A" - "C" Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 07/09/05 DUE DATE: June 23, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is March 27, 2006. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Will existing easements as platted per the previous subdivision plat be abandoned by separate instrument, if so list the recordation data on the plat and submit copies of the documents indicating the abandonment. Previous Comment: If applicable indicate the location of all existing easements. Clarify if existing easements on site are to be abandoned by separate instrument. DS 2-03.2.3.C 3. The dimension for the east 75-foot R/W as depicted on the cross section for Alvernon Way and the other dimensions do not add up. I acknowledge that the R/W from the centerline of Alvernon to the property line is greater than 75 feet but the dimension as depicted does not work. Please revise as required or clarify the discrepancy. Previous Comment: Please review and revise the street cross section detail drawing for Alvernon Way. The right of way numbers don't seem to work. Also please draw, label, and dimension on the plan the future curb and sidewalk for both Alvernon Way and Benson Hwy. DS 2-03.2.3.D If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S05030tp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: tentative plat, and additional requested documents. |