Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-030
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/13/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
09/15/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S05-030 Cantera Final Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2006 DUE DATE: October 11, 2006 COMMENTS: The Zoning Review Section approves the final plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed final plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised final plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. Be advised that principal for Ray Water Company must sign mylars before submitted to City. 2. Real Estate must be contacted for right-of-way abandonment to be scheduled on same Council meeting as final plat. All ROW recording blanks on final plat must be filled in on final plat submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S05-030fpr.doc |
11/09/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Cantera Final Plat Engineering Review 2nd resubmittal LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 10 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-030 SUMMARY: The revised Final Plat, complete assurance package, title report, and response letter were received and reviewed by Engineering. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Final Plat at this time. Please address the following remaining Final Plat comments prior to resubmittal. FINAL PLAT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.4.K: The submittal of this final plat prior to final approval of differential grading is done at the applicant's risk since changes could be required of the tentative plat that may affect the final plat and incur further comments. For this project, differential grading process must be completed prior to issuance of grading permit. Please provide updated status of differential grading. Call to discuss any remaining issues. 2) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.K: In response letter, it was stated that the Plat needs to be recorded first. Typically, vacations can be done concurrently at the same Mayor and Council meeting or done prior to platting. Discuss status of Antrim Loop vacation and show recording information on plat planview or explain correspondence with TDOT or Real Estate. 3) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.F: Show the limits of the 100-year floodprone area in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of 100 cfs or more. Provide bearing and distances on all floodplain lines. 4) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Address the following easement /survey comments: a) DS Sec.11-01.9: For any proposed offsite construction, maintenance, or other easements, submit the original copy of the notarized permission from adjacent property owner. Provide docket and page for the construction / maintenance easements. b) Symbol used in legend for survey monument at some boundary corners is not legible on planview. Clarify. 5) DS Sec.2-03.6.3.C: Beneficiary name should be checked. Under Beneficiary, provide beneficiary information including: contact person's name, Company that represents the beneficiary (from the agreement to construct this appears as Stardust Cantera, Inc.), and beneficiary's address. 6) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.C.5: Explain/revise General Note 15 to clarify that the boundary data as opposed to "section line" dimensions are from measured data for the distance and bearing between all boundary monuments. For the revised Final Plat resubmittal it will be necessary to address all the above comments, submit the revised Final Plat, original signed CC&R's, original notarized permission letter, and detailed response letter. Call me at 791-5550, extension 2204, to discuss comments or to schedule a meeting to go over comments before resubmittal. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
11/14/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 14, 2006 Scott Eisenfeld Castro Engineering Corp. 3580 West Ina Road, Suite 200 Tucson, AZ 85741 Subject: S05-030 Cantera Final Plat Dear Scott: Your submittal of September 13, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Final Plat (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 293-2115 |