Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-029
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/12/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 12, 2005 TO: E. Bruce Wilson, P.E., R.L.S. Landmark Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: The Santa Rita Hotel and Condominiums Tentative Plat/Development Plan – 2nd Submittal S05-029 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEETS 3 & 4. The first submittal of this project appeared to show the abandonment of existing public sewers. If that is still the case, please show those sewers and clearly show where the abandonment will start and end. SHEETS 3 & 4. The existing public sewers shown on the layout are quite confusing as only manholes are shown. Be aware that there are no existing public sewers on S 6th Avenue. Please show all existing public sewers, including sewer manholes and sewer pipes. Include the size and Pima County plan number. SHEETS 3 & 4. Independently from any negotiations, if there is a public sewer easement in the alley, please show it along with its recording information. If it is proposed for abandonment, please indicate so. If there is no existing public sewer easement, you may disregard this review comment. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/16/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1A) There should be five (5) percent of the gross floor area of the new construction provided in public plazas or courtyards for every new development. DS 9-05.4.4.A The gross floor area is the sum of the horizontal areas of all floors of all buildings, see LUC 6.2.9 for an expanded definition. Provide calculations to demonstrate that the 5% standard is attained for new construction. 1B) Shade shall be provided for at least fifty (50) percent of all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82° above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). Shade may be provided, provided they respect the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. Deciduous trees, as proposed in the Downtown Comprehensive Street Tree Plan, are encouraged to supplement existing evergreen trees. The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way is permitted to meet this standard. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this guideline. DS 9-05.4.3.B, LUC 2.8.10.K.5 Provide calculations on the landscape plan and any materials approved by the DRB useful deemed useful to document compliance. 1C) All new parking shall be designed so that vehicles are not visible from the adjoining street level, through incorporation of pedestrian arcades, occupied space, or display space. DS 9-05.4.3.C.2.b.1 Identify any walls, structures, or other features that may make the parking not visible from the adjoining street level on the landscape plan. 1D) Streetscape A. Public Art. Public art is encouraged in all new development. The character of the public art will fit within the context defined by the development and other surrounding buildings. B. Seating and Furnishings. 1. Seating will be provided at all outdoor gathering spaces. The character, color, and materials of the seating will fit within the context of the development and other surrounding buildings. 2. Waste receptacles will be provided and will fit within the context of the development. 3. Newspaper receptacles and vending machines in exterior spaces shall be consistent with the design of the project. Provide ANY information approved by the DRB on the development plan/landscape plan. 2) Revise the development plan and landscape plan to clarify how the project meets the screening provisions of LUC 3.7 & DS 9-05.4.3. Show and label all screening elements on both plans. Refuse storage and loading areas, as well as parking areas, require screening. Provide details. 3) Provide calculations for oasis area landscaping. LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3, DS 2-06.3.2 4) Revise the plans if necessary to direct stormwater runoff to the areas planted with crossvine. This plant requires regular irrigation and improved soils. 5) The areas planted with crossvine will need to be located entirely on site. All plants used within public right-of-way areas are required to be from the drought tolerant plant list. LUC 3.7.2.2 Revise the plans as necessary. 6) Approval from the City Engineer and TDOT Landscape Architect for the landscape and irrigation improvements in public right-of-way areas is required. |
| 08/25/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: SANTA RITA HOTEL AND CONDO S05-029 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review August 11, 2005 . Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 08/25/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-029 Santa Rita Hotel and Condominiums Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: August 25, 2005 DUE DATE: August 26, 2005 1. Provide a Floor Area Ratio calculation per LUC 3.2.11. Revise the loading zone calculation to include a statement as to how many loading zones are required as well as provided. LUC 3.2.11, DS 2-05.2.4.O 2. Provide the recordation information and show the location of all easements, existing and proposed, on the plan. A public alley is shown running north-to-south down the middle of the property. If this has been vacated/abandoned provide documentation of abandonment and include recording information (docket and page) on the plan. DS 2-03.2.3.C DS 2-05.2.4.G DS 2-05.2.4.E 3. The configuration of parking, pedestrian circulation, loading, trash dumpster, etc. shown on sheets 3 of 8 and 4 of 8 does not match the street level plan shown on sheet 6 of 8. Revise for consistency. 4. Loading zones may not be located so that parked trucks will block access to the dumpsters. Revise drawing, label and dimension loading zones and provide a calculation for the number of loading zones both required and provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O 5. Show clearly the location and dimensions of the two common areas "A" and "B" on the plan. DS 2-03.2.4.C & .I9 6. Indicate clearly and dimension fully the pedestrian circulation system on the plan drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS 2-08 7. Label clearly the location of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces on the plan drawing. On the typical detail drawings of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking on sheet 2 of 8, add the required 5-foot area for maneuvering bicycles into spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 8. The on-street parking shown may not be counted toward meeting required on-site parking and so these on-street parking count numbers may be removed. 9. Provide lot combination documents, including a copy if the Covenant for Use and Development of Real Property. These forms may be obtained from the zoning review counter. Indicate in the title block that this is a resubdivision of City of Tucson, Block 257. LUC 3.3.6.1.B 10. Add a general note stating the number of condominium units proposed DS 2-03.2.2.B.4 11. All two-way PAAL's are required to be a minimum of 24 feet. Revise drawing to demonstrate compliance. LUC 3.3.7.2 12. All lettering and dimensions are required to be a minimum of twelve (0.12") point in size for archiving and microfilming purposes. Revise all text that does not meet this standard. Also, revise text so that there is no strikeover of lettering and dimensions on any of the sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.C 13. On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 the text stating the level numbers near the top edge of the sheets is truncated and incomplete. Revise to be legible. 14. The plan is difficult to read due to the numerous layers which are superimposed. Remove the existing conditions and existing parking layout from the development plan drawings for clarity and to reduce clutter. This information is already present on the demolition plan (sheet 5 of 8). It is difficult to determine the exact location of property line on the development plan because it is too thin and light on the drawings. The property lines should be shown in a bold dark line with property pins clearly depicted. DS 2-03.2.3.B If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/29/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/29/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-029 SANTA RITA HOTEL AND CONDO/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 08/29/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label unit numbers for residential condominiums per Pima County Code. 2.) Include units in Title Block legal description. |
| 08/30/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | S05-029 |
| 09/20/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-029, Santa Rita Hotel (RES 2005-085) Real Estate has an active RES file for the vacation of alley right of way and a portion of Scott Avenue. The vacation of these rights of way need to be considered by Mayor and Council before the final plat. It is imperative that the developer keep Real Estate informed as to the status of the plat. There needs to a comment under General Notes on the final plat that states The public rights-of-way were vacated by Adoption of Ordinance #________ on ____ date of _________, 20__ , and recorded in Docket____ at Page _____ . |
| 09/20/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * Posteds Approved -cond. Assumed that in the operating space (14' x 40') that there is 25 feet clear area above for operation of the service truck. |
| 09/21/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 21, 2005 Bruce Wilson Landmark Engineering 3845 North Business Center Drive Tucson, AZ 85705 Subject: S05-029 Santa Rita and Condominiums Tentative Plat Dear Bruce: Your submittal of August 11, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (landscape, real estate, zoning, addressing, wastewater, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (landscape, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1392 |