Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-029
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/28/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/01/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved March 1, 2005. |
| 03/10/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Project shows two dumpster enclosures. There is question on how the western most dumpster is to be serviced. A 14' by 40' clear area is required in front of the enclosure for direct pickup service. Access to the front of the enclosure is questioned. * General question: For the number of apartments and retail space it is questioned if the two enclosures which accommodates only an eight cubic yard dumpster would have enough capacity. Recommend that a Stak-Pac type of unit be considered for garbage and recycling. (For the resturant recommend that recycling container be considered.) |
| 03/14/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-029 THE SANTA RITA HOTEL AND CONDO/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: March 14, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include: Block 257, Military Plaza, Book 1, Page 24 in Title Block legal description. Completely the suffix for Scott and Broadway on sheet 3. Are the Condominium Units to be used for commercial or for living units? Please provide a site plan showing the condo units in the Hotel. They will need to be labeled with Unit Numbers per Pima County Standards. |
| 03/17/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 17, 2005 TO: E. Bruce Wilson, P.E., R.L.S. Landmark Engineering, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: The Santa Rita Hotel and Condominiums Tentative Plat/Development Plan – 1st Submittal S05-029 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Aviation Corridor to Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on historical records, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-029, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Combine General Notes 23 and 26 into one note that reads ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). SHEET 1. Revise General Note 9 as shown below and fill in the blanks THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEETS 3 & 4. Show the length, size and slope of all newly proposed sewers. SHEETS 3 & 4. Show a manhole number, rim elevation and invert elevation for all newly proposed manholes and cleanouts SHEETS 3 & 4. Use different line types for existing public sewers, proposed abandoned sewers, proposed public sewers and proposed private sewers. SHEETS 3 & 4. Show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewers. SHEETS 3 & 4. Show the number, rim elevation and invert elevation of the existing public manhole to which this project is connecting. SHEETS 3 & 4. Show any existing and proposed public sewer easements along with the appropriate recording information. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/22/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S05-029 Santa Rita Hotel and Condominiums Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: March 22, 2005 DUE DATE: March 29, 2005 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before February 27, 2006. 2. Fill in the S05-029 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. As condominium area is measured in cubic feet, provide air volume calculations, including the interior height of the condo units and the square footage of each unit so that the air volume can be verified. DS 2-03. 4. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. 5. The project site is located within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown Overlay Zone. Applications within this zone shall be reviewed in accordance with the Administrative Design Review Procedures 23A-32 of the Tucson Code. The application must include a Design Context and Compatibility Report in conformance with Development Standard 9-10.2. Refer to Section 3, Chapter 23, Section 2.8.10 of the Tucson Code and DS 9-05.4 for Design Criteria. Demonstrate compliance where applicable with all design criteria listed in section 2.8.10.5 of the Tucson Code. LUC 2.8.10.4 Tucson Code Section 3, Chapter 23, Division 8 Section 2.8.10 DS 9-05.4 6. Revise the legal descriptions in the title block and under the location map to be correct. No part of the project area is within the northwest corner of Section 13..... DS 2-03.2.1.G.3 7. Fill in all of the blanks on sheet 1 of 7, such as proposed building height, floor area, square footages of uses, handicap parking totals (required and provided), bicycle parking (required and provided of both types), etc. Note: Bicycle parking for the Downtown Redevelopment District is based on LUC 3.3.6.2. Provide a Floor Area Ratio calculation and a loading zone calculation also. Further comments may be necessary once all calculations are provided. DS 2-05.2.4.M, .N, .O, .P, .Q 8. The mixed use parking reduction may not be used within the Downtown Redevelopment District. Revise residential parking calculation to be based on the Downtown Redevelopment District requirement for off-street motor parking, which is one space per unit rather than being based on number of bedrooms. Tucson Code Section 5, Division 3, Section 3.3.6.1.C LUC 3.3.6.1.C 9. Per LUC 3.3.6.1.B revise parking calculations for other non-office uses to be based on 1 vehicle space per 300 square feet of GFA. LUC 3.3.6.1.B 10. General note 22 is not correct and is not consistent with the site area listed under the site calculation data. Revise to indicate the correct site area. DS 2-03.2.2.B.8 11. Provide the recordation information and show the location of all easements, existing and proposed, on the plan. A public alley is shown running north to south down the middle of the property. If this has been vacated/abandoned provide documentation of abandonment and include recording information (docket and page) on the plan. DS 2-03.2.3.C DS 2-05.2.4.G DS 2-05.2.4.E 12. Add site visibility triangles at all street intersections. DS 2-03.2.4.M DS 2-05.2.4.R DS 3-02.5 13. Loading zones may not be located so that parked trucks will block access to the dumpsters. Revise drawing, label and dimension loading zones and provide a calculation for the number of loading zones required and provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O 14. Show the location of the three common areas "A", "B" and "C" on the plan, indicate the dimensions and square footages of the common areas. DS 2-03.2.4.C & .I9 15. Indicate clearly and dimension fully the pedestrian circulation system on the plan drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS 2-08 16. Bicycle parking must be provided based on requirements listed in LUC 3.3.6.2. Revise plat to show bicycle parking calculations, the location of all class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking on the drawings, and add a fully dimensioned detail showing the configuration of bicycle parking spaces, including the required 5-foot area for maneuvering bicycles into spaces. LUC 3.3.6.2 DS 2-09 DS 2-05.2.4.Q 17. Demonstrate compliance with DS 9-05.4.6 and DS 9-05.4.5.C by detailing any proposed freestanding lighting and signage on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.W DS 9-05 18. Indicate clearly right-of-way widths and dimension from street monument lines the curbs and sidewalks, both existing and proposed. DS 2-05.2.4.F 19. The on-street parking shown may not be counted toward meeting required on-site parking. 20. Dimension the depth of the backup spurs at the southeast and southwest corners of the site on the Level 1-B parking plan on sheet 5 of 7. DS 3-05.2.2.D 21. General note 12 implies that the site will still consist of 5 lots after platting of the property. These lot lines must be effectively removed with this platting. Lot lines may not run through buildings. Provide the legal description (City of Tucson, Block 257) of the whole site in the site notes and indicate in the title block that this is a resubdivision of this Block in C.o.T. DS 2-03.2.1.G 22. List as a general note "Esisting zoning is OCR-2". DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 23. Any notes referencing RCP development, such as General Note 25, may be removed since this project is not proposed as an RCP subdivision DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 24. Add a note stating the number of condominium units proposed. DS 2-03.2.2.B.4 25. Provide height dimensions on the building elevation drawings. DS 2-05.2.4.N 26. Dimension the width of the entrance drives on the drawing. All PAAL's are required to be a minimum of 24 feet. DS 2-05.2.4.D 27. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/24/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: SANTA RITA HOTEL & CONDO'S D05-029 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review February 28, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities including the underground electrical lines and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 03/25/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: March 24, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-029 The Santa Rita Hotel and Condominiums T141313 (117-17) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. If this is to be one lot, please add “LOT 1” to the title blocks. If the hotel, restaurant and retail are to be separate lots, then this needs to be defined, with dimensions and bearings and added to the title blocks. Please add square footage to sheet 3, whether it is to be one lot or several. Add the road information for Broadway Blvd., Scott Ave., 6th Ave. and 12th Street. The common areas need to be defined, bearings and dimensions added and square footage added. Please remove the shading and stippling. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 03/29/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 29, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S05-029 The Santa Rita Hotel: Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services No comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/29/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org S05-029 Santa Rita Hotel and Condo 3/28/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Broadway (Stone to 6th Ave) No 0 10,700 31,920 3 31,920 24,099 3 2,713 Route 6, 15 minutes, 0 miles; Route 8, 10 minutes, 0 miles None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 03/29/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-029 The Santa Rita Hotel and Condo 03/29/05 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Old Pueblo South, Plan for Downtown Tucson, & Rio Nuevo GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: March 28, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (X) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP (*see attached comments*). () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached ( () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 3/28/05 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments The Santa Rita Hotel and Condo: Tent. Plat, mix use S05-029 March 28, 2005 This project is currently under the CDRC process, utilizing the current land zone of OCR-2, and not under consideration for either a rezoning, special exception or a residential cluster option review. However, staff would to like to notify the applicant that this site is location within a Historical and Rio Nuevo District, both overlay zones require a review of this project. Aside from other possible issues, the historical district requires their approval prior to any demolition of existing structures on this site. In addition, a Design Review Board (DRB) approval is required, which includes Rio Nuevo criteria for downtown development/redevelopment. |
| 03/29/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Condominiums is misspelled on the heading on sheet 1. 2. Label curb return radii at access points. 25' minimum on 6th Ave. 18' minimum elsewhere. 3. Show and label as to size SVTs at all access points and at street intersections. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/30/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The project is within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown Zone. Compliance with the provisions of DS 9-05.0 and LUC 2.8.10 is required. Revise all plans to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of those sections and as may be suggested by the DRB. TCC 23A-32 A) Plazas and Pedestrian Nodes. Plazas, courtyards, and patios are landscaped outdoor areas designed to accommodate multiple uses, from large gatherings of people for performing arts to smaller gatherings. The plazas and courtyards will be one of the ways that spaces and uses can be linked. There should be five (5) percent of the gross floor area of the new construction provided in public plazas or courtyards for every new development. DS 9-05.4.4.A B) Shade shall be provided for at least fifty (50) percent of all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82° above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). Shade may be provided, provided they respect the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. Deciduous trees, as proposed in the Downtown Comprehensive Street Tree Plan, are encouraged to supplement existing evergreen trees. The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way is permitted to meet this standard. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this guideline. DS 9-05.4.3.B, LUC 2.8.10.K.5 C) All new parking shall be designed so that vehicles are not visible from the adjoining street level, through incorporation of pedestrian arcades, occupied space, or display space. DS 9-05.4.3.C.2.b.1 D) Streetscape A. Public Art. Public art is encouraged in all new development. The character of the public art will fit within the context defined by the development and other surrounding buildings. B. Seating and Furnishings. 1. Seating will be provided at all outdoor gathering spaces. The character, color, and materials of the seating will fit within the context of the development and other surrounding buildings. 2. Waste receptacles will be provided and will fit within the context of the development. 3. Newspaper receptacles and vending machines in exterior spaces shall be consistent with the design of the project. E) Pavement of Sidewalks, Crosswalks, and Streets. Treatment of sidewalks, crosswalks, and streets should be consistent with the design guidelines of the Downtown Pedestrian Implementation Plan (DPIP). DS 9-05.4.3.D 2) Revise note 20 on Sht.1 of the plan to include the Rio Nuevo & Downtown Zone. 3) Revise the development plan and landscape plan to clarify how the project meets the screening provisions of LUC 3.7 & DS 9-05.4.3. Show and label all screening elements on both plans. 4) Label adjacent streets and indicate the footprint/overhang of the parking garage. 5) Revise the landscape plans to implement water harvesting for supplemental irrigation. LUC 3.7.4.3 Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff 6) Revise the development plant to indicate where sidewalks will be modified or replaced. Label existing streetscape features. 7) Show any existing vegetation that is to remain on the landscape plan. 8) The landscape plan includes planting within the adjacent public streets. Per LUC 3.7.2.9.A, The landscaping must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. This required approval is beyond the scope of this review, additional permits and approvals will be required. 9) Revise the development plan to clarify why plant symbols appear on the drawing. If they are plants identified on the survey that are to be removed, then they should not be shown on the development plan. |
| 04/04/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 04/05/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 5, 2005 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: The Santa Rita Hotel and Condominiums Tentative Plat S05-029 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 13 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat The Tentative Plat and Hydrology Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Tentative Plat 1. Provide the basis of elevation.(DS 2-03.2.3.F) 2. Identify in the legend, the striped areas adjacent to the solid waste enclosures. (DS 2-03.2.1.J) 3. Identify Sixth Avenue and Broadway Boulevard as MS&R routes. Indicate the existing and future right of way dimensions. 4. Provide boundary information including bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds; distances in feet and hundredths. (DS 2-03.2.3.B) 5. Clearly delineate the sight visibility triangles for the street intersections and for the parking area access lanes. (DS 2-03.2.4.M) 6. Provide details of proposed condominium units, including air space calculations and delineation of individual units. Hydrology Report 7. The hydrology report is accepted for tentative plat purposes. Submit a revised Tentative Plat. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 04/05/2005 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Contact Real Estate to complete the vacation of the alley right of way ASAP. |
| 04/06/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |