Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-025
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2005 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/23/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Remove General Note #44 from plan. Note is applicable to Pima County projects only. 2. Show existing fire lane signs for existing Nightbloom Way on plan. 3. Show location for proposed fire lane signs for Streets "A" and "B". 4. Indicate fire lane signs on both sides for Street Section "A" And Street Section "B". 5. Street Section "B". Provide 20 feet paving width, remove wedge curbs and provide vertical curbs on both sides of roadway to discourage on street parking. |
| 02/28/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Approved for residential curbside collection utilizing APC's. APC's are to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service. |
| 03/02/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-025 CIVANO BLOCK 2 / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Is a portion of this project in Section 12? If not please correct Location Map and Title Blocks. 2: Label approved interior street names on Final Plat. 3: Add “See Sheet……” to all applicable pages. 4: Ghost Lot 27 on pg. 4 and darken on pg. 5. |
| 03/08/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S05-025 MMLA PSOMAS CIVANO BLOCK 2 |
| 03/11/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-025 Civano Block 2 03/11/05 (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (ü) Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-97-SP-6A, Civano Revised IMPACT System, Civano Revised MOU NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: March 22, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) Resubmittal Required: (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 3/11/2005 The proposed project is within the current Planned Area Development (PAD) PAD-6a, Civano Neighborhood 1. More specifically it lies within the outer southeastern portion of the PAD designated as the Neighborhood Edge District/Community Orchards. Development criteria are taken from this current portion of the PAD. Rezoning of the entire Civano Site that encompasses 818 acres is currently being reviewed and processed as a new Master PAD. As part of this process the southern portion of this proposed project which is currently zoned Suburban Ranch (SR) is being considered to be incorporated into the Civano Neighborhood 1 PAD as part of the Neighborhood Center District. Since this has not been approved as yet, this review will reflect current zoning criteria as shown on the official City of Tucson zoning maps with references made to the proposed zoning designations from the Neighborhood Edge and Center Districts. 1. Currently the density patterns specified for the project site is denoted on Exhibit 12 of the existing PAD. The Exhibit indicates Single Family detached units are allowed with a minimum density of 31 Dwelling Units and a maximum of 50 Dwelling Units. This project identifies 28 lots being developed, which is below the minimum number indicated on Exhibit 12. The Neighborhood Edge District does allow for two or more dwelling units on one lot subject to 2,900 sq. ft. of lot area per unit. Please indicate if this will be the case, otherwise additional lots will be required. 2. Please add to general note 8 that lot area is measured to the centerline of abutting public right-of-way. 3. Per Exhibit 11, the orchards are indicated as being fronted along Nightbloom Way with the houses proposed behind the orchards to the east. Currently there a no changes being proposed as to the orientation of these features, since the developer indicated that the current configuration could be accommodated. Either the tentative plat need to reflect the current situation as illustrated in Exhibit 11 or the PAD must be amended. 4. Please provide the required lot coverage calculations to the tentative plat. Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 60%. 5. General note 33 does apply to this project. No portion of this project is zoned R-2. Please remove general note 33. 6. Per MOU 5.2.2 site design and grading plans shall limit site clearance on residential lots to preserve existing desert vegetation and maximize natural drainage in a manner consistent with the grading plans approved with the Master Plan and any approved PAD. Please provide information as how this shall occur. 7. Per MOU 5.2.11 extension of reclaimed water lines is required to all common areas within Civano. Please identify reclaimed water lines on the tentative plat along with note indicating its required use in all common areas. 8. Per MOU 5.2.13 all landscaping which is required for public streets adjacent to residential properties are to be limited to drought tolerant plants. Please indicate this on tentative plat. 9. Currently the southern portion of the proposed subdivision is zoned SR. Uses associated with SR zoning per the Civano Master Plan include preserved natural area, community recycling center and a commercial agricultural operation. Photovoltaic solar arrays and a solar observatory/viewing platform are also suggested uses for this zone. Under the proposed PAD this area which would include proposed lots 21-25 and Block A would be placed in the Neighborhood 1 PAD, within the Neighborhood Center District. Density, building heights, perimeter yard requirements, and building coverage calculations would be based on the 'Neighborhood Center's' criteria and would then be required to be reflected on these plans. This portion of the proposed project can not be approved until the PAD, which include changes to Neighborhood 1 PAD, are approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 03/15/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | March 15, 2005 TO: Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Civano, Block 2, Lots 1-28 & Block A and Common Areas A & B Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S05-025 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on project S03-021, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S05-025, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 3-5. For reference purposes, assign a number to all proposed manholes. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/15/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: March 14, 2005 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S05-025 Civano Block 2 T151512 (141-01) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add bearings for the lot lines. Remove hatching and add dimensions and bearings for the common areas and orchards. Are the orchards to be common areas? If they are not, they must be added to the title block; if they are part of Common Area “A”, the lines must be dashed to indicate they are not a separate parcel. If they are a separate common area, they need to be labeled as such and added to the tile block. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 03/17/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | 268 estimated daily trips |
| 03/18/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: CIVANO, BLOCK 2 Lots 1-28 S05-025 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated February 18, 2005. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. There is a junction cabinet located west of Lot 1; the easement for this equipment was recorded in Docket 11286 at page 1047. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. A copy of the plat with the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. The existing overhead pole line on the north side of the project may be in conflict. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version on a CD. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 03/24/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 03/24/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). While the SVTs are depicted, their size is not labeled. 2. Show no parking signs in sections A/5, B/5. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/25/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) An irrigation plan is required. Reclaimed water and water harvesting are required elements. Show water harvesting basins on the landscape/irrigation plans. 2) Per Civano Phase 1 Planned Area Development XIV-16 2.7.2 General Landscape Program, "In addition to the set-aside method, the developer is committed to preserve as much of the native plant community which falls within the areas to be developed as is humanly and economically possible. The following methods are in place and are underway to achieve this goal. It is estimated that approximately 60% of the native tree and saguaro and other cactus population within the areas to be developed will be salvaged, moved and reused within the development areas. Clarify how this committment is being met. 3) Delineate NUOS areas shown on the native plant preservation plan on the tentative and final plats. 4) Identify the basis for the riparian habitat delineation on the tentative plat. 5) Show and label the landscaped pedestrian paths shown on Exhibits 6 & 7 of Civano Phase 1 Planned Area Development on the landscape plan and tentative plat. |
| 03/28/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: March 28, 2005 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Civano Block 2 Development Plan S05-0025 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 01 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 3. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 4. Show Subdivision plat number (S05-025) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 5. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 6. A Mitigation report will be required for any disturbance in Xeroreparian Habitat. 7. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 8. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 9. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage. 3. List the drainage facilities maintenance checklist in the DR. 4. Include the Administration address on the cover of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Civano Block 2 cdrc |
| 03/29/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is February 21, 2006. 2. This project has been assigned subdivision case number S05-025. Please note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on the tentative and final plat, landscape and NPPO plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 3. All zoning classifications adjacent to the subject property, shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly delineated. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.D) 4. Revise the perimeter yard requirements under general note 10 to be based on the exact language found in the PAD. Front (Pedestrian Way): At least 50 percent of the building frontage must be set back a minimum of 12 feet. 12 feet minimum setback for second floor. Rear (Street): Minimum setback to main structure may be "0" feet but at least 50 percent of the building along this rear property line must be set back a minimum of 12 feet. Minimum setback of 18 feet to garage door except "0" feet if garage door is perpendicular to the street or unit is on the last lot at the end of the street. 12 foot minimum to second floor. Side: If a sideyard(s) is not 0 feet, it requires a minimum 4 feet. Side yards fronting on a street can be "0" feet but at least 50 percent of building wall must be set back a minimum of 6 feet. In any side yard, "0" foot setback for trellis patio covers that are at least seven feet above the ground. Structural support (walls, columns) for trellis patio covers may also have a "0" foot setback. Trellises under seven feet above the ground will be set back at least six feet. 5. It does not appear that every residential lot is located within 300 feet of an on-street visitor parking space. The distance shall be measured along the sidewalk area. Please assure that all lots have an on-street visitor parking space within 300 feet of their respective lot line. 6. There is no R-2 zoning within the proposed subdivision boundary. Please remove general note 33. 7. Currently the density patterns specified for the project site is denoted on Exhibit 12 of the existing PAD. The Exhibit indicates Single Family detached units are allowed with a minimum density of 31 Dwelling Units and a maximum of 50 Dwelling Units. This project identifies 28 lots being developed, which is below the minimum number indicated on Exhibit 12. The Neighborhood Edge District does allow for two or more dwelling units on one lot subject to 2,900 sq. ft. of lot area per unit. Please indicate if this will be the case, otherwise additional lots will be required. 8. Provide the lot coverage calculation. Maximum lot coverage as per LUC Section 3.2.9 shall not exceed 60%. 9. On the tentative plat, provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner lot, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard and street yard setback. These typicals are to be fully dimensioned and are to be drawn at a larger scale than the tentative plat. 10. Currently the southern portion of the proposed subdivision is zoned SR. Uses associated with SR zoning per the Civano Master Plan include preserved natural area, community recycling center and a commercial agricultural operation. Photovoltaic solar arrays and a solar observatory/viewing platform are also suggested uses for this zone. Under the proposed PAD this area which would include proposed lots 21-25 and Block A would be placed in the Neighborhood 1 PAD, within the Neighborhood Center District. Density, building heights, perimeter yard requirements, and building coverage calculations would be based on the 'Neighborhood Center's' criteria and would then be required to be reflected on these plans. This portion of the proposed project can not be approved until the PAD, which include changes to Neighborhood 1 PAD, are approved by Mayor and Council. 11. Maximum building height within Community Orchard area is 20 feet. Revise plat to indicate the maximum allowed building height. 12. Visitor parking areas are located in Common Area "B". Common Area B shall also be designated as parking under the title block. 13. Per Exhibit 11, the orchards are indicated as being fronted along Nightbloom Way with the houses proposed behind the orchards to the east. Currently there a no changes being proposed as to the orientation of these features, since the developer indicated that the current configuration could be accommodated. Either the tentative plat need to reflect the current situation as illustrated in Exhibit 11 or the PAD must be amended. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/30/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: March 30, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S05-025 Civano Block 2: Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Dedicate a minimum 15 ft wide public trail easement from Seven Generations Way to Drexel Rd. and located between Street "A" and the east property line. Construct a meandering 8 ft wide natural surface trail within the trail easement. Prior to construction of trail, trail route shall be flagged. Trail route and construction are subject to approval by Parks and Recreation. Trail specifications are two (2) inch thickness of stabilized decomposed granite compacted to 95% over native subgrade compacted to 95%. Trail shall be protected from wash flows, erosion, slope wash downs, drainage from adjacent street and property. Divert drainage away from trail to designed culverts or pipe drainage under trail. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/30/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |